「猫猫Meme」叙事火热,盘点值得关注的5个项目

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-04-04Last updated on 2024-04-04

Abstract

从过去的狗狗meme到青蛙,再到如今的猫咪,市场关注点不断随着行情变化。

原文作者:Weilin

随着 Solana 和 Base 区块链的 Meme 项目持续走热,Meme 行情已经不再是以往的一时热度,而成为了一种持续的「主旋律」。从过去的狗狗 meme 到青蛙,再到如今的猫咪,市场关注点不断随着行情变化。眼下,一些用户已经开始在猫猫币领域布局,抢占新的叙事。

根据 CoinGecko 数据,截至 4 月 2 日下午 5 时,猫猫主题的 meme 币 24 小时成交量前十名的项目分别是:WEN、MEW、POPCAT、NUB、KEYCAT、BAG、MOG、CAT、OMNI、ZORRO。此外,ORCAT 项目因为 BOME 的顶级持有者的参与也吸引了广泛关注。本文 PANews 将简单介绍一些亮点猫系 meme 项目,它们会取代狗狗 meme 占领生态吗?

「猫猫Meme」叙事火热,盘点值得关注的5个项目

WEN (WEN),Solana

「猫猫Meme」叙事火热,盘点值得关注的5个项目

源自 Solana DeFi 聚合平台 Jupiter 的创始人@weremeow 的诗《A Love Letter to Wen Bros》。每个 $WEN 代币代表这篇诗作的一部分所有权,体现了创意的「数字化所有权」。$WEN 的创新之处包括成为首款由分割 NFT 所创建的社群代币,首次在 Jupiter 的 LFG 平台上推出的代币,以及成为第一个符合 WNS NFT 标准的 NFT。此外,$WEN 代币分发给超过一百万个活跃的 Solana 钱包用户,体现了平等分配的理念。

4 月 2 日下午 5 时,WEN 报 US$ 0.0003229 , 7 天涨跌幅 -10.5% ,市值 $ 234, 883, 660 。

cat in a dogs world (MEW),Solana

「猫猫Meme」叙事火热,盘点值得关注的5个项目

MEW 是 Solana 网络上备受瞩目的项目,主打「反狗情绪」。

4 月 2 日,SolanaFloor 在社交媒体上发布消息称,cat in a dogs world(MEW) 宣布向每个 Solana Mobile Chapter 2 手机预购代币持有者空投 37, 600 枚 MEW,价值约 206 美元。值得注意的是,此次空投已经覆盖了 Mobile 费用的 44% 。

4 月 2 日下午 5 时,MEW 报 US$ 0.006154 , 7 天涨跌幅 173.1% ,市值 $ 547, 016, 094 。

Popcat (POPCAT),Solana

「猫猫Meme」叙事火热,盘点值得关注的5个项目$POPCAT 源自网络上流行的调皮猫咪表情,代表着网络病毒文化与蓬勃发展的加密世界的完美结合。作为 Meme 币的一员,$POPCAT 承载着轻松幽默的社群文化。

4 月 2 日下午 5 时,POPCAT 报 US$ 0.2737 , 7 天涨跌幅 18.8% ,市值 $ 268, 259, 788 。

Sillynubcat (NUB),Solana

「猫猫Meme」叙事火热,盘点值得关注的5个项目

NUB 项目的理念是通过不太严肃地对待任何事情来突显自己的独特性。其目标是消除加密宇宙对新手来说令人望而生畏的障碍,向那些对涉足加密世界感到好奇的人伸出友善的爪子。

4 月 2 日下午 5 时,NUB 报 US$ 0.09231 , 7 天涨跌幅 381.4% , 24 小时交易量 US$ 19, 183, 987 。

Keyboard Cat (KEYCAT), Base

「猫猫Meme」叙事火热,盘点值得关注的5个项目KEYCAT 的灵感来源于键盘猫迷因,部署在 Base 网络上。

4 月 2 日下午 5 时,KEYCAT 报 US$ 0.005948 , 24 小时涨跌幅 -6.8% , 24 小时交易量 US$ 16, 074, 196 。

除了以上这些猫系 meme 币,Solana 的带鲨鱼帽子的狸花猫 SharkCat($SC) 和 ORCAT 的行情也引起了广泛关注。「猫猫Meme」叙事火热,盘点值得关注的5个项目

4 月 1 日,链上数据显示,BOME 的 TOP 1 持有者 Sunday Funday 积极参与和投资了 Solana 生态中的新兴 Meme 项目 $ORCAT。随后,据@ai_ 9684 xtpa 监测,聪明资金地址 B 8 g 2 G...XogNJ,在之前通过交易 $BOME 获得了 120 万美金的利润。继此之后,该地址在昨晚 $ORCAT 的低点建仓,目前已实现 40 万美金的利润,回报率达到了 20279% 。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight News5m ago

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight News5m ago

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报9m ago

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报9m ago

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbit17m ago

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbit17m ago

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbit31m ago

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片