Uniswap breaks multi-year support: Will UNI see a larger crash?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-02Last updated on 2026-02-02

Abstract

Uniswap (UNI) has broken below a critical multi-year support level at $4.10, raising concerns about a potential larger crash. Currently trading around $3.85, UNI has experienced a 5.10% price drop and a decline in trading volume. The breakdown suggests a bearish outlook, with the possibility of a further 45% decline to the next support at $2.30 if the $4.10 level is not reclaimed. Derivative data shows a bearish tilt, with more short-leveraged positions than long ones. However, long-term investors appear to be accumulating, as indicated by a net outflow of UNI from exchanges. Technical indicators like the ADX and MFI suggest weak directional momentum and neutral market conditions. Overall, the loss of key support increases downside risk, though accumulation by long-term holders may provide some counterbalance.

Amid the bearish market conditions, Uniswap [UNI] has opened the door for further downside moves as it lost a key level it had been holding since June 2022.

This outlook has been further reinforced by intraday traders, as bets on short-leveraged positions continue to rise, suggesting that more falls may be on the horizon.

As of press time, UNI’s price lost 5.10% of its value and was trading around $3.85. The asset’s trading volume had also declined notably, dropping by 9% to $395 million, indicating growing fear among traders and investors.

Uniswap – Price action and key levels

Looking at the weekly chart, UNI appeared to have lost control of the key support at $4.10 and had also closed a weekly candle below this level.

The chart further showed that the asset had been holding this support since March 2022. Following this breakdown, the price action turned bearish, suggesting that a significant downside move may be on the horizon.

Based on past performance and current price action, if UNI fails to reclaim the $4.10 level, there is a strong possibility that the price could decline by another 45% and reach the next support at $2.30.

However, the Average Directional Index (ADX)—an indicator that measures trend strength—stood at 20.32, below the key threshold of 25, indicating that the asset lacked strong directional momentum.

Meanwhile, the Money Flow Index (MFI), which tracks buying and selling pressure based on price and volume, was at 44.32, suggesting neutral market conditions with no clear dominance from either buyers or sellers.

Derivative data shows mixed sentiment

From a derivatives perspective, UNI’s intraday traders appeared to be closely following the prevailing trend.

According to data from the derivatives analytics platform CoinGlass, traders were showing the highest interest at $3.69 on the downside and $3.99 on the upside.

Traders at these levels have built approximately $1.63 million worth of long-leveraged positions and $2.10 million worth of short-leveraged positions, indicating that market sentiment is currently tilted toward the bearish side.

However, long-term investors appear to be taking advantage of the recent price decline, as they seem to be accumulating UNI tokens.

According to CoinGlass, UNI’s Spot Inflow/Outflow data recorded a modest outflow of $1.26 million worth of UNI from exchanges over the past 24 hours, indicating potential accumulation.

In the crypto landscape, asset outflows from exchanges to wallets are generally viewed as a sign of accumulation.


Final Thoughts

  • UNI has lost its key support at $4.10, raising the risk of further downside as traders show strong interest in short-leveraged positions.
  • If UNI fails to reclaim the $4.10 level, the asset could face an additional decline of around 45% in the coming days, as there is no nearby support.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat key support level did Uniswap (UNI) lose, and since when had it been holding that level?

AUniswap (UNI) lost its key support level at $4.10, which it had been holding since March 2022.

QAccording to the article, what is the potential price target for UNI if it fails to reclaim the $4.10 level?

AIf UNI fails to reclaim the $4.10 level, the price could decline by another 45% to reach the next support at $2.30.

QWhat does the Average Directional Index (ADX) value of 20.32 indicate about UNI's trend strength?

AAn ADX value of 20.32, which is below the key threshold of 25, indicates that the asset lacks strong directional momentum.

QHow does the derivatives data from CoinGlass reflect trader sentiment towards UNI?

ADerivatives data shows traders built approximately $2.10 million in short-leveraged positions compared to $1.63 million in long-leveraged positions, indicating that market sentiment is currently tilted toward the bearish side.

QWhat does an outflow of UNI tokens from exchanges suggest about long-term investor behavior?

AAn outflow of $1.26 million worth of UNI from exchanges over 24 hours suggests that long-term investors are accumulating the tokens, as this is generally viewed as a sign of accumulation in the crypto landscape.

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy UNI

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Uniswap (UNI) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Uniswap (UNI) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Uniswap (UNI)After purchasing your Uniswap (UNI), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Uniswap (UNI)Easily trade Uniswap (UNI) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

7.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy UNI

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of UNI (UNI) are presented below.

活动图片