South Korea Urges Crypto Circuit Breakers After $42B Bithumb Mishap

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-04-13更新於 2026-04-13

文章摘要

South Korea's central bank has recommended implementing cryptocurrency exchange "circuit breakers" following a major incident on Bithumb. In February, the exchange erroneously distributed 620,000 Bitcoin (worth approximately $42 billion) to customers instead of the intended 620,000 Korean won (about $400). This triggered panic selling, causing Bitcoin's price on the platform to plummet. Although Bithumb quickly halted trading and reversed the transactions, nearly $125 million in Bitcoin had already been sold. The Bank of Korea's report emphasizes that the crypto sector lacks the stringent internal controls of traditional finance and calls for mandatory systems to detect and prevent such human errors and discrepancies in asset records. This proposal is part of broader legislative moves in South Korea to enhance the security and transparency of virtual asset exchanges.

To avoid a recurrence of the market chaos that ensued in February when Bithumb accidentally delivered over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin to its clients, the South Korean central bank has suggested that cryptocurrency exchanges have “circuit breakers” that temporarily suspend trade.

In a payments report released on Monday, the Bank of Korea suggested that legislators think about implementing measures to halt trading in cryptocurrency in the event of unexpected price fluctuations, much as the trading limitations implemented by the Korea Exchange.

Stringent Protocols

According to the bank, the virtual asset sector is currently not well-regulated and does not have the same internal control procedures as more traditional financial institutions. Therefore, the research concluded, stronger applicable policies are required to proactively avoid such instances, as they may happen at other virtual asset exchanges.

This comes at a time when politicians in South Korea are trying to enact legislation that would further regulate cryptocurrency. The Bank of Korea has said that these regulations should include its recommendations to make virtual asset exchange activities more secure and transparent.

Rather than 620,000 Korean won, which was about $400, Bithumb mistakenly transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, which was valued around $42 billion at the time, to clients in early February. According to the bank’s assessment, the price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as consumers hurried to sell, which in turn caused others to panic-sell, further lowering its price.

Within minutes, Bithumb stopped trading and reversed their Bitcoin transfers. However, the exchange clarified that 1,788 BTC, or almost $125 million, had already been sold before it could take any action, and it made up the difference using corporate reserves.

Crypto exchanges should be obligated to have systems that can identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, according to the Bank of Korea. It went on to say that exchanges should also be able to detect and report differences between a platform’s internal assets and those on the blockchain.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitwise Accelerates Hyperliquid ETF Debut with Revised Filing

TagsAltcoinBitcoinBlockchain

相關問答

QWhat did the Bank of Korea propose to prevent a recurrence of the Bithumb mishap?

AThe Bank of Korea proposed that cryptocurrency exchanges implement 'circuit breakers' to temporarily suspend trade in the event of unexpected price fluctuations.

QWhat was the nature of the error that Bithumb made in February?

ABithumb accidentally transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, valued at approximately $42 billion, to its clients instead of 620,000 Korean won (about $400).

QWhat was the market impact of Bithumb's erroneous transfer?

AThe price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as customers hurried to sell the mistakenly received funds, which triggered panic-selling and further drove down the price.

QAccording to the Bank of Korea, why is the virtual asset sector particularly vulnerable to such incidents?

AThe Bank of Korea stated that the virtual asset sector is not well-regulated and lacks the same internal control procedures as traditional financial institutions.

QWhat specific systems did the Bank of Korea suggest exchanges be obligated to have?

AThe Bank of Korea suggested exchanges should have systems to identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, and to detect and report differences between a platform's internal assets and those on the blockchain.

你可能也喜歡

55TB 变 28TB?Rubin 内存要砍半背后的谣言与恐慌

6月4日,半导体研究机构SemiAnalysis发布报告,指出英伟达下一代AI超算平台Vera Rubin NVL72的内存配置可能低于预期:每机架CPU侧采用的SOCAMM DRAM容量或从预期的约55TB降至约28TB,主要因多数系统将安装96GB模块而非192GB。此消息引发市场对内存需求“腰斩”的恐慌,导致美光(MU)股价单日一度暴跌超10%,市值蒸发超千亿美元。 然而,文章分析认为市场解读存在误区。首先,Rubin平台采用的SOCAMM2模块为可插拔设计,允许后续灵活升级,初始配置降低不等于永久需求收缩。其次,降配主因是2026年LPDDR5X供应链极度紧张,英伟达为保障机架交付和算力尽快上线而采取的务实策略,实际反映的是需求压倒供给。再者,在同等内存供给下,降低单机架配置反而可能使英伟达组装并出货更多机架,对内存厂商的总订单量影响有限。 美光当日大跌,也被认为更多是受半导体板块整体情绪拖累——博通(Broadcom)因未上调全年AI芯片收入指引而股价重挫,叠加SemiAnalysis报告提供的叙事催化,共同触发了高位获利回吐。 文章最后指出,美光当前的核心风险在于其在Rubin平台HBM4订单中的份额偏低,而非SOCAMM配置变化。此次市场恐慌更多是基于对标题的片面解读,忽视了模块化架构的升级弹性与行业供不应求的背景。

marsbit1 分鐘前

55TB 变 28TB?Rubin 内存要砍半背后的谣言与恐慌

marsbit1 分鐘前

“老登股”变“新贵”:从戴尔到诺基亚,AI如何重估旧基础设施?

过去被视为增长缓慢的“老牌科技股”,如戴尔、诺基亚、思科、康宁、西部数据等,近期因AI热潮而表现亮眼。这并非简单的市场炒作,而是AI发展进入实际部署阶段的必然结果。 此前,AI投资焦点集中在英伟达等算力核心和模型上。但随着AI从理论走向实践,大规模建设数据中心和部署应用需要完整的系统工程能力。这恰恰是老牌科技公司的优势所在。它们凭借几十年积累的客户、供应链、系统集成和交付经验,在AI基础设施建设中找到了新角色。 具体而言,市场主要从三条线重估这些公司:一是服务器与系统集成(如戴尔、HPE),它们扮演着将GPU等核心部件整合成完整AI服务器并交付的“总包商”角色;二是网络与连接(如康宁、诺基亚、思科),AI算力集群的高效运行极度依赖高速互联和光纤网络;三是存储(如西部数据、希捷),AI产生的海量数据(包括训练数据、日志、冷数据)催生了对高性价比大容量硬盘的持续需求。 真正的重估需要满足几个条件:明确的AI相关订单和收入增长、公司因此上调业绩指引、以及利润质量的同步改善。AI并不会让所有传统公司重生,它只筛选出那些真正卡位关键基础设施环节、并能将新需求转化为可持续利润的企业。这轮行情标志着AI进入真实建设期,市场开始为“谁能把AI基建建起来”的能力定价。

marsbit21 分鐘前

“老登股”变“新贵”:从戴尔到诺基亚,AI如何重估旧基础设施?

marsbit21 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片