OpenClaw "Endorses" Venice: What Other Targets Are There in the Privacy AI Track?

Odaily星球日报發佈於 2026-03-05更新於 2026-03-05

文章摘要

OpenClaw's brief endorsement of Venice has drawn market attention to the growing intersection of privacy and AI in the crypto space, sparking discussions around several related projects. Venice (VVV) is positioned as a decentralized, privacy-first alternative to ChatGPT, emphasizing its no-logging and no-censorship policies. Its token has surged amid both growing demand and a reduction in token supply. NEAR Protocol is shifting its narrative toward becoming an infrastructure layer for AI agents, particularly through its Confidential Intents system, which adds optional privacy to cross-chain transactions to combat MEV and front-running. Sahara AI aims to build a decentralized AI ecosystem that addresses data ownership and fair value distribution. Its ClawGuard system provides safety mechanisms for AI agents, while its data service platform incentivizes users to contribute data. Phala Network offers privacy-preserving computation via TEE-based smart contracts, providing a secure execution environment for AI agents. It has partnered with projects like ai16z to integrate confidential computation into agent frameworks. Analysts note that interest in privacy-AI projects had been building even before recent hype, suggesting the trend may have longer-term potential beyond short-term speculation.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | DingDang (@XiaMiPP)

The hot topic OpenClaw has started endorsing Privacy AI, and the "desperate crypto retail investors" seem to have found a new direction for speculation.

It is precisely within this narrative context that a batch of projects related to privacy computing and AI Agent infrastructure have begun to re-enter the market's view. Odaily Planet Daily's review found that during this wave of heated discussion, several projects have already become potential beneficiaries.

VVV(#133)

Venice is an AI generation platform focused on censorship resistance + privacy, positioning itself as a decentralized version of ChatGPT. The starting point of the Privacy AI hype originated from Venice. This is because OpenClaw had once highlighted Venice in its official documentation, only to remove it hastily within 24 hours. Although the recommendation could be removed, this action drew more attention to Venice and its privacy-first features.

Unlike most AI projects, Venice's core narrative is not AI model capability, but privacy itself. Against the backdrop of mainstream AI platforms increasingly strengthening content censorship, and with ongoing controversies over AI data leaks and model training, this "no recording, no censorship" product positioning precisely hits the most sensitive values of the crypto community.

In an era where the AI Agent trend is rapidly fermenting, Venice has stepped into this "era dividend" quite aptly. More coincidentally, the Venice project is actively reducing the token supply of VVV, decreasing inflation. Increased demand meeting reduced supply further strengthens the positive feedback expectation for the VVV token.

Read reference: OpenClaw Endorses Venice.ai, VVV Token Surges Over 500% in a Month

NEAR(#43)

Near Protocol, this veteran high-performance public chain project, is also actively seeking self-reinvention under the impact of the AI wave. It is no longer just a "traditional L1" pursuing TPS and low gas, but is gradually shifting its narrative focus towards the execution layer and settlement infrastructure in the era of AI Agents, attempting to find a new growth narrative in this new technological cycle.

Since the beginning of 2025, it has been vigorously promoting the NEAR Intents (Intent System). This system allows users or AI agents to simply express the "final desired outcome," and the backend will automatically complete complex operations across 35+ chains without manual bridging, wallet switching, or routing management.

On February 25, 2026, NEAR officially upgraded this intent system and launched Confidential Intents. This version introduces privacy computing capabilities into the original intent execution framework. Through Near's privacy sharding mechanism combined with Trusted Execution Environments (TEE), cross-chain transactions can hide key details during execution, such as swap paths, trade size, or specific strategies. However, it does not enforce privacy on all transactions like Zcash or Monero, but rather adds an optional layer of privacy protection to intent execution. Its main goal is not to anonymize transactions, but to prevent MEV, front-running, and sandwich attacks and other on-chain arbitrage behaviors, thereby making transactions more secure during execution.

In the future, AI agents might become the main "users" of blockchain. They will autonomously hold assets, conduct cross-chain transactions, execute strategies, and even coordinate with each other. Under this vision, blockchain not only needs to handle high-frequency transactions but must also provide capabilities like verifiable execution, privacy computing, and cross-chain coordination.

Near's current layout is precisely built around this imagination. It attempts to build an open network that can both support AI agents in automatically executing complex tasks and ensure the process is verifiable and secure. Against the backdrop of the continuously impacting AI wave, this transformation can be seen both as an attempt to actively embrace the new narrative and as a self-reshaping of a veteran public chain in the new cycle.

SAHARA(#295)

Sahara AI's core goal is to build a decentralized, transparent, and secure AI ecosystem, making the development, training, deployment, and commercialization of AI fairer and more trustworthy. The project is committed to solving the problems currently faced by the AI industry, such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and unclear model ownership.

The rise of AI Agents is bringing forth a new question: Who exactly do the data, models, and capabilities used by these Agents belong to? In the current AI industry structure, this question hasn't been properly resolved. The data required to train models often comes from a large number of dispersed contributors, but the final profits are highly concentrated in the hands of a few AI companies; model developers, even with technical capabilities, often can only依附 on platform ecosystems; and as AI Agents begin to call models, data, and tools autonomously, the entire value chain will become more complex. Without a clear set of rights confirmation and profit-sharing mechanisms, the future AI economy will likely repeat the path of Web2: data owned by users, value captured by platforms.

Sahara AI is precisely trying to establish new rules in this环节. Its ClawGuard security system provides verifiable safety guardrails for AI agents, ensuring they operate safely within preset rules. The Data Service Platform (DSP) allows users to earn token incentives by labeling and contributing AI training data, gradually forming a decentralized data market. Under this mechanism, data contributors can not only participate in the AI model training process but also receive continuous收益 when the data is used, while the platform also ensures data quality and privacy protection through on-chain mechanisms.

PHA(#601)

Phala Network is a privacy-preserving smart contract platform built on Substrate, aiming to provide verifiable privacy-preserving computation services for Web3 applications. To understand why Phala benefits from the AI Agent热潮, one first needs to answer a more fundamental question: What infrastructure does the operation of AI Agents actually rely on?

If we break down the current Agent ecosystem, its tech stack can be roughly divided into several layers. The top layer is the model layer, which includes various large language models or reasoning models, such as OpenAI, Claude, and a series of open-source models; below that is the Agent framework layer, including tools like LangChain, AutoGPT, OpenClaw, etc., which are responsible for organizing tasks, scheduling models, and calling external tools; further down is the execution environment layer, where the Agent actually runs code, calls APIs, and executes automated tasks; additionally, there is the payment and identity layer, used to handle payments, identity, and reputation systems between Agents; and at the very bottom is the compute power and privacy layer, responsible for ensuring the computation process is trustworthy and data security is not compromised.

From this structure, Phala's position恰恰 spans the execution environment layer and the compute power & privacy layer. Its core technology—a confidential computing network based on TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)—enables AI Agents to run programs securely off-chain while ensuring the computation process is verifiable and data is not窥探 by external parties. This is particularly crucial in the Agent economy.

In terms of specific ecosystem implementation, Phala has already begun to integrate with AI Agent projects. For example, Phala collaborated with ai16z to build a TEE component for its Eliza multi-agent framework, integrating trusted execution technology directly into the Agent runtime environment; meanwhile, some AI Agent token issuance projects (like aiPool) have also adopted Phala's TEE technology to manage private keys and on-chain assets.

In the future, as AI Agents evolve from "chat tools" into digital entities capable of holding funds, executing transactions, and even operating protocols, secure execution environments will gradually become an indispensable infrastructure layer for the entire Agent ecosystem, and Phala is trying to occupy this position.

Conclusion

When reviewing these projects, an interesting finding is: The time when these tokens actually started rising was actually earlier than the recommendation event these past few days. That is to say, before Venice brought "Privacy AI" to the forefront, a portion of funds in the market had already noticed this direction in advance, it just lacked a clear enough narrative trigger point at the time. The OpenClaw recommendation event was just a fuse that ignited attention.

In fact, whether it's a16z or Delphi Digital, their annual investment research reports for 2025 listed privacy and AI as key focus areas for 2026. However, when these macro judgments真正落到 the market, they often need a specific event to trigger consensus. And in early 2026, privacy and AI have come before us in such a combined form.

As for whether this will become the next long-term trend or just another short-lived thematic speculation,恐怕 still requires time to provide the answer.

相關問答

QWhat is the core narrative of Venice (VVV) in the context of privacy AI?

AVenice's core narrative is not AI model capability but privacy itself. It positions as a decentralized ChatGPT alternative, emphasizing 'no recording, no censorship' to address data leakage and model training controversies in mainstream AI platforms.

QHow is NEAR Protocol adapting to the AI wave and what key feature did it introduce in February 2026?

ANEAR Protocol is shifting its focus to become an execution layer and settlement infrastructure for the AI Agent era. In February 2026, it upgraded its intent system to Confidential Intents, introducing privacy computing capabilities via TEE to hide transaction details and prevent MEV and front-running.

QWhat problem does Sahara AI aim to solve in the AI ecosystem, and what is its ClawGuard system?

ASahara AI aims to address data privacy, algorithmic bias, and unclear model ownership in AI. Its ClawGuard system provides verifiable safety guardrails for AI agents, ensuring they operate within preset rules securely.

QWhich technology does Phala Network (PHA) use to provide privacy for AI Agent operations, and why is it critical?

APhala Network uses TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)-based confidential computing to enable AI Agents to run programs off-chain with verifiable computation and data privacy. This is critical as Agents evolve to hold funds and execute transactions, requiring secure execution environments.

QAccording to the article, what was the role of OpenClaw's recommendation in the privacy AI trend?

AOpenClaw's recommendation of Venice acted as a catalyst that drew market attention to privacy AI, though the trend had already been noticed by some investors earlier. It served as a narrative trigger for broader consensus.

你可能也喜歡

对话郏航丨回看中国支付出海二十年

本期播客访谈回顾了中国支付出海二十年的探索历程,嘉宾郏航先后参与银联国际化、蚂蚁Alipay+及新加坡DCS的稳定币支付业务,探讨如何构建下一代全球支付网络。 **卡组织的核心**:Visa、Mastercard的成功不仅在于技术标准,更在于其利益分配与治理机制形成的网络效应。银联等后来者难以复制,因缺乏颠覆性的用户价值驱动力,且受理网络规模难以匹敌。 **银联出海之路**:早期采取“北卡南用”策略,跟随中国出境游客拓展受理网络,但未能解决境外本地发卡问题,业务受国内移动支付兴起及跨境客流变化影响。 **蚂蚁的Alipay+尝试**:通过投资本地钱包并搭建互联互通网络,试图绕开卡组织。但扫码支付与卡组织本质仍是同一物种,未能建立可持续的利益分配模式,未能实现全球覆盖。 **稳定币的机遇**:稳定币挑战的是银行账户体系而非卡组织,它解决的是资金流动效率问题。当前U卡等产品是过渡形态,未来银行卡或将直接支持稳定币。稳定币有机会重构支付网络底层,实现全球渗透,但其发展需与现有体系结合,并建立合理的利益循环。 **总结**:支付网络的演进关键在于创造新的用户价值、利益分配和治理机制。稳定币可能带来根本性变化,但仍需务实推进。从业者应保持开放学习,建立独立商业思考,避免浮躁。

marsbit3 分鐘前

对话郏航丨回看中国支付出海二十年

marsbit3 分鐘前

Circle 股价暴跌 76%,港元稳定币两周内登场

去年6月,Circle股价触及260美元高点。至今年7月19日,股价已跌至62美元,跌幅约76%。市场正对稳定币领域的估值体系进行重写。 面对股价暴跌,Circle总裁Heath Tarbert强调公司着眼于长期规划,但市场反应冷淡。机构如瑞穗将其评级下调,理由包括竞争加剧和利润承压。Circle的核心优势在于USDC拥有约730亿美元的流通量与广泛链上覆盖,但其市场地位正面临挑战。新兴稳定币Open USD通过让利模式吸引合作伙伴,而支付巨头Visa推出的新平台亦支持多种稳定币,对Circle的领先地位构成分流压力。 与此同时,Tether(USDT)则面临美国《GENIUS法案》的合规考验,其储备资产结构需在未来两年内调整以满足新规要求,否则可能失去在美国市场的交易资格。 另一方面,香港市场进展迅速。由渣打银行(香港)支持的碇点金融科技已获香港金管局首批稳定币发行人牌照,预计最快将于本月底推出港元稳定币HKDAP。竞争焦点正从获取牌照转向如何将牌照优势转化为真实的资金流与应用场景。 总体而言,稳定币赛道已从“赢家通吃”进入多方竞逐阶段。Circle的股价巨震反映了竞争加剧、利率环境及市场情绪等多重挑战。未来,各参与方的叙事能力与落地执行力将面临严峻考验。

marsbit4 分鐘前

Circle 股价暴跌 76%,港元稳定币两周内登场

marsbit4 分鐘前

资本围剿之下,去中心化是公链的唯一防线

在这篇题为《资本围剿之下,去中心化是公链的唯一防线》的文章中,哥伦比亚商学院副教授Omid Malekan阐述了他对区块链核心价值的看法。他认为,去中心化并非公链众多特性之一,而是其唯一不可替代的核心特质,是抵御资本和传统巨头收编腐化的根本防线。 作者从现实主义的“马基雅维利”视角出发,分析了企业和资本的固有本性。他指出,盈利企业必然将自身利润置于技术创新之上,指望现有巨头自愿颠覆自身利益格局是不切实际的幻想。因此,任何在去中心化程度上妥协的方案,无论是许可链、节点高度集中的公链,还是中心化的二层网络,最终都会被资本劫持和控制,丧失其最初的中立与开放精神。 文章着重警告了“内部控制权掠夺”的风险,认为这比外部攻击(如51%攻击)更为致命。他列举了Visa、Mastercard和谷歌等平台从开放走向垄断的“劣化”历程,并指出承载价值更为广泛的底层公链,面临的被蚕食风险更高。企业推广“伪去中心化”的联盟链,实质是一种拖延战术,意在延缓真正去中心化技术的普及,并为自身设置准入壁垒。 最后,作者得出结论:尽管以太坊等去中心化公链存在缺陷且运行成本高昂,但在多方博弈下,市场中的资产终将流向安全性最高、最抗审查的基础设施。因此,以太坊仍是当下对抗资本围剿、避免被传统利益集团吞并的最优现实选择。

Foresight News14 分鐘前

资本围剿之下,去中心化是公链的唯一防线

Foresight News14 分鐘前

比特币的规则由谁决定?BIP-110 引爆治理分歧

BIP-110提案旨在通过临时软分叉,在共识层限制比特币链上非货币数据(如铭文、Runes),将部分当前有效的交易变为无效,以应对区块空间占用和节点负担问题。此举引发了比特币社区关于治理权的深刻分歧。 支持者(如部分节点运营者)认为,默认的节点转发策略已因绕行工具(如直接提交API)而失效,必须将边界推至共识层。反对者则有多重理由:MicroStrategy创始人Michael Saylor列出110条理由,认为该提案门槛(55%矿工信号)过低,且可能开创危险的治理先例;Blockstream联合创始人Adam Back主张,比特币无需许可的本质意味着无人有权强加价值判断,技术共识过程本身就是防止轻率变更的“免疫系统”;此外,该提案即使激活,也可能无法完全阻止数据嵌入,且被曝存在晚升级节点的共识漏洞风险。 争论还涉及各方的权力依据:矿工内部意见分裂(如Ocean支持,F2Pool反对,Foundry交客户投票);节点运营者强调每个节点的平等验证权;Core开发者能改变默认软件行为但缺乏问责;大型持币机构(如MicroStrategy)则以市场和叙事权介入。BIP-110已演变为一场关于“谁有权决定比特币规则”的治理压力测试,暴露了社区在协议升级合法性来源(PoW算力、节点执行、技术共识等)上的根本性分歧。

链捕手43 分鐘前

比特币的规则由谁决定?BIP-110 引爆治理分歧

链捕手43 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片