Online vs. Offline CBDCs — The Privacy Battle Dividing the EU

ccn.com發佈於 2025-12-25更新於 2025-12-25

文章摘要

The EU is divided over the design of its proposed digital euro, with a key conflict emerging between online and offline functionality. The Council of the EU supports a hybrid model that includes both online and offline capabilities. In contrast, privacy-focused members of the European Parliament advocate for an offline-only version, arguing it offers stronger, cash-like privacy by enabling peer-to-peer transactions without centralized tracking. They warn that an online system could allow excessive surveillance of consumer spending. The European Central Bank and European Commission favor the hybrid approach but face opposition from data protection authorities concerned about data minimization. With negotiations set for 2026, the outcome will determine the balance between privacy and functionality in the EU's digital currency.

Key Takeaways
  • The Council of the EU has adopted a digital euro negotiating position that favors online and offline functionality.
  • However, privacy hawks in the European Parliament are pushing for an offline-only digital currency.
  • As the two sides prepare for negotiations in 2026, privacy has emerged as the key battle line.

As the EU’s digital euro inches closer to realization, policymakers are split between two camps with competing visions for the central bank digital currency.

In one model, offline CBDCs behave like digital cash, with strong privacy built in by design.

However, another, more ambitious approach envisions the digital euro as a comprehensive online payment instrument that offers the same functionality as cards and digital wallets.

New Trending Crypto Wallet Offers
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Tangem

promotions
Trusted & Secure
Coins
111
  • Aave
  • Uniswap
  • GMX
  • Pendle
  • Ondo
  • Ankr
  • Fantom
  • Synthetix
  • Curve DAO Token
  • Compound
  • Maker
  • THORChain
  • Stacks
  • Arweave
  • Sui
  • Immutable
  • Optimism
  • Arbitrum
  • VeChain
  • The Sandbox
  • Decentraland
  • Axie Infinity
  • Render
  • The Graph
  • Chiliz
  • Helium
  • PAX Gold
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Tether
  • USD Coin
  • Solana
  • Ripple
  • Dogecoin
  • Cardano
  • Toncoin
  • Shiba Inu
  • Avalanche
  • TRON
  • Chainlink
  • Polygon Matic
  • Polkadot
  • Wrapped Bitcoin
  • Litecoin
  • Dai
  • NEAR Protocol
  • Bitcoin Cash
  • Monero
  • Stellar
  • Cosmos
  • Filecoin
  • Ethereum Classic
  • Aptos
  • Cronos
  • Binance USD
  • Neo
  • APEcoin
  • Gala
  • Theta Network
  • Wrapped Ethereum
  • OKB
  • Pepe
  • Mantle
  • First Digital USD
  • Kaspa
  • Bittensor
  • Celestia
  • XDC Network
  • Artificial Superintelligence Alliance
  • Jupiter
  • Quant
  • Worldcoin
  • PayPal USD
  • Bonk
  • Rocket Pool ETH
  • Flare
  • Tether Gold
  • Sei
  • JITO
  • JasmyCoin
  • PancakeSwap
  • Core
  • Ethereum Name Service
  • SushiSwap
  • 1inch Network
  • Tezos
  • Algorand
  • Flow
  • Trust Wallet Token
  • KuCoin Token
  • MultiversX
  • GateToken
  • Zcash
  • IOTA
  • Basic Attention Token
  • Enjin Coin
  • Frax
  • Ethena
  • Ethena USDe
  • Ethena Staked USDe
  • Kusama
  • Celo
  • STEPN
  • Gemini Dollar
  • UNUS SED LEO
  • Internet Computer
  • EOS
  • BitTorrent
  • Mina
  • Dash
  • Zilliqa
  • Casper
  • TrueUSD
  • Floki Inu
  • IoTex
  • Build'N'Build
No result
Claim Offer

BitBox

promotions
Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly
Coins
Claim Offer

Blockstream

promotions
Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly
Coins
Claim Offer

The Two Digital Euros: Online Accounts vs. Offline Tokens

The distinction between online and offline versions of the CBDC emerged early on in discussions over the digital euro, with a string of EU policy documents exploring the pros and cons of each model since 2020.

An online digital euro would function like today’s electronic payments, with accounts tied to individual consumers and businesses, and transactions validated through infrastructure operated by banks and other regulated Eurosystem participants.

Meanwhile, offline CBDCs more closely resemble traditional cryptocurrencies, with tokens that move between wallets on a peer-to-peer basis, eliminating the need to update balances on a centralized ledger.

Privacy Hawks Favor Offline-Only CBDC

In the debate over online versus offline digital euros, privacy is a central political constraint.

The European Central Bank (ECB) has repeatedly framed privacy as “by design,” arguing that it wants the digital euro to meet very high privacy standards compared with existing electronic payment rails.

But that prospect holds much more weight with an offline CBDC, which promises a cash-like degree of anonymity, at least for small payments.

Alongside the European Commission, the ECB favors a hybrid system, with larger payments requiring online validation, but some offline functionality for low-value payments.

However, after the Commission outlined a proposal for online and offline functionality in 2023, privacy hawks in the European Parliament pushed back, arguing that online CBDCs could grant centralized authorities unprecedented visibility into consumers’ daily spending.

They argued that the proposal’s privacy guarantees for online CBDCs lacked legal grounding and would require users to simply trust that their payment data wouldn’t be accessed by centralized authorities.

That view is backed by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), which have warned that the systematic logging of online payments risks violating EU data-minimization principles.

Council vs. Parliament

Since 2023, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have increasingly rallied around an offline-first, or even offline-only, digital euro.

But on Dec. 19,  the EU Council representing Member States backed a negotiating position that more closely aligns with the European Commission’s 2023 proposal.

Now, the EU’s two decision-making branches are on a collision course.

With negotiations set to take place throughout 2026, the future of the digital euro project rests on whether or not the Council can convince enough MEPs to back online CBDCs.

Critics of online digital euro payments can be found across the political spectrum.

With diverse parliamentary alliances expected to push for strong privacy protections for any online functionality, the Council will likely need to offer legal guarantees that have been absent from the discussion so far.

Top Trending Crypto Articles
  • Best Exchanges Check Out Our Recommended Exchanges Here
  • Buy Crypto Fast How To Buy Crypto with a Credit Card Now
  • Safe Crypto Gambling See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

相關問答

QWhat are the two competing models for the digital euro being debated in the EU?

AThe two competing models are an online digital euro, which functions like electronic payments with accounts tied to individuals and validated through bank infrastructure, and an offline digital euro, which operates like digital cash with peer-to-peer transactions and no need for a centralized ledger.

QWhy do privacy advocates in the European Parliament favor an offline-only digital euro?

APrivacy advocates favor an offline-only digital euro because it offers cash-like anonymity for transactions, especially for small payments, and prevents centralized authorities from having unprecedented visibility into consumers' daily spending, which they argue is a risk with online CBDCs.

QWhat is the position of the EU Council regarding the digital euro's functionality?

AThe EU Council adopted a negotiating position on December 19 that favors a hybrid system with both online and offline functionality, aligning closely with the European Commission's 2023 proposal.

QWhat concerns have data protection authorities raised about the online digital euro model?

AThe European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) have warned that the systematic logging of online payments risks violating EU data-minimization principles and lacks strong legal grounding for privacy guarantees.

QWhen are negotiations between the EU Council and the European Parliament on the digital euro expected to take place?

ANegotiations between the EU Council and the European Parliament are set to take place throughout 2026 to resolve the differences in their positions on the digital euro's design and functionality.

你可能也喜歡

比特币提现仍在继续:Coldcard冷钱包8年存储终成空

硬件钱包Coldcard遭黑客攻击,导致大量资金从易受攻击设备中被持续转出。据Galaxy Research数据,截至2026年8月2日,已有4585个地址被盗,损失总额达1367.05 BTC(约合8860万美元),远超7月30日最初报告的594.5 BTC。大部分被盗资金仍停留在攻击者地址。 问题根源并非固件,而是设备生成的种子短语存在漏洞。2021年3月起,因程序员错误集成libNgU库,设备从使用STM32硬件随机数生成器转为使用软件生成器Yasmarang,该生成器由公开可获取的芯片序列号和计时器状态初始化,导致生成的种子短语可在离线状态下被暴力破解。即使固件后续已更新,只要用户未将资金转移至基于新种子短语生成的新地址,旧钱包就始终处于风险中。 受影响的设备包括特定固件版本的Mk2/Mk3、Mk4/Mk5及Q系列。仅当种子短语是通过至少50次独立掷骰子或强唯一性BIP-39密码短语创建时方可幸免。官方建议受影响用户立即在已修复的固件上生成新种子短语并转移资产。 报道提及一位39岁投资者的案例,他因该漏洞损失了2 BTC(约13万美元)。他多年来通过体力劳动积攒比特币,将其视为在制裁和高通胀国家中的财务保障与提前退休的途径。此次事件使他的长期持有策略和“冷存储”信心遭受重击,他因此决定彻底退出加密货币领域。 从历史数据看,随机数生成器缺陷并非首例,类似问题曾导致巨额损失。此次事件警示,即使离线存储也未必绝对安全,其安全性高度依赖于底层硬件和算法的可靠性。

cryptonews.ru4 小時前

比特币提现仍在继续:Coldcard冷钱包8年存储终成空

cryptonews.ru4 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片