Kalshi and Polymarket Face Scrutiny as Lawmakers Target Death-Related Betting Markets

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-03-02更新於 2026-03-02

文章摘要

Prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket are under scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers after users placed large bets on events connected to U.S. strikes on Iran, including contracts related to the potential death of Iran’s Supreme Leader. Over $529 million was traded on related Polymarket contracts. Six Democratic senators have urged the CFTC to ban such death-related prediction contracts, citing ethical and national security risks. Kalshi’s CEO defended the platform, though the company later admitted to unclear contract wording and issued refunds. Polymarket, which operates offshore with fewer regulations, saw some users profit $1 million from well-timed bets. The situation highlights ongoing regulatory challenges in the prediction market industry.

Prediction market platforms like Kalshi andPolymarket are facing pressure after users placed larger bets on the events connected to the U.S. strikes on Iran, which include contracts linked to the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei. According to the reports, more than $529 million was traded on the Polymarket contracts related to the timing of the strikes. Kalshi’s market is asking whether Khamenei has generated over $50 million in trading volume.

Lawmakers Demand Regulatory Actions

Six Democratic senators have urged the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to ban prediction contracts that are linked to or correlate with a person’s death. In a letter to CFTC Chairman Michael Selig, the senators argued that such markets pose a serious ethical and national security risk.

Tarek Mansour, Kalshi CEO, defended the platform, stating that Kalshi does not list contracts directly tied to death and designs rules to prevent users from profiting from someone’s death. However, confusion emerged over how the Khamenei contract was settled. Under Kalshi’s official rules filed with the CFTC, which are to be settled at the last traded price before Khamenei’s death.

Kalshi later admitted the wording was unclear. The company announced it would refund all the trading fees from the market and fully reimburse traders who placed bets after Khamenei’s death.

Polymarket, which operates outside U.S. regulations and only requires a crypto wallet to trade. Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaos reported that six newly created accounts made about $1 million in profit by correctly betting on the strike date. Some of these bets were placed just hours before the attack occurred. This debate highlights how prediction markets should be regulated. Kalshi operates under U.S. oversight by the CFTC, while Polymarket operates offshore with fewer restrictions.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Hong Kong and Shanghai Authorities Integrate Cargo Data on Blockchain

TagsCrypto MarketCryptocurrency

相關問答

QWhat is the main reason Kalshi and Polymarket are facing scrutiny from lawmakers?

ALawmakers are scrutinizing them because users placed large bets on events connected to U.S. strikes on Iran, including contracts linked to the death of Iran's Supreme Leader, which they argue pose serious ethical and national security risks.

QHow much trading volume was generated on Polymarket contracts related to the timing of the U.S. strikes on Iran?

AMore than $529 million was traded on the Polymarket contracts related to the timing of the strikes.

QWhat specific action did six Democratic senators demand from the CFTC regarding prediction markets?

AThey urged the CFTC to ban prediction contracts that are linked to or correlate with a person's death.

QHow did Kalshi respond to the confusion over the settlement of its Khamenei contract?

AKalshi admitted the wording was unclear, announced it would refund all trading fees from that market, and fully reimburse traders who placed bets after Khamenei's death.

QWhat key difference in regulation is highlighted between Kalshi and Polymarket?

AKalshi operates under U.S. oversight by the CFTC, while Polymarket operates offshore with fewer restrictions and only requires a crypto wallet to trade.

你可能也喜歡

彼得·希夫声称Strategy公司的STRC计划损害了MSTR股东的利益

Strategy公司(MSTR)发布二季度财报后,其股价在7月31日面临更大抛压。知名比特币批评者彼得·希夫随后指责公司宣称的核心企业目标——维持其优先股STRC价格接近100美元声明价值——损害了MSTR普通股股东的利益。希夫认为,该政策在优先股投资者和普通股股东之间造成了直接冲突,意味着公司并非以股东价值最大化为首要目标。 Strategy则解释,维持STRC价格稳定是其数字信贷资本更广泛战略的一部分,旨在稳定公司资本结构。STRC是一种永久优先股,目前提供每年12%的现金股息,且股息率每月调整,以激励其交易价格接近100美元面值,降低价格波动。该结构为公司收购比特币提供了额外融资渠道,但要求管理层平衡股息义务、流动性储备、优先股定价和普通股动态。 公司管理层已扩充美元储备至约37.5亿美元,用以覆盖约2.1年的优先股股息和利息支出,并回购了部分STRC。这些行动显示出公司意图强化优先股结构,同时保持财务灵活性。 市场观点出现分歧。希夫持续警告,Strategy对优先证券和资本募集的使用可能导致普通股股东权益被稀释。而其他机构如Grayscale Research则认为,公司近期出售部分比特币降低了融资风险,STRC价格的复苏也反映了市场对其资本结构的信心增强。未来考验在于公司如何平衡比特币增持、优先股股息支付、可能的股票回购以及普通股面临的市场压力。

cryptonews.ru8 分鐘前

彼得·希夫声称Strategy公司的STRC计划损害了MSTR股东的利益

cryptonews.ru8 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片