Is Washington About To Kill Crypto Prediction Markets For Good? — Why Congress Suddenly Cares

bitcoinist發佈於 2026-03-26更新於 2026-03-26

文章摘要

On March 25, two separate acts were introduced to ban U.S. congressional staff, members of Congress, and federal officials from trading on prediction markets. Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts issued an immediate office-wide ban, calling these markets “playgrounds for corrupt insiders” that create perverse incentives. Separately, Representatives Adrian Smith and Nikki Budzinski introduced the bipartisan PREDICT Act, which would prohibit elected officials, senior appointees, and their families from trading on political and policy outcome markets. Violators would face a 10% fine on the value of the trade and forfeiture of profits. The moves reflect growing concern in Washington over insider trading risks in prediction markets, especially following instances of traders making large profits on geopolitical events. These actions may lead to stricter regulations and increased scrutiny on crypto-based prediction platforms.

Two different acts banning congressional staff, members of congress and federal officials from trading on prediction markets were introduced on Wednesday, March 25, one of them being effective immediately.

Massachusetts Bans Crypto Prediction Market

Washington’s battle against prediction markets rages on. Following a bipartisan Senate bill introduced on Monday that targets sports‐style bets on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, democratic representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts (MA-06) formally banned all of his staff from “participating in prediction markets”, such as the aforementioned, “to trade or hold positions on political, legislative, regulatory, geopolitical outcomes, or any information that is learned in an official capacity”. The press release frames it as the first such explicit office-wide ban in Congress.

Moulton’s rationale is clear: staff are meant to serve constituents, not profit from policy choices and global events. As he views it, prediction markets have become ethically questionable “playgrounds for corrupt insiders”:

Prediction markets have become a playground for corrupt insiders who are able to place bets on things like election outcomes, wars, and even the deaths of public figures. This is creating a perverse incentive structure that poses a genuine threat to American society today.

Congressional staff and the Members they work for exist to serve the constituents of the districts they represent, not to profit off of the very policy decisions and world events that we are here to respond to.

Nebraska Bans Crypto Prediction Market Too

On Nebraska’s side, Congressman Adrian Smith (R-NE-03) and Congresswoman Nikki Budzinski (D-IL-13) introduced the Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Congressional Trading Act (PREDICT Act), another bipartisan effort that aims to ban members of Congress, their spouses and children, the president and vice president, and senior appointees from trading on political and policy outcome markets.

Their core argument and statement are very similar to Moulton’s. Recent episodes of little‐known traders making massive profits on contracts tied to war with Iran or the length of government shutdowns have sharpened fears about insider information leaking into these markets. Smith said:

Serving the American people is a privilege, not a pathway to profit. Our commonsense, bipartisan bill will give Americans confidence that the decisions of their elected officials are guided by merit, not personal profit.

Budzinski added:

The American people are tired of politicians using their influence for personal gain, and the rise of prediction markets has made those concerns even more relevant. In recent months, we’ve seen instances of little-known traders making massive profits on events ranging from war with Iran to how long a government shutdown will last, raising necessary questions about the use of inside information.

Breaking the PREDICT Act would trigger a civil fine equal to 10% of the value of the banned trade, plus a requirement to hand over all profits from it to the U.S. Treasury, the announcement states.

A Growing Concern For Washington?

These new episodes come on top of earlier efforts like Rep. Ritchie Torres’s Financial Prediction Markets Public Integrity Act, following the capture of Venezuela’s former dictator Nicolás Maduro, which also targeted insider trading on platforms such as Polymarket.

For on‐chain and offshore prediction markets, a hard ban on US officials could actually de‐risk the space by reducing headline “insider” scandals, but it also raises the odds of stricter KYC and monitoring requirements in the US.

As it becomes increasingly clear that Washington has its attention set on ethically questionable crypto ventures, it is not too far-fetched to think that similar logic could be extended to other high‐beta crypto venues where policy and profit visibly collide (e.g., tokens tightly linked to election or war outcomes). Traders would do well pricing in regulatory overhang alongside usual market risk.

BTC’s price drops slightly after reaching $71k yesterday, trading for around $69k today. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Cover image from Perplexity, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

相關問答

QWhat is the main reason cited by Representative Seth Moulton for banning his staff from participating in prediction markets?

AMoulton believes staff should serve constituents, not profit from policy choices and global events, and views prediction markets as ethically questionable 'playgrounds for corrupt insiders'.

QWhat is the name of the bipartisan act introduced by Congressman Adrian Smith and Congresswoman Nikki Budzinski to ban trading on political prediction markets?

AThe Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Congressional Trading Act (PREDICT Act).

QWhat are the penalties for violating the PREDICT Act according to the announcement?

AA civil fine equal to 10% of the value of the banned trade, plus a requirement to hand over all profits from it to the U.S. Treasury.

QWhich earlier legislative effort targeted insider trading on platforms like Polymarket, as mentioned in the article?

ARep. Ritchie Torres's Financial Prediction Markets Public Integrity Act.

QHow might a hard ban on US officials using prediction markets affect the crypto prediction market space?

AIt could de-risk the space by reducing headline 'insider' scandals but also increase the likelihood of stricter KYC and monitoring requirements in the US.

你可能也喜歡

对话宏观分析师:AI 吸干美股全部流动性,比特币 4 万才是底部

美国宏观分析师Luke Groman认为,当前美股屡创新高主要由少数AI股票推动,实则市场流动性正被AI和大宗商品吸走。比特币作为“流动性烟雾警报器”已发出预警,近期表现疲软。他基于技术分析预测,比特币可能回踩40,000美元区间,因此虽在接近顶部时清仓了大部分比特币,但至今未大举买回。 Groman指出,AI公司通过会计手段前置收入、摊销费用,推高了账面盈利和估值,但消耗了大量现金,未来一旦建设放缓可能面临盈利反转。长期看,他预计股票以美元计价会上涨,但以黄金和比特币计价将下跌。 地缘政治方面,霍尔木兹海峡持续关闭可能导致石油供应紧张,引发滞胀式衰退。同时,美国正通过大量出口“非货币黄金”来缩减对华贸易逆差,这反映全球贸易结算可能转向“凭证即清算”的硬资产模式,黄金和比特币的价值因此凸显。 债务问题上,他引用历史数据称,债务/GDP比率超过130%的国家多数会违约,通常伴随高通胀。而AI若如其估值所示般革命性,将严重冲击白领就业,进而影响美国财政收入,加剧债务困境。 综上所述,Groman对市场持谨慎态度,认为需警惕流动性收缩、地缘风险及债务问题,并密切关注比特币可能的深度调整。

marsbit55 分鐘前

对话宏观分析师:AI 吸干美股全部流动性,比特币 4 万才是底部

marsbit55 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片