Eric Trump Goes to War With Big Banks Over ‘Anti‑American’ Crypto Lobbying

bitcoinist發佈於 2026-03-05更新於 2026-03-05

文章摘要

Eric Trump has publicly criticized major U.S. banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America, accusing them of pursuing an "anti-American" agenda by lobbying against crypto and stablecoins. He claims these institutions are trying to block Americans from earning higher yields on savings—often 4–5% in crypto platforms—to protect their low-interest monopoly and prevent deposit flight. According to Trump, banks are supporting bills like the Clarity Act to restrict yields and rewards on stablecoins, undermining competition and consumer freedom. He argues this contradicts American ideals and reflects the banking industry's panic over losing dominance in digital finance. The conflict centers on the GENIUS Act, which allowed stablecoins but banned interest payments, and the proposed Clarity Act, which aims to further limit yields.

Eric Trump lashed out against Big Banks for targeting Crypto and stablecoins, essentially not letting Americans make as much money as they could be.

An “Anti-American” Crypto Agenda

In a post on social network X on March 4, following his father Donald Trump’s message accusing banks of “undermining” the GENIUS Act, Eric Trump subsequently called out big banks like JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Bank of America.

He claims these banks are actively blocking Americans from “getting higher yields on their savings” and preventing “any rewards or perks from being given to customers,” arguing this is happening because they are “desperately targeting crypto/stablecoins, where platforms plan to offer 4–5% yields or rewards.” He goes as far as saying this stance betrays America’s freedom ideals:

The ABA and other lobbyists are spending millions trying to ban or restrict those yields via bills like the Clarity Act, crying “fairness” and using words like “stability”—when it’s really about protecting their low-rate monopoly and preventing deposit flight. his is anti-retail, anti-consumer, and straight-up anti-American.

The Greatest Hypocrites

In a different post from the same day, Eric Trump doubled down, accusing Big Banks of “doing everything they can to block the crypto industry” and branding them institutions that have “held a monopoly and screwed their customers for years.”

As Eric Trump sees it, this comes as a sort of tantrum, the last-ditch effort of a scared institution to keep control of Americans’ savings:

They are the greatest hypocrites and are in mass panic given they know they are losing the digital finance race!

The GENIUS Act vs. The Clarity Act

Both Donald and Eric Trump’s rants respond to a broader context: two flagship Trump-era bills are being weaponized against each other by the TradFi institutions.

The GENIUS Act, last year’s “big win” for payment stablecoins, legalized fully‐backed dollar tokens while explicitly banning issuers from paying interest on customer balances, a compromise that pushed yield into exchanges, fintech apps and DeFi protocols instead of killing it outright.

Now the banking lobby wants the CLARITY Act to finish the job: they are demanding a blanket prohibition on “yields, rewards or inducements” for stablecoin holders, closing the GENIUS loophole that still lets platforms compete with near‐zero bank accounts.

This is the fight the Trumps are now front running: an active opposition against those that are trying to make sure digital dollars can never pay ordinary savers more than the legacy system does.

BTC’s price trends to the downside on the daily chart. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Cover image from ChatGPT, BTCPUSD chart from Tradingview

相關問答

QWhat did Eric Trump accuse big banks like JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America of doing?

AEric Trump accused big banks of actively blocking Americans from getting higher yields on their savings and preventing rewards or perks from being given to customers, claiming they are desperately targeting crypto and stablecoins to protect their low-rate monopoly.

QWhich two acts are central to the conflict between the Trump family and big banks regarding crypto and stablecoins?

AThe GENIUS Act and the Clarity Act are central to the conflict, with the GENIUS Act legalizing fully-backed dollar tokens but banning interest on customer balances, while the Clarity Act seeks to prohibit yields, rewards, or inducements for stablecoin holders.

QWhy does Eric Trump label the actions of big banks and their lobbyists as 'anti-American'?

AHe labels them as 'anti-American' because he believes they are undermining America's freedom ideals by protecting their monopoly, preventing deposit flight, and restricting consumers from earning higher yields through crypto and stablecoins.

QWhat does Eric Trump claim is the real motivation behind the banking lobby's support for bills like the Clarity Act?

AHe claims the real motivation is to protect their low-rate monopoly and prevent deposit flight, rather than genuine concerns about fairness or stability.

QHow does Eric Trump describe the big banks' response to the rise of digital finance?

AHe describes it as a mass panic and tantrum, accusing them of being hypocrites who are desperately trying to block the crypto industry because they are losing the digital finance race.

你可能也喜歡

意大利央行未发现稳定币在汇款中存在系统性优势

意大利银行的一项研究显示,稳定币在跨境汇款中并未展现出持续的成本与速度优势。其潜在优势被法币出入金手续费以及本地支付基础设施的处理流程所抵消。 研究比较了通过200 USDC在意大利与巴西、阿根廷、日本、阿联酋和南非等10条双向通道进行汇款的成本与结算时间,并与标准汇款服务进行对比。 结果显示,稳定币转账的总成本在0.3%到近9%之间波动,具体取决于汇款方向。在具备即时支付系统的通道中,结算可在20分钟内完成;若缺乏此类基础设施,则需一至两个工作日。 主要成本和延迟源于货币兑换以及当地基础设施的质量。区块链网络手续费并非主要因素。 尽管在大多数研究通道中,稳定币成本低于世界银行统计的全球平均汇款成本(6.65%),但与传统汇款服务商Wise相比,仅在七条可比通道中的三条具备成本优势。 研究者认为,若稳定币能直接用于商品服务消费而无需兑换成当地货币,其优势将更为明显。同时指出,禁令性监管无法消除市场对稳定币的需求,而过严的规则只会增加零售用户的使用难度。 此外,报告提及,稳定币总市值在7月已从5月峰值下跌超100亿美元,至约3100亿美元,创下自2022年5月Terra崩溃以来的最大月度跌幅。

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

意大利央行未发现稳定币在汇款中存在系统性优势

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

比特币热潮正酣:塞勒尔新声明引发关于购买的猜测

纳斯达克上市公司MicroStrategy(代码:MSTR)的执行董事长迈克尔·塞勒于8月2日发布信息“Bitcoin Drive engaged”(比特币驱动已启动),再次引发市场对于该公司将在周一宣布新一轮比特币购买的猜测。其周日的帖子附带了该公司惯用的购买追踪图表,这符合塞勒通常在每周财报发布前暗示其金库变动的做法。 塞勒的附图报告显示,MicroStrategy的比特币储备为843,775枚BTC,市值约532.5亿美元。平均购买成本为每枚75,653美元,未实现亏损为105.8亿美元(-16.58%)。截至8月2日,累计进行了113次购买操作。 此前在7月27日,类似的周日信号曾预告了公司的公告,当时塞勒发文称“我们还需要一种颜色”,随后MicroStrategy披露了其更大的现金储备。这种时间上的巧合强化了市场对周一将发布新金库状况公告的预期。 然而,该公司实时账本显示,在最近两次共计出售3,588枚BTC(包括1,363枚和2,225枚)后,其比特币储备已从847,363枚降至843,775枚。根据提交给美国证券交易委员会(SEC)的文件,这些出售是为了资助优先股支付并补充美元储备。最近的报告还显示,在截至7月26日的一周内,MicroStrategy没有购买任何比特币,同时将其美元储备增加至约37.5亿美元,这使其优先股股息和债务利息的预计覆盖期限延长至约2.1年。 财务风险依然高企,该公司报告2026年第二季度运营亏损83.3亿美元,与上年同期140.3亿美元的运营利润形成急剧逆转。这些业绩包含了公司数字资产方面83.2亿美元的未实现亏损,而2025年第二季度为未实现利润140.5亿美元。 管理层还可能通过额外出售比特币获得高达12.5亿美元,以补充用于支付优先股股息和债务利息的美元储备。因此,预计周一的披露将揭示“Bitcoin Drive”信息是否标志着资产积累的恢复,因为MicroStrategy需要在平衡其843,775枚BTC自有储备与不断增长的现金负债和积极的资本管理之间做出抉择。

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

比特币热潮正酣:塞勒尔新声明引发关于购买的猜测

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片