Blockchain Association Urges Congress To Keep BRCA Intact In Crypto Market Structure Bill

bitcoinist發佈於 2026-02-27更新於 2026-02-27

文章摘要

With a March 1 deadline approaching for the CLARITY Act, the Blockchain Association is intensifying its advocacy efforts on Capitol Hill. The trade group is urging lawmakers to preserve the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) within the upcoming crypto market structure bill. Its primary focus is on Title III of the draft legislation, emphasizing the need to protect open-source software developers from being regulated as financial intermediaries. The association argues that developers who write and publish non-custodial code, without controlling user assets, should not be subject to the same rules as financial institutions. This distinction is presented as crucial for fostering American leadership in DeFi innovation. Concurrently, a new bipartisan bill, the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026, has been introduced in the House to explicitly protect developers from prosecution under laws targeting unlicensed money transmitters.

With a White House deadline on the anticipated CLARITY Act set for March 1, crypto policy discussions are intensifying in Washington. On Thursday afternoon, Senate Democrats are scheduled to meet to continue deliberations on the crypto market structure bill.

Ahead of those talks, the Blockchain Association returned to Capitol Hill to press lawmakers on how decentralized finance (DeFi) will be treated in the latest draft from the Senate Banking Committee.

Blockchain Association Lobbies For Developer Protections

The industry trade group, which represents a range of crypto companies, said its advocacy efforts are focused particularly on Title III of the draft legislation and on preserving the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) as negotiations move forward.

In a post on social media platform X, the organization stated that leaders from 18 member companies were meeting with 24 Senate offices across both the Banking and Agriculture Committees.

According to the association, the stakes extend beyond technical regulatory language. “Today’s meetings are about whether America will keep its commitment to open innovation — and to the developers who build permissionless software,” the group wrote.

It emphasized that it has consistently pushed for legislation that clearly distinguishes between developers of non-custodial software and financial intermediaries that actually take control of customer funds.

As Congress works toward a comprehensive framework for digital asset markets, the association argued, policymakers must ensure that DeFi protocols are not effectively pushed out of existence through overly broad rules.

Clear Line Between Custodians And Code Writers

Central to the debate is the treatment of open-source developers. The group maintains that developers who publish code but do not custody or manage user assets should not be regulated as financial institutions.

“Open-source developers should not be treated as financial intermediaries when they do not custody or control customer assets,” the association said, adding that the United States has a significant opportunity to lead globally in DeFi innovation if it gets the policy approach right.

Summer Mersinger, the Blockchain Association’s chief executive officer, reinforced that message in a post earlier Thursday. She described developer protections as foundational to what she called the next wave of American innovation.

As lawmakers advance market structure legislation, she said, it is essential to draw a clear boundary between entities that hold and control consumer funds and those that merely create and publish open-source software.

New Bipartisan Crypto Bill

The debate over developer liability is also unfolding in the House of Representatives. On Thursday, crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett reported that Representatives Scott Fitzgerald, Ben Cline, and Zoe Lofgren introduced the bipartisan Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026.

The proposed legislation is designed to protect software developers from prosecution under Section 1960 of the federal criminal code. The bill seeks to clarify that Section 1960 — originally crafted to address unlicensed money transmitters that custody customer funds — applies only to actors who actually control user assets.

It would exclude developers who simply write or publish code, a distinction that the crypto industry, and especially the DeFi sector, has been advocating to incorporate into the CLARITY Act.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap valuation at $2.3 trillion as of Thursday afternoon. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

相關問答

QWhat is the Blockchain Association urging Congress to do regarding the BRCA in the crypto market structure bill?

AThe Blockchain Association is urging Congress to keep the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) intact as negotiations on the crypto market structure bill move forward.

QWhich specific part of the draft legislation is the Blockchain Association's advocacy focused on?

AThe association's advocacy efforts are focused particularly on Title III of the draft legislation.

QAccording to the Blockchain Association, what is the fundamental distinction that must be made in regulation?

AThe association argues for a clear distinction between developers of non-custodial software and financial intermediaries that actually take control of customer funds.

QWhat is the name and purpose of the new bipartisan bill introduced in the House of Representatives?

AThe new bipartisan bill is called the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026. Its purpose is to protect software developers from prosecution under Section 1960 of the federal criminal code by clarifying that it only applies to actors who control user assets, not those who merely write or publish code.

QWhat does the Blockchain Association say is at stake in these policy discussions?

AThe association states that the stakes are about whether America will keep its commitment to open innovation and to the developers who build permissionless software, ensuring that DeFi protocols are not pushed out of existence by overly broad rules.

你可能也喜歡

美股「版本之子」最新调仓分析:90亿做空NVIDIA,子弹打向电力与内存板块

被视为全球最激进AI投资人之一的Leopold Aschenbrenner近期调整仓位,以约90亿美元名义仓位做空英伟达、阿斯麦和甲骨文等热门AI基础设施公司,同时将资金转向电力、内存、数据中心网络以及Anthropic等更深层的AI基础设施与模型资产。 分析认为,这并非AI泡沫破裂的信号,而是资金在AI基础设施内部从过度拥挤的“芯片优先”交易,向“能源、网络、机房建设优先”轮动的迹象。英伟达近期完成250亿美元债券融资,虽账面现金充足,此举可能意味着AI行业的融资方式出现轻微转变,利用低成本资金进行扩张。 Leopold的核心逻辑在于,“卖铲子”交易已过于拥挤,真正的瓶颈已从GPU转向电力、内存、数据中心网络及实体建设能力。谁能解决这些物理限制并快速建成数据中心,谁就将获得下一轮红利。他重仓押注能源、新型云厂商(如CoreWeave)及光学/光纤公司,并私人持有大量Anthropic股权,直接投资AI“矿”本身。 此外,讨论指出铜在短距离高带宽传输中仍是关键材料,而光纤是下一步升级方向。能源公司因其全球刚性需求,被视为最稳妥的长期押注。整体来看,当前市场仍存在扎实需求,但资金正流向更底层、更“不性感”的基础设施环节。

marsbit26 分鐘前

美股「版本之子」最新调仓分析:90亿做空NVIDIA,子弹打向电力与内存板块

marsbit26 分鐘前

谁最会用Claude Code?答案可能不是程序员

这篇基于约40万次Claude Code会话的分析报告发现,AI编程工具正在重塑人与代码的协作关系。核心结论是:在智能体编程中,人类主要承担“做什么”的规划决策,而AI则负责“怎么做”的执行工作,包括编写、修改和调试代码。 研究显示,使用Claude Code的成功率并不取决于用户是否是程序员。在法律、金融、管理等非技术职业的用户中,完成编码任务的效率已接近软件工程师水平。真正影响结果的关键因素是用户对自己要解决问题的理解深度,即领域专业知识。领域专家能够用更精准的指令引导AI完成更大量、更复杂的工作。 数据表明,从2025年10月到2026年4月,Claude Code承担的任务价值平均增长约25%,且用于纯粹调试的会话占比下降近半,更多转向端到端的开发、部署、数据分析及文档撰写等工作。同时,当会话遇到问题时,新手用户放弃的比例远高于中高级用户,突显了领域知识在引导和纠正AI方面的重要性。 报告指出,AI编程降低的是实现门槛,而非判断门槛。未来,懂业务、能清晰定义问题和评估结果的人,可能比单纯会写代码的人更能发挥AI的价值。这意味着,智能体工具不会取代领域知识,反而会放大其作用,使各行业的从业者都能完成以往难以独立完成的技术工作。

marsbit1 小時前

谁最会用Claude Code?答案可能不是程序员

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片