Big Banks Threaten To Sue OCC Over Crypto Rules, Citing Threats To Financial Stability

bitcoinist發佈於 2026-03-09更新於 2026-03-09

文章摘要

Major US banks, led by the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), are threatening to sue the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) over its approval of federal trust charters for crypto firms. They argue that the OCC's streamlined licensing process, which has approved firms like Ripple, Circle, and Fidelity, releases these companies into the financial system without the stringent oversight applied to traditional banks. Banking groups warn this blurs the definition of a "bank," creates a regulatory loophole, and poses significant risks to financial stability, consumer protection, and competition. The opposition is also supported by state regulators and smaller banking groups.

The traditional banking sector in the United States is reportedly intensifying its opposition to crypto firms and considering a potential lawsuit against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) over federal licenses granted to these companies.

According to a Monday report by The Guardian, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) is evaluating its legal options after the OCC did not respond favorably to repeated warnings from influential banking groups and state regulators concerning its reinterpretation of federal licensing rules.

Banks Demand Action Against OCC’s Crypto Licenses

Since President Donald Trump took office, the OCC has streamlined the process for crypto firms and fintech startups to acquire and operate under a national bank trust charter, which allows them to serve customers in all 50 states.

This resulted in conditional bank charters being approved for five major crypto firms, including Ripple, Circle (CRCL), BitGo, Paxos, and Fidelity, back in December of last year.

However, traditional banks express concern that this approval effectively releases these firms into the broader financial system without the stringent oversight and controls that fully-fledged banks undergo.

In October, the Bank Policy Institute publicly urged the regulator to reject license applications from notable crypto and blockchain companies, including Circle, Ripple, and the London-based payment firm Wise.

The BPI, which counts banking leaders such as Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan, Brian Moynihan of Bank of America, and David Solomon of Goldman Sachs among its board members, cautioned that granting lighter regulatory frameworks to firms offering bank-like services could blur the lines defining what constitutes a “bank.”

This, they argued, could exacerbate systemic risk and undermine the integrity of the national banking charter. Currently, the BPI is contemplating whether to initiate legal action against the OCC.

Smaller Banks And State Regulators Also Push Back

The Guardian also reported that the OCC’s approach to crypto has also faced resistance from smaller banking groups and state regulators.

The Conference of State Bank Supervisors, which represents regulators from all 50 states, sent a letter to the OCC last month arguing that granting regulatory approval to crypto and payment firms would compromise competition, consumer protection, and financial stability.

Similar concerns were echoed by the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), an organization representing approximately 5,000 smaller banks.

The ICBA warned that the current proposals to issue licenses to crypto companies would create a “loophole” in core banking regulations and raise serious public policy concerns about consumer safety and the overall stability of the financial services sector.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap at $2.33 trillion as of Monday, March 9. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

相關問答

QWhy are big banks threatening to sue the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)?

ABig banks, represented by the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), are threatening to sue the OCC because they oppose the federal licenses granted to crypto firms. They argue that these licenses allow crypto companies to operate like banks without undergoing the same stringent oversight, which they believe poses a threat to financial stability and undermines the integrity of the national banking charter.

QWhich major crypto firms received conditional bank charters from the OCC?

AAccording to the article, the OCC approved conditional bank charters for five major crypto firms: Ripple, Circle (CRCL), BitGo, Paxos, and Fidelity.

QWhat specific concerns does the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) have about the OCC's actions?

AThe BPI is concerned that granting lighter regulatory frameworks to crypto firms offering bank-like services blurs the definition of a 'bank,' exacerbates systemic risk, and undermines the integrity of the national banking charter.

QWhich other groups, besides the large banks, are pushing back against the OCC's crypto licensing?

ASmaller banking groups and state regulators are also pushing back. The Conference of State Bank Supervisors and the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) have expressed concerns that these licenses compromise competition, consumer protection, and financial stability.

QWhat was the total crypto market cap mentioned in the article as of the report date?

AThe daily chart in the article shows the total crypto market cap was $2.33 trillion as of Monday, March 9.

你可能也喜歡

SpaceX、OpenAI、Anthropic连续上市,市场真的吃得下吗?

## 摘要 本文探讨了SpaceX、OpenAI和Anthropic三家科技巨头在短期内接连寻求上市,市场能否消化其巨额融资需求的问题。 **核心数据与现状:** - **SpaceX**:已以每股135美元上市,募资750亿美元,估值达1.77万亿美元。招股获超额认购,首日市值突破2.1万亿美元,显示强劲需求。 - **OpenAI**:目标估值约1万亿美元,但财务状况面临挑战,据分析处于亏损状态,市场对其短期内完成IPO持谨慎态度。 - **Anthropic**:财务表现相对最佳,增长迅猛,并预计在上市前实现首次季度运营盈利,估值近万亿美元。 三家IPO总计可能从市场抽资超过2000亿美元,相当于2025年全年美国IPO募资总额的四倍多。 **市场态度分歧:** - **多头**认为市场流动性充裕(货币市场基金约8万亿美元),且存在对纯AI标的的直接投资需求。 - **空头**警告这可能导致流动性虹吸,迫使机构抛售其他资产(如芯片股)来筹集现金,并指出IPO本质是早期投资者向公开市场转移风险。 - 还有一种“投降式看多”心态,即因职业风险而不得不参与,被视为市场泡沫后期的特征。 **上市时机与深层动因:** - 资本擅长为远期愿景(如火星殖民、通用人工智能)定价,且这些公司拥有真实的收入增长。 - 创始人控制力强(如马斯克),并通过关联交易网络扩大影响力。 - 此轮IPO提高了散户配售比例,意在让用户成为股东,但也可能让其承担尾部风险。 - 行业内资金循环(如英伟达投资、OpenAI采购)推高了各方估值,但新价值创造与否存疑。 **结论:市场能否消化?** 1. **单笔消化**:有能力,SpaceX的成功已证明。 2. **连续冲击**:是主要风险,可能导致需求分流或定价不及预期。因此三家公司有意错峰上市。 3. **基本面支撑**:这是最大悬念。SpaceX有实体业务现金流;若Anthropic实现盈利,将增强板块信心;而财务状况不明的OpenAI最为脆弱,其公开的财务数据可能引发估值重估。 **最终判断**:市场有容量承接这些IPO,但真正的考验在于OpenAI等公司公开财务底牌后,其万亿美元估值是否能被真实的盈利能力和客户投资回报率所支撑。当前市场弥漫着一种“清醒的赌博”心态。

marsbit1 小時前

SpaceX、OpenAI、Anthropic连续上市,市场真的吃得下吗?

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片