Justin Sun: HT Is Seriously Undervalued Compared to BNB

Huobi發佈於 2022-10-21更新於 2022-10-24

文章摘要

On the evening of October 20, Justin Sun, the global advisor of Huobi Global, talked about the price of HT in a Twitter Space live broadcast. He believes that the price of HT is seriously undervalued compared to BNB.

On the evening of October 20, Justin Sun, the global advisor of Huobi Global, talked about the price of HT in a Twitter Space live broadcast. He believes that the price of HT is seriously undervalued compared to BNB. Here are several reasons:

● These two tokens have the same circulation

● Huobi Global has more tools to empower HT

● Popular coins such as APT have a higher trading volume on Huobi Global

Is it real?

Firstly, look at the circulation. The total supply of BNB is 200 million, while the total supply of HT is 500 million, 300 million more than its compatitor. However, nearly 300 million HTs have already been burnt through the “HT Token Burn Program Community Vote”. From the perspective of circulating supply, the current circulating supply of HT is around 130 million, and the circulating supply of BNB is 160 million. The circulating supply of HT is less than that of BNB. Focusing on non-circulating HT, with 200 million in circulation compared to 160 million, the price of BNB is around 270 US dollars per token, while the price of HT is only 7 US dollars per token, the gap is indeed too wide.

From the burning curve below, by burning 150 million HT in March 2020, the burning speed of HT was significantly accelerated, while BNB was relatively slow.

Second, when HT was initially released, part of it was used to buy point cards as gifts, and HT could be used to purchase VIP members, and also could be used to vote for listing. Since the end of 2020, the empowerment actions will be significantly reduced. In addition, the Chinese users would force to leave in 2021, and the empowerment actions of HT were basically suspended. However, the empowerment of BNB actions was continuous, which lead to a rebound in the price of BNB at the end of 2021, and widens its price gap with HT. The empowerment move of HT is indeed a little weaker, but there is no fundamental difference between them by circulation and brand influence, if HT could follow the BNB in the empowerment perspective, the price gap may see a quick narrowing in the short run.

Lastly, take the trading volume of the popular currency APT as an example to analyze the gap between the giants. According to the data of Coingecko, the trading volume of the APT/USDT trading pair in Binance for the last 1 day is around 120 million US dollars, while in Huobi it is about 40 million US dollars. the gap was just about 3 times. This gap is much narrower than the price gap between HT and BNB.

The following are quoted from Justin in the live broadcast. You can tell for yourself whether it makes sense or not:

“I personally believe that HT is definitely undervalued because the circulation of HT and BNB is exactly the same, about 160 million. Now a BNB coin is a few hundred dollars, while HT is only 7-8 dollars, I think HT is still undervalued. Although Binance has a strong network effect, Huobi Global is still an excellent exchange.

For example, in the past two days, Huobi Global is still the main battlefield for the trading of APT which is a new and top-level project. To a certain extent, the price of HT does not match the users, trading depth, and capital of Huobi global. In another word, HT is still underestimated.

I’m not trying to spread FOMO emotion to you guys. Suppose I’m not a Huobi Global consultant, my judgment of the undervalue of HT will still be firm. So HT now is definitely will be a profitable investment. The reason HT was undervalued is that Huobi Global did not empower HT. Now that I am a Huobi Global consultant, I must ensure that Huobi Global will focus on empowering HT. In meetings for the last few days, I have emphasized more than 50 times to make sure that our organization's top priority is to empower HT and turn the direction of operation back to HT prosperity. "

你可能也喜歡

美联储利率决议及凯文·沃什声明后,专家齐聚并分享了他们最新评论!

美联储决定维持利率不变后,市场专家针对会议结果及美联储主席凯文·沃什的发言发表了评论。尽管有三名委员对维持利率的决议投下反对票,暗示美联储内部可能出现更多政策分歧,但市场反应相对有限——债券收益率小幅下降,美元略有走软。 专家普遍认为,美联储在九月会议上仍有可能加息。Nationwide Investment Management Group的马克·哈克特指出,三名反对票可能标志着美联储委员将更加独立行事,而非追求表面共识。Citadel Securities在会前发布的报告曾呼吁加息,随后的市场反弹被哈克特称为“松了一口气的反弹”。 货币与利率策略主管奥黛丽·柴尔德-弗里曼表示,尽管决议后收益率和美元有所回落,但反对票的存在显示了美联储的强硬立场。她认为美联储将继续依据经济数据决策,美元在夏季可能因债券高收益率而保持强势。 分析师克里斯·安斯泰指出,市场将密切关注沃什讲话期间及之后美国10年期国债收益率的变化。其收益率已超过决议前水平,若长期收益率持续上升,可能反映出市场担忧美联储抗通胀力度不足,这对沃什而言是一个负面信号。安斯泰同时提到,财政部长斯科特·贝森特将10年期收益率视为抵押贷款等信贷的关键指标,因此长期利率变动对经济管理至关重要。 毕马威首席经济学家黛安·斯旺克则认为,美联储应在本次会议上加息,并预计九月会采取行动。她指出,高通胀已持续近五年,尽管美联储并非通胀的唯一原因,但采取货币政策行动仍是其责任。斯旺克警告,长期过高的通胀可能从异常现象转变为经济体系的常态。 (本文不构成投资建议。)

cryptonews.ru45 分鐘前

美联储利率决议及凯文·沃什声明后,专家齐聚并分享了他们最新评论!

cryptonews.ru45 分鐘前

《我没时间说服你》——中本聪名言问世16周年

2010年7月29日,比特币创始人中本聪在Bitcointalk论坛上回复用户关于交易速度过慢的质疑时,写下了那句著名的话:“如果你不相信我或不理解,我没有时间试图说服你,抱歉。”这句罕见的、略显不耐烦的回复,在多年来始终冷静、耐心解答技术问题的沟通记录中显得格外突出。 文章回顾了中本聪的一贯沟通风格。在长达数年的公开和私下交流中,他面对关于可扩展性、安全性等重复性质疑时,通常以具体的技术机制、数据或类比进行详尽解释,而非简单驳斥。他展现出坚定的设计哲学,例如从一开始就设想比特币网络将由少量全节点和大量轻客户端构成,并基于摩尔定律等具体预测来论证其 scalability 潜力。同时,他能够坦承设计中的简化之处,避免事后辩解。 在私下与早期合作者(如Martti Malmi)的邮件中,中本聪表现出协作甚至自嘲的一面,亲自参与细节讨论。而在公开场合,他的发言则更具教导性,致力于向大众解释比特币的工作原理。他始终避免个人崇拜,曾要求将功劳归于更广泛的开发群体。 这场关于可扩展性的辩论及其引发的名言,至今仍影响着比特币社区。中本聪的原始论述表明,比特币架构的核心权衡是初始设计的一部分。他的沟通方式也为开源协作树立了榜样:委托授权、书面记录决策、让贡献者共同创建材料。而那句著名回复则提醒所有人,即使是耐心十足的导师,在重复解释已给出的答案时,耐心也可能耗尽。

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

《我没时间说服你》——中本聪名言问世16周年

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片