Kim Kardashian charged by SEC, agrees to pay $1.3 million fine

CNBC發佈於 2022-10-04更新於 2022-10-04

文章摘要

Kim Kardashian agreed to pay a $1.26 million fine to the Securities and Exchange Commission to settle civil charges after the reality TV star touted a crypto asset, EthereumMax, on Instagram.

Kim Kardashian agreed to pay a $1.26 million fine to the Securities and Exchange Commission to settle civil charges after the reality TV star touted a crypto asset, EthereumMax, on Instagram.

The SEC charged Kardashian with failure to disclose that she was paid $250,000 to publish her Instagram post. In addition to paying the fine, she agreed to cooperate with the SEC’s ongoing investigation.

“This case is a reminder that, when celebrities or influencers endorse investment opportunities, including crypto asset securities, it doesn’t mean that those investment products are right for all investors,” said SEC Chair Gary Gensler. “We encourage investors to consider an investment’s potential risks and opportunities in light of their own financial goals.”

Kardashian also agreed to not promote any crypto securities for three years.

“Ms. Kardashian is pleased to have resolved this matter with the SEC,” said a statement from her attorneys. “Kardashian fully cooperated with the SEC from the very beginning and she remains willing to do whatever she can to assist the SEC in this matter. She wanted to get this matter behind her to avoid a protracted dispute. The agreement she reached with the SEC allows her to do that so that she can move forward with her many different business pursuits.”

`

The SEC found that Kardashian violated the anti-touting provision of federal securities laws. Kardashian agreed to the order without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings.

The settlement includes a $1 million fine and forfeiting the $250,000 payment she received, plus interest.

Gensler tweeted that “any celebrity or influencer’s incentives aren’t necessarily aligned with yours.” He said the investing public shouldn’t confuse the skills of celebrities “with the very different skills needed to offer appropriate investment advice.”

The SEC may have targeted Kardashian as a way to send a message to other influencers who might be promoting crypto currencies or other investment assets, said Charles Whitehead, professor at Cornell Law School. He called it a “shot across the bow” for celebrity crypto endorsers.

`

“It’s a way to signal to other influencers: if you’re thinking about dealing with crypto, think twice,” said Whitehead. “The SEC is also using her as an influencer – but to boost compliance with securities laws. [It’s a] smart way to bring attention to the matter so others won’t do it.”

Kardashian isn’t the first celebrity to pay an SEC fine for using their influence to push crypto currencies. In 2018 boxer Floyd Mayweather Jr. and music producer DJ Khaled each paid fines for pushing cryptos. Mayweather, who had been compensated $300,000, paid a bit more than $600,000 in penalties, while Khaled, who had been paid $50,000, was hit with penalties topping $150,000. In addition actor Steven Segal paid more than $300,000 in penalties for doing the same thing in 2020.

`

In a June 13, 2021 Instagram post Kardashian wrote, “Are you guys into crypto? This is not financial advice but sharing what my friends told me about the ethereum max token!” She added different hashtags, including #ad, along with #emax and #disrupthistory, among others.

The SEC said she had 225 million Instagram followers at the time of the post.

The #ad is not sufficient to comply with SEC laws in regards to touting investments, Gensler said in an interview on CNBC Monday.

“If you’re advertising perfume, or you’re advertising vacation homes or anything else on the internet, there are various laws related to that. But these are the securities laws,” he said.

Kardashian’s net worth is estimated at $1.8 billion according to Forbes. So a $1.26 million fine is the equivalent of a fine of less than $100 for a typical US family, which has a net worth of about $122,000 according to the most recent estimates by the Federal Reserve.

你可能也喜歡

我对内存厂商的怨念:三星们正在掐死 AI 资本开支周期

本文由P Equity Research撰写,核心观点认为以三星、SK海力士、美光为首的DRAM内存三巨头,正通过持续大幅涨价,可能提前扼杀当前的AI资本开支周期。 作者指出,这三家公司控制了全球89%的DRAM市场,形成寡头联盟。在AI芯片需求激增的推动下,他们利用供不应求的局面不断抬价,DRAM合约价格同比涨幅已逼近惊人的700%。这使得内存成本在云厂商资本开支中的占比急剧上升,预计将从2026年的30%升至2027年的40%左右。微软已因此额外增加250亿美元开支,其他云厂商也面临巨大成本压力。 作者表达了对内存厂商的不满,认为它们在毛利率已高达60%甚至更高的“国王般”水平下,仍在追求更高利润,此举正在牺牲AI产业的扩张速度。云厂商的自由现金流已接近枯竭,经营现金流的98%被用于资本开支,为互联网泡沫以来最高水平。为应对成本,它们不得不大量融资,同时芯片设计商(如英伟达、AMD)也开始寻求减少内存用量的技术方案以降低成本。 文章驳斥了“内存已无周期”的观点,认为繁荣与崩盘的循环必然到来。作者预测转折点将比市场普遍预期的更早:内存厂商的毛利率可能在2027年中左右见顶,随后资本开支增速将显著放缓甚至暂停,内存需求预期减弱,导致内存股股价回吐涨幅,并在2028-2030年期间随着产能增加而可能迎来真正的价格崩盘。 总之,作者基于内存厂商的定价策略、云厂商的财务压力以及产业的技术应对,判断当前由内存高价驱动的AI资本开支热潮不可持续,周期拐点或将提前至2027年。

marsbit41 分鐘前

我对内存厂商的怨念:三星们正在掐死 AI 资本开支周期

marsbit41 分鐘前

模型之外皆属Harness:Deepseek下场,国内AI竞争主战场为何变了?

2026年,Deepseek内部组建了专注于代码智能体产品的Harness团队,标志着国内AI竞争的主战场正从“炼大模型”转向“造工具链与办公落地”。Harness(运行时基础设施)被比喻为AI的“岗位说明书与工具箱”,负责让大模型能与外部世界交互、执行具体任务。Deepseek亲自下场,意在掌握接口设计权与训练数据闭环,通过Harness与模型的共同进化形成飞轮效应。 其他大厂也在差异化布局工具链:腾讯依托企业微信与云生态,推出WorkBuddy企业版,主打企业级协同与系统连接;阿里则开源了前端浏览器Agent框架PageAgent,旨在降低Web自动化门槛。这种分化表明,行业正聚焦于通过厚重的工程打磨垂直解决方案。 海外趋势印证了市场转向:波兰公司Viktor凭借能在Slack内自主执行复杂任务的AI员工,实现了可观收入,证明企业愿意为“自主执行”而非“辅助生成”付费。工具链竞争也带来了新挑战,如长时运行中的Token爆炸问题,要求Harness具备强大的上下文管理、错误恢复和安全沙箱等工程能力。地缘政治因素导致的海外工具限制,也为国产Harness创造了市场空间。企业采购和开发者因此需更关注工程交付能力与生态兼容性,而非单纯比较模型参数。

marsbit51 分鐘前

模型之外皆属Harness:Deepseek下场,国内AI竞争主战场为何变了?

marsbit51 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片