To Counter Quantum Threat, Ethereum Abandons Poseidon and Switches to Traditional Hashes

marsbit發佈於 2026-08-14更新於 2026-08-14

文章摘要

On August 13th, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced a strategic pivot in the face of the quantum computing threat: the Ethereum Foundation will abandon the SNARK-friendly hash function Poseidon at the L1 level in favor of traditional hash functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2. This decision, informed by eight years of research, represents a major shift in Ethereum's post-quantum cryptography roadmap. Poseidon, introduced in 2019, has been favored for zkRollups and zkVMs due to its efficiency within SNARK circuits. However, its shorter cryptographic history and analysis timeline became liabilities when post-quantum security became a critical requirement. The change is enabled by breakthroughs in SNARK design, particularly the adoption of "binary field" arithmetic. This allows traditional hash functions (which rely heavily on bitwise operations) to be verified efficiently in SNARKs, with recent benchmarks achieving millions of hashes per second on a laptop. Another key driver is the accelerating timeline of the quantum threat. Reports warn that "Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers" (CRQCs) could break current public-key cryptography (like ECDSA) as early as the 2030s, risking trillions in on-chain assets. The enhanced cryptanalysis capabilities of AI have also weakened some post-quantum candidates, pushing Ethereum towards hash-based schemes, deemed more quantum-resistant. Ethereum's post-quantum deployment plan aims for a production-ready leanVM by 2027, followed b...

Author: ChandlerZ, Foresight News

On August 13, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced on X that the Ethereum Foundation has decided to abandon the SNARK-friendly hash algorithm Poseidon at the L1 layer in favor of traditional hash functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2.

This decision is the culmination of eight years of research, tens of millions of dollars in investment, and a significant revision to the post-quantum cryptography roadmap.

Since its introduction in 2019, Poseidon has been regarded as an ideal hashing solution for applications like zkRollups and zkVMs. Its structure made it cheaper and more efficient within SNARK circuits compared to traditional binary-operation-based hash functions. However, when post-quantum security became a hard requirement for Ethereum, Poseidon's limitations began to surface.

Justin Drake stated that this shift is thanks to a breakthrough in SNARK design, specifically an "binary field" arithmetic approach that enables traditional hash functions to perform comparably to previously SNARK-optimized designs like Poseidon within SNARK circuits. A single laptop can now verify approximately 1 million traditional hash invocations per second.

The article notes that Poseidon has been a mainstream SNARK-friendly hash scheme since 2019, providing security for applications like zkRollups and zkVMs. Drake indicated that plans show a production-ready leanVM is expected to launch in 2027, with deployment across the consensus, data, and execution layers slated for 2028. The Ethereum Foundation's post-quantum team is also accelerating research related to binary fields.

Why Now?

The main barrier preventing traditional hashes from being used in SNARKs has long been computational language differences. SHA2, BLAKE2s, and Keccak heavily use Boolean operations like XOR and bit shifts. Traditional SNARKs typically handle arithmetic over large prime fields, and simulating each bit operation incurs high constraint costs. Poseidon was designed directly around prime field arithmetic, achieving higher proving speeds with fewer constraints at the cost of a shorter algorithmic history requiring ongoing cryptanalysis.

Binary fields switch the underlying mathematics to the smallest prime field containing only 0 and 1, using binary extension fields to handle larger data. Bit operations can thus be directly incorporated into the proof system. SNARKs are now adapting to traditional hashes, shifting the technical focus from designing SNARK-friendly hashes to designing hash-friendly SNARKs.

The Binius proposal by Jim Posen and Benjamin Diamond in 2023 demonstrated a path using binary tower field SNARKs. The Flock paper by Benedikt Bünz, Ron Rothblum, and William Wang was uploaded to arXiv on July 29, 2026, reporting benchmarks of 82,000 BLAKE3 compressions, 42,000 SHA-256 compressions, and 30,000 Keccak permutations proven per second on a single M4 Max core, with 10-core BLAKE3 throughput exceeding 660,000 operations per second.

Drake noted that laptops can now prove about 1 million traditional hash invocations per second, at a cost roughly 100 times that of native CPU Boolean computation. SNARK.fast reportedly reached 1.8 million BLAKE3 operations per second on an M3 Max just days ago.

leanVM in 2027, Three-Layer Deployment in 2028

Another key reason for abandoning Poseidon is the accelerating timeline for post-quantum security. Project Eleven's "The Quantum Threat to Blockchains - 2026 Report" warns that the rapid development of quantum computers poses a serious threat to blockchain security. Once a "Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computer" (CRQC) emerges, Shor's algorithm could quickly break asymmetric encryption like ECDSA (used by Bitcoin and most public chains) and RSA. Q-Day (the day of quantum decryption) is estimated to potentially arrive between 2030 and 2033, putting trillions of dollars in on-chain assets at risk.

Because blockchain public keys are static long-term and cannot be rolled back, migration is extremely difficult. The report recommends immediately initiating Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) migration, including quantum-resistant signature schemes based on lattices and hashes, and transitioning gradually via hybrid schemes to prevent a full-scale quantum threat outbreak.

Justin Drake warned that AI's enhanced capabilities in cryptanalysis have already impacted lattice-based scheme HAWK and isogeny-based scheme SQIsign. This has forced the Ethereum Foundation to place its bet on hash-based schemes, which are considered more resilient against quantum attacks.

Previously, Ethereum published its post-quantum roadmap, including deploying a production-ready leanVM in 2027 and completing deployment across the consensus, execution, and data availability layers in 2028. leanVM is a minimal zero-knowledge virtual machine designed for post-quantum signature aggregation and is seen as a core component of the overall strategy.

In March 2026, the Ethereum Foundation launched pq.ethereum.org as a post-quantum security resource hub. Over 10 client teams have begun running weekly post-quantum interoperability devnets. The Foundation also established the $1 million Poseidon Prize and an equal-sized Proximity Prize to advance post-quantum cryptography research. Vitalik Buterin has repeatedly emphasized that post-quantum security is a necessary condition for Ethereum's "walkaway test"—Ethereum cannot "ossify" until it achieves quantum safety.

The hash function switch does not alter the overall structure of Ethereum's post-quantum roadmap. The BLS signatures currently used by validators rely on elliptic curves. The future scheme will still be based on hash signatures like leanXMSS, with leanVM then compressing a large number of signatures into one small proof per block. A previous comparison on Ethereum's official page showed that a leanXMSS signature is about 3000 bytes, while a BLS signature is only 96 bytes. The data compression target for leanVM is approximately 250x.

SHA2 or BLAKE2s have longer histories of public analysis, allowing the EF to reduce the time spent waiting for Poseidon parameters to undergo years of cryptanalysis. Drake's strawmap points to a production-ready leanVM in 2027 and deployment across the consensus, data, and execution layers in 2028.

Competitive Race, Solana Chooses Falcon

Ethereum is not the only major public chain preparing for the post-quantum era. The Solana Foundation released its post-quantum security roadmap in April 2026. Its core developer teams, Anza and Jump Crypto's Firedancer, independently reached the same conclusion, selecting the same post-quantum signature scheme: Falcon.

Falcon is one of the NIST-standardized post-quantum signature schemes. Its signatures are compact, making it suitable for high-throughput blockchain environments like Solana.

After independent research, the two major validator client development teams, Anza and Firedancer, both selected the post-quantum digital signature scheme Falcon and have publicly shared initial implementation code on GitHub. The current roadmap has three phases: continuous evaluation of Falcon and alternatives; adopting post-quantum schemes for new wallets once the quantum threat materializes; and finally, migrating existing wallets en masse. Additionally, Blueshift's Solana Winternitz Vault has been running in the ecosystem for over two years and was cited earlier this year in a Google Quantum AI whitepaper as a leading industry case study.

The Solana Foundation stated that a material threat from quantum computing is still years away, so immediate migration is not necessary. However, research, infrastructure, and ecosystem coordination are ready, allowing for a rapid launch when the time comes, with minimal expected impact on network performance.

Starknet is currently the closest point of comparison to the EF's new direction. StarkWare's roadmap, announced on June 30, outlines a three-phase process. The first phase will replace the Pedersen hash algorithm with BLAKE2 for state commitments, contract addresses, and network configuration, while also introducing post-quantum consensus signatures like Falcon-512. The second phase focuses on migration tools for traditional contracts. The third phase addresses external dependencies still tied to Ethereum, including bridge system calls and blob data availability, and depends on Ethereum's own migration path.

Compared to other public chains, Ethereum has chosen a path of "establishing standards first, then modifying code." Abandoning Poseidon for SHA2/BLAKE2 is a choice for more mature and widely validated cryptographic primitives in the post-quantum era.

熱門幣種推薦

相關問答

QWhat was the main reason for Ethereum's decision to abandon the Poseidon hash algorithm at the L1 layer?

AThe main reason was to meet the mandatory requirement for post-quantum security. While Poseidon was efficient for SNARK circuits, its limitations and the need for stronger defenses against future quantum threats led to the shift. Recent breakthroughs in SNARK design using 'binary fields' now allow traditional hash functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2 to perform nearly as efficiently as Poseidon in SNARK circuits, making them a more mature and cryptographically analyzed choice for the post-quantum era.

QWhat is the significance of 'binary fields' in relation to SNARK design mentioned in the article?

ABinary fields shift the underlying mathematics of SNARKs to a field consisting only of 0s and 1s (or use binary extension fields). This allows bit-level operations (like XOR and shifts, common in traditional hash functions) to be processed directly by the proof system. This breakthrough enables SNARKs to efficiently verify traditional hash functions, changing the technical focus from designing SNARK-friendly hashes to designing hash-friendly SNARKs.

QAccording to the article, what are the key timeline milestones in Ethereum's post-quantum migration roadmap?

AThe key milestones are the planned launch of a production-ready leanVM in 2027, followed by the deployment across the consensus layer, data availability layer, and execution layer in 2028. leanVM is a minimal zero-knowledge virtual machine designed for post-quantum signature aggregation, which is a core component of the strategy.

QWhich post-quantum signature scheme has Solana's development community selected, and what was a key factor in this choice?

ASolana's core developer teams (Anza and Jump Crypto's Firedancer) independently selected the Falcon signature scheme. A key factor in this choice is that Falcon is a NIST-standardized post-quantum signature scheme known for its compact signatures, making it suitable for high-throughput blockchain environments like Solana.

QHow does Starknet's post-quantum migration roadmap compare to Ethereum's new direction?

AStarknet's roadmap aligns closely with Ethereum's new direction. Its first stage involves replacing the Pedersen hash algorithm with BLAKE2 for various functions and introducing a post-quantum consensus signature like Falcon-512. Subsequent stages focus on migration tools for traditional contracts and resolving external dependencies tied to Ethereum. The final stage's progress depends on Ethereum's own migration path, indicating a coordinated approach within the broader ecosystem.

你可能也喜歡

QCP Capital分析师解释比特币为何在63,000美元附近停滞不前

QCP Capital 最新报告指出,比特币当前在63,000美元附近陷入停滞,未能突破近期交易区间。分析师认为,此次回调并非由单一行业催化剂引发,而是数字资产同时面临多项跨市场压力:地缘政治风险上升、油价走强、全球流动性不确定性以及市场对整体向好的美国宏观数据反应疲软。 报告指出,比特币展现了韧性,吸收了多则负面消息而未出现大幅破位下跌,但缺乏上行动力。美国通胀数据持续放缓,7月CPI和PPI均低于预期,且就业数据疲软,降低了市场对货币政策迅速收紧的预期,但比特币价格反应平淡。这表明,除了宏观数据,交易头寸、流动性状况和整体风险偏好等因素同样关键。 美国数字资产监管正沿两条路径发展:国会立法进程推迟,但SEC等监管机构仍在持续推进相关工作。此外,企业国库(如Strategy)的双向操作(既买入也卖出比特币)使得资金流动情况变得更加复杂,需关注其流动性状况和资产出售政策。 地缘政治方面,霍尔木兹海峡航运谈判持续,不确定性支撑油价高位运行,进而通过影响通胀预期和长期债券收益率,间接对加密货币等流动性敏感资产构成压力。 历史季节性显示,8月和9月比特币通常表现疲软,但当前市场结构因ETF和机构参与已发生变化,季节因素更多提供背景参考而非预测依据。 QCP总结认为,比特币正消化多种相互竞争的力量,展现了韧性但缺乏向上突破的动能。后续需关注PCE数据、杰克逊霍尔研讨会及9月FOMC会议等关键事件,它们将测试当前震荡区间能否在季节性淡季中维持。

cryptonews.ru21 分鐘前

QCP Capital分析师解释比特币为何在63,000美元附近停滞不前

cryptonews.ru21 分鐘前

DeepSeek故意做了一个难用的Agent?

DeepSeek近期战略转向引发关注。模型价格方面,V4 Pro不再延续低价策略,而新发布的智能体框架DeepSeek Harness则将焦点转向了模型运行时的底层基础设施。 过去,DeepSeek通过打造强大且价格低廉的模型,并开源开放,成功构建了以模型调用量为核心的生态。如今,其战略重心似乎从争夺模型调用量,转向了争夺调用发生的位置——即智能体(Agent)的运行时环境。 DeepSeek Harness的设计理念一反当前AI产品将复杂性封装给用户的趋势。它没有提供一个“开箱即用”的完整Agent产品,而是将构成Agent的模型、工具、技能、工作流等组件拆解为可自由替换和组合的模块,甚至允许动态加载和卸载插件。其底层内核Cordis致力于解决插件的时空可组合性问题,旨在让Agent能在运行过程中自我调整和进化,根据任务目标实时构建所需能力。 更值得注意的是,Harness并未强制绑定DeepSeek自家的模型,允许接入其他厂商的模型。这表明其野心可能不在于推销特定模型,而在于定义和控制下一代Agent的运行时标准,类似于操作系统在软件生态中的角色。 因此,V4 Pro的涨价与Harness的发布可被视为一体两面:模型开始扮演为整个生态持续提供动力的“发动机”角色,而Harness则旨在构建一个吸引开发者的底层平台。其当前相对“难用”和面向开发者的特性,恰恰反映了它优先服务于生态建设者而非普通用户的初期策略。DeepSeek的长期目标,或许是推动Agent从预定义的产品,进化为能够动态自我构建和演化的新型软件形态。

marsbit56 分鐘前

DeepSeek故意做了一个难用的Agent?

marsbit56 分鐘前

预测市场的价值、增长与风险

文章探讨了预测市场的巨大潜力、快速增长及伴随的监管与消费者保护问题。预测市场通过简单的“是/否”合约让用户对各种事件结果进行交易,价格直接反映市场认为的该结果发生概率。其核心价值在于提供高效的风险对冲工具和优于传统民调的概率预测,并能吸引用户进入平台,部分最终转化为长期投资者。以Robinhood为例,其预测市场收入已超过加密货币和股票交易。 增长主要由体育赛事(如世界杯)驱动,预测市场正在大量吸纳传统体育投注的用户和交易量。然而,这引发了严重的法律和监管争议。美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)认为事件合约属于其监管的衍生品,而许多州政府则视其为体育投注,应受州级监管并纳税,双方已展开多起诉讼。监管归属的模糊性带来了不确定性。 更突出的问题是消费者保护。数据显示,多数普通用户在预测市场中亏损,而专业交易者获利丰厚。平台营销方式(如推广高风险的“串关”投注)与传统投注平台类似,但针对问题性投注行为的保护措施(如年龄限制、自我排除机制)却主要依赖平台自律,而非法律强制要求,这可能导致消费者受损。 文章最后提出改进建议:将消费者保护机制内置于产品设计中,对体育类合约实施更严格的保护与税收,并利用预测市场的吸引力引导用户转向长期储蓄和投资产品,借鉴英国“有奖债券”的历史经验,将投机冲动转化为财务健康。 作者认为预测市场是“更好的市场”,但当前对普通消费者并不更友好。他呼吁平台、监管机构和州政府尽快合作,建立更完善的保护框架,以避免未来可能出现的严厉监管反弹,从而损害该市场的真正价值。

marsbit3 小時前

预测市场的价值、增长与风险

marsbit3 小時前

交易

現貨

熱門文章

什麼是 ETH 2.0

ETH 2.0:以太坊的新時代 介紹 ETH 2.0,廣為人知的以太坊 2.0,標誌著對以太坊區塊鏈的一次重大升級。這次過渡不僅僅是表面上的改造;其目標是從根本上增強網絡的可擴展性、安全性和可持續性。ETH 2.0 透過從能量密集型的工作量證明(PoW)共識機制轉向更高效的權益證明(PoS),承諾為區塊鏈生態系統帶來變革性的改變。 什麼是 ETH 2.0? ETH 2.0 是一系列獨特且相互連接的更新,專注於優化以太坊的能力和性能。這次全面改革旨在解決現有以太坊機制所面臨的主要挑戰,特別是交易速度和網絡擁堵問題。 ETH 2.0 的目標 ETH 2.0 的主要目標圍繞著改善三個核心方面: 可擴展性:旨在顯著提升網絡每秒可以處理的交易數量,ETH 2.0 希望突破目前約每秒 15 笔交易的限制,潛在地達到數千筆。 安全性:增強的安全措施是 ETH 2.0 的核心,特別是提高抵抗網絡攻擊的能力以及保護以太坊的去中心化精神。 可持續性:新的 PoS 機制旨在不僅提高效率,還大幅降低能耗,讓以太坊的運營框架與環保考量相符。 誰是 ETH 2.0 的創造者? ETH 2.0 的創建可追溯至以太坊基金會。這個非營利組織在支持以太坊發展方面發揮著關鍵作用,由著名的聯合創始人 Vitalik Buterin 主導。他對於更可擴展和更可持續以太坊的願景,是這次升級的推動力,並吸引了來自全球的開發者和愛好者的貢獻,共同致力於改善協議。 誰是 ETH 2.0 的投資者? 雖然有關 ETH 2.0 的投資者的具體信息尚未公開,但以太坊基金會已知方向來自區塊鏈及技術領域的各種組織和個人支持。這些合作夥伴包括創投公司、技術公司和慈善機構,它們共同致力於支持去中心化技術和區塊鏈基礎設施的發展。 ETH 2.0 如何運作? ETH 2.0 以引入一系列關鍵特性而著稱,使其與前身有所區別。 權益證明(PoS) 轉向 PoS 共識機制是 ETH 2.0 的標誌性變化之一。與依賴於能量密集型挖礦進行交易驗證的 PoW 不同,PoS 允許用戶根據他們在網絡中抵押的 ETH 數量來驗證交易和創建新區塊。這導致能量效率的提升,能耗降低約 99.95%,使以太坊 2.0 成為一個相當綠色的替代方案。 分片鏈 分片鏈是 ETH 2.0 的另一個關鍵創新。這些較小的鏈與主要的以太坊鏈平行運行,使得多筆交易可以同時處理。這種方法增強了網絡的整體容量,解決了困擾以太坊的可擴展性問題。 信標鏈 在 ETH 2.0 的核心是信標鏈,它協調網絡並管理 PoS 協議。它在某種程度上充當了組織者:它監督驗證者,確保各分片與網絡的連接,並監控整體區塊鏈生態系統的健康狀況。 ETH 2.0 的時間軸 ETH 2.0 的旅程標誌著幾個關鍵里程碑,描繪了這次重大升級的演變: 2020年12月:信標鏈的啟動標誌著 PoS 的引入,為 ETH 2.0 的遷移鋪平了道路。 2022年9月:“合併”的完成代表著以太坊網絡成功從 PoW 轉型為 PoS 框架,預示著以太坊的新時代。 2023年:預期分片鏈的推出旨在進一步增強以太坊網絡的可擴展性,鞏固 ETH 2.0 作為去中心化應用和服務的強大平台。 主要特性和優勢 改進的可擴展性 ETH 2.0 最重要的優勢之一是其改進的可擴展性。PoS 和分片鏈的結合使網絡能夠擴大容量,允許其處理的交易量遠超舊有系統。 能源效率 PoS 的實施對於區塊鏈技術中的能源效率來說是一個巨大的進步。通過大幅降低能源消耗,ETH 2.0 不僅減少了運營成本,還與全球可持續發展目標更加一致。 增強的安全性 ETH 2.0 的更新機制提高了網絡的安全性。PoS 的部署,加上通過分片鏈和信標鏈建立的創新控制措施,確保了對潛在威脅更高程度的保護。 降低用戶成本 隨著可擴展性的改善,交易成本也會明顯降低。預期增強的容量和減少的擁堵將轉化為用戶更低的手續費,使以太坊在日常交易中變得更可及。 結論 ETH 2.0 標誌著以太坊區塊鏈生態系統的一次重要演變。隨著其解決可擴展性、能源消耗、交易效率和整體安全性等關鍵問題,這次升級的重要性不言而喻。轉向權益證明、引入分片鏈以及信標鏈的基礎性工作,顯示出以太坊未來能夠滿足去中心化市場日益增長的需求。在一個由創新和進步推動的行業中,ETH 2.0 是區塊鏈技術在為更可持續和高效的數字經濟鋪路方面能力的見證。

375 人學過發佈於 2024.04.04更新於 2024.12.03

什麼是 ETH 2.0

什麼是 ETH 3.0

ETH3.0 與 $eth 3.0:以深入分析以太坊的未來 介紹 在快速發展的加密貨幣和區塊鏈技術領域,ETH3.0,通常標記為 $eth 3.0,已成為一個備受關注和猜測的話題。該術語包含兩個主要概念,值得說明: 以太坊 3.0:這代表潛在的未來升級,旨在增強現有的以太坊區塊鏈的能力,特別集中於提高可擴展性和性能。ETH3.0 表情符號代幣:這個獨特的加密貨幣項目旨在利用以太坊區塊鏈創建一個以表情符號為中心的生態系統,促進加密貨幣社區的參與。 理解這些 ETH3.0 的方面不僅對加密愛好者至關重要,也對觀察數字空間中的更廣泛技術趨勢的人有所幫助。 什麼是 ETH3.0? 以太坊 3.0 以太坊 3.0 被認為是對已建立的以太坊網絡的擬議升級,自其誕生以來,它一直是許多去中心化應用程式(dApps)和智能合約的支柱。預想的增強主要集中於可擴展性——整合先進技術,如分片和零知識證明(zk-proofs)。這些技術創新旨在促進每秒交易數量的前所未有(TPS),潛在地達到數百萬筆,從而解決當前區塊鏈技術面臨的最重大限制之一。 這次改進不僅是技術性的,更是戰略性的;它旨在為以太坊網絡的普遍採用和未來的實用性做準備,因為該未來將面臨對去中心化解決方案日益增長的需求。 ETH3.0 表情符號代幣 與以太坊 3.0 不同,ETH3.0 表情符號代幣進入了一個更輕鬆和更具玩樂性的領域,通過將互聯網表情符號文化與加密貨幣動態相結合。該項目使用戶能夠在以太坊區塊鏈上購買、出售和交易表情符號,提供一個促進社區通過創造力和共同利益參與的平台。 ETH3.0 表情符號代幣旨在展示區塊鏈技術如何與數字文化交匯,創造出既有趣又具有經濟價值的使用案例。 誰是 ETH3.0 的創造者? 以太坊 3.0 對以太坊 3.0 的倡議主要由以太坊社區內的一個開發者和研究人員的聯盟推動,特別是包括 Justin Drake。他因對以太坊演變的見解和貢獻而聞名,Drake 在關於將以太坊轉變為新共識層的討論中是一個重要人物,這被稱為「Beam Chain」。 這種協作開發的方式標誌著以太坊 3.0 不是單一創造者的產品,而是集中精力促進區塊鏈技術進步的集體智慧的體現。 ETH3.0 表情符號代幣 關於 ETH3.0 表情符號代幣的創造者的詳細資料目前無法追溯。表情符號代幣的特性通常導致更分散和社區驅動的結構,這可以解釋為什麼缺乏具體的歸屬感。這與更廣泛的加密社區的精神相符,該社區的創新往往源於協作而非個人努力。 誰是 ETH3.0 的投資者? 以太坊 3.0 對以太坊 3.0 的支持主要來自以太坊基金會以及一個充滿熱情的開發者和投資者社區。這種基礎聯繫提供了相當程度的合法性,並增強了成功落實的前景,因為它利用了多年網絡運營建立的信任和可信度。 在快速變化的加密貨幣氣候中,社區支持在推動開發和採用中發揮了關鍵作用,將以太坊 3.0 置於未來區塊鏈進步的重要競爭者地位。 ETH3.0 表情符號代幣 雖然目前可用的來源並沒有明確提供支持 ETH3.0 表情符號代幣的投資機構或組織的具體信息,但這反映出表情符號代幣典型的資金模型,通常依賴於基層支持和社區參與。此類項目的投資者通常由因社區驅動的創新潛力以及在加密社區中發現的合作精神而受到激勵的個人組成。 ETH3.0 如何運作? 以太坊 3.0 以太坊 3.0 的區別特點在於其擬議的分片和零知識證明技術的實施。分片是一種將區塊鏈劃分為更小、更易管理的單元或「分片」的方法,這些分片能夠同時處理交易,而不是按序處理。這種處理的去中心化有助於避免擁堵,並確保即使在高負載下,網絡也能保持響應。 零知識證明(zk-proof)技術通過允許交易驗證而不揭示涉及的基本數據,增加了一層複雜性。這一方面不僅增強了隱私性,還提高了整個網絡的效率。還有討論將零知識以太坊虛擬機(zkEVM)納入此次升級,進一步擴大網絡的能力和實用性。 ETH3.0 表情符號代幣 ETH3.0 表情符號代幣通過利用表情符號文化的受歡迎程度而脫穎而出。它建立了一個市場,讓用戶參與表情符號交易,不僅僅是為了娛樂,也是為了潛在的經濟利益。通過整合質押、流動性供應和治理機制等特性,該項目營造了一種促進社區互動和參與的環境。 通過提供娛樂和經濟機會的獨特結合,ETH3.0 表情符號代幣旨在吸引多樣的觀眾,範圍從加密愛好者到隨便的表情符號愛好者。 ETH3.0 的時間表 以太坊 3.0 2024年11月11日:Justin Drake 暗示即將到來的 ETH 3.0 升級,重點是可擴展性改進。這一公告標誌著關於以太坊未來架構正式討論的開始。2024年11月12日:預期中的以太坊 3.0 提案將在曼谷的 Devcon 上公佈,為更廣泛的社區反饋和潛在的開發後續步驟奠定基礎。 ETH3.0 表情符號代幣 2024年3月21日:ETH3.0 表情符號代幣正式在 CoinMarketCap 上列出,標誌著其進入公眾加密領域,並增強了其基於表情符號的生態系統的可見性。 關鍵要點 總之,以太坊 3.0 代表了以太坊網絡內的重要演變,集中於通過先進技術克服可擴展性和性能的限制。其擬議的升級反映出對未來需求和可用性的主動應對。 另一方面,ETH3.0 表情符號代幣 encapsulates 加密貨幣領域中以社區為驅動文化的本質,利用表情符號文化來創建鼓勵用戶創造力和參與的平台。 理解 ETH3.0 和 $eth 3.0 的不同目的和功能對於任何對加密領域中正在進行的發展感興趣的人來說都是至關重要的。隨著這兩個倡議鋪展獨特的道路,它們共同凸顯了區塊鏈創新動態和多樣化的本質。

389 人學過發佈於 2024.04.04更新於 2024.12.03

什麼是 ETH 3.0

如何購買ETH

歡迎來到HTX.com!在這裡,購買Ethereum (ETH)變得簡單而便捷。跟隨我們的逐步指南,放心開始您的加密貨幣之旅。第一步:創建您的HTX帳戶使用您的 Email、手機號碼在HTX註冊一個免費帳戶。體驗無憂的註冊過程並解鎖所有平台功能。立即註冊第二步:前往買幣頁面,選擇您的支付方式信用卡/金融卡購買:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即時購買Ethereum (ETH)。餘額購買:使用您HTX帳戶餘額中的資金進行無縫交易。第三方購買:探索諸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方式以增加便利性。C2C購買:在HTX平台上直接與其他用戶交易。HTX 場外交易 (OTC) 購買:為大量交易者提供個性化服務和競爭性匯率。第三步:存儲您的Ethereum (ETH)購買Ethereum (ETH)後,將其存儲在您的HTX帳戶中。您也可以透過區塊鏈轉帳將其發送到其他地址或者用於交易其他加密貨幣。第四步:交易Ethereum (ETH)在HTX的現貨市場輕鬆交易Ethereum (ETH)。前往您的帳戶,選擇交易對,執行交易,並即時監控。HTX為初學者和經驗豐富的交易者提供了友好的用戶體驗。

4.8k 人學過發佈於 2024.12.10更新於 2026.06.02

如何購買ETH

相關討論

歡迎來到 HTX 社群。在這裡,您可以了解最新的平台發展動態並獲得專業的市場意見。 以下是用戶對 ETH (ETH)幣價的意見。

活动图片