The Harsh Truth About Crypto Infrastructure and M&A Deals

cryptonews.ru發佈於 2026-08-11更新於 2026-08-11

文章摘要

The brutal truth about crypto infrastructure and M&A deals The crypto industry faces a fundamental crisis: an overabundance of capital and technology, but a critical shortage of scalable consumer distribution channels. In their desperation to prove viability to investors, crypto startups have fallen into a costly trap—subsidizing paid pilot projects and partnerships with Web2 corporations and traditional financial institutions. However, 95% of these pilots never reach full-scale deployment. Web2 corporations are not interested in being long-term SaaS clients; they will simply acquire successful infrastructure outright when it proves valuable, as seen with Stripe/Bridge and Robinhood/Bitstamp. This marks the start of an aggressive consolidation cycle. Well-capitalized players and top-tier protocols will achieve inorganic growth by acquiring battle-tested infrastructure, licenses, and distribution channels at realistic valuations, while underfunded projects chasing pilots will fail. The coming consumer expansion will follow an 80/20 market split: 1. 80% will be controlled by a handful of regulated Web2/fintech giants (e.g., Visa, Stripe, PayPal) who provide the regulatory guardrails and user-friendly interfaces for mass adoption. 2. 20% will remain a permissionless DeFi "sandbox" for developers to build and test new on-chain primitives. Therefore, the path for Web3 startups is reversed. Founders must first prove product-market fit in the 20% DeFi sandbox. Scaling will not...

Then came the period of massive capital overhang. Venture funds raised billions during the previous cycle, leaving crypto company treasuries overflowing with unused cash. As the market matured, founders faced a harsh barrier — namely, an overabundance of technological primitives and an acute shortage of scalable consumer distribution channels.

To prove their venture's viability to their investors, crypto founders began to buy their way into the corporate world. They started paying Web2 enterprises and traditional financial institutions for design partnerships, pilot programs, and non-binding memoranda of understanding.

This is venture capital's deadliest trap, masking the real structural transformation happening in the digital asset space.

Why Paid Enterprise Pilots Are a Dead End

Here is the unvarnished truth about the current enterprise crypto market: Web2 corporations are not interested in your open-source innovations. They want your idle venture capital and revenue flow from day one.

Crypto startup founders spend hundreds of thousands from their treasuries to subsidize pilot projects with traditional financial institutions. The Web2 corporation gets paid to issue a press release, ticks a box for its internal innovation lab, and drags the Web3 team through an eighteen-month compliance audit.

The sad reality is that 95% of these pilots never reach production deployment. Web3 companies rarely succeed in onboarding traditional corporations as long-term, recurring SaaS customers, because the corporate architecture and risk appetite of Web2 companies are simply not built to scale third-party crypto-vendor software under their own brands.

Meanwhile, both sides are trapped in a B2B mirage. Crypto startups try to sell infrastructure to financial institutions. Financial institutions try to sell structured products to Web3 protocols. Both sides shake hands in a crowded hall, looking at an empty stadium: the retail consumer isn't there.

History is already familiar with this script:

  • The 2012–2018 Fintech Bank Labs Era: Early B2B fintech startups spent years paying traditional banks for proof-of-concept pilots. The banks reaped PR benefits, while almost none of the pilots evolved into actual consumer products.
  • The 1996–2001 Telecom Market Crash: After the Telecom Act, infrastructure startups raised over $500 billion to lay millions of miles of "dark" fiber, with zero proprietary consumer distribution channels. Over 90% went bankrupt. A decade later, four giants who combined distribution captured over 80% of the market value, launching consumer applications on those very channels.

Web2 Doesn't Rent Infrastructure — It Buys It

When a Web3 primitive does hit a real distribution market, incumbent Web2 players won't remain perpetual vendor customers. They will simply acquire the infrastructure and bring it in-house.

Look at how the market is already consolidating:

  • Stripe and Bridge: Stripe didn't sign a perpetual vendor contract to use a third-party stablecoin API. Once Bridge demonstrated $5B in annual cross-border volume, Stripe fully acquired the company for $1.1B to integrate stablecoin infrastructure directly into its global payments layer.
  • Robinhood and Bitstamp: Robinhood didn't partner with an external platform for international expansion. The company acquired Bitstamp for $200M, gaining over fifty global regulatory licenses and institutional liquidity in a single deal.

This shift marks the beginning of an aggressive M&A consolidation cycle. As underfunded protocols and pilot-chasing startups shutter, the market opens a rare window for strategic land grabs. For capitalized market players and top-tier Web3 protocols, the time for inorganic growth is now. Instead of spending years on unproven in-house R&D or subsidizing corporate pilots, acquiring battle-tested infrastructure, regulatory licenses, and established distribution channels at realistic valuations is the fastest way to capture market share.

For a Web3 startup aiming to become a true "unicorn" today, relying on open-source and paid enterprise partnerships is a dead end. Real defensibility now requires structural moats, such as proprietary regulatory licenses, deep network liquidity, or distribution lock-in mechanisms that a Web2 engineering team cannot replicate over a weekend.

How the Next Consumer Cycle Functions

The wave of protocol write-downs, startup shutdowns, and exploits we see today is not a sign of crypto's decline. It is necessary market "hygiene." It wipes out the "pilot hunters" and clears the field for the next cycle, creating perfect conditions where category leaders scoop up proven technology and distribution channels while the rest fall away.

The coming B2C expansion will not happen via thousands of standalone dApps struggling with wallet onboarding. It will happen through a stark 80/20 market split.

1. 80% (Regulated Consumer Gateways)

A small group of three to five Web2 and fintech giants, including companies like Visa, Stripe, Robinhood, PayPal, and BlackRock, will control 80% of total crypto market volume and retail liquidity. They will provide the missing components for mass adoption: regulatory shelter, compliance, fiat on/off ramps, and intuitive, uncomplicated UX. The end consumer won't even know they are using Web3 infrastructure. They will simply notice the transaction was instant and free.

2. 20% (DeFi R&D Proving Ground)

The remaining 20% will persist as an ungovernable, "Wild West" style DeFi sandbox. This is where developers will continue to build foundational on-chain primitives, test aggressive tokenomics, and validate initial Product-Market Fit (PMF) among crypto-native power users.

The New Startup Funnel

Within this paradigm, the path to scaling a Web3 company changes completely. Founders must first validate early Product-Market Fit (PMF) within the 20% DeFi sandbox. Once volume and utility are proven, scaling won't happen by building a standalone B2C brand from scratch. It will be achieved by plugging into one of the few regulated Web2 gateways controlling the 80% distribution layer—or being acquired by one.

The big winners of the coming B2C cycle will not be Web3 teams burning cash on non-binding corporate MOUs. They will be infrastructure teams quietly building institutional-grade foundational "rails," engineered for direct connection to Web2 distribution channels the moment the retail floodgates open.

熱門幣種推薦

相關問答

QAccording to the article, what is the main problem with Web3 startups paying traditional enterprises for pilot projects?

AThe main problem is that 95% of these paid pilot projects never reach serial implementation. Web2 corporations are not genuinely interested in the open-source innovations; they want the idle venture capital and immediate revenue stream. These projects rarely lead to Web3 startups acquiring traditional corporations as long-term SaaS clients, as the corporate architecture and risk appetite of Web2 companies are not designed to scale third-party crypto software under their own brands.

QWhat historical examples does the article give to illustrate the failure of the 'pay-for-pilots' model in other industries?

AThe article gives two historical examples: 1) The Fintech Bank Labs era (2012–2018), where early B2B fintech startups paid traditional banks for proof-of-concept pilots. The banks reaped PR benefits, but almost none of the pilots evolved into real consumer products. 2) The telecom market crash (1996–2001), where infrastructure startups raised over $500 billion to lay 'dark' fiber without their own consumer distribution channels, leading to over 90% of them going bankrupt. Later, a few giants captured the market value by launching consumer apps on that infrastructure.

QHow does the article describe the shift in Web2's approach to Web3 infrastructure, using Stripe and Robinhood as examples?

AThe article states that Web2 does not rent infrastructure; it buys it. When a Web3 primitive proves its value in a real distribution market, incumbent Web2 players do not become perpetual clients of suppliers. Instead, they acquire the infrastructure to bring it in-house. Examples given are: 1) Stripe acquiring Bridge for $1.1B to integrate its stablecoin infrastructure directly into its global payments layer, rather than signing a perpetual API contract. 2) Robinhood acquiring Bitstamp for $200M to gain over fifty global regulatory licenses and institutional liquidity in a single deal.

QWhat is the predicted 80/20 market structure for the next consumer crypto cycle, as outlined in the article?

AThe article predicts a strict 80/20 market bifurcation: 1) 80% (Regulated Consumer Gateways): A small group of three to five Web2/fintech giants (like Visa, Stripe, Robinhood, PayPal, BlackRock) will control 80% of crypto market volume and retail liquidity, providing regulatory safeguards, compliance, fiat integration, and intuitive UX. 2) 20% (DeFi R&D Sandbox): The remaining 20% will be a permissionless 'Wild West' DeFi sandbox where developers build core on-chain primitives, test aggressive tokenomics, and validate product-market fit among crypto-native users.

QWhat new startup funnel paradigm does the article propose for Web3 companies aiming to scale?

AThe article proposes that Web3 founders must first validate early product-market fit (PMF) within the 20% DeFi sandbox. Once volume and utility are proven, scaling will not happen by building a standalone B2C brand from scratch. Instead, it will be achieved by integrating into one of the few regulated Web2 gateways controlling the 80% distribution layer or by being acquired by one of them. The big winners will be infrastructure teams building institutional-grade 'rails' designed for direct connection to Web2 distribution channels.

你可能也喜歡

交易

現貨

熱門文章

什麼是 DOGE M

Doge Matrix ($doge m):新一代社區驅動的加密貨幣 介紹 在不斷演變的加密貨幣領域中,新項目不斷湧現,每個項目都旨在吸引投資者和愛好者的興趣。最近進入這一領域的項目之一是 Doge Matrix,代碼為 $doge m。這個項目因其根植於圍繞 Dogecoin 的流行迷因文化而受到關注,並在 web3 空間中確立了自己的地位。本文旨在對 Doge Matrix 進行全面分析,涵蓋其概述、創建者、投資者、功能、時間線和顯著特點。 Doge Matrix ($doge m) 是什麼? Doge Matrix 是一個社區驅動的加密貨幣項目,似乎建立在 Dogecoin 的廣泛吸引力之上,這是一種以柴犬吉祥物和迷因起源而聞名的數字貨幣。雖然 Doge Matrix 的總體目標並未明確定義,但它的特點是致力於利用社區的參與和支持。與傳統加密貨幣通常強調通過底層技術的實用性或內在價值不同,Doge Matrix 將自己定位於擁抱加密貨幣文化現象的空間,特別吸引那些與基於迷因的資產精神共鳴的人。 Doge Matrix 利用 Dogecoin 社區的優勢,作為更廣泛生態系統的一部分,邀請對加密貨幣和數字領域感興趣的用戶參與和互動。 Doge Matrix ($doge m) 的創建者是誰? Doge Matrix 的創建者身份仍然未知。這種缺乏透明度在加密貨幣領域並不罕見,一些項目在未透露其創始人身份的情況下啟動。關於創始團隊的信息缺失可能會引發潛在投資者對項目責任和方向的質疑。 Doge Matrix ($doge m) 的投資者是誰? 目前,沒有公開的資訊詳細說明支持 Doge Matrix 的投資者或投資基金。該項目似乎主要依賴社區支持,而非機構投資。這一模式與該倡議的社區驅動特性相一致,促進了一個由參與者塑造項目方向的環境,而不是由少數財務支持者主導。 Doge Matrix ($doge m) 如何運作? 關於 Doge Matrix 的運作機制的具體細節有些模糊,反映了迷因幣空間中項目的普遍趨勢,即創新功能並不總是清晰表達。儘管如此,Doge Matrix 似乎旨在通過鼓勵用戶參與來利用現有的加密貨幣生態系統,同時利用與 Dogecoin 相關的熟悉文化參考。 其潛在的獨特特徵源於社區互動,而非技術進步,強調代幣持有者之間的共享經驗和合作。雖然具體的創新尚未明確說明,但該項目似乎創造了一個社區成員可以互動、分享想法並推動項目潛力的空間。 Doge Matrix ($doge m) 的時間線 回顧該項目的時間線,顯示出一些定義其迄今為止旅程的重要事件: 2024年11月25日:Doge Matrix 達到其歷史最高價,標誌著其早期歷史中的一個重要里程碑。 2025年1月1日:相反,Doge Matrix 達到其歷史最低價,顯示出加密貨幣通常伴隨的波動性,特別是在項目生命周期的早期階段。 持續進行中:該項目仍在積極交易並得到其社區的支持,儘管具體的未來里程碑或目標尚未披露。 關於 Doge Matrix ($doge m) 的要點 社區焦點 Doge Matrix 的核心是對社區參與的承諾。該項目基於成員之間的合作和共同目標而蓬勃發展,強調集體努力的重要性。與通常有明確領導結構的集中式項目不同,Doge Matrix 目前展示了一種更靈活的治理方式,每位社區成員的聲音都很重要。 波動性 加密貨幣市場以其波動性而聞名,Doge Matrix 也不例外。其價格歷史反映出高低價值之間的顯著波動,這是許多新加密貨幣的典型特徵,但也強調了投資新興代幣所面臨的風險。 缺乏詳細信息 Doge Matrix 最引人注目的特點之一是關於其技術基礎和運作機制的詳細信息稀缺。這種模糊性使得潛在投資者在參與該項目之前必須進行徹底的盡職調查。 結論 總之,Doge Matrix ($doge m) 展示了一波新興的加密貨幣項目,這些項目在很大程度上依賴於社區參與和文化相關性。儘管在某些具體方面(如明確的領導、定義的目標和詳細的功能)有所欠缺,但該項目成功地在加密社區中引起了興趣,利用了迷因文化的既有吸引力。與任何加密貨幣投資一樣,理解固有風險並進行全面研究對於潛在參與者至關重要。Doge Matrix 是加密行業動態且有時不可預測的本質的提醒,標誌著不斷的演變和對社區驅動倡議的熱情。

803 人學過發佈於 2025.02.03更新於 2025.02.03

什麼是 DOGE M

什麼是 $M

理解 Mantis ($M):跨鏈互操作性的新時代 在不斷演變的 Web3 和加密貨幣領域,新項目努力提供創新的解決方案,旨在提升用戶體驗並擴展去中心化金融生態系統中的功能可能性。其中一個引起關注的項目是 Mantis ($M),這是一個基於跨鏈互操作性和基於意圖的結算原則的開創性協議。本文深入探討 Mantis 的基本方面,包括其核心功能、創建者、投資支持、創新特徵和關鍵里程碑。 Mantis ($M) 是什麼? Mantis 被描述為一個 多域意圖結算協議,簡化了跨鏈互動,使得用戶能夠在各種區塊鏈平台上無縫執行複雜的金融交易。該協議通過三個主要層次運作: 意圖表達:用戶可以使用由 DISE LLM 提供的自然語言來表達其交易目標,這是一種先進的 AI 語言模型。例如,用戶可能會表達希望以 1% 的滑點容忍度將以太坊 (ETH) 交換為索拉納 (SOL)。 執行:這一層利用一個解決者網絡,競爭以滿足用戶的意圖。交易通過如需求一致 (CoWs) 和訂單流拍賣 (OFAs) 等機制執行,確保用戶需求得到最佳滿足。 結算:利用跨區塊鏈通信 (IBC) 協議,Mantis 實現原子跨鏈交易,使用戶能夠在包括以太坊、索拉納和宇宙等各種支持的鏈上操作。 Mantis 被設計為為閒置資產引入 原生收益生成,並利用加密證明來保持整個過程中交易的完整性。 創建者與開發團隊 Mantis 由 Composable Foundation 構思,這是一個以研究為驅動的組織,以其對區塊鏈互操作性解決方案的重視而聞名。該基金會與包括哈佛大學和里斯本大學在內的著名學術機構合作,為 Mantis 的架構和功能提供廣泛的研究和開發支持。 Composable Foundation 致力於促進區塊鏈領域的創新,使 Mantis 成為滿足多個區塊鏈網絡間日益增長的互操作性需求的強大解決方案。 投資者與支持 儘管有關個別投資者的具體細節尚未公開披露,但 Mantis 享有來自多個實體的實質支持,包括: 來自 IBC 支持鏈的生態系統補助金,支持協議在去中心化金融生態系統中的增長和整合。 與基礎設施提供商的戰略夥伴關係,增強 Mantis 的網絡能力和部署策略。 通過 Composable Foundation 的財庫提供的資金,確保持續的財務支持以應對持續的開發和運營成本。 這些合作努力反映了利益相關者對增強跨鏈功能和 Mantis 基礎設施創新潛在效用的重要性達成共識。 主要創新 Mantis 通過幾項開創性創新來提升其功能和效用: 鏈無關意圖:用戶可以從任何支持的鏈發起交易,同時在另一條鏈上結算。這種靈活性賦予用戶權力,促進不同平台之間的互動。 AI 驅動的界面:DISE LLM 的整合使得用戶能夠使用自然語言進行複雜的 DeFi 操作,從而簡化互動,並使區塊鏈技術對更廣泛的受眾變得可及。 跨域 MEV 捕獲:Mantis 通過解決者之間的競爭創建了一個內部市場,以獲取最大可提取價值 (MEV)。這一創新方法允許在複雜交易中實現更高的效率和價值提取。 模組化結算層:該協議支持多種驗證方法,包括零知識證明和樂觀滾動,提供一個靈活的框架,可以適應新興的區塊鏈技術。 歷史時間表 Mantis 的發展標誌著幾個關鍵里程碑,描繪了其軌跡和增長: | 年份 | 里程碑 | |————|————————————————————————-| | 2022 | 在 Composable Foundation 的研究部門內進行初步概念開發。 | | 2024 第三季 | 啟動測試網,實現索拉納和以太坊之間的橋接能力。 | | 2025 第一季 | 預計代幣生成事件 (TGE) 與主網啟動同時進行。 | | 2025 第二季 | 預期整合 DISE LLM 並擴展跨鏈能力。 | | 2025 下半年 | 計劃通過進一步的 IBC 升級支持超過 15 條鏈。 | 這個時間表概述了 Mantis 的演變,從概念討論到積極實施和未來增長階段。 生態系統增長策略 Mantis 的生態系統增長策略包括幾項旨在鼓勵用戶參與和開發者參與的舉措: 信用系統:用戶可以通過提供流動性和參加推薦計劃來獲得協議信用。這些信用可在未來兌換獎勵,促進強大的用戶社區。 模組化軟件開發工具包 (SDK):這個工具包使開發者能夠基於意圖驅動模型利用 Mantis 的基礎設施創建應用程序,從而促進其生態系統內的創新。 治理模型:隨著協議的成熟,$M 代幣持有者將在協議治理中擁有發言權,允許他們對提議的升級和變更進行投票,從而增強社區參與和去中心化。 Mantis 代表了跨鏈架構領域的一個重大進展。通過無縫整合先進的 AI 算法和強大的結算框架,Mantis 努力解決多鏈生態系統中的碎片化問題。其創新方法優先考慮改善用戶體驗,同時遵循去中心化和安全性的基本原則,為未來區塊鏈技術的互操作性設立了新標準。 隨著 Mantis 繼續其增長和實施之旅,它承諾成為 Web3 和去中心化金融競爭格局中值得密切關注的項目。憑藉其跨越界限和提升用戶參與的重點,Mantis 預計將成為未來加密貨幣領域發展的重要組成部分。

481 人學過發佈於 2025.03.18更新於 2025.03.18

什麼是 $M

如何購買M

歡迎來到HTX.com!在這裡,購買MemeCore (M)變得簡單而便捷。跟隨我們的逐步指南,放心開始您的加密貨幣之旅。第一步:創建您的HTX帳戶使用您的 Email、手機號碼在HTX註冊一個免費帳戶。體驗無憂的註冊過程並解鎖所有平台功能。立即註冊第二步:前往買幣頁面,選擇您的支付方式信用卡/金融卡購買:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即時購買MemeCore (M)。餘額購買:使用您HTX帳戶餘額中的資金進行無縫交易。第三方購買:探索諸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方式以增加便利性。C2C購買:在HTX平台上直接與其他用戶交易。HTX 場外交易 (OTC) 購買:為大量交易者提供個性化服務和競爭性匯率。第三步:存儲您的MemeCore (M)購買MemeCore (M)後,將其存儲在您的HTX帳戶中。您也可以透過區塊鏈轉帳將其發送到其他地址或者用於交易其他加密貨幣。第四步:交易MemeCore (M)在HTX的現貨市場輕鬆交易MemeCore (M)。前往您的帳戶,選擇交易對,執行交易,並即時監控。HTX為初學者和經驗豐富的交易者提供了友好的用戶體驗。

1.5k 人學過發佈於 2025.07.02更新於 2026.06.02

如何購買M

相關討論

歡迎來到 HTX 社群。在這裡,您可以了解最新的平台發展動態並獲得專業的市場意見。 以下是用戶對 M (M)幣價的意見。

活动图片