Polymarket Reveals $205M in Unannounced Funding Rounds

TheCryptoTimes發佈於 2025-10-08更新於 2025-10-08

Prediction market platform Polymarket has disclosed two major funding rounds, worth around $205 million, that had not been publicly revealed before over the last two years.

On X, CEO Shayne Coplan shared details of two funding rounds. Earlier this year, the company raised $150 million, led by Founders Fund at a $1.2 billion valuation. 

The round also attracted a mix of well-known venture firms, including Ribbit Capital, Valor, Point72 Ventures, and Coinbase, along with prominent angel investors such as Naval Ravikant, Travis Kalanick, Rick Rubin, and Ron Conway, among others.

The previous year, just before the 2024 U.S. elections, Polymarket raised $55 million, led by Blockchain Capital at a $350 million valuation. That round also included major backers like Founders Fund, 1789, 1confirmation, Abstract, Coinbase, Dragonfly, ParaFi, and SV Angel, alongside high-profile angels such as Anthony Kiedis, Dylan Field, Mark Pincus, and others.

Together with earlier rounds, Polymarket’s total funding now stands at roughly $279 million before its recent partnership with Intercontinental Exchange (ICE).

The disclosure follows ICE’s announcement that it will invest up to $2 billion in Polymarket, giving the company a $9 billion post-money valuation. ICE, which owns the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), said the partnership will make it a global distributor of Polymarket’s event-based data and explore ways to bring tokenization into traditional markets.

A new chapter for Polymarket

Polymarket reached a new milestone, recording its highest-ever monthly total of new markets. According to data from Block, over 33,320 markets were created in October, more than doubling August’s previous record of 13,800. 

The surge comes as the platform prepares for its return to the U.S., following a no-action letter from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) that clarified rules around event contracts.

Last month, Polymarket also signaled plans for a native token launch through an updated U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing. Its parent company, Blockratize Inc., added a new category, “Option, Warrant or Other Right to Acquire Another Security,” to its Form D. The new addition suggests Polymarket may be preparing to issue its own token.

Also Read: Bitcoin Has 71% Chance to Hit $126K in Uptober Rally: Polymarket


Mobile Only Image

你可能也喜歡

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

作者王健硕在2026年5月回看其于2023年3月对ChatGPT做出的二十条预测,并借助AI代理进行验证。整体看,其大方向判断多正确,但细节和程度常有偏差。 **看对的方面:** - **技术架构**:准确预测RAG(检索增强生成)将成为解决知识更新和幻觉的主流方法,以及LUI(自然语言用户界面)将催生巨大新产业。 - **发展趋势**:预见到“机器人网络”和新的agent寻址系统将出现,中国能快速做出可用大模型并缩小与顶尖差距。 - **本质认知**:正确指出ChatGPT没有意识,图灵测试仅测表象;判断其是巨大进步但非AGI,且短期内不会造成整体失业潮。 **看错或看偏的方面:** - **具体数据错误**:关于GPT-4有100T参数的传闻完全错误。 - **绝对化判断**:断言LLM“不可能”自己学好数学被后来模型在IMO夺金证伪;认为AI生成内容可“规避”版权,实则引发史上最大侵权赔偿。 - **价值与成本误判**:认为价值终落应用层,但最大赢家是算力层(如英伟达);模型成本“5-10亿封顶”的估算严重偏离实际。 - **社会影响误读**:认为ChatGPT的“加权平均”特性可能促进“世界大同”,但实际AI正走向个性化,并可能制造新信息茧房。 **总结规律:** 1. 预测机制和方向比具体数字更可靠。 2. 倾向于高估短期变化速度,低估长期影响程度。 3. 容易忽略问题内部的“分布”差异(如失业影响集中在年轻群体)。 4. 留有餘地、分层表述的判断更经得起时间检验。 5. 一些根本性争议,三年时间仍不足以给出定论。 这次复盘旨在为未来的判断立下更审慎的规矩。

marsbit2 小時前

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

marsbit2 小時前

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

2023年3月,在GPT-4发布前,作者王健硕对ChatGPT的未来做出了二十项预测。三年后的2026年,他使用AI agent对这些判断进行回顾验证,评估其准确性。 **主要看对的方面:** 1. **RAG成为主流**:预测通过外部检索而非修改模型来解决知识更新和幻觉问题,这已成为行业标准架构。 2. **LUI(自然语言界面)兴起**:预测自然语言交互将催生巨大新产业,Agent、MCP协议等发展印证了这一点,但LUI是与GUI共存而非取代。 3. **机器人网络与新寻址系统**:预测Agent将自动协作并需要新寻址方式,MCP、A2A等协议正朝此方向发展。 4. **中国能做出可用大模型**:预测中美模型差距会迅速缩小,事实如此,但真正领先的国内厂商与其当初点名不同。 5. **AI无意识与图灵测试本质**:核心判断“AI无意识,图灵测试仅测表象”基本成立,但“绝无意识”的绝对论断被后续研究置于灰区。 **看错或看偏的方面:** 1. **GPT-4参数数量**:所传“100T参数”严重错误,实际约为1.8T。 2. **LLM的数学能力**:诊断“数学差需外挂工具”正确,但“不可能自行学会”的结论被后续“推理模型”在IMO夺金证伪。 3. **价值捕获**:预测价值在应用层,但现实中算力层(如英伟达)捕获了最大利润,模型层反而亏损。 4. **版权问题**:判断“生成物可能无法登记版权”正确,但认为能“规避侵权”则错误,已出现巨额侵权赔偿案例。 5. **信息茧房与世界大同**:机制上AI会将观点向众数平均,但AI正快速走向“千人千面”的个性化,可能制造新茧房而非消解极化。 6. **大模型成本**:预测“局部战争”和玩家涌入正确,但“5-10亿美元封顶”的成本估算与前沿训练实际花费严重不符。 **总结规律:** 1. 判断**方向和机制**比具体数字、程度更可靠。 2. 倾向于**高估短期变化速度,低估长期能力上限**。 3. 容易忽略**问题内部的分布差异**(如总量正确但部分群体受损)。 4. **留有餘地、分层表述**的判断更经得起时间检验。 5. 一些根本性争论,**三年时间不足以给出最终答案**。 这次回顾表明,在快速变化的领域,把握大方向比追求精确预测更重要,同时需警惕绝对化表述并承认认知的局限性。

链捕手4 小時前

三年之后:回看 2023 年我对 ChatGPT 的判断

链捕手4 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片