Solana Greenlights Alpenglow, Its Most Explosive Upgrade Yet

bitcoinist發佈於 2025-09-03更新於 2025-09-03

文章摘要

Solana validators have overwhelmingly approved SIMD-0326 “Alpenglow,” a sweeping consensus rewrite that aims to cut transaction finality from roughly 12.8...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Solana validators have overwhelmingly approved SIMD-0326 “Alpenglow,” a sweeping consensus rewrite that aims to cut transaction finality from roughly 12.8 seconds to about 150 milliseconds—a 100x reduction that developers and observers are already calling the most consequential upgrade in the network’s history. According to the official tally shared via Solana Status, 98.27% of stake voted Yes, 1.05% voted No, and 0.69% abstained, with 52% of total stake participating.

Solana Slashes Finality By 100x

“The community governance process for SIMD-0326: Alpenglow is complete. The proposal has passed: 98.27% Yes, 1.05% No, 0.69% Abstain; 52% of stake cast a vote,” Solana Status posted on X on September 2. Anza, the Solana R&D firm that authored the proposal, added context for operators: “Mainnet-beta is in epoch 843 which concludes the voting process for SIMD-0326: Alpenglow. The proposal has passed with 98% of stake voting Yes.”

Alpenglow replaces core elements of the existing consensus—Proof-of-History (PoH) and TowerBFT—with two new components designed for real-time performance: Votor, a direct-vote finality engine that achieves sub-second confirmations via single-round finalization in the “fast path” (when ~80% of stake is responsive) or two rounds in a 60% fallback; and Rotor, a streamlined block propagation layer intended to supplant Turbine and cut network overhead.

In practice, that architecture is what underpins the ~150–200 ms confirmation targets. Beyond raw speed, Alpenglow touches validator economics and fault tolerance. With vote transactions moving off-chain, Solana will eliminate per-slot vote fees and introduce a fixed Validator Admission Ticket (VAT)—initially 1.6 SOL per epoch—that is burned.

The model aims to preserve economic friction against spam even as vote traffic leaves the ledger, while simplifying load on the network. Separately, the design targets a “20+20” resilience envelope: safety if up to 20% of stake is adversarial and liveness if an additional, disjoint 20% is offline. These mechanics were debated in the forum during the governance window and were reiterated in technical explainers ahead of the vote.

Governance mechanics and timeline. The governance process followed the steps laid out on the Solana forum: discussion in epochs 833–838, stake weights captured in epoch 839, and voting in epochs 840–842, with passage defined as Yes ≥ two-thirds of (Yes + No) and a 33% quorum in which abstentions count toward quorum. Anza’s epoch-843 note simply marks the moment the chain passed the voting boundary on mainnet-beta.

With the validator signal secured, Alpenglow now moves from governance to engineering reality. Whether it ultimately delivers stable ~150 ms finality at scale is a question only testnet and mainnet can answer—but the 98% approval makes clear the Solana ecosystem’s directional bet: real-time blockchain. An official implementation schedule remains forthcoming.

At press time, SOL traded at $209.

Solana price
SOL price fights key resistance, 1-week chart | Source: SOLUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

你可能也喜歡

世界模型、元宇宙、数字孪生、物理AI:它们是一回事吗?

过去几年,元宇宙、Web3.0、仿真数据平台、数字孪生、物理AI等概念轮番登场。它们与世界模型并非同一回事,但都指向数字世界与物理世界边界模糊的大趋势。世界模型更像是这些概念的“认知层”或“底层操作系统”,负责让AI理解并推演世界。 这些概念大致可分三类:一是“空间体验”如元宇宙;二是“生产关系”如Web3.0;三是“技术能力”如仿真数据平台、数字孪生、物理AI和世界模型。世界模型属于第三类,且更为底层。 具体来看:元宇宙是虚拟空间体验,世界模型可能成为其内容生成的“发动机”。Web3.0聚焦于所有权与经济规则,与世界模型基本不在同一技术图层。仿真数据平台可视为世界模型的1.0版本,后者旨在实现场景生成的智能化。数字孪生是现实的镜像,而世界模型更进一步,具备预测未来的能力。物理AI指能在物理世界行动的AI,世界模型是其理解与推演世界的核心组件。 在层次结构中,世界模型处于认知层,向上支撑应用工具层(如仿真平台、数字孪生)、行动层(物理AI)和体验层(元宇宙),向下依赖算力和数据。它可能成为连接数字与物理世界的共同底座,就像操作系统支撑各类应用。这些概念当初描绘的愿景,其实现很可能离不开世界模型的发展。

marsbit1 小時前

世界模型、元宇宙、数字孪生、物理AI:它们是一回事吗?

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片