Nearly 90% Of Crypto Firms Fail UK’s AML Standards—What’s Going Wrong?

bitcoinist發佈於 2024-09-06更新於 2024-09-07

文章摘要

The turbulent UK cryptocurrency landscape sees the Financial Conduct Authority report that 87% of crypto registration applications failed in the...

The turbulent UK cryptocurrency landscape sees the Financial Conduct Authority report that 87% of crypto registration applications failed in the last fiscal year.

This is a staggering fact that brings up very serious questions concerning the effectiveness of anti-money laundering controls in the industry. Only four out of 35 applications were approved, underlining how tough the regulatory environment remains.

Struggling To Meet Standards

The FCA has been acting as the regulator for crypto businesses since January 2020, overseeing compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing, and Transfer of Funds Regulations.

Overall, the report states that this high number of firms falls short of the required standard. This was because most applications were refused on the grounds of unsatisfactory fraud and AML controls necessary for assurance that illicit funds do not penetrate the financial system.

The UK FCA denied the applications of nearly 90% of crypto registrations. Source: FCA

FCA Chair Charles Randell commented:

“Although some firms have shown adequate systems, too many have failed to meet acceptable standards of risk management and controls to date, leading to this wave of rejections and withdrawals.”

But the new European Union regulations, including Markets in Crypto-Assets, or MiCA framework, have made things even more complex. While these rules aim at better regulating crypto assets, they also add further layers of complexity to UK firms already battling local compliance issues.

With rules yet to be implemented, many are wondering if the UK will still be a viable market for crypto operations.

A New Era Of Regulation

The FCA report contributes to the larger initiative aiming at increasing regulatory control of the crypto sector. This also entails the building of a new “Crypto Cell” at the National Crime Agency with more authority to handle crimes connected to cryptocurrencies.

This division will be responsible for investigations and law enforcement support; this therefore reinforces the government’s commitment to stamping out financial crime in this fast-changing sector.

Total crypto market cap currently at $1.9 trillion. Chart: TradingView

However, the FCA has been so strict in its stance that crypto firms are growing frustrated. Many have complained of months of delays and inadequate feedback within the registration process.

Some firms have decided to go overseas in search of easier legal environments for their operations, nonetheless serving UK clients. This issue raises questions about UK competitiveness in the crypto space, at least for companies seeking friendlier regimes for their activities.

The Future Of Crypto In The UK

Under the incoming Labor government, the future of crypto legislation rests in the balance; the UK government has put plans involving cryptocurrencies on the sidelines.

Although the FCA intends to assist companies through the registration procedure, the significant failure rate indicates a long way to go for establishing confidence and system clarity.

Pressure is mounting for authorities and companies to strike a suitable balance between compliance and creativity as only 44 companies effectively registered since the FCA started supervising the sector.

While incoming rules under MiCA could provide a path towards improved governance, the UK’s crypto scene is probably going to stay problematic until then.

Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

Christian Encila

Christian Encila

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

你可能也喜歡

世界模型、元宇宙、数字孪生、物理AI:它们是一回事吗?

过去几年,元宇宙、Web3.0、仿真数据平台、数字孪生、物理AI等概念轮番登场。它们与世界模型并非同一回事,但都指向数字世界与物理世界边界模糊的大趋势。世界模型更像是这些概念的“认知层”或“底层操作系统”,负责让AI理解并推演世界。 这些概念大致可分三类:一是“空间体验”如元宇宙;二是“生产关系”如Web3.0;三是“技术能力”如仿真数据平台、数字孪生、物理AI和世界模型。世界模型属于第三类,且更为底层。 具体来看:元宇宙是虚拟空间体验,世界模型可能成为其内容生成的“发动机”。Web3.0聚焦于所有权与经济规则,与世界模型基本不在同一技术图层。仿真数据平台可视为世界模型的1.0版本,后者旨在实现场景生成的智能化。数字孪生是现实的镜像,而世界模型更进一步,具备预测未来的能力。物理AI指能在物理世界行动的AI,世界模型是其理解与推演世界的核心组件。 在层次结构中,世界模型处于认知层,向上支撑应用工具层(如仿真平台、数字孪生)、行动层(物理AI)和体验层(元宇宙),向下依赖算力和数据。它可能成为连接数字与物理世界的共同底座,就像操作系统支撑各类应用。这些概念当初描绘的愿景,其实现很可能离不开世界模型的发展。

marsbit1 小時前

世界模型、元宇宙、数字孪生、物理AI:它们是一回事吗?

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片