CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2024-05-02更新於 2024-05-03

文章摘要

The defunct crypto lender filed for bankruptcy in 2020.

Three former executives with bankrupt crypto lender Cred were indicted Thursday on charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud and engaging in financial transactions for illicit purposes.

Daniel Schatt, a Cred co-founder and former CEO, Joseph Podulka, former CFO, and James Alexander, the former chief capital officer, were indicted by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Northern District of California. Schatt and Podulka were arrested and made their initial appearances in a San Francisco court earlier in the day, according to a press release published Friday.

Cred filed for bankruptcy in November 2020, estimating its liabilities to be between $100 million and $500 million at the time, but saying it had less than $100 million in estimated assets. At the time, the company blamed its failure on "irregularities" in how "specific corporate funds" were handled. A reorganization plan was later approved by a federal judge, according to court records.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Cred was among the first of a slate of high-profile crypto lender bankruptcies – preceding 2022's Celsius and Voyager bankruptcies by around two years.

Similar to these other failed companies, Cred offered a lending program, "CredEarn," that accepted deposits from investors and offered market-leading interest rates before it filed for bankruptcy without enough money to pay back creditors. Depositors had entrusted more than $100 million worth of crypto with Cred by the time it collapsed.

"[T]he defendants lured customers to make investments by promising to return a significant yield on cryptocurrency investments—the defendants did not disclose, however, that virtually all the assets to pay the yield were generated by a single company whose business was to make unsecured micro-loans to Chinese gamers," the U.S. Department of Justice said in a press release.

"Contrary to the defendants’ assurances, Cred engaged in lending that was neither collateralized nor guaranteed. Moreover, Cred’s hedging strategy did not protect the company’s investments against volatility," the statement read.

"The Cred Liquidation Trust and its professionals have been working tirelessly to pursue recoveries for creditors. We spent a lot of time and effort cooperating with law enforcement. We are thankful for the hard work and diligence by the DOJ and FBI, which resulted in indictments of the key executives responsible for the first major crypto bankruptcy case in the United States," said attorneys Darren Azman and Joseph Evans with McDermott Will & Emery LLP, who are the lead counsel for the Cred Inc. Liquidation Trust.

Advertisement
Advertisement

In its 2020 bankruptcy filing, Cred put most of the blame for its collapse on the failure of an outside investment manager, Quantcoin, with whom Cred entrusted 800 BTC – worth around $10 million at the time. Later on, the Cred Liquidation Trust alleged in a lawsuit that most of the lost customer funds had, in fact, been quietly loaned out to the Chinese micro-lender MoKredit, which ultimately failed to repay its debts.

MoKredit made most of its money from unsecured loans to Chinese gamers, and its relationship with Cred – along with the fact that the two companies shared a co-founder – was not properly disclosed to Cred creditors, according to Friday's indictment.

The Cred Liquidation Trust has separately alleged that Cred funneled users into CredEarn through the retail-oriented crypto exchange Uphold, which at one point counted Cred Founder Dan Schatt as a board member. '"Uphold drove thousands of retail customers to lend cryptocurrency to the CredEarn program by falsely marketing it as 'safe,' 'secured,' 'insured,' and 'fully hedged,'" the suit read.

According to the suit, which was dismissed earlier this year, CredEarn was initially supposed to be called "UpholdEarn" but was renamed to avoid regulatory risk.

"Uphold knew that Cred was implementing a highly risky hedging strategy, and that there was regulatory risk associated with cryptocurrency yield earning programs," read the suit. "Rather than take on all of these risks, Uphold and Schatt decided to shift the risks away from Uphold by running ['Earn'] through Cred."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Uphold denied the claims in the lawsuit and said Schatt was removed from its board involuntarily. Although the lawsuit from Cred's Liquidation Trust was dismissed (that dismissal was upheld on appeal), an additional class action suit from Cred's creditors against Uphold is still pending.

你可能也喜歡

巨头打响Context之战,重构AI护城河

今年以来,美国AI三巨头(OpenAI、Anthropic、Google)围绕“Context”(上下文/语境)展开激烈竞争,这正在重构AI时代的护城河。 Context的含义已从最初衡量模型输入长度的技术参数,演变为涵盖用户资产、工具权限、任务状态和个性化理解的综合概念。竞争经历了三次跃迁: 1. **长上下文窗口**:早期比拼模型一次性能处理多少文本,从数万字迅速扩展到百万级。 2. **跨会话记忆(Memory)**:焦点转向AI能否长期记住用户偏好和历史交互,建立连续性关系。 3. **进入真实环境**:最新趋势是AI通过浏览器、桌面应用和GUI操作能力,主动进入用户任务现场,获取动态、实时的Context。 三家巨头路径各异: * **OpenAI**:以ChatGPT账户为核心,反向整合各种场景(应用、浏览器、编程),使其成为汇聚和调用Context的中枢。 * **Anthropic**:聚焦高价值垂直场景(如编程、Agent),通过Computer Use(GUI操作)和MCP(工具连接协议)主动获取任务环境中的动态Context。 * **Google**:面临将海量但分散的旧有数据(搜索、邮件、文档等)重构为AI可理解、可用的任务型Context的工程挑战,正逐步将其生态产品转化为Gemini的个性化背景。 竞争逻辑正从互联网时代的“网络规模”转向AI时代的“个体纵深”。护城河不再仅依赖于用户数量,而更取决于: 1. **Context的复利**:AI在每次任务中加深对用户的理解,降低后续冷启动成本。 2. **权限与工具链的嵌入**:AI获得授权进入真实工作流,迁移成本变高。 3. **信任关系的形成**:长期、可靠的服务才能获得执行复杂任务的权限。 AI产品争夺的是“任务入口”。国内如腾讯等公司,其挑战也在于如何将存量生态(关系、内容、服务)高效转化为AI可进入和调用的任务Context。这场Context之战的核心,是看谁能将生态更快转化为AI的工作环境,并在深度理解用户中建立新壁垒。

marsbit2 小時前

巨头打响Context之战,重构AI护城河

marsbit2 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片