Craig Wright Witnesses Face Questions About Their Memories in COPA Trial

CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2024-02-14更新於 2024-02-15

文章摘要

Lawyers for the Crypto Open Patent Alliance declared that the recollection of the witnesses today was "hazy" and "confused."

  • Craig Wright witnesses Ignatius Pang, Robert Jenkins and Shoaib Yousef took to the stand on Thursday.
  • Lawyers for the Crypto Open Patent Alliance questioned the soundness of the three witnesses' memories.
  • The trial on whether or not Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, bitcoin's creator, is still ongoing.

Lawyers for the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) questioned the soundness of Craig Wright's witnesses' memories on Thursday in an ongoing trial probing whether or not he is – as Wright claims – Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto.

Three witnesses testified virtually, including Ignatius Pang, who has known Wright since 2007. His statement centered around a memory of Wright asking him to build a LEGO blockchain in 2008, which Wright likened to a Chinese recursive chain puzzle.

Another witness, Robert Jenkins, testified that he had conversations with Wright around 2009 or 2010 about concepts tied to bitcoin and blockchains.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Shoaib Yousef, the last witness to testify Thursday, said he discussed digital currency with Wright in the late 2000s.

Jonathan Moss, an attorney representing COPA, questioned whether the witnesses could accurately recall events from "16 years ago." Both Jenkins and Yousef agreed it may be difficult to recount events from that far back.

"I would suggest to you that you have confused these dates and details as you are looking back with the hindsight of what you now know," Moss told Jenkins.

Jonathan Hough, another COPA attorney, made a similar statement to Pang: "All I am saying to you is this hazy recollection is not a reliable recollection."

Wright was taken to court by COPA in the beginning of February in an effort to prove he is not Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of bitcoin (BTC). Wright himself took the stand last week and faced a week’s worth of questioning, which came to a close on Wednesday.

The trial is set to continue on Friday, when three additional witnesses will take the stand.

Edited by Parikshit Mishra and Nikhilesh De.

你可能也喜歡

AI 巨头的「Token 补贴大战」,快打完了吗?

AI巨头间的“Token补贴大战”正趋于白热化,但这场竞争的性质和可能结局与互联网时代的补贴战截然不同。 目前,OpenAI和Anthropic等公司的订阅套餐存在巨额补贴,高端套餐用户享受到的Token价值可能是其付费的数十倍。这种“逆向定价”旨在用亏损绑定重度用户和开发者。然而,与滴滴、美团等通过补贴建立用户锁定效应的模式不同,AI Token的切换成本极低——用户几乎可以无成本地在不同AI模型间迁移。这意味着补贴无法构筑护城河,一旦停止,用户可能迅速流失。 竞争格局呈现结构性不对称。谷歌凭借每年超3000亿美元的广告收入,拥有可持续补贴Token的“印钞机”,而OpenAI和Anthropic则依赖融资,未来上市后将面临盈利压力。Google Ventures创始人Bill Maris指出,谷歌完全有能力将Token价格再降80%,这将给竞争对手带来严峻挑战。 关于终局,文章认为存在两种可能:一是“互联网服务”剧本,通过补贴实现垄断后涨价;二是“水电煤”剧本,Token成为标准化基础资源,价格被压向成本线,利润率趋近于零。由于Token缺乏锁定效应,第二种可能性更大。这意味着AI竞争可能是一场没有明确赢家的“无限游戏”,参战者的核心目标是确保自己始终留在牌桌上,通过竞争共同推动技术普及和生态壮大。 最终,AI可能像电力一样,成为一种任何公司都无法独占的公共基础设施。这对用户而言或许是好事,只要补贴战持续,就能以极低成本享用强大算力。但对OpenAI和Anthropic等公司而言,它们所追逐的靠AI赚取暴利的梦想,可能从结构上就难以实现。

marsbit24 分鐘前

AI 巨头的「Token 补贴大战」,快打完了吗?

marsbit24 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片