Prometheum, the Only U.S.-Registered Crypto Platform, Picks Ether as Its First Product

CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2024-02-06更新於 2024-02-07

文章摘要

The much-debated crypto broker says it's poised to start its SEC-compliant custody with ETH, then will soon add other names and begin a trading operation within months.

  • Prometheum is seeking to blaze a new trail as an SEC-compliant crypto firm, beginning with a custody operation that intends to start its business by holding customers' ETH.
  • The company's executives say the firm will follow with a number of other tokens before launching its trading operations, targeting the second quarter of 2024 to open its doors.

Prometheum Inc. – still standing alone as the only U.S.-registered crypto securities platform – has disclosed that the first digital asset it'll handle for clients will be Ethereum's ether (ETH).

The company, which has been a target of industry criticism and debate, hasn't yet taken in any revenue after having only very recently cleared the final regulatory hurdle to open its custody operation. But co-CEOs Aaron and Benjamin Kaplan said they'll take on custody of customers' ETH by the end of next month.

"We want to be able to service the largest market cap and most liquid token," said Aaron Kaplan in an interview with CoinDesk. "Ethereum is first, and there should be many more thereafter."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Prometheum represents a high-stakes test case in U.S. crypto. It's the first firm to attempt to go through all the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's compliance hurdles to set itself up as a special-purpose broker-dealer and crypto custodian through the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. And next quarter, Prometheum's executives said they intend to open the doors of their alternative trading system – a kind of U.S. trading venue that is similar to a full-fledged exchange but with fewer compliance requirements.

At that point, the company will either be proving the claims of its executives that crypto can be handled in the U.S. in a way that appeases the securities watchdog, or proving the naysayers who argue that it's impossible to meet the SEC's expectations. The stakes aren't just high for Prometheum and the rest of the industry, but also for the government agency that has claimed for years that there's a proper way for crypto firms to "come in and register" to do business in the U.S.; Prometheum came in and registered but what happens next is unclear. And while it tests these murky waters, it may also help establish whether the SEC intends to view ETH as a security.

Prometheum's choice of ETH as its opening asset could come with its own complications. Unlike bitcoin (BTC), which the SEC has openly declared isn't a security and is therefore none of the agency's business, the commission has been more coy about whether ETH is among the digital tokens that should be considered securities that fall under its jurisdiction. Its sister agency, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, hasn't been so shy about declaring that ETH is definitely a commodity.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Prometheum is registered to custody crypto securities and isn't in the commodities business. Ben Kaplan said the firm will go with whatever the SEC's word is on ETH.

"The CFTC is not our regulator," he said. "When the SEC says to us, 'It's not a security,' then we'll be troubled."

The startup, which Aaron Kaplan has said has about 50 employees, is seeing "immense interest" in its service as a so-called "qualified custodian," though it hasn't yet confirmed any institutional names that may do business there. It intends to service asset managers, hedge funds, investment advisers, banks and other financial institutions.

"A lot of people got burned in 2022," he said, referring to the turmoil involving the under-regulated U.S. industry.

Prometheum may get a tremendous shot in the arm if the SEC follows through with a rule it proposed to require registered investment advisers only be allowed to park their customers' crypto assets with qualified custodians. That list typically includes registered broker-dealers and banks, but SEC Chair Gary Gensler has argued it probably doesn't include today's major crypto exchanges. The rule is on the agency's public agenda to be finalized by April, though such agendas often prove overly ambitious.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Whether the SEC finishes the rule or not, Aaron Kaplan contended that traditional financial firms will want to deal with a service that's properly registered and "speaking the same compliance language."

He argued that the company could also benefit from the trend toward asset tokenization, because that practice needs a firm that can trade, clear and settle in one place.

The outcome of Prometheum's business plan and whether the SEC stays silent or attempts to intervene isn't the only uncertainty facing the firm. As with the rest of the sector, its future could be steered by ongoing court cases that promise answers on how crypto securities will be defined.

If courts side with the recent Coinbase arguments in its case with the SEC that cryptocurrencies traded on a secondary market don't carry explicit contracts and aren't securities, such a decision could affect the universe of securities Prometheum can host on its platform.

Edited by Nick Baker.

你可能也喜歡

租来的信仰:比特币ETF资金流里,有多少是真钱

文章《租来的信仰:比特币ETF资金流里,有多少是真钱》揭示了比特币ETF每周资金流入数据的真实构成。核心观点是,这些数据常被误解为纯粹的机构看多情绪,但实际上很大程度上受到一笔“期现套利”交易的影响。 套利者会同时买入ETF并在芝加哥商品交易所做空等值的比特币期货,以此锁定期货与现货之间的价差利润,而完全对冲了比特币价格波动的风险。这种“delta中性”的交易在数据上同样表现为ETF资金流入,与真正的信仰买盘难以区分。数据分析显示,每周资金流波动中约一半可由对冲基金新增的期货空头来解释,两者相关性高达0.70。相比之下,比特币当周的价格涨跌几乎无法预测资金流。 然而,这种套利交易主要驱动的是资金流的短期“波动”,而非长期“存量”。自ETF推出以来累计约550亿美元的净流入中,当前由套利交易贡献的净额仅约10亿美元。其余是稳定的、方向性的买盘,大约每周4亿美元,长期复利积累构成了持仓的主体。套利头寸在ETF总资产中的占比已从2024年高峰时的约14%降至目前的约4%-5%。 文章指出,这笔套利交易已持续离场近两年。当期货基差收益(套利空间)收窄至无利可图时,相关的ETF资金流入和对冲空头会同步消退。因此,不应将基差收窄时的资金流出简单解读为市场看空比特币。 总之,比特币ETF资金流数据高估了市场信仰的“波动率”,而非其“水平”。解读该数据时,应结合期货基差收益和杠杆基金的净空头头寸变化,以辨别其中有多少是“租来的”套利资金,多少是“自有的”真实买盘。

marsbit4 分鐘前

租来的信仰:比特币ETF资金流里,有多少是真钱

marsbit4 分鐘前

格林斯潘去世:他写下的市场规则,沃什正在改写

2026年6月22日,前美联储主席艾伦·格林斯潘去世,享年100岁。他留下的货币政策遗产——“格林斯潘卖权”和市场信条“别和美联储作对”,至今深刻影响着全球金融市场。 格林斯潘于1987年上任后,迅速以“提供流动性”应对“黑色星期一”股灾,奠定了美联储在危机中为市场托底的预期。1994年他果断加息控制通胀,展现了其政策的另一面。1998年协调救助长期资本管理公司,强化了“大而不倒”的逻辑。然而,2000年后他将利率降至1%并维持一年,被部分观点认为助推了房地产泡沫,为2008年金融危机埋下伏笔。 格林斯潘卸任后声誉历经起伏,但其塑造的央行干预市场预期和行为范式持续存在。 就在他去世前几天,现任美联储主席凯文·沃什启动了对美联储运作方式的全盘重审,成立了多个专项工作组,意图从“第一性原理”出发审视现有框架。沃什可能弱化或取消“前瞻性指引”,这动摇了市场赖以预测美联储行动的基石。若此,格林斯潘时代留下的“央行明确托底”预期将面临根本性改变。 格林斯潘代表了一个央行自信能管理市场的时代,而沃什面对的则是一个更复杂、充满怀疑的时代。格林斯潘的逝世,象征着一个货币政策范式的终结,美联储正试图在没有“大师”指引的情况下,独自前行。

marsbit20 分鐘前

格林斯潘去世:他写下的市场规则,沃什正在改写

marsbit20 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片