Prometheum, the Only U.S.-Registered Crypto Platform, Picks Ether as Its First Product

CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2024-02-06更新於 2024-02-07

文章摘要

The much-debated crypto broker says it's poised to start its SEC-compliant custody with ETH, then will soon add other names and begin a trading operation within months.

  • Prometheum is seeking to blaze a new trail as an SEC-compliant crypto firm, beginning with a custody operation that intends to start its business by holding customers' ETH.
  • The company's executives say the firm will follow with a number of other tokens before launching its trading operations, targeting the second quarter of 2024 to open its doors.

Prometheum Inc. – still standing alone as the only U.S.-registered crypto securities platform – has disclosed that the first digital asset it'll handle for clients will be Ethereum's ether (ETH).

The company, which has been a target of industry criticism and debate, hasn't yet taken in any revenue after having only very recently cleared the final regulatory hurdle to open its custody operation. But co-CEOs Aaron and Benjamin Kaplan said they'll take on custody of customers' ETH by the end of next month.

"We want to be able to service the largest market cap and most liquid token," said Aaron Kaplan in an interview with CoinDesk. "Ethereum is first, and there should be many more thereafter."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Prometheum represents a high-stakes test case in U.S. crypto. It's the first firm to attempt to go through all the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's compliance hurdles to set itself up as a special-purpose broker-dealer and crypto custodian through the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. And next quarter, Prometheum's executives said they intend to open the doors of their alternative trading system – a kind of U.S. trading venue that is similar to a full-fledged exchange but with fewer compliance requirements.

At that point, the company will either be proving the claims of its executives that crypto can be handled in the U.S. in a way that appeases the securities watchdog, or proving the naysayers who argue that it's impossible to meet the SEC's expectations. The stakes aren't just high for Prometheum and the rest of the industry, but also for the government agency that has claimed for years that there's a proper way for crypto firms to "come in and register" to do business in the U.S.; Prometheum came in and registered but what happens next is unclear. And while it tests these murky waters, it may also help establish whether the SEC intends to view ETH as a security.

Prometheum's choice of ETH as its opening asset could come with its own complications. Unlike bitcoin (BTC), which the SEC has openly declared isn't a security and is therefore none of the agency's business, the commission has been more coy about whether ETH is among the digital tokens that should be considered securities that fall under its jurisdiction. Its sister agency, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, hasn't been so shy about declaring that ETH is definitely a commodity.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Prometheum is registered to custody crypto securities and isn't in the commodities business. Ben Kaplan said the firm will go with whatever the SEC's word is on ETH.

"The CFTC is not our regulator," he said. "When the SEC says to us, 'It's not a security,' then we'll be troubled."

The startup, which Aaron Kaplan has said has about 50 employees, is seeing "immense interest" in its service as a so-called "qualified custodian," though it hasn't yet confirmed any institutional names that may do business there. It intends to service asset managers, hedge funds, investment advisers, banks and other financial institutions.

"A lot of people got burned in 2022," he said, referring to the turmoil involving the under-regulated U.S. industry.

Prometheum may get a tremendous shot in the arm if the SEC follows through with a rule it proposed to require registered investment advisers only be allowed to park their customers' crypto assets with qualified custodians. That list typically includes registered broker-dealers and banks, but SEC Chair Gary Gensler has argued it probably doesn't include today's major crypto exchanges. The rule is on the agency's public agenda to be finalized by April, though such agendas often prove overly ambitious.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Whether the SEC finishes the rule or not, Aaron Kaplan contended that traditional financial firms will want to deal with a service that's properly registered and "speaking the same compliance language."

He argued that the company could also benefit from the trend toward asset tokenization, because that practice needs a firm that can trade, clear and settle in one place.

The outcome of Prometheum's business plan and whether the SEC stays silent or attempts to intervene isn't the only uncertainty facing the firm. As with the rest of the sector, its future could be steered by ongoing court cases that promise answers on how crypto securities will be defined.

If courts side with the recent Coinbase arguments in its case with the SEC that cryptocurrencies traded on a secondary market don't carry explicit contracts and aren't securities, such a decision could affect the universe of securities Prometheum can host on its platform.

Edited by Nick Baker.

你可能也喜歡

美国SEC与CFTC起诉高利安风险投资公司涉及4亿美元加密货币庞氏骗局

美国证券交易委员会(SEC)和商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)周二分别对Goliath Ventures及其创始人克里斯托弗·德尔加多提起民事诉讼,指控其运营一个约4亿美元的加密庞氏骗局。SEC称,该公司通过未注册的证券发行从超1300名投资者处募集至少4.25亿美元,谎称资金将投入加密流动性池,但实际并未投资,德尔加多挪用了至少5100万美元用于个人消费。CFTC指出,约1600名客户被招揽投入至少3.97亿美元用于比特币和以太坊交易。 德尔加多已同意就SEC的民事案件达成和解,CFTC则另案寻求赔偿、罚款和市场禁入。他此前于6月30日对电汇欺诈共谋、电汇欺诈和洗钱指控认罪,司法部称其造成投资者至少2.5亿美元损失,并同意上缴与骗局相关的财产、车辆、奢侈品、银行及加密账户。 据SEC指控,Goliath承诺月回报率3%至10%,并保证本金安全,实则用新投资者资金支付旧投资者,伪造账户余额和业绩数据。该公司通过销售代理招募投资者,至2025年11月因无法快速募集足够资金履行支付义务而停止运营并崩盘。德尔加多的和解方案待法院批准,将永久禁止其违反相关证券法规,并限制其参与证券交易及关联经纪商活动。法院将最终确定其非法所得、判决前利息及民事罚款金额。

cointelegraph2 小時前

美国SEC与CFTC起诉高利安风险投资公司涉及4亿美元加密货币庞氏骗局

cointelegraph2 小時前

如果以太坊未曾从 PoW 转向 PoS:一场未曾发生的博弈

2022年9月,以太坊完成“合并”,从工作量证明转向权益证明,大幅降低了能源消耗。近期,关于这次转型是否值得的讨论重新升温,引发了对其替代路径的设想:如果以太坊坚持PoW至今会怎样? 文章从几个角度探讨了这一“反事实”场景。一方面,继续使用PoW可能使以太坊保留一个庞大的GPU算力网络。在AI时代,这些通用算力有潜力被组织成全球性的去中心化算力基础设施,为以太坊带来新的战略机遇。 另一方面,坚持PoW也意味着持续的代价:更高的新币发行量和矿工抛售压力,可能对币价形成长期压制;PoW共识机制也可能在协议扩容、降低交易成本方面面临更多技术约束;此外,高能耗问题可能持续影响机构采用和监管观感。 文章引用了多位业内人士的观点。有人认为转向PoS放弃了在AI算力市场发展的巨大潜力;也有人指出,持续PoW的以太坊经典市值大幅下滑,证明仅靠PoW不足以保证成功。 最终,这场讨论的核心并非评判两种共识机制的优劣,而是揭示了两条截然不同的发展路径:PoW路线可能塑造一个强大的“数字商品”网络;而转向PoS,则旨在将以太坊打造为全球开放的结算层和数字经济基础设施。AI时代的到来,让当年被淘汰的GPU算力成为稀缺资源,使得这场已尘埃落定的选择再度引人深思。如今的关键在于,以太坊能否在其选择的PoS道路上,成功捕获AI、稳定币等新兴领域的巨大价值。

marsbit3 小時前

如果以太坊未曾从 PoW 转向 PoS:一场未曾发生的博弈

marsbit3 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片