U.S. SEC Clears 'Dealer' Rule Expansion That Could Rope in DeFi

CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2024-02-05更新於 2024-02-06

文章摘要

The Securities and Exchange Commission approved a final rule Tuesday that DeFi interests call "hostile" to that sector, potentially requiring projects to register as dealers.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) widened its definition of a dealer today to pull many more financial operations into its jurisdiction – including, as it warned in a footnote of its original proposal – those dealing in crypto securities.

"The commission is not excluding any particular type of securities, including crypto asset securities, from the application of the final rules," according to the SEC's description. "The dealer framework is a functional analysis based on the securities trading activities undertaken by a person, not the type of security being traded."

The dealer rule is among several crypto-tied regulatory efforts that had been pending at the SEC and other agencies, including the Internal Revenue Service. While it drew less attention than IRS tax measures and the SEC proposals weighing expansion of the exchange definition and restricting crypto custody, the move could have serious consequences in the digital assets industry – particularly in decentralized finance (DeFi).

Advertisement
Advertisement

"Absent an exemption or exception, if anyone trades in a manner consistent with de facto market making, it must register with us as a dealer – consistent with Congress’s intent,” SEC Chair Gary Gensler said in a statement.

The text of the rule noted the extensive objections and stated confusions of crypto industry insiders, including those in DeFi.

"While some commenters stated that the proposed rules should not apply to so called DeFi, whether there is a dealer involved in any particular transaction or structure (whether or not referred to as so-called DeFi) is a facts and circumstances analysis," the agency noted. "There is nothing about the technology used, including distributed ledger technology based protocols using smart contracts, that would preclude crypto asset securities activities from falling within the scope of dealer activity."

The commission did consider a crypto carve-out, according to the document, but decided that would have "negative competitive effects" by giving crypto firms an advantage over those who have to register.

While this effort – which goes into full effect in April of next year – was largely targeted at electronic participants in the U.S. Treasuries market, the requirements will be the same for any business roped into the expanded definition. A dealer must register with the SEC, comply with securities laws and join an industry-backed self-regulatory organization.

As the crypto industry has often argued, many DeFi operations could find it impossible to register or maintain compliance with SEC demands.

Advertisement
Advertisement

SEC Commissioners Mark Uyeda and Hester Peirce opposed the rule on Tuesday.

"Under the Commission’s approach, any person can be a 'dealer' if they buy and sell securities as part of a regular business," Uyeda said, arguing that the change is "creating additional regulatory confusion for other markets, including crypto asset securities."

"Not surprisingly, the rule reflects little thought regarding its practical application in the crypto markets," noted Peirce, who has for years called for the agency to establish tailored regulations for crypto.

The DeFi Education Fund was among crypto groups that objected to the original proposal. The group called Tuesday's final version "misguided and unworkable."

"The SEC not only failed to confront the substance of our concerns but also failed altogether to articulate any discernible path to compliance for DeFi market participants," the organization said in a statement. "Imposing obligations on entities in the DeFi ecosystem that cannot be complied with is wrong, impractical, and hostile to innovation."

The crypto industry has been fighting with the regulator in federal courts over which cryptocurrencies meet the definition of a security that the SEC would have authority over. The outcome of that legal battle could have major implications in the debate over which firms count as dealers under this latest regulatory demand.

Advertisement
Advertisement

你可能也喜歡

从 Corning 到 Ciena,AI 光通信链条里的 10 倍股机会

该文章聚焦于AI数据中心升级带来的光通信产业链投资机会。核心观点是,随着数据传输从800G向1.6T、3.2T演进,铜缆因发热、功耗等物理极限面临瓶颈,向光通信转型成为必然。文章认为,最大的投资机会往往在于整个产业链中不可或缺的供应商,而非单一的明星芯片公司。 文章梳理了产业链关键环节及代表公司: 1. **玻璃与光纤层**:**康宁(Corning)** 是核心供应商,其最新光纤技术能成倍提升数据承载能力,已获得Meta、亚马逊等科技巨头的长期大额订单,并展现出强劲的利润增长弹性。 2. **互连层**:**安费诺(Amphenol)** 通过并购成为重要的高速连接器与线缆供应商,受益于AI数据中心建设,增长迅速且估值相对合理。**Credo Technology** 则专注于连接芯片,在铜缆与光通信之间架起桥梁,增长快但客户集中度高风险高。 3. **系统层**:**Ciena** 是相干光学系统领导者,其技术能让现有光纤承载更大数据量,无需重新铺设,已获得大量云服务商订单,积压订单创纪录。 4. **上游材料与测试层**:**AXT** 是光激光器关键材料磷化铟晶圆的稀缺供应商,但面临中国出口许可等风险。**VEO Solutions** 提供光通信设备必需的测试工具,是产业链中的“卖铲人”,业务随AI基建加速而爆发。 文章最后提到,若不想逐个选股,可关注新出现的纯光子主题ETF(代码FOTO),但其规模尚小,需谨慎研究。总结而言,光通信是AI数据洪流下的确定性方向,投资机会将沿整条产业链扩散。

marsbit8 分鐘前

从 Corning 到 Ciena,AI 光通信链条里的 10 倍股机会

marsbit8 分鐘前

20 岁创始人,招 18 岁员工,被 19 岁的人投资

这篇文章探讨了当前人工智能(AI)领域出现的“年轻化”现象。随着大模型技术的快速发展,行业对AI人才的争夺异常激烈,并出现了明显的年龄偏好。许多顶尖高校的应届生或在校实习生能够获得高达数百万人民币的年薪或数千元的日薪,其薪酬水平远超传统互联网行业的资深从业者。 文章指出,这种现象背后是“AI Native”概念的兴起。企业认为,更年轻、从小接触AI的从业者(多为00后)在思维模式、学习速度和创新能力上更具优势,能更快适应技术的快速迭代。相比之下,拥有多年工作经验但转型较慢的从业者可能面临被淘汰的风险。因此,大厂和初创公司都竞相提前锁定优秀学生,通过高薪、重要项目主导权、灵活扁平的管理模式以及密集的社交活动来吸引他们。 这种趋势形成了一个围绕“年轻”的利益循环:年轻研究员凭借成果获得高薪或创业机会;年轻的创业者更容易获得年轻投资人的青睐和融资;而成功的年轻团队又倾向于雇佣和信任更年轻的成员。这在一定程度上冲击了传统的、基于资历和经验的行业规则,但也加剧了人才竞争和行业内部分化。文章最后也反思了这种狂热背后的隐忧,即技术革命在厚赏“非凡”年轻人的同时,也可能对无法快速适应的“平凡”从业者施以严厉的惩罚。

marsbit1 小時前

20 岁创始人,招 18 岁员工,被 19 岁的人投资

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片