Epic Games Receives $2 Billion To Build “The” Metaverse

CryptoPotato發佈於 2022-04-12更新於 2022-04-14

文章摘要

Epic Games created Unreal Engine and redefined the gaming industry. Now they want to create a metaverse —and got $2Bn for it.

Sony and Kirkby, the company behind The LEGO Group, are teaming up to fund Epic Games’ new venture focused on the metaverse.
On April 11, Epic Games, an American video game development company, announced the raising of $2 billion —1 Billion USD from Sony and 1 Billion USD from KIRKBI — to build a metaverse.
According to Epic Games, the idea of a metaverse is not just hype. The gaming studio wants to create new experiences based on its already popular games and new projects.  Epic Games sais that such major funding round aims to “advance the company’s vision to build the metaverse and support its continued growth.”
Epic games achieves a $32 billion valuation.
Thanks to this new investment, the company behind Fortnite achieved a valuation of $32 billion, allowing it to delve deeper into this new business model. The executive responsibilities remain the same, and Tim Sweeney remains as the company’s CEO.
Epic Games has not given more information about its plans so far. Still, its metaverse product would likely compete with already established decentralized alternatives, such as Decentraland and The Sandbox, which have attracted hundreds of investors and famous artists. Other centralized options, like Meta’s project, are also playing their cards.
Epic Games is also popular for being the studio behind Unreal engine, which isthe bread and butter of many video game developers, fiilmmakers and content creators. It offers multiple tools such as physics/lightning simulations, video editing, and animation rendering, among many other advantages. So it could be safe to say that it could play a significant role in the development of a metaverse.
Epic Games and LEGO Want a Metaverse That Helps Children to Become Good Individuals
Niels B Christiansen, CEO of The LEGO Group, said that children develop abilities like “creativity, collaboration, and communication through digital experiences thanks to both physical and digital games.” The corporation believes its team has a duty to create inspiring and beneficial content for all of society, helping children put their abilities to good use.
“We have a responsibility to make them (video games) safe, inspiring and beneficial for all. Just as we’ve protected children’s rights to safe physical play for generations, we are committed to doing the same for digital play. We look forward to working with Epic Games to shape this exciting and playful future.”
Tim Sweeney, CEO & Founder of Epic Games, emphasized that LEGO has “captivated the imaginations of kids and adults” for so many years, adding that building a metaverse with them will be “fun, entertaining, and made for kids and families.”
So far, Epic Games has not revealed what technology it will use to develop its metaverse. It is possible that the company goes for a centralized, non-blockchain model (like Meta’s) but the company has previously advocated for a pro-crypto model, allowing the release of many crypto games on its marketplace even though one of its direct competitors, Steam, decided to ban them.
So, it might be too early to rule out a decentralized Epicverse.

你可能也喜歡

美债危机和高收益率背景下,黄金作为“金融保险”的配置价值

本文探讨了在美债危机和高收益率背景下,黄金作为“金融保险”的配置价值。文章认为,美国巨额债务、高收益率环境以及地缘政治风险等因素,削弱了投资者对传统纸币和美元资产的信心,从而凸显了黄金作为无对手方风险的价值储存手段的重要性。 核心驱动力包括:1)黄金与实际利率呈反向关系,当前低实际利率环境提供支撑;2)地缘政治紧张与能源通胀推高避险需求;3)全球央行(尤其是中国央行)持续购金,形成结构性需求;4)投资需求(如ETF)创历史新高。文章回顾了金价从2025年初约2,624美元飙升至2026年1月历史高点5,589美元的历程,并指出当前价格在约4,460-4,523美元区间。 对于投资者,获取黄金敞口的主要途径有:实物黄金、黄金ETF(如GLD、IAU)以及黄金矿业ETF(如GDX)。后者具有杠杆效应,但风险也更高。文章同时提示了黄金面临的风险,包括实际利率大幅转正、美元走强、地缘政治缓和及估值过高等。 最后,文章建议将黄金视为投资组合的保险部分,而非增长型资产,多数情况下配置比例在5%-10%为宜。投资者需密切关注美国实际利率、美伊谈判进展、央行购金数据及关键价格位(如4,500美元和5,000美元),以判断未来走势。在当前宏观环境下,持有黄金的逻辑得到了罕见的基本面支撑。

marsbit21 分鐘前

美债危机和高收益率背景下,黄金作为“金融保险”的配置价值

marsbit21 分鐘前

MSTR 与 STRC 的「死亡螺旋」风险有多大?

MicroStrategy(MSTR)近期出售32枚比特币引发市场担忧,其股价及旗下永续优先股STRC价格均出现下跌。文章分析了MSTR、比特币(BTC)与STRC深度绑定的结构,并与已崩溃的LUNA-UST算法稳定币系统进行比较。 核心结论是,尽管MSTR-STRC结构与LUNA-UST在表面上有相似之处(如价格锚定、高收益和潜在的螺旋下跌风险),但两者存在根本差异。STRC的价格稳定依赖于股息率调整和公司信用,而非UST那种直接影响LUNA供给的算法机制。STRC持有人在公司破产时对剩余资产拥有优先追索权,这提供了价格下限支撑,与UST可归零不同。此外,MSTR支付股息的能力依赖于其通过增发股票等方式持续融资,而非UST那种依赖外部协议收益的模式。 目前,MicroStrategy的美元储备仅能支撑约6个月的利息和股息支出,未来融资能力高度依赖市场对比特币的信心以及其股价表现。文章指出,只要比特币价格不跌破约2.63万美元,优先股股东本金损失风险较低;且公司净杠杆率仅11%,因债务导致破产的概率很小。 未来六个月被视为关键期。若比特币市场能在此期间触底回暖,MicroStrategy或能通过健康去杠杆重启其资本运作引擎。总体来看,MSTR-STRC发生类似LUNA-UST那种灾难性“死亡螺旋”的概率极低,但其可持续性仍取决于市场信心和未来半年的融资环境。

Foresight News1 小時前

MSTR 与 STRC 的「死亡螺旋」风险有多大?

Foresight News1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片