Crypto Bear Market Startup Guide Part 1: Pre-Market Price Spread Market for Tokenized Stocks

Odaily星球日报发布于2026-03-16更新于2026-03-16

文章摘要

The article "Crypto Bear Market Startup Guide Part 1: Pre-IPO Stock Price Difference Market" discusses entrepreneurial opportunities during a crypto bear market, focusing on the emerging niche of pre-IPO stock price difference markets. It begins by challenging the notion that bear markets are beneficial for building, citing data showing over 80% of crypto startups from the 2022 bear market are still active, suggesting that focused development and survival skills can thrive in downturns. The core analysis highlights the significant price discrepancies for pre-IPO stocks of companies like Kalshi, Polymarket, and SpaceX(xAI) across different crypto-based trading platforms such as PreStocks, Jarsy, and Tessera. For instance, Kalshi's pre-IPO price shows a $148 (37%) difference between PreStocks ($397) and Jarsy ($545). Polymarket's price gap is $94 (over 50%), and SpaceX has a $75 (12.7%) difference. The author argues this demonstrates a clear market need for a unified platform that bridges these price gaps across traditional and crypto pre-IPO markets, acting as a liquidity bridge. The proposed business model for such a "pre-IPO price difference market" would likely generate revenue through trading fees, LP fees, and arbitrage on the platform's own capital. The piece positions this as a promising venture for the anticipated 2026 IPO boom.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010)

Not long ago, Mysten Labs CEO evan.sui shared his views on the "bear market." He mentioned that he does not agree with the notion that "the bear market is great, just keep building." In fact, the bear market is not "great"; packaging it as good for everyone overlooks the real costs (such as discouraging builders and users). Many retail investors and excellent teams will face cash flow problems and be forced to exit, ultimately harming the long-term development of the crypto industry.

However, data evidence does not align with this view. A report released by Lattice VC in October 2024 showed that over 80% of crypto startups that announced seed round funding during the 2022 bear market were still building at that time. In other words, if project teams can ensure relatively stable personnel and funding, the bear market may indeed be more conducive to project development and growth. The reasons might be that during a bear market, project teams focus more on product development and experience optimization; or perhaps the bear market hones the project teams' abilities to survive through various means. In any case, being in a crypto bear market, determined startup teams might find opportunities in adversity and carve out their own path to development.

In light of this, we will use a series of articles titled "Crypto Bear Market Startup Guide" to explore potential entrepreneurial tracks and project directions with our readers during this cycle. If any crypto projects are born or grow rapidly as a result in the future, Odaily Planet Daily also welcomes project teams to discuss cooperation.

Today, let's first discuss one of the hottest potential entrepreneurial directions besides prediction markets—the pre-market price spread market for tokenized stocks.

The Real Demand for Tokenized Stock Pre-Market: Platform Differentiation and Liquidity Bridge

As an intermediate bridge connecting the crypto market with the traditional financial market, tokenized stock trading platforms have not only garnered high attention and active participation from crypto project teams but have also seen involvement from global leading securities platforms including Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange, aiming to capture incremental markets while further activating liquidity in traditional financial markets.

Furthermore, not only have listed cryptocurrency concept stocks undergone tokenization and on-chain contract transformation, but many pre-IPO hot concept stocks have also received enthusiastic追捧 from both crypto and traditional financial markets, giving rise to several pre-market stock tokenization trading platforms.

Considering that the capital market is about to welcome a wave of U.S. stock listings this year from companies including OpenAI, Anthropic, SpaceX(xAI), Kalshi, Polymarket, OKX, Kraken, and a series of AI model companies, commercial aerospace companies, prediction market platforms, and crypto exchanges, there is no doubt that 2026 is destined to be a "big year for IPOs."

Against the backdrop of a fluctuating and occasionally rebounding crypto market and a consistently rising stock market, the热度 of the pre-market stock trading market further supports the above view—there is strong demand from both crypto and traditional financial markets for pre-market trading of hot concept stocks.

This is the main reason for the emergence of pre-market stock trading platforms such as PreStocks, Jarsy, Tessera, and others. Moreover, compared to traditional financial market pre-market trading markets like Hiive and Nasdaq Private Market, crypto pre-market trading markets offer more flexible trading methods, purchase limits, and entry barriers, with relatively higher premiums, which is why many users enthusiastically participate.

However, just as the same token can have different price differences on different exchanges, before mechanisms类似 oracles are introduced into the pre-market stock market, regardless of the reason, we can clearly see that different platforms have certain price differences for the same underlying stock mentioned above.

Based on the above information, we can make a somewhat bold judgment—the crypto market still lacks one or more "bridge platforms between pre-market stock trading markets."

This might be a necessary step forward in advancing the tokenization of stocks and the tokenization of pre-market stock markets—a unified comprehensive platform covering pre-market trading in both traditional financial markets and crypto markets.

Below, we will use the two leading prediction market platforms, Kalshi and Polymarket, which are recently seeking $20 billion in funding, and SpaceX(xAI), valued at $1.25 trillion, as examples to explore the feasibility and real demand of this "entrepreneurial direction."

Comparing Pre-Market Price Spreads on PreStocks, Jarsy, Tessera 3 Major Platforms: Maximum Spread Rate Exceeds 50%, Price Difference Up to Nearly $150

Kalshi Pre-Market Spread: Up to $148, Spread Rate About 37%

Taking the Kalshi pre-market as an example, its prices on different platforms are as follows—

On the PreStocks platform, the pre-market price of the stock token is around $397; (Compared to the $369 we mentioned one month ago in the article "Kalshi Trading Volume Continues to Hit New Highs, What Is a Reasonable Pre-IPO Stock Price?", it has increased by nearly $30, a rise of 7.6%)

On the Jarsy platform, the pre-market price is quoted at around $545. (Compared to the $504 we mentioned one month ago in the article "Kalshi Trading Volume Continues to Hit New Highs, What Is a Reasonable Pre-IPO Stock Price?", it has increased by over $40, a rise of 8.1%)

In other words, the price difference for Kalshi's pre-market stock on the two major trading platforms is as high as $148 (Odaily Planet Daily Note: Considering the two platforms use order book trading mechanisms and on-chain liquidity token trading mechanisms respectively, we are only making a abstract comparison here,暂时 not involving specific asset settlement forms, same below). If calculated based on the $360 price on the traditional financial market pre-market trading platform Hiive, the pre-market price difference甚至 reaches $185.

Polymarket Pre-Market Spread: Up to $94, Spread Rate Over 50%

Taking the Polymarket pre-market as an example, its prices on different platforms are as follows—

On the PreStocks platform, the pre-market price of the stock token is around $186 (Odaily Planet Daily Note: up 23% in the past 30 days);

On the Jarsy platform, the pre-market price is quoted at around $280.

In other words, the price difference for Polymarket's pre-market stock on the 2 major platforms is about $94, with a spread rate of approximately 50.5%.

SpaceX(xAI) Pre-Market Spread: About $75, Spread Rate 12.7%

Taking SpaceX(xAI) as an example, its prices on different platforms are as follows—

On the PreStocks platform, the pre-market price of the stock token is around $666 (Odaily Planet Daily Note: up 4.1% in the past 30 days);

On the Tessera platform, the pre-market price of the stock token is temporarily reported at around $591 (Odaily Planet Daily Note: up about 14.5% in the past 30 days).

In other words, the price difference for SpaceX's pre-market stock on the 2 major platforms is about $75, with a spread rate of approximately 12.7%.

In summary, based on existing pre-market trading platforms, it might be possible to build a pre-market price spread market for tokenized stocks to meet market trading and speculation demands, once sufficient pre-market tokens or pre-market equity capital is available.

Of course, considering that the current market liquidity remains within the million-dollar level, the main business model of this platform may revolve around transaction fees, LP fees, and realizing price differences from the platform's own investment allocations, among others.

相关问答

QWhat is the main argument presented by Mysten Labs CEO evan.sui regarding the 'bear market' in crypto?

AMysten Labs CEO evan.sui argues that bear markets are not 'great' and that the narrative that they are good for everyone ignores the real costs, such as driving away builders and users, causing cash flow problems for retail investors and excellent teams, and ultimately harming the long-term development of the crypto industry.

QAccording to the Lattice VC report from October 2024, what percentage of crypto startups that announced seed funding during the 2022 bear market are still building?

AAccording to the Lattice VC report from October 2024, over 80% of crypto startups that announced seed funding during the 2022 bear market are still building.

QWhat is the proposed new business opportunity discussed in the article for the bear market?

AThe proposed new business opportunity is creating a 'pre-market price difference market for tokenized stocks' or a bridge platform that connects different pre-market stock trading platforms to capitalize on the price discrepancies between them.

QWhat was the approximate price difference (in USD) and the difference rate for Kalshi stock between the PreStocks and Jarsy platforms?

AThe price difference for Kalshi stock between the PreStocks ($397) and Jarsy ($545) platforms was approximately $148, with a difference rate of about 37%.

QWhat potential business model is suggested for a platform that capitalizes on pre-market stock price differences?

AThe potential business models suggested are transaction fees, liquidity provider (LP) fees, and profiting from the price differences of the platform's own investment allocations.

你可能也喜欢

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

面对人工智能的冲击,许多人担心工作被取代。然而,真正的威胁在于个人对他人和系统的依赖,以及由此产生的“薪资奴役”——即为生存而从事无意义、枯燥的工作。摆脱这种困境的关键,不是抵制技术,而是成为拥有高自主性的“不可受雇”个体。 文章提出了成功抵御AI替代的五个核心要素:自主性(主动行动的能力)、品味(判断事物价值的经验)、说服力(让他人关注你工作的能力)、毅力(坚持并从错误中学习)和迭代(根据反馈持续改进)。这些能力无法仅通过理论学习获得,必须通过实践来培养。 要启动转变,首先要彻底改变环境,重塑身份认同。其次,应选择一个能获得真实、快速反馈的实践领域,例如创业。在众多技能中,内容创作(媒体)比编写代码更具优势,因为其价值是主观的,需要独特的审美和判断力,这正是AI目前难以完全复制的。 具体行动上,可以从三个步骤开始: 1. **挖掘原始素材**:反思自己长期痴迷的知识领域、轻松解决的难题或童年被压抑的兴趣,找到独特的个人经验。 2. **确立反向思考主轴**:找出你坚信但主流观点错误的地方,或行业内普遍忽视的“皇帝新衣”,形成独特的批判性视角。 3. **立即发布**:将前两步的思考融合,撰写并发布第一个核心内容(如帖子、视频),勇敢接受真实世界的反馈,并在此基础上持续学习和迭代。 最终,抵御AI的关键在于构建一份与自身身份深度契合的毕生事业,通过持续的内容创作和真实互动,建立无法被自动化取代的独特价值和影响力。行动,从今天发布第一个想法开始。

marsbit2小时前

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

marsbit2小时前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

文章探讨了通过投掷骰子生成比特币钱包种子短语的安全方法及其现实挑战。核心观点如下: **1. 骰子提供物理熵源** 骰子结果由众多微小变量决定,理论上虽可预测,但实践中无法被攻击者复制或计算,从而提供高质量的随机性。每个六面骰子投掷约产生2.585比特熵,50次投掷即可满足典型12词助记词(128比特熵)的安全需求。 **2. Coldcard漏洞事件凸显手工熵源的价值** 近期Coldcard硬件钱包因固件漏洞导致其内部随机数生成器存在缺陷,致使约1128枚比特币被盗。但那些**完全**通过足量骰子投掷生成种子短语的用户未受此漏洞影响,因为他们的主密钥未使用有缺陷的生成器。 **3. 重要警示:手工种子并非万能保护** 安全研究员指出,即使用户使用骰子生成了安全的种子,若他们使用了Coldcard的其他功能(如生成纸钱包、克隆密钥、共享签名密钥、密码等),这些**衍生密钥**仍可能调用有漏洞的随机数生成器,从而存在风险。安全种子不保证设备生成的所有秘密都安全。 **4. 手工生成熵源的现实局限性** 尽管数学上可靠,但该方法对大多数用户并不友好: * **过程繁琐易错**:需投掷50-99次,精确记录,任何输入错误都会导致钱包完全不同。 * **引入新风险**:用户可能在记录、转换过程中泄露信息,或使用有偏的骰子/投掷方式。 * **用户体验差**:难以想象大规模推广需要用户手动投掷近百次骰子。安全措施需适应现实生活场景和普通用户的知识水平。 **5. 给用户的建议** 受影响的Coldcard用户应: * 更新固件至最新版。 * 检查是否使用过有漏洞的功能生成了次级密钥或密码,如有则需立即更换。 * 考虑采用多签方案,使用不同厂商的设备分散风险。 **结论**:手工投掷骰子生成熵源是技术娴熟用户的一个有效安全选项,但其过程复杂、容易出错,不适合作为主流用户的默认方法。长远目标是依赖安全、透明且无需专业知识的硬件/软件随机数生成方案。

cryptonews.ru5小时前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

cryptonews.ru5小时前

交易

现货
活动图片