‘Over $10m lost annually’ – Why Aave Labs is under fire

ambcrypto发布于2025-12-14更新于2025-12-14

文章摘要

The Aave community is facing an ownership crisis, with the DAO and its service providers, including Aave Labs, in conflict over protocol revenue. Critics argue that fees from features built and paid for by the DAO should belong to the treasury. This dispute intensified after a CowSwap integration redirected swap fees away from the DAO, estimated to cause an annual revenue loss of over $10 million. Delegates labeled this move a "privatization" of protocol revenue and an attack on tokenholders. In defense, Aave Labs founder Stani Kulechov highlighted the company's long-term contributions and innovations that benefit the DAO. Despite the debate, the price of AAVE remained stable around $200.

The Aave community is embroiled in an ownership crisis. Both the DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) and the protocol’s service providers are fighting for revenue.

At the centre of the crisis is Aave Labs, the service provider or one of the contractors that builds part of the DeFi lending protocol’s features.

Who owns Aave’s fees?

According to multiple governance participants, contractors, including the Labs, were paid directly by the Aave [AAVE] DAO.

As a result, the user interfaces, brand, and other features and associated fees and revenues are “fully owned” by the DAO because it paid for them.

However, a recent CowSwap integration changed that perception.

Under the new setup, swap fees no longer flowed to the DAO treasury, triggering backlash from delegates.

One of the token delegates estimated the DAO’s annual revenue loss to be at least $10 million.

“A loss to the DAO over 365 days seen by at least over $10m, assuming a transfer of only $200k each week.”

Critics argued that the ParaSwap, which was replaced by CowSwap, shared revenue with the DAO. However, the current arrangement sidelined the DAO for the private service provider.

Delegates raise the alarm

Earlier this year, Aave Labs proposed a tokenization product, Horizon, alongside a token, but it was shot down by the DAO.

For Marc Zeller, Founder of a token delegate and DAO service provider, Aave-Chan Initiative, Aave Labs’ “privatization” of protocol revenue was a “concerning” and “clear attack” on tokenholders.

Another VC partner, Louis, echoed a similar stance and added,

“The biggest threat to any token and DAO is a competing, independent equity vehicle. AAVE tokenholders should push back much more aggressively against this long-term risk.”

Aave Labs defends itself

The Aave token buyback is currently being undertaken by the DAO and is one of the mechanisms by which value accrues to tokenholders.

However, Stani Kulechov, the Founder of Aave stated that,

“Aave Labs has been contributing to the protocol and its benefit for over 8 years...It is responsible for innovation with Aave V4 and similar other protocol iterations and GHO, all those primitives that we built accrue revenue to the Aave DAO.”

On-chain data from Blockworks Research showed Aave recorded more than $15 billion in net deposit flows during Q3 2025.

That said, the alcoin’s price didn’t get caught up in the debate, as it remained range-bound around $200 for the past week.


Final Thoughts

  • Aave protocol ownership remains contested between contractors and the DAO.
  • Critics claimed that Aave Labs, a contractor, is undermining the DAO and tokenholders.

你可能也喜欢

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

基础K线形态:逃顶形态-M头

M头也称双顶,是K线图中较为常见的反转形态之一,由两个较为相近的高点构成,其形状类似于英文字母“M”,因而得名。在连续上升过程中,当股价上涨至某一价格水平,成交量显著放大,币价开始掉头回落;下跌至某一位置时,币价再度反弹上行,但成交量较第一高峰时略有收缩,反弹至前高附近之后再第二次下跌,并跌破第一次回落的低点,币价移动轨迹像M字,双重顶形成。

1.6k人学过发布于 2023.04.18更新于 2024.01.09

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对M(M)币价的意见。

活动图片