The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit发布于2026-06-11更新于2026-06-11

文章摘要

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimis...

Original Author: Biteye

Currently, the SpaceX IPO pricing is preliminarily set at $135 per share, with a planned fundraising scale of approximately $75 billion, corresponding to a fully diluted valuation of about $1.77 trillion. This essentially secures its position as the largest IPO in the history of capital markets.

If this scale is ultimately achieved, Musk's net worth is expected to surge by over $220 billion, challenging for the title of the world's first trillionaire.

However, heavy is the head that wears the crown. The reason the SpaceX IPO attracts such attention is not only its potential to become the largest IPO ever but also because the capital markets are already fiercely debating its valuation.

Is SpaceX really worth $1.77 trillion? With an extra $220 billion in his wallet, will Musk be able to sleep soundly?

🌟 The Bull Case: Underwriters Weave a Long-Term Story with Starlink + Rocket Launches + AI

Bulls believe investing in SpaceX is not merely about backing a rocket company but rather about getting an early stake in the future gateway to space infrastructure.

The $1.77 trillion valuation seems high, but if Starlink, low-cost launches, and AI businesses continue to deliver, $135 has a long-term story to support it.

Goldman Sachs @GoldmanSachs

X Followers: 1.132M | XHunt Rank: 12015 | Global top-tier investment bank, one of the core underwriters for the SpaceX IPO.

Core View: SpaceX's valuation should not be understood solely as a traditional aerospace company; Starlink and future AI business must be incorporated into the long-term growth model.

Goldman Sachs expects SpaceX's revenue in 2028 to be around $160 billion, exceeding $470 billion by 2030.

The AI division is considered the most aggressive part. Goldman Sachs projects SpaceX's AI-related revenue could reach approximately $322 billion by 2030.

Morgan Stanley @MorganStanley

X Followers: 742K | XHunt Rank: 32049 | Global top-tier investment bank, one of the core underwriters for the SpaceX IPO.

Core View: SpaceX's long-term value stems from the compound growth of "Space + AI," with a future revenue ceiling far higher than traditional aerospace companies.

Morgan Stanley similarly expects SpaceX's 2028 revenue to be around $160 billion.

More aggressive is the long-term forecast: by 2040, Morgan Stanley projects SpaceX's revenue could reach $3.4 trillion, with adjusted EBITDA exceeding $2.7 trillion.

If you're buying the gateway to space infrastructure for the next decade+, $135 is undervalued, but it will take a long time to realize.

Sacra

An independent research firm focused on private tech companies, specializing in deep-dive company analysis and valuation breakdowns.

Core View: Bullish on the business long-term, but $135 is not a low valuation; it's more like paying upfront for an option on SpaceX transforming from an aerospace company into a space infrastructure platform.

Sacra estimates SpaceX's 2025 revenue at approximately $18.7 billion, with Starlink contributing $11.4 billion, already becoming the company's most important profit center.

It believes SpaceX's core advantage lies in vertical integration: building its own rockets, launching them, deploying its own satellites, and controlling terminals and ground networks, creating a cost advantage difficult for competitors to replicate.

If only considering the current Starlink and rocket launch businesses, $135 is not cheap. If one believes SpaceX can further expand from an aerospace company into a comprehensive platform covering satellite internet, low-cost launches, and more space infrastructure, this price becomes easier to accept.

ARK Invest @ARKInvest

X Followers: 816K | XHunt Rank: 1637 | Innovation-focused investment firm led by Cathie Wood, long-term tracker of disruptive technology assets.

Core View: While SpaceX's $1.77 trillion valuation is high, it's not entirely without support when considering the long-term opportunity through 2030.

ARK Invest's open-source valuation model for SpaceX shows an expected enterprise value of approximately $2.5 trillion by 2030. According to its model, the bull case scenario is around $3.1 trillion, and the bear case scenario is around $1.7 trillion.

ARK's core logic is that SpaceX's value comes not just from rocket launches but from Starlink's global satellite internet network, low-cost launch capability, and future space infrastructure businesses.

Based on ARK's projections, the IPO subscription price of $135 still has some upside potential.

🌟 The Bear Case: Independent Firms Believe IPO Valuation is Already Severely Overextended

The bear camp does not deny that SpaceX is one of the world's most unique commercial aerospace assets, nor do they deny Starlink's long-term value.

However, they believe the $1.77 trillion IPO valuation has already priced in too much future growth, especially given the significant uncertainty surrounding the AI business.

Morningstar @MorningstarInc

X Followers: 238K | XHunt Rank: 98209 | Globally renowned independent investment research firm, commonly using fundamental analysis and DCF models to assess company value.

Core View: SpaceX is a good company, but the IPO valuation is clearly on the high side.

Using a DCF model, Morningstar gives SpaceX a fair value estimate of approximately $780 billion, only about 45% of the IPO target valuation of $1.77 trillion.

In Morningstar's breakdown, the valuation for SpaceX's core launch business + Starlink is approximately $611 billion, with the xAI / AI-related business valued at around $170 billion on a probability-weighted basis.

Morningstar also highlights two risks: Musk is a key figure at SpaceX, and the company's valuation carries a significant "Musk premium." After the IPO, selling pressure may arise as lock-up periods expire for early shareholders and employees.

Morningstar believes the $135 price is clearly expensive and not suitable for rushing into the IPO; there may be better buying opportunities post-IPO.

PitchBook @PitchBook

X Followers: 48K | XHunt Rank: 49174 | Global platform for private equity, venture capital, and private company data, covering valuations and financing information for numerous private companies.

Core View: Around $1.5 trillion is acceptable, $1.75 trillion is expensive, but not entirely irrational.

PitchBook uses a Sum-of-the-Parts model to estimate SpaceX's fair value range between $1.1 trillion and $1.7 trillion, primarily focusing on the launch business and Starlink, not entirely reliant on the xAI narrative.

The $135 price is already near or slightly above the upper end of PitchBook's valuation range – not cheap, but not completely outrageous if one takes a long-term view on Starship and Starlink execution.

New Constructs @NewConstructs

X Followers: 5675 | XHunt Rank: - | Independent equity research firm focusing on financial quality, valuation risks, and reverse DCF analysis.

Core View: SpaceX is not worth participating in at a $1.75 trillion valuation; it advises investors to avoid the IPO.

New Constructs rates SpaceX as Unattractive. They argue that the $1.75 trillion valuation implies excessively high future growth and profit requirements. SpaceX would need to simultaneously become one of the highest revenue and profit-generating companies in the U.S. stock market to justify this price.

Risks cited include: inadequate internal accounting controls at SpaceX, public investors having almost no voting rights, a large portion of IPO proceeds potentially used to repay debt, potentially misleading non-GAAP metrics, and related-party transaction risks.

To justify a $1.75 trillion valuation, SpaceX's revenue may need to reach $1.1 trillion by 2035, implying an average annual growth rate of about 50% over the next decade. New Constructs believes such growth rates have almost no historical precedent.

New Constructs' judgment is the most direct: the risk-reward at this price is unfavorable, and they recommend not participating in the IPO.

Trefis @Trefis

X Followers: 2661 | XHunt Rank: - | Independent U.S. stock valuation platform that derives target prices by breaking down business models.

Core View: SpaceX is an exceptionally unique company, but the $135 offering price is clearly overvalued.

Trefis acknowledges SpaceX's long-term advantages in commercial aerospace, Starlink satellite internet, and low-cost launches but argues these advantages do not mean investors should ignore price.

Trefis gives SpaceX a target price of approximately $79 per share, far below the $135 IPO price.

🌟 Final Thoughts

Whether from the bull or bear side, most essentially acknowledge that SpaceX is one of the world's most unique commercial aerospace companies.

The real point of contention is whether the $135 price offers any margin of safety.

📈 Bulls believe buying SpaceX is about the long-term story of Starlink, low-cost launches, AI, and future space infrastructure.

📉 Bears argue that $135 has already priced in expectations to the fullest.

Currently, the $SPCX IPO subscription is already oversubscribed by 4 times, indicating that despite the valuation debate, capital enthusiasm for SpaceX remains high.

🙋 So the question is: Will you participate in the $SPCX IPO? Do you think Musk's $220 billion gain is well-deserved, or will it keep him up at night?

相关问答

QWhat is SpaceX's proposed IPO share price and what would the corresponding fully diluted valuation be?

ASpaceX's proposed IPO price is $135 per share, which would result in a fully diluted valuation of approximately $1.77 trillion.

QAccording to Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, what is the core narrative supporting the bullish case for SpaceX's high valuation?

AThe bullish case, as presented by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, revolves around SpaceX being a long-term investment in future space infrastructure, combining growth from Starlink, low-cost launch services, and future AI-related business segments.

QWhat is Morningstar's fair value estimate for SpaceX and how does it compare to the proposed IPO valuation?

AMorningstar's fair value estimate for SpaceX is approximately $780 billion, which is only about 45% of the proposed $1.77 trillion IPO valuation.

QWhat are some of the key risks associated with SpaceX's IPO as highlighted by New Constructs?

ANew Constructs highlighted several key risks: the valuation implies extremely high future growth requirements, insufficient internal accounting controls, minimal voting rights for public investors, the possibility of IPO proceeds being used to repay debt, potentially misleading non-GAAP metrics, and risks related to related-party transactions.

QWhat is the main point of contention between the bullish and bearish perspectives on SpaceX's IPO according to the article's conclusion?

AThe main point of contention is whether the IPO price of $135 per share provides a reasonable margin of safety. Bulls see it as justified by long-term growth in space infrastructure, while bears believe it already fully prices in optimistic future expectations.

你可能也喜欢

SBF提出新代币偿还FTX受害者,但这可能实现吗?

摘要:据报道,正在服刑的FTX创始人萨姆·班克曼-弗里德(SBF)近期表达了通过发起一个新的代币项目来偿还FTX受害者的个人愿望。这一说法因极具话题性而引发关注,但其与法律现实存在巨大差距。 核心信息点: * 这只是SBF的个人希望,并非一个积极的、可行的计划。 * 背景是,美国上诉法院已于2026年6月12日维持了对SBF的25年刑期判决。 * 目前没有任何经过验证的、在法律上可行的代币项目存在。 文章分析指出,作为一名正在服长期刑期的重罪犯,SBF在运营公司、筹集资金、发行证券或管理代币项目方面面临显而易见的法律障碍。即使他个人相信新方案能偿还受害者,法院、监管机构、债权人或破产管理人也不太可能允许。 该言论之所以仍受关注,是因为FTX倒闭是加密货币历史上的标志性事件,任何关于偿还受害者或新计划的提及都会触动市场记忆。这同时也引出了一个更广泛的行业问题:失败的平台能否利用代币来弥补损失?在FTX的案例中,法律和声誉障碍远高于普通的重组故事。 因此,本文的立论点不应是SBF将推出代币,而应强调他个人幻想与法律现实之间的张力:即便司法系统已做出严厉判决,他仍 reportedly 设想一条基于代币的偿还路径。任何实际的偿还过程,仍将严格遵循法律程序、破产结构和债权人追偿机制,而非一个来自监狱牢房的想法。

bitcoinist6小时前

SBF提出新代币偿还FTX受害者,但这可能实现吗?

bitcoinist6小时前

贝莱德以BITA为代码推出备兑看涨比特币ETF

贝莱德推出了一款新的比特币ETF产品——iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF,交易代码为BITA。与单纯的现货比特币基金不同,该产品采用备兑看涨期权策略,旨在通过出售期权获得权利金收入,并向投资者提供每月派息,为寻求加密相关收益但不愿直接使用DeFi或离岸借贷产品的投资者提供了新选择。 这种策略意味着产品在比特币横盘或震荡市场中可能表现更佳,但在比特币价格快速上涨时,其收益可能会落后于单纯的现货持有。这并非产品缺陷,而是其设计核心:贝莱德将比特币波动性打包成一种收入策略,为更保守或注重收益的投资者提供了更接近传统期权ETF的产品形式。 BITA的推出表明比特币ETF市场正迅速超越单纯的现货产品,进入策略多样化阶段,如赚取溢价收入、对冲和结构化敞口等。这标志着比特币正逐渐被视作可整合进更广泛基金架构的市场要素,而不仅仅是孤立资产。 该产品主要吸引那些已接受比特币投资逻辑,但希望在经纪账户内获得更平滑、以收益为导向产品的投资者,以及寻求在不单纯依赖价格升值的情况下讨论比特币敞口的投资顾问。它并非现货比特币或IBIT的替代品,而是一种不同的工具。关键在于投资者是否理解其收益与上涨潜力之间的权衡。

bitcoinist8小时前

贝莱德以BITA为代码推出备兑看涨比特币ETF

bitcoinist8小时前

日本加息,为什么全世界都在紧张?

日本央行在2026年6月将政策利率提升至1%,这是自1995年来的首次。尽管1%的利率在主要经济体中并不高,但由于日本长期充当全球最低成本融资中心的特殊角色,此次加息引发了全球市场的广泛关注。 过去二十余年,日本近乎零的利率环境催生了大规模的日元套利交易。国际资本以极低成本借入日元,转而投资于全球高收益资产,如美国科技股和新兴市场债券,这为全球资产价格上涨提供了重要的流动性基础。日本加息意味着这一廉价资金源头开始收紧,可能引发全球资本的去杠杆化调整。 日本长期维持超低利率,源于其人口老龄化、长期通缩和高额政府债务等结构性约束。然而,疫情后全球通胀传导、国内工资持续增长(近年春斗涨薪均超5%)以及日元贬值压力,共同推动其货币政策转向。 市场担忧的核心并非当前1%的利率水平,而是日本持续三十年的超宽松货币政策框架发生根本性转变的趋势。这种变化将重塑全球套利交易的逻辑和风险资产的定价基础。不过,决定全球资本最终流向的关键,仍在于美日之间的利差变化。如果未来美联储进入降息周期而日本继续加息,两者货币政策差异的收窄可能对国际资本市场产生更深远的影响。 简言之,日本加息标志着全球最重要的低成本融资来源进入正常化进程,这可能引发建立在廉价日元资金之上的全球资本配置体系进行深度重估。

marsbit10小时前

日本加息,为什么全世界都在紧张?

marsbit10小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片