40 Days Of Deadlock: US Shutdown Risks ETF Delay Amid Soaring Demand

bitcoinist发布于2025-10-19更新于2025-10-19

文章摘要

The US federal funding lapse has stretched on, creating new delays for regulatory decisions tied to crypto products. According to...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The US federal funding lapse has stretched on, creating new delays for regulatory decisions tied to crypto products. According to reports, the shutdown has lasted beyond 40 days in some scenarios used by market forecasters, and reduced staffing at federal agencies is slowing routine approvals.

Shutdown Stretches Past 40 Days

Reports have disclosed a market estimate putting the chance of a prolonged shutdown at about 55% for certain stretches, which traders say complicates timing for filings and reviews.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is operating with fewer staff, and that has forced some rulemakings and approval windows to be pushed back. For applicants hoping for quick sign-offs, this means waiting longer than planned.

Source: Kalshi

Investor Interest Remains High

Despite the holdup, investor appetite for regulated crypto products appears strong. According to filings and traffic data cited in market reports, clients of Charles Schwab hold roughly 20% of the US crypto ETF market by assets under custody, and web visits to crypto information pages have jumped about 90% on an annualized basis. That shows demand is not evaporating while regulators are idle.

What That Means For Markets

When reviews resume in force, some strategists expect pent-up demand to move into newly approved products. Based on reports, the delay has simply shifted the calendar rather than killed the approvals.

Yet market reaction is not guaranteed to be large; some money may already be waiting on the sidelines, while other investors have moved on.

Bitcoin is currently trading at $107,147. Chart: TradingView

Backlog Could Trigger A Fast Response

Regulatory staff will face a backlog when full operations return. Papers awaiting attention may be prioritized, and several issuers will press to get decisions cleared.

Sources tracking the space warn that a sudden cluster of approvals could follow the end of the funding gap, creating rapid inflows into the newly cleared funds.

Risks Beyond Timing

The shutdown is one of several risks. Reports point to the fact that approvals depend on legal arguments, compliance steps, and the agency’s view on market structure.

A temporary staffing shortfall delays work, but it does not change the substantive questions the regulator must answer before signing off. That means some applications could still be rejected or heavily conditioned.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

你可能也喜欢

大模型刷爆所有考试,却离AGI更远了:这篇论文拆穿了什么?

大模型在各种考试中表现优异,却被一篇新论文指出离真正的通用人工智能(AGI)更远了。目前业界对AGI缺乏公认定义,导致目标模糊。学者Michael Timothy Bennett提出新观点,认为真正的AGI不应以模仿人类为标准,而应是在有限计算、记忆和能量资源下,能像“人工科学家”一样广泛、高效、科学地适应新环境和发现新知识的系统。 他指出当前大模型本质是“规模最大化近似”,依赖海量数据记忆答案,缺乏真正的因果理解和主动探索能力。例如,模型可能因文本概率而错误比较“9.11和9.9”。真正的AGI需具备三大关键能力:从被动响应变为主动实验者;从学习相关性到理解因果关系;在资源限制下动态平衡“探索新知”与“利用已知”。 论文将构建智能的元方法分为三类:主流的规模最大化、追求简洁的简单性最大化,以及弱化约束让系统自寻最优解的约束弱化最大化。Bennett认为,单靠堆参数的路线无法实现AGI,未来需要多种方法融合。 若“人工科学家”标准被接受,AI发展将迎来范式转移:评估重点将从刷榜考试分数,转向测试其在未知环境中的适应与发现能力;技术路线也将从单纯追求规模,转向融合因果推理、主动学习等多维能力的发展。这提示AGI的实现并非现有技术的线性延伸,而是一次根本性的路线重置。

marsbit1小时前

大模型刷爆所有考试,却离AGI更远了:这篇论文拆穿了什么?

marsbit1小时前

教皇发布首份AI通谕:4万字10个观点,AI焦虑被说透了

2026年5月,教皇良十四世发布了天主教会首份关于人工智能的通谕《Magnifica Humanitas》。这份四万余字的文件并非技术指南,而是一份道德框架,旨在探讨AI时代下的人类价值与挑战。 通谕的核心观点认为,技术并非中立,其发展与应用深刻反映了构建者的价值观与利益。AI已悄然融入日常决策系统(如内容推荐、招聘匹配),但其内部运作机制甚至开发者也难以完全解释。关键问题在于技术权力的集中:少数大型私营机构掌控着算力、数据和平台,可能加剧数字鸿沟。 通谕指出了AI带来的具体焦虑:在就业、医疗、司法等领域,自动化决策需要透明与人工监督;AI生成内容的能力可能大规模制造虚假信息;AI伴侣虽满足情感需求,却无法承担真实关系中的责任。此外,通谕强调,AI教育不应只停留在工具使用,更需培养批判性思维;AI重塑劳动时,工作不应仅被视为效率问题,更是人发展能力、参与社会的途径。对于致命或不可逆的决定,人类必须保留最终判断与责任。 最终,通谕将AI的挑战定义为“人类学挑战”。当AI能够模拟创造、判断甚至关系时,人类必须重新审视自身不可替代的价值——即承担真实责任、拥有自由意志与面对脆弱的能力。这份通谕并非提供解决方案,而是将一套道德话语引入全球关于技术未来的讨论之中。

marsbit1小时前

教皇发布首份AI通谕:4万字10个观点,AI焦虑被说透了

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片