India Makes Cybersecurity Audits Mandatory for Crypto Firms

TheCryptoTimes发布于2025-09-17更新于2025-09-17

The Indian government has brought in mandatory cybersecurity audits for cryptocurrency exchanges, custodians, and other intermediaries in response to a surge in crypto cybercrimes.

As per a report from The Economic Times, a newly hired security auditor under the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In) will conduct these audits. CERT-In, which functions under the IT ministry, is responsible for overseeing the country’s cyberspace.

The new requirement is tied to registration with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), India’s anti-money laundering agency. Since virtual digital asset (VDA) firms are already covered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), they are expected to meet compliance standards similar to banks.

In a letter dated September 15, 2025, the FIU asked VDA service providers to ensure that designated compliance officers and directors take immediate action. Currently, India has around 55 entities involved in crypto trading, custody, and related services. The FIU retains the power to deny or cancel registrations if firms fail to meet anti-money laundering requirements.

Why is it necessary?

Cryptocurrency crimes are on the rise in India. As per the Economics Times, local exchange Giottus reported that cryptocrimes account for nearly 20–25% of all cybercrime cases in India. 

Recent hacks have seen criminals exploit loopholes to steal digital assets. They then route the stolen funds through complex global networks, darknet markets, privacy coins, and coin-mixing services to erase transaction trails.

In the previous month, the Indian Parliament’s Standing Committee on Home Affairs released its 254th Report titled “Cyber Crime – Ramifications, Protection and Prevention.” The report highlights how cryptocurrencies are increasingly being exploited in financial frauds, money laundering, ransomware attacks, and human trafficking. The term “crypto” appears repeatedly throughout the report, consistently in a negative context.

Questioning the cybersecurity audits

Functioning these audits is a step forward. However, the main question is whether cybersecurity auditors, who usually review banks and brokerages, can spot security gaps in crypto platforms.

One key measure for these platforms is protecting the ‘private key,’ the alphanumeric code that controls access to funds. Auditors will need to check how and where these keys are stored.

Still, industry voices see this as a positive step. “The introduction of cyber security audits in all likelihood is triggered by recent crypto thefts in a few exchanges,” said Harshal Bhuta, partner at CA firm P. R. Bhuta & Co. He also mentioned the CERT-In directions from April 28, 2022, require keeping logs and storing subscriber data for a set period. This will help authorities track funds hidden through cryptocurrency transactions.

Purushottam Anand, Advocate and Founder of Crypto Legal, expressed that the FIU has also replaced the earlier “Fit & Proper” certificate with a new accreditation called “Partner Accreditation for Compliance & Trust” (PACT).” He noted, “It is expected that FIU will provide additional guidance to registered entities on the scope and parameters for such assessments.

Crypto regulation needed in India

India has imposed strict reporting rules for crypto. Due to this setback,  the industry continues to face challenges such as high taxes and a lack of a dedicated regulatory framework.

Recently, Mudrex, one of India’s largest crypto investment platforms, surveyed 9,352 people on crypto regulation, taxation, and investment trends. The study found that 93% of respondents support regulation. Of these, 56% want full investor-protection frameworks, 24% prefer lighter oversight to encourage innovation, and 13% favor regulation limited to taxation. 

Some industry reports suggest the government could adopt a segmented approach to regulation, treating Bitcoin, stablecoins, and utility tokens differently based on their use.

Also Read: Indian Politician Says Digital Rupee Could Lower Remittance Costs


Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

你可能也喜欢

第三方服务商遭入侵引发300万美元钓鱼攻击,Polymarket承诺赔付受影响的用户

预测市场平台Polymarket表示,在因第三方供应商遭入侵导致其前端被植入恶意代码后,将全额赔偿受影响的用户。此次事件引发了一场网络钓鱼攻击,区块链安全研究人员估计损失近**300万美元**。 Polymarket在**6月25日**发布的声明中称,已于当日发现供应商遭入侵,并迅速移除了受影响的依赖项,控制了事态。公司表示正在联系受影响的用户并承诺全额退款。此次事件似乎仅影响了在攻击期间与受感染前端交互的用户,平台底层智能合约未受影响。 据分析,攻击源于一家遭入侵的第三方供应商,其在平台前端部分注入了恶意脚本。Polymarket尚未公开涉事供应商身份或发布详细的技术分析报告。 区块链安全公司PeckShield指出,这起事件疑似针对Polymarket用户的钓鱼活动。攻击者从超过**11个受害钱包**中盗取了价值约**300万美元的PUSD**,随后将被盗资金从Polygon桥接至以太坊,并兑换为约**1,893 ETH**,最终整合至一个被监控的地址。Polymarket未公开确认具体损失金额或受影响钱包数量。 与许多用户需自行承担损失的钓鱼事件不同,Polymarket承诺对所有受攻击影响的用户进行赔偿。公司表示正在直接联系受影响用户并继续调查此次入侵事件,但未提供赔偿流程或完整事件报告发布的具体时间表。

ambcrypto12分钟前

第三方服务商遭入侵引发300万美元钓鱼攻击,Polymarket承诺赔付受影响的用户

ambcrypto12分钟前

XRP周线RSI显示超卖信号,交易员紧盯1.10美元支撑位

XRP周线RSI指标显示超卖信号,交易员正密切关注1.10美元关键支撑位。在经历市场大幅回调后,XRP价格已进入一个被交易员拿来与先前周期底部条件相比较的深度超卖技术形态。当前焦点在于,这一位于关键支撑区域的技术设置,究竟会成为反弹信号,还是延续下跌的警示。 文章指出,在高时间框架图表上,极端的RSI读数能够显示卖压是否已过度延伸,但该指标本身衡量的是动量而非价值。对于XRP而言,当前技术层面的核心问题是:这一超卖状态反映的是市场抛售 capitulation,还是仅仅是一个弱势资产在弱市中的表现。答案将取决于买家能否守住支撑位,以及整个加密货币市场能否企稳。 XRP作为最受关注的大型山寨币之一,其技术形态容易快速吸引市场注意力,但也伴随着风险——如果比特币持续疲软,拥挤的反弹交易可能迅速瓦解。目前,RSI信号最好被解读为一个警告,表明XRP正处于一个重要的决策点。它并不保证底部已经形成,但暗示了价格在支撑位附近的下一步动向,或将决定未来一段时间的交易情绪。 最终,市场方向并非由单一头条决定。当前市场正同时应对流动性减弱、政策监管趋严、机构产品推出以及高波动性代币再度承压等多重因素。因此,最稳妥的解读方式是避免将此视为确定的价格催化剂,而应关注其对市场参与者、建设者和观察下一阶段加密货币采用的投资者所带来的实际影响。

bitcoinist14分钟前

XRP周线RSI显示超卖信号,交易员紧盯1.10美元支撑位

bitcoinist14分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片