Gemini Stock Drops 24% Post-IPO Amid Profitability Woes

TheCryptoTimes发布于2025-09-16更新于2025-09-16

Shares of crypto exchange Gemini (GEMI) have fallen nearly 24% since its initial public offering (IPO) last week, signaling a sharp reversal in early investor excitement and raising questions about its high valuation amid significant financial losses.

The stock, which trades on the Nasdaq exchange, closed down approximately 6% on Tuesday at $30.42. After its IPO priced at $28 per share last Friday, Gemini’s stock initially surged to a high of $45.89 on its first day of trading. However, the early gains have since evaporated, with the stock plunging more than 34% from its peak as market sentiment has cooled.

The drop seems to be related to investors’ worries that the company isn’t making enough money. Gemini filed for an initial public offering (IPO) and said it had a net loss of $283 million for the first half of 2025. This was after losing $159 million for the whole year of 2024. The exchange was worth $3.3 billion before trading, which is a big difference in results.

Analyst Highlights Valuation Challenge

Ed Engel, an analyst at Compass Point, highlighted the valuation challenge, noting that “GEMI is currently trading at 26 times its annualized first-half revenue,” a steep multiple for a loss-making company.

Gemini’s slump comes as competitors have seen mixed results over the past week; shares of Coinbase (COIN) remained flat and Robinhood (HOOD) fell 3%, while Circle (CRCL) saw its stock rise 13%.

Gemini Price ChartGemini Price Chart

Gemini Price Chart, SOURCE: Yahoo Finance

While Gemini successfully raised $425 million from its public offering, its subsequent market performance underscores the intense scrutiny that crypto-native firms face on Wall Street. The swift downturn suggests that investors are increasingly prioritizing a clear path to profitability over brand recognition and growth projections alone.

Gemini’s experience may serve as a cautionary tale for other crypto companies considering an IPO, indicating that public markets demand sustainable financial models, even from the most established digital asset brands.

Also read: SEC, Gemini Reach Tentative Settlement in Crypto Lending Case

Disclaimer

The Crypto Times publishes news, analysis, and educational content for informational purposes only. We do not offer financial, investment, legal, or trading advice of any kind. All content on our website is intended to be neutral and fact-based. Readers should always do their own research, consult with licensed professionals, and evaluate risks independently.

The Crypto Times does not endorse or recommend any specific cryptocurrencies, tokens, projects, financial products, or investment strategies. We do not accept legal liability for any financial losses incurred as a result of reliance on information published by us.


Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

你可能也喜欢

解读资产上链背后的杠杆、流动性与风险真相

RWA(现实世界资产)代币化常被讨论,但其价值不在于简单的资产上链,而在于能否在DeFi生态中实现高效、有韧性的金融运作。文章指出,代币化仅是赋予资产一个可识别的数字凭证(如同条形码),真正的变革来自DeFi提供的杠杆、流动性和风险管理能力。 核心挑战在于RWA与DeFi存在多重“时间时钟”冲突:区块链实时结算,而底层传统资产交易、赎回和处理存在延迟。这导致在压力情景下(如周末清算),链上快速处置需求与现实世界缓慢流程之间产生缺口,低波动资产(如国债代币)可能因流动性不足而比高波动加密资产风险更高。 真正的流动性并非总锁定价值(TVL),而是在需要时能否在限定时间内以可接受价格退出。资产需具备多条清晰的退出路径(二级市场卖出、发行方赎回、抵押借贷)。 杠杆能释放资产效用(如抵押借贷),但也引入脆弱性。抵押率的设定需综合考虑法律可执行性、数据新鲜度、赎回延迟、市场深度等多重风险,而不仅是资产波动率。因此,某些情况下国债代币的抵押率应低于ETH。 RWA的风险是一张相互关联的图谱,涉及发行方、托管、预言机、流动性提供者、协议等多节点,需持续监控链下指标(如赎回排队、市场深度)而不仅依赖价格信号。 展望未来,国债代币仅是起点。算力、能源等复杂资产以及代币化股票与永续合约的结合将带来更大机遇与更复杂的风险,需要精心设计风险隔离、动态抵押等机制。 最终,RWA的意义不在于代币本身,而在于其能否融入一个健壮的、可编程的市场体系,在压力下完成估值、融资、对冲和处置,实现资本的高效配置和风险管理。代币是条形码,市场才是运转的机器。

marsbit32分钟前

解读资产上链背后的杠杆、流动性与风险真相

marsbit32分钟前

数学的终结:40位顶尖数学家齐聚OpenAI秘密会议

今年8月初,刚刚获得菲尔兹奖的Jacob Tsimerman与OpenAI科学家Sébastien Bubeck在旧金山召集约40位顶尖数学家举行闭门峰会。会议上一场报告标题为“数学的终结”,引发对人工智能可能终结人类数学研究的深度担忧。 近期AI在数学领域取得一系列突破性成果:5月,OpenAI未发布模型推翻了悬置多年的“单位距离猜想”;8月,该公司又公布了10项AI生成的数学与计算机科学新发现;Anthropic员工利用Claude构造出668维超立方体上的垂直向量对。这些成果绕过了传统的学术发表流程,通过社交媒体等方式快速传播。 数学界的反应出现分裂。超过3000名数学家签署“莱顿宣言”,呼吁负责任地使用AI并确保成果的可验证性。另一些学者则主张抵制AI以保住人类在数学中的位置。与会者指出,AI目前虽能证明问题,但难以解释论证中最困难的部分,也无法自主提出新概念。人类的理解与阐释仍是数学知识成为文献的关键。 峰会探讨了数学未来的几种可能形态:或如软件工程般大规模协作;或如物理学般依赖算力;或人类转为AI产出的“策展人”;抑或数学家集体转向AI安全研究。组织者强调“必须把人放在第一位”,数学的意义在于人类能从中学习。然而会议并未达成共识,数学界仍在寻找自身在AI时代的定位。Tsimerman选择加入OpenAI从事AI安全研究,这一举动本身已折射出该领域面临的深刻变革。

marsbit37分钟前

数学的终结:40位顶尖数学家齐聚OpenAI秘密会议

marsbit37分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片