A Ticking Time Bomb? US Senator Compares GENIUS Act To 2008 Financial Crisis

bitcoinist发布于2025-08-01更新于2025-08-01

文章摘要

US President Donald Trump’s new crypto law is under fire from Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who warns it could repeat mistakes...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

US President Donald Trump’s new crypto law is under fire from Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who warns it could repeat mistakes that led to the 2008 crash.

Based on reports from Vanity Fair, Warren says the GENIUS Act was shaped more by industry players than by public interest, and she fears ordinary Americans will pay the price.

GENIUS Act: Industry Influence Draws Fire

According to Warren, the bill was “coined” by crypto insiders eager to protect their own gains. She pointed out that firms linked to the Trump family rolled out memecoins like Official Trump and Melania, plus a USD1 stablecoin, all while pushing for looser rules.

Forbes put the president’s crypto take at $1 billion in June—higher than any other project he runs. Warren noted that Trump even disbanded the DOJ’s crypto enforcement unit, clearing the way for insiders to write the rules.

“Donald Trump is using the presidency to enrich himself through crypto, and he’s doing it in plain sight,” she said.

Crypto lawyers and lobbyists had a direct line to lawmakers, crafting language that favors big issuers at the expense of consumer safeguards. Warren warned that this setup hands too much power to a few, with little chance for Congress or watchdogs to step in.

Historical Echoes Loom

Warren drew a straight line back to the 2000 Commodity Futures Modernization Act. That bill deregulated over-the-counter derivatives, helping spark the 2008 financial crisis.

She recalled that crash cost 10 million American families their homes, jobs and savings. “When Washington works for industries like this,” she said, “a handful of people get really rich, and the American people pay the price.”

Total crypto market cap currently at $3.8 trillion. Chart: TradingView

Warren’s point is clear: handing draft legislation to the very industry you’re meant to oversee rarely ends well.

Yet the GENIUS Act does include some tougher rules. It forces stablecoin issuers to hold high-quality reserves and submit to regular audits.

Tether, the biggest USD-pegged token, has already boosted its reserves to meet the new thresholds. Even so, historians of finance warn that strong paper rules can unravel if checks and balances vanish.

GENIUS Act: Stablecoin Risks Take Center Stage

Meanwhile, some economists say the GENIUS Act risks returning the US to a patchwork of private currencies. He points to Free Banking Era chaos, when banks issued their own notes and payment networks broke down.

Today, tech giants from Walmart to Amazon could launch branded coins, bypassing banks and card networks. That could mean hundreds of private dollars floating side by side, each with its own failure risk.

Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

你可能也喜欢

稳定币是加密世界的“保皇派”:Open USD 让旧货币体系亲自下场

Open USD的推出标志着稳定币竞争进入新阶段,由140多家传统金融、科技和加密机构组成的联盟共同参与,使其从创业公司的产品之争升级为基础设施之争。学者胡翌霖指出,稳定币并非加密革命的温和派,而是旧货币体系内部的“保皇派改革”——它利用区块链提升效率,却依然维护美元和美联储的中心地位。真正的加密革命需挑战更根本的前提:市场是否必须依赖央行作为货币秩序的核心。 Open USD由Visa、万事达、贝莱德、谷歌、Coinbase等巨头联合推出,允许企业零成本铸造赎回,并将储备收益分配给合作伙伴。这直接威胁到USDC等现有稳定币的商业模式。胡翌霖认为,其象征意义在于传统金融体系亲自下场主导稳定币网络,反衬出原生稳定币创业者的尴尬:若其目标仅是提升旧体系效率,那么当旧体系采纳该技术后,其革命性便宣告终结。 胡翌霖将稳定币比作天文学史上的第谷体系:虽吸收新技术,却拒绝“地球动起来”的核心革命。稳定币反对的是低效的支付网络与金融中介,而非美元本位本身。它更像是美元霸权的“区块链升级包”,可能强化而非削弱美元体系。如果链上金融全面以美元稳定币计价,繁荣的链上活动反而可能巩固链下传统金融资产的价值,使加密本币(如ETH)沦为单纯的“燃料”,难以获得货币性溢价。 因此,胡翌霖强调,追求文明级变革的加密项目(如比特币)不应将叙事降格为手续费经济,而必须坚持“去中心化”的核心,无论是通过币本位、抗审查还是开放治理。真正的“哥白尼时刻”在于让人们相信:市场交易与货币价值可以自发形成,无需一个固定的央行作为中心。稳定币可作为过渡工具,但若加密世界最终仍围绕美元旋转,则革命尚未成功。

链捕手2小时前

稳定币是加密世界的“保皇派”:Open USD 让旧货币体系亲自下场

链捕手2小时前

渣打接管 USDC 入口,Circle 让权换规模

渣打银行与Circle联合宣布,机构客户现可通过渣打账户体系直接进行USDC的铸造与赎回,无需在Circle单独开户。该服务率先在迪拜国际金融中心推出,未来将视监管情况拓展。 此举标志着全球系统重要性银行首次正面接管稳定币的“印钞”入口。对于养老金、主权基金等大型合规机构而言,他们此前因风控与合规门槛难以直接使用USDC,如今可通过其信任的银行渠道安全接入,相当于将USDC转化为“银行账户内的一个选项”,有望吸引巨量传统资金入场。 对Circle而言,这是一笔战略性交易:让渡部分前端客户关系,换取借助渣打成熟渠道触达以往难以突破的大型机构客户,从而提升USDC的整体发行规模与利息收入核心业务。对渣打而言,则无需自行发币,即可利用现有信用网络提供数字资产服务并收取费用。 双方形成了新的分工:Circle专注规模与信用背书,渣打则扮演合规入口与分销渠道。选择迪拜首发,意在利用其友好的监管环境进行模式试验,再向其他市场复制。 此事更深层的意义在于叙事转变:稳定币不再意图绕开传统金融体系,而是被整合进主流银行的资产负债表与产品货架,其机构层面的合法性问题已基本解决。未来的竞争焦点将转向在发行方、银行渠道与合规牌照的新组合中,谁更贴近客户并掌握定价权。

marsbit5小时前

渣打接管 USDC 入口,Circle 让权换规模

marsbit5小时前

交易

现货
活动图片