Google Takes Legal Action Against Alleged Crypto Scammers for Uploading Fraudulent Apps

CoinDeskPolicy发布于2024-04-03更新于2024-04-04

文章摘要

The defendants are said to have committed hundreds of acts of wire fraud, "causing harm to Google and at least approximately 100,000 Google users."

  • Google is suing a group of alleged scammers who are said to have uploaded fraudulent apps to Google Play.
  • Victims were lured to download the apps with promises of high returns that the lawsuit described as "illusory."
  • A Google spokesperson described the lawsuit as a "unique opportunity" to set a precedent for how to deal with bad actors.

Google filed a lawsuit against alleged crypto scammers claiming they uploaded fraudulent investment apps to Google Play.

The lawsuit filed Thursday in the Southern District of New York alleges that Yunfeng Sun and Hongnam Cheung committed hundreds of acts of wire fraud, "causing harm to Google and at least approximately 100,000 Google users."

The defendants made "multiple misrepresentations to Google in order to upload their fraudulent apps to Google Play, including but not limited to, misrepresentations about their identity, location, and the type and nature of the application being uploaded," according to the filing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Victims were lured to download the apps with promises of high returns from investing in crypto and other products, which the lawsuit described as "illusory." When victims attempted to withdraw their balances, they would be asked to pay various fees to recover their investments and purported gains, according to the filing.

"This is a unique opportunity for us to use our resources to actually combat bad actors who were running an extensive crypto scheme to defraud some of our users," Halimah DeLaine Prado, general counsel at Google, said in an interview with CNBC. "This [lawsuit] allows us to not only use our resources to protect users, but to also serve as sort of a precedent to future bad actors that we don't tolerate this behavior."

Edited by Sheldon Reback.





你可能也喜欢

AI 巨头的「Token 补贴大战」,快打完了吗?

AI巨头间的“Token补贴大战”正趋于白热化,但这场竞争的性质和可能结局与互联网时代的补贴战截然不同。 目前,OpenAI和Anthropic等公司的订阅套餐存在巨额补贴,高端套餐用户享受到的Token价值可能是其付费的数十倍。这种“逆向定价”旨在用亏损绑定重度用户和开发者。然而,与滴滴、美团等通过补贴建立用户锁定效应的模式不同,AI Token的切换成本极低——用户几乎可以无成本地在不同AI模型间迁移。这意味着补贴无法构筑护城河,一旦停止,用户可能迅速流失。 竞争格局呈现结构性不对称。谷歌凭借每年超3000亿美元的广告收入,拥有可持续补贴Token的“印钞机”,而OpenAI和Anthropic则依赖融资,未来上市后将面临盈利压力。Google Ventures创始人Bill Maris指出,谷歌完全有能力将Token价格再降80%,这将给竞争对手带来严峻挑战。 关于终局,文章认为存在两种可能:一是“互联网服务”剧本,通过补贴实现垄断后涨价;二是“水电煤”剧本,Token成为标准化基础资源,价格被压向成本线,利润率趋近于零。由于Token缺乏锁定效应,第二种可能性更大。这意味着AI竞争可能是一场没有明确赢家的“无限游戏”,参战者的核心目标是确保自己始终留在牌桌上,通过竞争共同推动技术普及和生态壮大。 最终,AI可能像电力一样,成为一种任何公司都无法独占的公共基础设施。这对用户而言或许是好事,只要补贴战持续,就能以极低成本享用强大算力。但对OpenAI和Anthropic等公司而言,它们所追逐的靠AI赚取暴利的梦想,可能从结构上就难以实现。

marsbit17分钟前

AI 巨头的「Token 补贴大战」,快打完了吗?

marsbit17分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片