U.S. Senate Banking Committee Looks For Regulatory Clarity In "Crypto Cash" Hearing

Coingape发布于2023-02-15更新于2023-02-15

文章摘要

It is anticipated that the Senate Banking Committee would advocate for new, stricter regulatory protections to protect U.S. customers.

In a Valentine’s Day scheduled hearing, skeptical members of the Senate Banking Committee are hearing both crypto enthusiasts and evangelists to understand the recent “crypto crash” while advocating new, more stringent regulatory safeguards to protect consumers in the United States. This comes after a string of failures that plagued the cryptocurrency industry over the course of the past year, starting with the FTX debacle.
""

Senators Concerned About Crypto Crash


The hearing takes place at a crucial juncture for the cryptocurrency market, which currently faces a series of scandals, fraud, dramatic arrests, international manhunts, hacks, exploits, obtrusive marketing and even age-old embezzlement strategies. In many instances, major financial authorities such as the SEC, NYDFS & Justice Department have barged into crypto firms to either penalize them or outright ceasing them to operate.

Ranking Member Tim Scott opened the hearing by saying the committee needed to hear from the SEC Chair Gary Gensler directly in order to understand the recent regulatory actions undertaken by the financial watchdog; hinting at the charges levied against Kraken and Paxos. The committee’s chairman, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), reiterated the worries that governments and central banks expressed ten years ago: cryptocurrency can be used for illegal operations like drug trafficking and human trafficking, and can result in fraudulent behavior.


Brown in his opening remarks was quoted as saying:

"Contrary to crypto evangelists’ claims of democratizing finance, it’s not the early adopters are the big money investors left holding the bag when it comes to crypto."

“It turns out fortune doesn’t favor the brave. It favors wealthy insiders. It’s not just about a few bad actors that didn’t do things quite the right way. These crypto catastrophes have exposed what many of us already knew about digital assets, cryptocurrency, and stablecoins.”, Brown added.


Questions Raised Against SEC


In order to protect savers and investors, government officials conducted an investigation with the assistance of three witnesses to evaluate the requirements and advantages of establishing a regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency business.

However, not everyone was persuaded that imposing extra crypto regulations is the best way to address the problems facing the cryptocurrency business. Senator Tim Scott (R-South Carolina), said that federal authorities already held the power to clamp down on a corporation such as FTX.


He stated that even though the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) previously noted that cryptocurrency firms are required to comply with existing regulations, emphasizing the fact that it’s also the responsibility of regulators to “enforce existing regulations and to conduct appropriate, effective supervision.”

你可能也喜欢

天主教与执法团体警告CLARITY法案可能削弱打击加密货币犯罪的安全措施

一个由天主教领袖、执法相关团体及反贩卖倡导者组成的联盟警告称,《清晰法案》可能会削弱打击加密货币犯罪的安全措施。批评焦点在于法案中保护非托管软件开发者免受货币传输服务商待遇的条款。 这一争议触及了加密货币监管中最棘手的问题之一:如何区分中性软件与金融中介。加密倡导者认为,发布非托管代码的开发者不应像交易所或支付处理商那样受到监管。批评者则担心,广泛的豁免可能使追踪非法金融活动变得更加困难。 非托管软件是去中心化金融(DeFi)的核心。钱包、智能合约和去中心化协议通常允许用户在没有公司控制资金的情况下进行交易。这种架构是加密货币价值主张的核心部分,但当不法分子使用相同工具时,也带来了执法挑战。 《清晰法案》旨在制定更清晰的市场结构规则,但反对意见表明并非所有政策争论都围绕投资者保护或交易所注册。一些立法者在决定开发者保护应扩展到何种程度时,还会考虑人口贩卖、制裁逃避、欺诈以及执法可见性等因素。 尽管面临阻力,该法案并未夭折,但支持者可能需要回应法案可能为非法金融活动创造漏洞的担忧。这可能导致修正案、更狭窄的安全港规则或额外的报告要求。对加密公司而言,风险很高:更明确的规则可能在美国释放投资和产品开发潜力,但如果法案被定性为削弱犯罪防护,其政治道路将变得更为艰难。

bitcoinist4小时前

天主教与执法团体警告CLARITY法案可能削弱打击加密货币犯罪的安全措施

bitcoinist4小时前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

今年以来,比特币先驱Adam Back及其创立的Blockstream频繁引发争议。本月初,调查账号NatInfoSec发布长文,指控Blockstream发行的比特币矿业票据(BMN)可能存在严重问题。 指控核心包括:1. **算力与兑付能力存疑**:根据BMN的兑付义务,Blockstream需运营远超其公开显示的算力(约15 EH/s),但未在公开渠道找到相匹配的矿场、电力或算力证据。票据条款允许其以任意来源的BTC进行兑付,透明度不足。2. **高收益与高风险**:相关票据提供高达20%的固定年化收益,在波动剧烈的挖矿行业中难以持续,资金来源成疑。3. **关键人物前科与披露问题**:Blockstream矿业业务的重要关联方、Exacore CEO Christopher Cook曾被判邮件欺诈罪,但此前未在发行文件中披露,其背景陈述也存在夸大。4. **牵连BSTR上市计划**:质疑者担心BMN的潜在风险可能波及Adam Back关联的、正筹备SPAC上市的Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company(BSTR),尽管其法律独立性尚不明确。 BitMEX Research随后发表评论,承认Cook的前科属实且高收益令人担忧,但认为其他部分指控证据不足或存在误导,例如BMN与BSTR在法律上可能独立。社区争论焦点集中于Blockstream矿场算力的**可验证性**——投资者能否独立核查支撑收益的真实挖矿活动。 目前,围绕BMN仍存在几个关键疑问:实际发行规模与责任边界、矿场算力是否足以支撑兑付、近20%固定收益的具体来源、兑付资金的链上可验证性,以及Cook的实际角色。Blockstream尚未对此作出系统性回应。尽管指控有待最终证实,但BMN产品在透明度、风险披露和收益合理性方面,确实存在需要厘清的空间。

marsbit8小时前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

marsbit8小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片