[Featured Research] 2023 US Market Prediction

Economist发布于2023-01-31更新于2023-01-31

文章摘要

Looking under the hood, the latest GDP report also confirms organic growth is rapidly trending down and heading below zero.

In 4-5 months, I expect the US to be in a recession.

Predictions without a timeframe are useless and not actionable.

Now, it seems most analysts ‘‘expect a recession’’.

Ok, but when will it hit and how hard will it be?

The answers to these two questions are very important for asset allocation in 2023.

First of all: shall we agree on what characterizes a recession in the first place?

While many refer to 2 consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth as the main signal for a recession, the NBER instead looks at consumer spending, the labor market and corporate earnings.

GDP reports are delayed and often subject to big revisions.

The NBER methodology is more robust, and it allows us to assess live whether we are in a recession or not mostly looking at consumers, the labor market and earnings growth.

So: let's do that.

Here are 4 leading macro indicators that can help assess when and how hard a recession could hit.

#1: The Global Credit Impulse

When Recession? - March/April 2023

How Bad? - Bad

The global credit impulse (blue) leads S&P500 earnings growth (orange) by 9 months, and given its rapid decline in 2022 it’s now pointing to negative YoY EPS by March/April 2023

Rapid declines in the Global Credit Impulse have preceded YoY EPS contraction in the 10-20% area

#2: The Conference Board Leading Indicator Index

When Recession? - April/May 2023

How Bad? - On par with 2001 at least

This index incorporates the top 10 statistically significant forward-leading indicators for the US economy.

Over the last 50+ years, every time the YoY series of this index prints in negative territory for 2+ consecutive months a recession is guaranteed.

The Housing Market

When Recession? - May 2023

How Bad? - Pretty bad, given unemployment rate is supposed to breach 7% by early 2024

In 2007 Edward Leamer of the University of California stated that the housing market IS the business cycle

I believe he is fundamentally right

Housing-related jobs and economic activity represent anything between 12-15% of US GDP and employment alone

The NAHB housing index (orange, inverted) leads trends in US unemployment rate (blue) by roughly 12 months

According to the Sahm Rule, a recession starts when the 3-month moving average of the US unemployment rate rises by 50+ bps relative to its low during the previous 12m

#4: Philly Fed New Orders

When Recession? - May 2023

How Bad? - Too early to say, probably on par with 2001 at least

The survey goes out to 125 CEOs of relevant companies who tend to have a good grasp of where economic activity is headed.

Over the last 40 years, every time the 12m moving average of this index dropped below 15 for 2+ months, a recession always followed.

Conclusion: several leading macro indicators are pointing to a US recession starting in 4-5 months, and of a magnitude at least on par with 2001.

Looking under the hood, the latest GDP report also confirms organic growth is rapidly trending down and heading below zero.

你可能也喜欢

天主教与执法团体警告CLARITY法案可能削弱打击加密货币犯罪的安全措施

一个由天主教领袖、执法相关团体及反贩卖倡导者组成的联盟警告称,《清晰法案》可能会削弱打击加密货币犯罪的安全措施。批评焦点在于法案中保护非托管软件开发者免受货币传输服务商待遇的条款。 这一争议触及了加密货币监管中最棘手的问题之一:如何区分中性软件与金融中介。加密倡导者认为,发布非托管代码的开发者不应像交易所或支付处理商那样受到监管。批评者则担心,广泛的豁免可能使追踪非法金融活动变得更加困难。 非托管软件是去中心化金融(DeFi)的核心。钱包、智能合约和去中心化协议通常允许用户在没有公司控制资金的情况下进行交易。这种架构是加密货币价值主张的核心部分,但当不法分子使用相同工具时,也带来了执法挑战。 《清晰法案》旨在制定更清晰的市场结构规则,但反对意见表明并非所有政策争论都围绕投资者保护或交易所注册。一些立法者在决定开发者保护应扩展到何种程度时,还会考虑人口贩卖、制裁逃避、欺诈以及执法可见性等因素。 尽管面临阻力,该法案并未夭折,但支持者可能需要回应法案可能为非法金融活动创造漏洞的担忧。这可能导致修正案、更狭窄的安全港规则或额外的报告要求。对加密公司而言,风险很高:更明确的规则可能在美国释放投资和产品开发潜力,但如果法案被定性为削弱犯罪防护,其政治道路将变得更为艰难。

bitcoinist2小时前

天主教与执法团体警告CLARITY法案可能削弱打击加密货币犯罪的安全措施

bitcoinist2小时前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

今年以来,比特币先驱Adam Back及其创立的Blockstream频繁引发争议。本月初,调查账号NatInfoSec发布长文,指控Blockstream发行的比特币矿业票据(BMN)可能存在严重问题。 指控核心包括:1. **算力与兑付能力存疑**:根据BMN的兑付义务,Blockstream需运营远超其公开显示的算力(约15 EH/s),但未在公开渠道找到相匹配的矿场、电力或算力证据。票据条款允许其以任意来源的BTC进行兑付,透明度不足。2. **高收益与高风险**:相关票据提供高达20%的固定年化收益,在波动剧烈的挖矿行业中难以持续,资金来源成疑。3. **关键人物前科与披露问题**:Blockstream矿业业务的重要关联方、Exacore CEO Christopher Cook曾被判邮件欺诈罪,但此前未在发行文件中披露,其背景陈述也存在夸大。4. **牵连BSTR上市计划**:质疑者担心BMN的潜在风险可能波及Adam Back关联的、正筹备SPAC上市的Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company(BSTR),尽管其法律独立性尚不明确。 BitMEX Research随后发表评论,承认Cook的前科属实且高收益令人担忧,但认为其他部分指控证据不足或存在误导,例如BMN与BSTR在法律上可能独立。社区争论焦点集中于Blockstream矿场算力的**可验证性**——投资者能否独立核查支撑收益的真实挖矿活动。 目前,围绕BMN仍存在几个关键疑问:实际发行规模与责任边界、矿场算力是否足以支撑兑付、近20%固定收益的具体来源、兑付资金的链上可验证性,以及Cook的实际角色。Blockstream尚未对此作出系统性回应。尽管指控有待最终证实,但BMN产品在透明度、风险披露和收益合理性方面,确实存在需要厘清的空间。

marsbit6小时前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

marsbit6小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片