# Bài viết Liên quan Criminal

Trung tâm Tin tức HTX cung cấp những bài viết mới nhất và phân tích chuyên sâu về "Criminal", bao gồm xu hướng thị trường, cập nhật dự án, phát triển công nghệ và chính sách quản lý trong ngành tiền kỹ thuật số.

Web3 Developers Urgent Self-Check: Technical Circumvention of Copyright Infringement Is a Criminal Offense

A Hangzhou Internet Court ruling in the "Fat Tiger Gets a Vaccine" NFT copyright case underscores that decentralization does not exempt developers and platforms from legal responsibility. The verdict clarifies that "technology-enabled copyright evasion" — bypassing digital safeguards like access controls or copyright protection mechanisms — constitutes infringement, even if done indirectly. Such evasion includes direct circumvention (e.g., breaking encryption) and indirect acts (e.g., distributing tools that enable bypassing protections). In Web3, risks are heightened due to broader evasion targets (e.g., smart contracts, blockchain protocols), complex involved parties (e.g., anonymous DAOs, global nodes), and irreversible on-chain侵权 consequences. Chinese judicial interpretations explicitly criminalize providing tools or services designed to circumvent copyright protections. Platforms cannot claim "technology neutrality" and must implement proactive governance, including smart contract audits and content monitoring. Compliance should be integrated early in project design, with legal expertise guiding tokenomics and technical architecture to balance innovation and legality.

marsbit01/06 03:34

Web3 Developers Urgent Self-Check: Technical Circumvention of Copyright Infringement Is a Criminal Offense

marsbit01/06 03:34

Behind Cryptocurrency 'Thefts and Scams': Why Does Civil Relief Frequently Encounter Obstacles?

Behind the surge in cryptocurrency "thefts and scams", why does civil relief frequently hit roadblocks? This article explores the legal challenges through two representative cases. In Case 1, a company paid 800,000 USDT to a Chinese employee of an overseas exchange for a listing service, only to have the employee disappear. Despite cross-border complexities and initial police refusal to accept the report (citing the company’s foreign status and claims that crypto "is not protected by law"), lawyers eventually secured case acceptance by invoking criminal procedure rules and citing regulatory recognition of virtual assets as property. However, formal立案 (case filing) is still pending. Case 2 involved a woman scammed into transferring over RMB 3 million to a USDT exchanger for a fake investment. While police quickly arrested the exchanger, the main scammer remained abroad. The exchanger was released due to lack of criminal intent, and a civil lawsuit against them for unjust enrichment was rejected at filing. The judge indicated that even if accepted, such cases rarely succeed. The analysis highlights key obstacles: the "criminal procedure takes precedence" principle often blocks civil suits until criminal proceedings conclude; if a criminal judgment orders restitution, further civil claims are barred; and bypassing criminal reporting to file civilly usually results in the case being referred back to police, wasting time. Ultimately, when crypto crimes are involved, civil relief is extremely difficult. The more viable path remains criminal prosecution, despite its own challenges, as civil victories are exceptionally rare in practice.

marsbit12/09 19:39

Behind Cryptocurrency 'Thefts and Scams': Why Does Civil Relief Frequently Encounter Obstacles?

marsbit12/09 19:39

活动图片

Danh mục Phổ biếnright-arrow

Thẻ Nổi bậtright-arrow

Project Updates

Regulatory Policy