Q4 Net Loss of $667 Million, Yet Stock Soars 16%, Don't Buy Coinbase Now

Odaily星球日报Xuất bản vào 2026-02-14Cập nhật gần nhất vào 2026-02-14

Tóm tắt

Coinbase reported a net loss of $667 million in Q4 2025, with revenue of $1.78 billion falling short of expectations. Despite this, its stock surged 16.46% the next day, reflecting short-term market optimism. However, analysts caution against investing in Coinbase at this time, citing high cyclicality and near-term headwinds. Revenue is split between transaction-based income (56%) and subscription/services (44%). Transaction revenue relies heavily on retail trading spreads, which are under pressure due to declining crypto prices and reduced volatility. Subscription revenue, led by USDC interest income and staking, offers diversification but remains sensitive to interest rates and market conditions. Key debates include whether Coinbase can reduce its dependence on crypto market cycles, the sustainability of stablecoin profits, and the impact of future regulations. While the company holds a dominant position in the U.S. market due to its regulatory compliance and trust, it faces growing competition from decentralized exchanges globally. Analysts project underperformance in 2026, with earnings potentially 14% below consensus due to compressed client assets and trading activity. Although regulatory clarity may benefit Coinbase long-term, it is unlikely to offset immediate financial pressures. Valuation scenarios range from a negative IRR in a bear case to a high IRR in an optimistic rebound, but near-term risks currently outweigh potential returns.

Original Author / Tiago Souza, Mario Stefanidis

Compiled by / Odaily Planet Daily Golem(@web 3_golem)

Editor's Note: On February 13th, Coinbase released its Q4 and full-year 2025 financial report.The reportshowed that although Coinbase had a strong full-year performance with trading volume and market share doubling, and platform assets and USDC balances both hitting record highs, it recorded a net loss of $667 million in Q4 2025, with a loss per share of $2.49, and total revenue of $1.78 billion, falling far short of analysts' expectations.

Consequently, several Wall Street investment banks, including JPMorgan and Canaccord,loweredtheir target price for Coinbase stock. However, by the close of US markets on February 14th, COIN still surged by 16.46%, seemingly unaffected by the Q4 earnings miss, proving that the market remains optimistic about Coinbase's various business developments in 2026 in the short term.

But analysts at Artemis believe that in this field, timing is crucial. While Coinbase's market prospects are promising in the long run, its current returns are insufficient to compensate for the risks in the short term. Coinbase remains highly cyclical. Given the continued pressure on brokerage fundamentals and the lagging impact of the current market downturn, the market's general expectations for Coinbase in 2026 are still too high. Therefore, it is not advisable to buy its stock now.

The analysts systematically elaborated on the composition of Coinbase's business revenue, its current advantages, and future challenges. Odaily Planet Daily has compiled and translated the key analysis points below for investors' reference.

Conclusion First: Not Recommended to Invest in Coinbase Now

Coinbase's Core Financial Data Over the Years

We currently do not recommend investing in Coinbase because we believe its current returns are insufficient to compensate for the risks. Although Coinbase still holds an absolute leading position in the US market, with a strong institutional client base, a favorable regulatory status, and solid domestic competitive advantages, the timing of investor entry is paramount.

Looking back at previous cryptocurrency sell-offs, earnings estimate downgrades and P/E multiple compression often persist for some time after the initial price correction, as declining account asset sizes and weak trading activity lag behind financial performance. We expect a similar pattern in the current cycle.

Given the continued pressure on Coinbase's brokerage business fundamentals and the high likelihood of earnings falling short of expectations for fiscal years 2025 and 2026, significant downside risks remain. Although Coinbase's long-term franchise value persists, short-term volatility and the potential for earnings misses lead us to conclude: at this stage of the cycle, the expected return is insufficient to compensate for the risk.

Overview of Coinbase's Business Revenue Composition

Coinbase is a centralized cryptocurrency platform whose primary source of revenue is its brokerage business, providing digital asset trading intermediary services for retail and institutional clients. The platform matches client trades with liquidity providers, uses public blockchains to record and settle asset ownership, and integrates with the traditional banking system for fiat deposits and withdrawals.

Despite the competitive and cyclical nature of the trading market, Coinbase is actively expanding its business beyond a pure trading economy model towards broader crypto financial infrastructure and has embedded multiple initiatives directly into its core application. These initiatives include:

  • Coinbase One, a subscription product offering zero-fee trading and enhanced services, aimed at boosting recurring revenue and customer retention;
  • Prediction markets (in partnership with Kalshi), expanding Coinbase's derivatives and event-driven trading capabilities;
  • Tokenized stocks, allowing users to access traditional financial assets via blockchain.

In addition to existing businesses like institutional custody and prime brokerage services, staking and on-chain yield, stablecoin distribution and payments, and derivatives, Coinbase is also building application and settlement infrastructure through its open-source, permissionless Ethereum Layer-2 network, Base.

These initiatives aim to enhance customer engagement and retention, especially at the institutional level, diversify revenue towards more recurring and infrastructure-related income, and transform Coinbase from a trading-oriented broker into a platform and gateway connecting traditional finance with on-chain markets.

Trading Revenue

56% of Total Revenue | 6-Year CAGR 36% | Market Size: $270 Billion (2024)

Trading revenue is the core brokerage business of Coinbase, where the company holds approximately a 14% market share. Revenue comes from transaction fees and spreads charged on platform trading volume.

Trading volume is primarily driven by total platform assets, which are approximately $516 billion, with retail contributing 42% and institutional clients 58%. While institutional clients contribute most asset growth, retail clients remain the primary source of profitability due to significantly higher trading spreads.

  • Retail Spread: ~154 basis points
  • Institutional Client Spread: ~6 basis points

Institutional clients trade through Coinbase Prime, a suite of standalone products offering advanced execution algorithms, smart order routing, and over-the-counter (OTC) block trading services. These clients require more sophisticated infrastructure but yield lower revenue per dollar, highlighting the importance of retail participation for Coinbase's overall margin profile.

Subscription and Services Revenue

44% of Total Revenue | 6-Year CAGR 232%

This segment aggregates Coinbase's non-trading revenue sources, reflecting the company's strategic shift towards a recurring, infrastructure-driven profit model. It includes the following parts:

  • Stablecoins (30% of Revenue)

Stablecoin revenue is primarily influenced by USDC adoption and the federal funds rate. Coinbase earns interest income from USDC reserves through a revenue-sharing agreement with the issuer, Circle.

Under the August 2023 agreement, Coinbase receives all interest income generated from USDC on its platform, while interest from USDC held off-platform is split 50/50 between Coinbase and Circle.

This structure makes USDC Coinbase's most significant non-trading revenue source, creating a scalable but interest-rate-sensitive revenue stream that helps reduce the company's reliance on volatile trading volumes (trading revenue still accounted for 86% of total revenue in 2020).

Notably, the majority of the economic value from the Circle partnership accrues to Coinbase, reflecting Coinbase's control over distribution and user access. Data shows that USDC's market share stabilized after a period of decline following Circle's distribution agreement with Coinbase, before beginning to recover, underscoring the central role large, trusted platforms play in stablecoin adoption and reinforcing the strategic value of Coinbase's distribution advantage.

  • Staking Services (10% of Revenue)

Customers stake crypto assets through Coinbase, and the company earns a commission from the staking rewards. In proof-of-stake (PoS) networks like Ethereum and Solana, staking involves locking up assets to support network validation. Validators earn rewards akin to yield, which Coinbase facilitates, taking a cut as a service fee.

Key revenue drivers for this segment include crypto asset prices and overall blockchain activity.

  • Other Services (4% of Revenue)

This category includes several monetization initiatives launched post-IPO that are currently scaling:

  1. Coinbase One, a subscription service offering lower trading fees, enhanced rewards, and priority customer support;
  2. Base, Coinbase's L2 blockchain, enabling developers to build applications and services on-chain;
  3. Payments, including a prepaid debit card launched in partnership with Visa, allowing customers to spend fiat and earn crypto rewards. Transactions settle in fiat, but the user experience resembles native crypto payments.

Bull and Bear Debates Around Core Coinbase Issues

Can Coinbase significantly reduce its cyclicality, or will its stock remain a leveraged proxy for cryptocurrency (primarily Bitcoin) prices?

Historically, COIN's stock price has been highly correlated with Bitcoin and broader cryptocurrency prices, reflecting its earnings being driven by spot trading volumes.

  • Bull Case: Management's moves into subscriptions, stablecoins, derivatives, custody, and Base will diversify revenue and reduce cyclicality over time.
  • Bear Case: Despite these initiatives, spot trading still dominates its economics, meaning declines in Bitcoin and major crypto prices will impact its stock price.

Falling crypto assets directly lead to decreased trading volume, margins, and earnings.

Can stablecoins significantly improve the company's profit profile?

  • Bull Case: USDC-related revenue is a scalable, high-margin business tied to on-chain payments, treasury use, and tokenized cash, providing a partial hedge against trading volatility.
  • Bear Case: Stablecoin revenue is highly sensitive to interest rates, asset mix, and competitive dynamics, meaning rate cuts or changes in custody balances could significantly impact earnings. If stablecoin profits prove cyclical rather than structural, the perceived downside protection in Coinbase's earnings model weakens.

How will regulatory changes over the next 12-24 months impact the company's profit profile?

  • Bull Case: Clearer rules will facilitate institutional participation and cement Coinbase's position as the most compliant platform in the US, making it the default gateway to crypto markets.
  • Bear Case: Regulation could also attract traditional brokers and financial institutions into crypto, accelerating fee compression and intensifying competition, especially in the retail market. Greater legitimacy might expand trading volumes but could come at the cost of long-term pricing power.

Centralized Exchange Challenges and Coinbase's Unique Advantages

The Rise of DEXs in the Global Trading Market

Globally, the total addressable market (TAM) for both centralized exchanges (CEXs) and decentralized exchanges (DEXs) is the same underlying pool of capital: cryptocurrency trading activity encompassing spot, derivatives, and on-chain asset exchanges, with annual nominal volumes currently in the trillions of dollars.

For spot trading alone, industry data shows global CEX spot volume exceeded $18 trillion in 2024, while derivatives volume is significantly larger. In the US, the spot TAM is smaller but still substantial, with USD-denominated spot volume estimated at around $1.5 trillion annually, reflecting the US's importance in fiat liquidity and price discovery. Historically, centralized exchanges (CEXs) have captured the majority of this market due to their deep liquidity, easy fiat on-ramps, and more user-friendly experience, especially for retail and institutional participants.

However, over time, the share of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) in global trading volume has steadily grown, from low single digits a few years ago to over twenty percent today. This shift is more pronounced outside the US, where DEX usage benefits from permissionless access, while US market share remains noticeably lower, constrained by fiat dependency and regulatory friction.

The underlying drivers are structural: L2 networks have reduced transaction costs, improved execution quality and liquidity depth, and the rapid development of the on-chain ecosystem, where functions like trading, lending, and yield generation are increasingly performed natively.

Simultaneously, increased regulatory and compliance burdens have limited product flexibility for CEXs in multiple jurisdictions, while DEXs remain globally accessible by design. Additionally, it's worth noting that in the US, increased regulatory and compliance burdens similarly limit product flexibility for CEXs in multiple jurisdictions, while DEXs are accessible globally without permission.

Therefore, although CEXs still dominate absolute trading volume and institutional flow, especially in the US, DEXs are capturing an increasingly larger share of the global trading market size (TAM), reflecting a gradual but persistent reallocation of trading activity.

Coinbase's Advantages in the US Market

In the global cryptocurrency market, trading fees vary significantly across platforms, reflecting differences in regulatory regimes, cost structures, and competitive intensity. In this context, Coinbase has historically charged fees significantly higher than most global peers, primarily due to its US-centric operational model.

Operating fully within the US regulatory framework implies higher costs (covering compliance and custody standards, reporting, capital requirements, etc.), but it also provides users with a level of legal clarity and security that offshore platforms cannot match. For US retail users, especially during periods of strong market growth, this trade-off has justified paying for convenience, trust, and regulatory certainty.

Fee Rates Charged by Different Exchanges

In the US, Coinbase holds a unique position as the largest and longest-standing regulated cryptocurrency exchange, particularly in USD-denominated spot trading.

Coinbase captures approximately 40% to 50% of US spot cryptocurrency trading volume, with its share even higher during periods of market stress when counterparties prioritize balance sheet safety and regulatory clarity. Coinbase's core customer base includes US retail users who value ease of use and reliable fiat on-ramps, as well as institutional clients (including asset managers, ETFs, corporations, and market makers) who value convenience and regulatory certainty.

This two-sided franchise model is bolstered by deep banking relationships, integrated custody services, and a long history of engagement with US regulators.

But the competitive landscape in the US differs markedly from global markets. Coinbase's main competitors include Robinhood (which competes aggressively on price in the retail market but offers a narrower range of crypto products), Kraken (which attracts more active traders with lower fees), and Binance.US (whose scale and product breadth remain limited compared to its global parent).

Unlike offshore platforms, these competitors operate under similar regulatory constraints, limiting fee arbitrage and product differentiation. Therefore, competition in the US focuses less on who offers the lowest global fees and more on trust, compliance, and USD liquidity. Coinbase's regulatory credibility, institutional penetration, and dominant USD on-ramp position solidify its leadership in the US crypto market, even as competitive pressures intensify at the margins.

Three Arguments for Expecting Suboptimal Future Performance for Coinbase

Argument 1: Coinbase's brokerage business is expected to face pressure in Q4 2025, potentially leading to FY2025 revenue being about 7% below market expectations

Although Coinbase is expanding into other services on its platform, its earnings remain highly dependent on two main business segments: brokerage and stablecoin-related revenue. This anticipated performance decline stems primarily from continued pressure on the brokerage business in Q4 2025. We estimate this using the Artemis terminal to track Coinbase's spot trading volume, which historically has an average error margin of about 2.5% for quarter-end volume estimates.

Current data indicates a slowdown in trading activity this quarter, with Q4 2025 trading volume around $249 billion. We anticipate a decline in retail take rates, consistent with patterns observed during previous crypto sell-offs, where retail take rates fell to around 130 basis points due to reduced volatility and increased competition. Institutional take rates, already structurally low, are expected to remain below 5 basis points, aligning with patterns from historical downturns.

Argument 2: Headwinds for the brokerage business are expected to persist into 2026, but the downward pressure will be less severe than during the 2022/2023 crypto winter due to portfolio structure changes; EPS for 2026 is expected to be 14% below consensus

We expect earnings pressure to continue in 2026, primarily driven by the cryptocurrency sell-off that began in 2025 and extended into early 2026. A core variable in the brokerage revenue model is assets per account (the average dollar value held by clients), which has historically been highly correlated with total cryptocurrency market capitalization (~0.8 for retail accounts, ~0.6 for institutional accounts). This dynamic is particularly important given retail clients' higher sensitivity to market swings and typically higher fee rates.

As of February 2026, the total cryptocurrency market cap is down approximately 20% from the end of 2025, following a 22% decline in Q4 2025, indicating continued pressure on client asset balances. In our base case forecast, we model a compression in retail assets per account of nearly 10% for 2026, and institutional account balances also compressing nearly 10%.

We assume a recovery pattern consistent with previous cycles in 2027, with market cap rebounding to 2024 levels, followed by sustained growth of around 15% annually thereafter, leading to outperformance relative to consensus expectations in later years.

On the stablecoin front, we continue to model strong growth, anticipating ~40% growth in 2026, supported by USDC market cap growth of ~70% versus 2025, albeit slowing from the ~110% growth seen from 2024 to 2025. This growth partially offsets brokerage weakness.

However, overall, we project total revenue to decline by approximately 1% in 2026, implying revenue ~17% below consensus, with EPS declining ~15%, as operating leverage amplifies the impact of weak trading fundamentals.

Argument 3: Regulatory progress in 2026 is structurally positive but too slow to offset near-term earnings pressure

We expect regulatory clarity in the US crypto market to improve in 2026, potentially through partial market structure legislation, reducing legal uncertainty and strengthening the position of compliant incumbents like Coinbase. In principle, clearer rules could be a significant catalyst for broader crypto adoption, especially among institutional investors, unlocking new pools of capital and expanding the TAM.

Members of the SEC's crypto working group have previously indicated that "regulators are expected to issue guidance clarifying the line between securities and non-securities in the crypto space, provide potential innovation exemptions for tokenized securities and new on-chain market structure pilot programs, and expand the use of no-action letters to indicate that certain activities are not enforcement priorities."

However, the legislative process remains slow, and the pace of implementation suggests that any substantial adoption benefits will materialize gradually over time rather than immediately. In the near term, Coinbase's financial performance remains primarily driven by crypto prices, retail trading volumes, and take rates—factors currently under pressure amid a prolonged adjustment phase. Institutional adoption, while supported by regulatory progress, tends to be gradual and carries structurally lower trading margins.

Furthermore, regulatory optimism is already largely priced into market sentiment following ETF approvals and recent policy signals. Therefore, while regulatory improvement does represent a long-term structural positive, its slow pace renders these benefits insufficient to offset near-term earnings headwinds, creating downside risk to consensus expectations for 2026 and 2027.

Valuation Forecasts Under Different Scenarios

Low Valuation Scenario

We assume a prolonged downturn comparable to the 2022-2023 cycle, modeling a ~50% decline in assets per account for 2026 and flat growth in 2027, reflecting sustained weakness in user engagement and asset balances. We assume USDC growth slows to ~25% annually, as on-chain activity and risk appetite remain subdued.

In this scenario, pressure on Coinbase's brokerage business persists, operating leverage remains constrained, and visibility into earnings sustainability diminishes. Consequently, we apply a more conservative 25x NTM P/E multiple as an exit multiple at the end of 2026, appropriate for Coinbase valued as a highly cyclical brokerage. This scenario implies a negative IRR of approximately 15%, highlighting the downside risk if the adjustment proves deeper and longer than expected.

Base Case Scenario

We assume a more moderate adjustment, with retail assets per account declining nearly 10% in 2026 and institutional client assets declining nearly 10%, followed by a recovery to 2024 levels in 2027 as crypto market cap rebounds.

For stablecoins, we model ~40% annualized growth, with stronger growth in 2026 and 2027 (~70% and ~60% respectively), reflecting continued USDC adoption. Growing stablecoin revenue partially offsets brokerage weakness and gradually improves the overall revenue mix.

We apply a 30x NTM P/E multiple as an exit multiple at the end of 2027, implying an attractive ~20% IRR over three years. However, we acknowledge path dependency is crucial: although the model's final returns are compelling, the anticipated earnings miss in 2026 and potential future volatility make the risk-adjusted trajectory less attractive.

Optimistic Scenario

We assume an initial adjustment similar to the base case, with retail assets per account declining nearly 10% in 2026 and institutional client assets declining ~14%, followed by a stronger rebound starting in 2027. Under this scenario, assets per account grow ~80% in 2027 and 2028, broadly in line with the recovery seen in 2023-2024, followed by sustained growth in the high single digits thereafter.

For stablecoins, we project USDC market cap growing at a ~56% CAGR through 2030, with ~80% growth in 2026 and ~50% in 2027, reflecting accelerated USDC adoption and expanding on-chain utility.

Under these assumptions, Coinbase's revenue mix becomes significantly less cyclical, supporting higher operating leverage and justifying a 35x expected P/E (NTM P/E) valuation by the end of 2027, implying an IRR of approximately 226% over three years.

Câu hỏi Liên quan

QWhy did Coinbase's stock price surge 16% despite reporting a Q4 net loss of $667 million?

AThe market's short-term optimism about Coinbase's various business developments in 2026 outweighed the negative impact of the Q4 earnings miss, as evidenced by the stock's significant gain.

QWhat are the two main revenue segments for Coinbase, and what are their respective contributions to total revenue?

AThe two main revenue segments are Transaction Revenue, which contributes 56% of total revenue, and Subscription and Services Revenue, which contributes the remaining 44%.

QAccording to the analysts, what is the primary reason for not recommending an investment in Coinbase at the current time?

AThe analysts believe the current potential returns are insufficient to compensate for the risks, citing continued pressure on brokerage fundamentals, high cyclicality, and the likelihood of earnings falling short of expectations in 2025 and 2026.

QWhat major competitive threat to centralized exchanges (CEXs) like Coinbase is highlighted in the article?

AThe article highlights the steady growth in the market share of Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs), which have captured over twenty percent of global trading volume, representing a structural shift in trading activity away from CEXs due to factors like lower costs on L2 networks and regulatory constraints on CEXs.

QWhat is the single most important non-transaction revenue source for Coinbase, and what are its main risk factors?

AThe single most important non-transaction revenue source is stablecoin revenue (30% of total revenue), primarily from its share of interest earned on USDC reserves. Its main risk factors are high sensitivity to interest rates and changes in the composition of assets held in reserve, meaning earnings could be significantly compressed by rate cuts or competitive shifts.

Nội dung Liên quan

Chỉ số Sáng tạo 50 tăng mạnh 10,73%, Vì sao thị trường A-share diễn ra 'Đảo chiều hình chữ V'?

Sau nhiều phiên điều chỉnh liên tiếp, thị trường chứng khoán Trung Quốc đã có một ngày tăng điểm mạnh mẽ vào ngày 21/7 với mô hình phục hồi hình chữ V. Chỉ số Kechuang 50 (Sci-Tech Innovation Board 50) dẫn đầu với mức tăng kỷ lục 10,73% trong gần một năm, trong khi ba chỉ số chính của Thượng Hải và Thâm Quyến cũng đồng loạt tăng. Khối lượng giao dịch đạt 2.970 tỷ nhân dân tệ, với hơn 3.100 cổ phiếu tăng giá. Lực lượng dẫn dắt đợt phục hồi là toàn bộ chuỗi ngành bán dẫn, bao gồm thiết bị, bộ nhớ, wafer và HBM. Các quỹ ETF chủ đề bán dẫn liên quan cũng tăng mạnh, nhiều quỹ tăng trên 10%. Sự bật tăng mạnh này được cho là nhờ sự cộng hưởng của ba yếu tố chính: 1. **Dòng tiền đổ vào:** Tín hiệu tích cực từ việc các "đội quân quốc gia", công ty bảo hiểm, công ty niêm yết và các quỹ công/tư tăng mua vào, giúp nâng đỡ thanh khoản và lòng tin thị trường. Các ETF chỉ số rộng đã chứng kiến dòng tiền ròng lớn. 2. **Hỗ trợ từ chính sách:** Các cam kết từ Ủy ban Giám sát Chứng khoán Trung Quốc (CSRC) về việc duy trì thị trường ổn định đã tạo tâm lý tích cực. 3. **Môi trường bên ngoài ổn định:** Sự phục hồi của thị trường chứng khoán toàn cầu, đặc biệt là ở Hàn Quốc, đã tạo điều kiện thuận lợi cho đợt bật lại của cổ phiếu công nghệ Trung Quốc. Các tổ chức phân tích nhận định rằng giai đoạn hoảng loạn nhất của ngành công nghệ nhiều khả năng đã qua đi sau đợt điều chỉnh sâu. Mặc dù thị trường ngắn hạn vẫn có thể biến động, nhưng xu hướng công nghiệp dài hạn như nhu cầu AI, bán dẫn thay thế trong nước vẫn nguyên vẹn. Các nhà đầu tư được khuyến nghị tập trung vào các phân khúc then chốt với nguồn cung vẫn còn hạn chế trong chuỗi AI, đồng thời theo dõi kết quả báo cáo tài chính và động thái của các nhà đầu tư tổ chức.

marsbit37 phút trước

Chỉ số Sáng tạo 50 tăng mạnh 10,73%, Vì sao thị trường A-share diễn ra 'Đảo chiều hình chữ V'?

marsbit37 phút trước

Cổ Phiếu Công Nghệ Có Động Lực Mạnh Tại Mỹ Ghi Nhận Phiên Tăng Mạnh Nhất Lịch Sử, Nhưng Đợt Sụt Giảm Đã Kết Thúc?

Bài viết phân tích đợt bật tăng mạnh mẽ của cổ phiếu công nghệ theo đà tăng trưởng (momentum) trên thị trường chứng khoán Mỹ vào ngày 21/7. Dù các chỉ số như yếu tố động lượng TMT của Morgan Stanley và chỉ số động lượng beta cao của Goldman Sachs ghi nhận mức tăng mạnh kỷ lục, đặc biệt là ở lĩnh vực bán dẫn với sự đóng góp của các mã như Micron và Intel, bối cảnh tổng thể vẫn tiềm ẩn nhiều rủi ro. Đợt phục hồi này được cho là xuất phát từ việc các nhà đầu tư bán khống bị buộc phải mua lại cổ phiếu (short squeeze) sau khi nhóm cổ phiếu này đã lao dốc tới 33%. Tuy nhiên, nhiều chuyên gia tỏ ra thận trọng. BTIG cảnh báo đây có thể chỉ là đợt bật tăng kỹ thuật trong bối cảnh thị trường có độ rộng yếu (số cổ phiếu giảm giá nhiều hơn tăng giá) và khối lượng giao dịch thấp, khuyến nghị nhà đầu tư nên bán ra khi giá lên cao. Trong khi đó, Goldman Sachs và UBS lạc quan hơn, cho rằng đợt bán tháo đã gần kết thúc và đây là cơ hội để mua vào từng bước, đặc biệt là các cổ phiếu AI, mặc dù khuyến cáo nên sử dụng các công cụ phòng ngừa rủi ro. Triển vọng tiếp theo của thị trường phụ thuộc lớn vào mùa báo cáo tài chính, với trọng tâm là kết quả của Alphabet và định hướng chi tiêu vốn cho AI. Đồng thời, thị trường trái phiếu cũng đang cảnh báo khi lợi suất trái phiếu dài hạn tăng lên, cùng với giá dầu leo thang do căng thẳng địa chính trị, có thể gây áp lực lên cổ phiếu trong thời gian tới.

marsbit44 phút trước

Cổ Phiếu Công Nghệ Có Động Lực Mạnh Tại Mỹ Ghi Nhận Phiên Tăng Mạnh Nhất Lịch Sử, Nhưng Đợt Sụt Giảm Đã Kết Thúc?

marsbit44 phút trước

Cổ phiếu 'Động lượng Công nghệ' Mỹ ghi nhận mức tăng trong ngày lớn nhất lịch sử, nhưng đã kết thúc đợt sụt giảm mạnh chưa?

Cổ phiếu động lực công nghệ Mỹ đã bật tăng mạnh nhất trong lịch sử vào ngày 21/7, với chỉ số yếu tố động lượng TMT của Morgan Stanley tăng hơn 12%. Đợt phục hồi này diễn ra sau ba phiên giảm liên tiếp và mức sụt giảm tích lũy 33% từ mức đỉnh, được thúc đẩy chủ yếu bởi lĩnh vực bán dẫn và hiện tượng "bán tháo ép" (short squeeze) khi các nhà đầu tư bán khống phải đóng vị thế. Tuy nhiên, sức mạnh của đợt bật tăng bị nghi ngờ do khối lượng giao dịch thấp hơn mức trung bình và sự phân hóa rộng rãi trên thị trường - chỉ số chính tăng nhưng số cổ phiếu giảm giá lại nhiều hơn số tăng giá. Các quan điểm chiến lược trái ngược nhau: BTIG khuyến nghị "bán ra khi giá lên" vì lực cản kỹ thuật mạnh, trong khi Goldman Sachs và UBS cho rằng đợt bán tháo đã gần kết thúc và đề xuất mua vào từng phần. Mùa báo cáo kết quả kinh doanh, đặc biệt là từ Alphabet, cùng với diễn biến lợi suất trái phiếu kho bạc tăng cao và giá dầu leo thang do căng thẳng địa chính trị, sẽ là những yếu tố then chốt quyết định tính bền vững của đợt phục hồi này.

链捕手46 phút trước

Cổ phiếu 'Động lượng Công nghệ' Mỹ ghi nhận mức tăng trong ngày lớn nhất lịch sử, nhưng đã kết thúc đợt sụt giảm mạnh chưa?

链捕手46 phút trước

Bitcoin xuất hiện 3 tín hiệu đáy vĩ mô – Nhưng liệu BTC có thể đạt 70.000 USD?

Thị trường đang dần chuyển hướng nhận định từ "đáy cục bộ" sang "đáy vĩ mô" đối với Bitcoin. Từ góc độ kỹ thuật, việc BTC vượt ngưỡng 66.000 USD đã thổi bùng tâm lý lạc quan. Nhà phân tích Ali Martinez chỉ ra rằng Bitcoin một lần nữa xuất hiện ba tín hiệu kỹ thuật trùng khớp với các đáy chu kỳ vĩ mô trong lịch sử: RSI hàng tháng giảm xuống ~43.65, Chande Momentum Oscillator (CMO) đạt ~-71 và giá giao dịch quanh đường trung bình động 50 tháng. Mô hình tương tự từng xuất hiện vào các năm 2015, 2019 và 2022, thường báo hiệu giai đoạn tích lũy mạnh trước những đợt tăng giá lớn. Tuy nhiên, tính bền vững của đà tăng vẫn phụ thuộc vào thanh khoản. Dữ liệu on-chain cho thấy một nghịch lý: giá phá vỡ nhưng dòng tiền không theo kịp. Vốn hóa thị trường stablecoin đã giảm hơn 10 tỷ USD trong tháng qua, và stablecoin tiếp tục rời khỏi các sàn giao dịch trong 35 ngày liên tiếp, trong khi hoạt động tích lũy Bitcoin trên thị trường giao ngay chưa có dấu hiệu tăng mạnh. Do đó, dù tín hiệu kỹ thuật lạc quan, việc chuyển dịch sang đáy vĩ mô và một đợt bứt phá quyết định lên vùng 70.000 USD vẫn cần được xác nhận thêm bởi dòng thanh khoản mới.

ambcrypto50 phút trước

Bitcoin xuất hiện 3 tín hiệu đáy vĩ mô – Nhưng liệu BTC có thể đạt 70.000 USD?

ambcrypto50 phút trước

Hợp lâu tất phân, phân lâu tất hợp: Khi L1 trở thành Rollup của chính nó, cục diện cuối cùng của Ethereum là gì?

Từ lâu, cộng đồng Ethereum đã lo lắng về việc L2 làm suy yếu giá trị và tính kết hợp toàn cầu của L1. Bài viết thảo luận về sự tiến hóa trong mối quan hệ giữa L1 và L2, nhấn mạnh rằng lộ trình mở rộng quy mô của Ethereum đang thay đổi. Trọng tâm trước đây của L2 là cung cấp không gian giao dịch rẻ hơn, nhưng khi L1 tự nâng cao khả năng xử lý thông qua tăng Gas Limit, statelessness và zkEVM, vai trò của L2 đang được định vị lại. Trong tương lai, L2 sẽ cần cung cấp các giá trị khác biệt như tối ưu hóa ứng dụng cụ thể, tính riêng tư và mô hình quản trị linh hoạt, thay vì chỉ là không gian thực thi chi phí thấp. L1 sẽ đóng vai trò là trung tâm toàn cầu mạnh mẽ cho việc giải quyết, trạng thái chia sẻ và thanh khoản. Một thách thức lớn là sự phân mảnh do nhiều L2 gây ra, cắt nhỏ tính thanh khoản và trải nghiệm người dùng. Giải pháp nằm ở việc cải thiện khả năng tương tác, chẳng hạn thông qua các khung Intent mở (như Open Intents Framework) và Lớp Tương tác Ethereum (EIL), nhằm tạo trải nghiệm xuyên chuỗi liền mạch. Rút ngắn thời gian xác nhận cuối cùng (finality) của L1 từ cấp phút xuống cấp giây cũng rất quan trọng để tăng tốc các tương tác xuyên chuỗi. Một quan điểm thú vị được đưa ra bởi nhà nghiên cứu Barnabé Monnot: với sự phát triển của hệ thống chứng minh (như zkEVM), bản thân L1 cuối cùng có thể trở thành một dạng "Rollup của chính nó". Điều này không có nghĩa là L1 bị "hạ cấp", mà mô tả một kiến trúc nơi việc xác thực bằng chứng mật mã có thể thay thế việc thực thi lại toàn bộ giao dịch bởi mọi node, từ đó làm mờ ranh giới truyền thống giữa L1 và L2. Các Native Rollup trong tương lai có thể kế thừa khả năng xác minh một cách nguyên bản hơn từ L1. Tóm lại, tương lai của Ethereum không phải là L1 thay thế L2 hay ngược lại, mà là sự hình thành của một hệ sinh thái gồm nhiều môi trường thực thi đa dạng (L2) với các chức năng và mô hình khác nhau, nhưng cùng chia sẻ nền tảng bảo mật, thanh khoản và trạng thái từ một L1 vững chắc. Thách thức lớn nhất là kết nối lại những thứ đã bị phân mảnh do mở rộng quy mô, để Ethereum một lần nữa cảm thận như một chuỗi thống nhất cho người dùng.

链捕手1 giờ trước

Hợp lâu tất phân, phân lâu tất hợp: Khi L1 trở thành Rollup của chính nó, cục diện cuối cùng của Ethereum là gì?

链捕手1 giờ trước

Giao dịch

Giao ngay
活动图片