iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbitXuất bản vào 2026-04-21Cập nhật gần nhất vào 2026-04-21

Tóm tắt

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness...

By New Product Insight Finance, Author|Wu Wenwu

After iQiyi launched its AI artist library, multiple artists quickly denied signing any AI-related authorizations, sparking heated discussions. Behind this, iQiyi, which is frantically pushing its new AI narrative, is clearly too impatient.

01 “iQiyi Is Crazy” Trends on Hot Search

At the 2026 iQiyi World Conference held on April 20, iQiyi officially announced the launch of its "AI Artist Library," with over a hundred artists already onboard. Names like Zhang Ruoyun, Yu Hewei, Wang Churan, and Li Yitong appeared on the big screen list.

iQiyi founder and CEO Gong Yu, in his speech, made remarks such as "AI can help actors go from acting in 4 dramas a year to 14, giving everyone more time to rest" and "in the future, live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage," which further fueled the discussion.

Several topics related to iQiyi quickly trended on hot searches, with the topic "iQiyi Is Crazy" even reaching the number one spot on Weibo's hot search list that day, drawing widespread attention and discussion.

However, iQiyi was quickly contradicted. After the list was released, multiple artists including Zhang Ruoyun, Yu Hewei, and Wang Churan urgently issued statements clearly denying having signed any AI-related authorizations. For example, Zhang Ruoyun's studio was the first to state that they had not signed any AI-related authorization and that their legal team was handling the matter urgently.

iQiyi officials had to quickly respond, stating that joining the iQiyi Nado Pro Artist Library indicates the artist's willingness to engage in AI film and television projects, but participation in any specific project or role requires separate negotiation and authorization.

iQiyi wants to build an AI artist library to provide a standardized platform for AIGC creators, making it easier for them to select artists and efficiently communicate collaboration details through iQiyi with the artists' representatives.

From the artists' perspective, being aware of such a matter but not having signed an authorization agreement is something that artists, who highly value their portrait rights, IP value, and commercial value, clearly cannot accept. It even touches their bottom line.

From the netizens' point of view, iQiyi's move is somewhat excessive. Some netizens commented that this seems like releasing the list first to pressure the artists into compliance. Others said the platform is treating actors as "consumables" without even a heads-up.

The incident also sparked discussions about the legal issues surrounding AI artists. Some lawyers reminded that an actor authorizing their image does not mean AI entities can freely use their likeness; portrait license agreements should clearly define the scope, duration, and manner of use.

From the perspectives of iQiyi, artists, users, and netizens, the considerations, usage points, value points, and impacts of AI are entirely different.

02 iQiyi Is Too Impatient

In recent years, talking about the long-form video platform iQiyi always evokes different images and opinions from the outside world.

For instance, whenever a hit TV series or web drama airs on iQiyi, it sparks discussions about iQiyi's ability to create hit shows and the commercial returns it brings.

However, more of the discussion we hear about iQiyi concerns how short video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou have stolen users away, diverting user attention, especially with the popularity of micro-dramas, leading more people to abandon long-form video platforms.

According to the "China Network Audiovisual Development Research Report (2026)" released at the Network Audiovisual Conference in April 2026, the average daily time spent on micro-dramas was 129 minutes (December 2025).

iQiyi also faces competition from platforms like Bilibili and Xiaohongshu. "New Product Insight Finance" noted that many mid-to-long form videos on Bilibili now are not inferior to iQiyi in terms of category, quantity, and quality. Xiaohongshu is not just a content discovery platform; its short video content has also risen.

iQiyi's anxiety and pressure have long been directly reflected in its financial reports. According to iQiyi's financial report, for the full year 2025 ended December 31, 2025, the company's total revenue was 27.29 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 6.62%, marking the second consecutive year of negative growth after a 7.97% drop in 2024.

Notably, regarding profit calculations, the non-GAAP operating profit was 640 million yuan, a significant drop of about 73% compared to 2.36 billion yuan in 2024; calculated according to US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), iQiyi turned from profit to loss, with a net loss of 206 million yuan. In 2023, the company's net profit had peaked at 1.93 billion yuan.

In the fourth quarter, iQiyi's total revenue was 6.79 billion yuan, achieving both year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth. The non-GAAP operating profit was 140 million yuan.

Facing intense competitive pressure and realistic operational pressure, iQiyi urgently needs to tell a new story. As all internet companies are successively telling their AI stories, iQiyi, not wanting to be left behind, has begun to constantly push its new AI narrative.

In the second half of 2025, iQiyi targeted areas like AI micro-dramas, AI comic dramas, and AI children's animation. During the earnings conference call in February 2026, it introduced a C-end story: AI character interaction, the Tao Dou World where users and virtual stars/IP characters chat in real-time and co-create storylines, and personalized AI editing that automatically clips highlights, secondary creations, and mashup videos for users.

Then came iQiyi's latest release: the official launch of Nado Pro + 100 artists' AI digital avatars, which unexpectedly caused such a controversy.

iQiyi founder and CEO Gong Yu also stated that the goal is to have a commercial AI blockbuster by this summer, or at the latest, this autumn.

In the view of "New Product Insight Finance," AI has become iQiyi's current lowest-cost and fastest-acting storyline, hoping to tell a new story and find a new growth point to boost market confidence.

At the end of March this year, iQiyi announced it had submitted an application to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in a confidential manner to advance its listing in Hong Kong. iQiyi now needs to tell a new story to the capital market even more.

Clearly, for various reasons, iQiyi is frantically pushing its new AI narrative, but it is obviously being too impatient.

Senior media personality Hu Xijin commented on the iQiyi AI artist library incident, saying, "iQiyi高调宣布117位演员签约AI影视艺人库,并表示未来真人实拍可能将成非遗,我个人感觉很吃惊。" (iQiyi高调 announced that 117 actors signed with the AI film and television artist library and stated that live-action filming might become intangible cultural heritage in the future. Personally, I was very surprised.). Hu also clearly stated, "爱奇艺过于急功近利了。" (iQiyi is too impatient for quick success and instant benefit.).

03 iQiyi's AI Considerations

This release of the AI artist library by iQiyi was originally intended to be a major move, but it unexpectedly led to denial statements from multiple artists and sparked extensive discussions about iQiyi and the broader context of AI in film and television.

Every technological update and iteration profoundly impacts the video industry and long-form video platforms like iQiyi. For example, the last shift was from the PC era to the internet, followed by the popularity of short videos impacting long-form videos, forcing iQiyi to respond.

The latest wave of AI technology has an even greater impact on film, television, video, and video platforms. iQiyi can only embrace AI and continuously tell its new AI stories.

The application of AI in film and television is an inevitable trend, but its use in the industry has distinctly contrasting A and B sides; it is a double-edged sword.

On one hand, AI technology can significantly reduce costs, optimize creative processes, and improve production efficiency. In film shooting and post-production editing, AI is a magical tool.

On the other hand, although AI technology has advanced noticeably and reached a stage where the "fake" can seem real, AI creation has become data-driven, modular, and formulaic.

For example, the AI short dramas flooding short video platforms are full of plots like domineering CEOs and reincarnation reversals. The stories and tropes are highly similar, even with the same script generating different AI versions, making them very homogeneous and assembly-line like.

Therefore, iQiyi's first consideration is whether it should launch more AI tools, become an AI platform, or become the protagonist of AI? Yangtze Evening News commented on this, saying, "iQiyi, you were meant to embrace AI, not become AI."

At least for now, AI remains an辅助技术手段和工具 (auxiliary technological means and tool). AI stories will become more diverse in the future and will continue to progress.

The second consideration for iQiyi is: cold AI versus the sense of real people, who do audiences prefer?

For a long-form video platform like iQiyi, its core competitiveness still lies in high-quality IP, strong production capabilities, and the ability to produce hit web dramas and TV series. The key to these works is the script, the actors' performances, and the viewing experience they provide to the audience.

If there is too much AI in the works, even the main characters become AI, then the cold sense of AI will only intensify.

Viewers, especially iQiyi members, will always care more about the sense of real people in an excellent work, as the emotional expression and changes of a character can never be replaced by AI.

iQiyi should adopt different strategies. For instance, it can heavily promote AI in works like AI micro-dramas, AI comic dramas, and AI movies, but producing a high-quality work with AI is not necessarily low cost.

iQiyi's third consideration is to balance the interests of multiple parties: the platform, artists, and audiences.

As mentioned earlier, from the perspective of different participants in iQiyi's release of the AI artist library, there are indeed different starting points and considerations. Particularly, how to gain artist acceptance is a key point. Of course, the most important point is still the audience's acceptance of AI works.

In 2025, after the AI-generated "actor" Tilly Norwood emerged, the US Screen Actors Guild, followed by European and Canadian actors' unions,相继表态“坚决反对用合成角色替代真人演员” (successively stated they "resolutely oppose using synthetic characters to replace real actors"). Some international consensus suggests that AI can be a tool, but not the protagonist, especially not at the cost of sacrificing the livelihoods of real people and artistic dignity.

If we zoom out to the entire long-form video industry, the considerations brought by AI mentioned above are not just iQiyi's alone; they are shared considerations for everyone.

References:

[1] "iQiyi Is Crazy"? CEO Gong Yu Responds, Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei Issue Emergency Statements, Jiemian News

[2] "iQiyi Is Crazy", You Were Meant to Embrace AI, Not Become AI, Yangtze Evening News

[3] iQiyi Financial Report, iQiyi

(This article does not constitute any investment advice)

Tiền kỹ thuật số thịnh hành

Câu hỏi Liên quan

QWhat was the main controversy surrounding iQiyi's announcement of its 'AI Actor Library'?

AThe main controversy was that multiple actors, including Zhang Ruoyun, Yu Hewei, and Wang Churan, quickly issued statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements, despite being listed as participants. This led to accusations that iQiyi was trying to pressure actors into compliance and sparked a debate about the legal and ethical use of AI in the entertainment industry.

QAccording to the article, what are the two-sided (AB) impacts of AI on the film and television industry?

AThe two-sided impacts are: 1) Positive: AI technology can significantly reduce costs, optimize the creative process, and improve production efficiency in filming and post-production editing. 2) Negative: AI creation can become data-driven, modular, and formulaic, leading to highly similar, homogeneous, and assembly-line-like content, as seen in the proliferation of similar AI short dramas on platforms.

QWhat financial pressure does iQiyi face, as mentioned in the article, that is driving its push for AI stories?

AiQiyi faced financial pressure with its total revenue for 2025 falling 6.62% year-over-year to 27.29 billion yuan, marking the second consecutive year of negative growth. Its non-GAAP operating profit plummeted by about 73% to 640 million yuan, and it reported a net loss of 206 million yuan under GAAP standards, a significant drop from a net profit of 1.93 billion yuan in 2023.

QWhat three 'thinking questions' or challenges does the article pose for iQiyi regarding its AI strategy?

AThe three thinking questions are: 1) Should iQiyi focus on developing more AI tools and being an AI platform, or should it try to become the main protagonist of AI itself? 2) How does iQiyi balance the appeal of cold AI against the 'living human feeling' that audiences prefer? 3) How can iQiyi balance the interests of the platform, actors, and viewers regarding the use of AI?

QHow did iQiyi's CEO, Gong Yu, contribute to the controversy with his statements at the iQiyi World Conference?

AGong Yu sparked further discussion by stating that 'AI can help actors go from acting in 4 dramas a year to 14 dramas, giving them more time to rest' and that 'live-action filming may become a world cultural heritage in the future.' These comments, alongside the AI Actor Library announcement, contributed to topics like 'iQiyi is crazy' trending number one on Weibo and intensified the public debate.

Nội dung Liên quan

Lệnh cấm máy ATM tiền ảo tại Minnesota có hiệu lực sau khi báo cáo tổn thất 1 triệu USD

Một đạo luật cấm máy ATM tiền ảo (virtual currency kiosks) đã chính thức có hiệu lực tại Minnesota, Hoa Kỳ, từ ngày 1 tháng 8. Luật SF 3868 do Thống đốc Tim Walz ký vào tháng 5 nghiêm cấm tất cả hoạt động lắp đặt, vận hành và cung cấp các máy này. Các công ty phải ngừng hoạt động máy trước ngày hiệu lực và tháo dỡ chúng khỏi nơi công cộng trước ngày 31 tháng 12. Lý do cho lệnh cấm là những tổn thất tài chính lớn liên quan đến lừa đảo. Sở Thương mại Minnesota báo cáo người dân trong tiểu bang đã mất khoảng 1 triệu USD do các vụ lừa đảo qua máy ATM tiền ảo từ năm 2023 đến 2025. Trong đó, các đối tượng lừa đảo thường nhắm vào người cao tuổi, tạo ra các tình huống khẩn cấp giả để ép nạn nhân chuyển tiền nhanh chóng. Năm 2025, tổng thiệt hại liên quan đến tiền ảo tại Minnesota được báo cáo lên tới hơn 151 triệu USD. Minnesota không phải là tiểu bang duy nhất hành động. Tennessee cũng đã áp đặt lệnh cấm toàn bộ từ ngày 1 tháng 7, trong khi Georgia thi hành luật giới hạn giao dịch. Các bang như Delaware và New Jersey cũng đang xem xét các biện pháp tương tự. Trước khi lệnh cấm có hiệu lực, Minnesota có 201 máy ATM tiền ảo đang hoạt động.

cointelegraph35 phút trước

Lệnh cấm máy ATM tiền ảo tại Minnesota có hiệu lực sau khi báo cáo tổn thất 1 triệu USD

cointelegraph35 phút trước

Goldman Sachs: Tháng 7 đánh sập các giao dịch đông đúc, thị trường tăng giá Mỹ chưa dứt nhưng khó làm hơn

Theo phân tích của Goldman Sachs, thị trường chứng khoán Mỹ tháng 7 vừa qua đã trải qua một đợt thanh lọc mạnh ở cấp độ danh mục đầu tư, dù chỉ số tổng thể (S&P 500) vẫn giữ vững. Các giao dịch đông đúc và sử dụng đòn bẩy cao, đặc biệt trong lĩnh vực công nghệ, AI và cổ phiếu Hàn Quốc, đã phải hứng chịu đợt bán tháo mạnh, dẫn đến biến động lớn bên dưới bề mặt ổn định của chỉ số. Đợt giảm đòn bẩy này được xem như một sự điều chỉnh cần thiết, làm nguội bớt cơn sốt đầu cơ. Câu chuyện AI cũng chuyển từ giai đoạn kỳ vọng thuần túy sang bị thử thách bởi khả năng hiện thực hóa lợi nhuận từ các khoản đầu tư khổng lồ. Trong khi một số gã khổng lồ như Microsoft và Amazon cho thấy tín hiệu tích cực, sự phân hóa đã trở nên rõ ràng. Bối cảnh chính sách từ Fed với tín hiệu ít minh bạch hơn và áp lực từ lợi suất trái phiếu dài hạn cũng làm tăng thêm thách thức, đặc biệt cho các cổ phiếu tăng trưởng nhạy cảm với lãi suất. Tóm lại, xu hướng thị trường gấu vẫn chưa xuất hiện, được hỗ trợ bởi nền tảng kinh tế và lợi nhuận doanh nghiệp vững. Tuy nhiên, đà tăng có thể sẽ chậm lại và khó khăn hơn. Nhà đầu tư cần thận trọng, tránh các giao dịch quá đông đúc và phức tạp, đồng thời ưu tiên tính thanh khoản. Thị trường lúc này không còn ở giai đoạn "mua và nắm giữ" dễ dàng nữa.

marsbit4 giờ trước

Goldman Sachs: Tháng 7 đánh sập các giao dịch đông đúc, thị trường tăng giá Mỹ chưa dứt nhưng khó làm hơn

marsbit4 giờ trước

Giao dịch

Giao ngay

Bài viết Nổi bật

Làm thế nào để Mua AR

Chào mừng bạn đến với HTX.com! Chúng tôi đã làm cho mua Arweave (AR) trở nên đơn giản và thuận tiện. Làm theo hướng dẫn từng bước của chúng tôi để bắt đầu hành trình tiền kỹ thuật số của bạn.Bước 1: Tạo Tài khoản HTX của BạnSử dụng email hoặc số điện thoại của bạn để đăng ký tài khoản miễn phí trên HTX. Trải nghiệm hành trình đăng ký không rắc rối và mở khóa tất cả tính năng. Nhận Tài khoản của tôiBước 2: Truy cập Mua Crypto và Chọn Phương thức Thanh toán của BạnThẻ Tín dụng/Ghi nợ: Sử dụng Visa hoặc Mastercard của bạn để mua Arweave (AR) ngay lập tức.Số dư: Sử dụng tiền từ số dư tài khoản HTX của bạn để giao dịch liền mạch.Bên thứ ba: Chúng tôi đã thêm những phương thức thanh toán phổ biến như Google Pay và Apple Pay để nâng cao sự tiện lợi.P2P: Giao dịch trực tiếp với người dùng khác trên HTX.Thị trường mua bán phi tập trung (OTC): Chúng tôi cung cấp những dịch vụ được thiết kế riêng và tỷ giá hối đoái cạnh tranh cho nhà giao dịch.Bước 3: Lưu trữ Arweave (AR) của BạnSau khi mua Arweave (AR), lưu trữ trong tài khoản HTX của bạn. Ngoài ra, bạn có thể gửi đi nơi khác qua chuyển khoản blockchain hoặc sử dụng để giao dịch những tiền kỹ thuật số khác.Bước 4: Giao dịch Arweave (AR)Giao dịch Arweave (AR) dễ dàng trên thị trường giao ngay của HTX. Chỉ cần truy cập vào tài khoản của bạn, chọn cặp giao dịch, thực hiện giao dịch và theo dõi trong thời gian thực. Chúng tôi cung cấp trải nghiệm thân thiện với người dùng cho cả người mới bắt đầu và người giao dịch dày dạn kinh nghiệm.

Tổng lượt xem 697Xuất bản vào 2024.12.11Cập nhật vào 2026.06.02

Làm thế nào để Mua AR

Thảo luận

Chào mừng đến với Cộng đồng HTX. Tại đây, bạn có thể được thông báo về những phát triển nền tảng mới nhất và có quyền truy cập vào thông tin chuyên sâu về thị trường. Ý kiến ​​của người dùng về giá của AR (AR) được trình bày dưới đây.

活动图片