Why Wall Street says ‘no bill is better than a bad U.S. crypto bill’

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-16Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-16

Анотація

Industry players strongly oppose the recently proposed U.S. crypto market structure bill, arguing it fails to provide adequate regulatory clarity. While the legislation aims to classify digital assets and define regulatory roles, key figures like Bitwise CEO Hunter Horsley and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong criticize specific provisions—such as restrictions on asset tokenization and stablecoin rewards—as counterproductive. Armstrong notably stated, “no bill is better than a bad bill,” emphasizing that overly restrictive rules could limit competition and exclude Americans from emerging financial opportunities. Despite ongoing negotiations, concerns over consumer protection, pension risks, and rising crypto-related fraud continue to drive opposition. The industry seeks clearer guidelines, especially for DeFi and institutional involvement, but believes innovation will continue regardless of the bill’s outcome.

Industry players have pushed back strongly against the recently released draft of the crypto market structure bill, which lawmakers scheduled for a vote earlier this week.

Although the bill aims to deliver long-awaited regulatory clarity, it has failed to win broad support across the sector.

The legislation aims to define how digital assets are classified and clarify the roles of regulatory agencies in overseeing the space. It also seeks to outline which products and services crypto companies can legally offer, while prioritizing consumer protection for U.S. citizens.

The industry has reacted far more critically to this bill than to earlier crypto legislation, such as the GENIUS Act, which established a stablecoin framework and won broad support.

Why the pushback?

Hunter Horsley, CEO of Bitwise Asset Management, said regulators have made progress in supporting the crypto industry, but they still leave major clarity gaps.

Speaking to CNBC, Horsley highlighted concerns about the bill. He pointed out that certain provisions, such as restrictions on asset tokenization and the ban on stablecoin rewards, pose significant challenges.

He added that there is strong interest from large institutions, including Bitwise clients, banks, wealth management firms, and hedge funds, all of whom need clearer regulatory language around DeFi.

“There are a lot of firms that want to tokenize securities, equities... some of the world’s largest asset managers. They want, if possible, to know clearly what the rules of the road are.”

Horsley emphasized that the situation is no longer driven solely by the crypto industry. Traditional financial institutions are now actively looking to bring their clients into the ecosystem, a shift he believes may be influencing the structure and direction of the current bill.

“I don’t think it’s coming from a place of attempting to be counterproductive. I think the reality is that these are complex issues, and there’s a lot of voices.”

He concluded by stressing that the outcome of this bill is not a “make or break” moment for crypto, adding that innovation in the space will continue regardless.

Coinbase CEO also pushes back

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has echoed similar concerns, stating that “no bill is better than a bad bill,” as the company withdrew its support for the current version of the legislation.

Armstrong acknowledged that while some elements of the bill do not fully align with the interests of American consumers, Coinbase remains open to engaging with lawmakers to find a workable path forward, according to his CNBC interview.

He argued that banks must not use legislation to limit competition or “put their thumb on the scale,” warning that this approach would exclude Americans from emerging financial opportunities.

To illustrate his point, Armstrong highlighted how stablecoin rewards could offer users yields of up to 3.8%, compared to an average of 0.14% (or 14 basis points) from traditional banks on dollar deposits. He also noted that stablecoins are typically backed by reserves such as U.S. Treasury bills, while banks operate on a fractional reserve basis.

Despite the disagreements, negotiations remain active. Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott confirmed that discussions are ongoing, stating that “everyone is at the table working in good faith.”

Pushback and hurdles

Opposition to the bill has been building for months, as various stakeholders seek to protect their interests.

In December 2025, AMBCrypto reported that the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) urged the Senate to reconsider the legislation, warning that it could place “profound risk” on workers’ pensions due to the volatility associated with crypto assets.

Concerns over fraud have also intensified. Crypto-related scams have surged, with an estimated $14 billion lost to fraud in 2025 alone, according to blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis.

Market sentiment has reflected these concerns. The broader crypto market has experienced volatility over the past day, with the total market capitalization standing at approximately $3.23 trillion.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitwise CEO calls for greater clarity around how the bill addresses DeFi and asset tokenization.
  • Industry players push back on the legislation, although negotiations remain ongoing as all parties stay engaged in discussions.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the main reason Wall Street and crypto industry players are saying 'no bill is better than a bad bill'?

AThey believe the current draft of the crypto market structure bill contains problematic provisions, such as restrictions on asset tokenization and a ban on stablecoin rewards, which could stifle innovation and limit financial opportunities for Americans, making it a 'bad bill'.

QAccording to Bitwise CEO Hunter Horsley, what is a key concern for large institutions regarding the proposed crypto bill?

ALarge institutions, including banks and asset managers, need clearer regulatory language specifically around DeFi (Decentralized Finance) and the rules for tokenizing securities and equities.

QWhat specific financial comparison did Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong make to argue against the bill's restrictions?

AArmstrong compared the potential 3.8% yield from stablecoin rewards to the average 0.14% yield offered by traditional banks on dollar deposits, highlighting the better returns consumers could get with stablecoins, which are often backed by safer reserves like U.S. Treasury bills.

QWhat are some of the major risks cited by opponents of the bill, such as the American Federation of Teachers?

AOpponents warn the bill could place 'profound risk' on workers' pensions due to the volatility of crypto assets and point to the surge in crypto-related fraud, with an estimated $14 billion lost to scams in 2025 alone.

QDespite the strong pushback, what is the current status of negotiations on the bill according to the Senate Banking Committee Chair?

ASenate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott confirmed that negotiations are still active, stating that 'everyone is at the table working in good faith' to find a path forward.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

The article describes an era where AI-generated content is flooding the market, forcing human authors to prove they are not machines. It begins with the example of dozens of AI-written, error-ridden biographies of Henry Kissinger appearing on Amazon within hours of his death, a pattern repeated for other deceased celebrities and even living experts who find fraudulent books under their names. This spam content has exploded, with monthly new book releases on platforms like Amazon reaching 300,000 by late 2025. The issue spans genres, from suspiciously high proportions of AI-written teen romance and self-help books to dangerous, AI-generated foraging guides containing lethal advice. The platforms' automated review systems, designed to catch plagiarism and banned words, are ill-equipped to detect AI-generated text that avoids these pitfalls while being nonsensical or fraudulent. The problem has infiltrated traditional publishing. A major publisher, Hachette, had to recall a bestselling horror novel after AI detection tools suggested 78% of its content was machine-generated. An acclaimed European philosophy book was later revealed to be entirely written by AI under a fake author persona. In response, authors are fighting back. At the 2026 London Book Fair, 10,000 writers published a blank book titled "Don't Steal This Book" containing only their signatures—using emptiness as a protest weapon in an age of AI overproduction. Initiatives like the "Human Author Certification" program have emerged, ironically placing the burden on humans to prove their work is not machine-made. The article warns of a vicious cycle: AI-generated low-quality books pollute the data used to train future AI models, leading to "model collapse" and an ever-worsening flood of digital waste, eroding trust in publishing and devaluing human creativity.

marsbit12 хв тому

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

marsbit12 хв тому

The King of Blind Date Attire in Korea: How SK Hynix Made a Comeback Against Samsung?

In South Korea's dating scene, SK Hynix employees are now highly sought after, a status shift fueled by the company's astronomical profits and employee bonuses, projected to reach up to 6.1 million RMB per person by 2027. This marks a dramatic reversal for the long-time second-place player in memory semiconductors, which has now surpassed its rival Samsung in annual operating profit. The turnaround story began in 2008 when a struggling Hynix, emerging from bankruptcy restructuring, took a risky bet by agreeing to develop High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) with AMD. At the time, HBM had no clear market beyond high-end graphics cards and was a costly, complex technology. Major players like Samsung, pursuing its own HMC technology, declined. For Hynix, with only memory as its core business, it was a gamble born of necessity. The pivotal moment came in 2012 when SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won acquired Hynix. Defying industry downturns, he invested heavily in R&D and fabrication, sustaining the HBM project through over a decade of commercial uncertainty and internal challenges. A key break occurred around 2016-2017 when Samsung faced production issues supplying HBM2 for Google's TPU, allowing SK Hynix to gain a crucial foothold in the data center market. The AI explosion post-ChatGPT in 2022 was the catalyst, turning HBM into a critical bottleneck for AI accelerators like NVIDIA's GPUs. By 2025, SK Hynix captured 62% of the global HBM market, leaving Samsung at 17%. For the first time, its annual operating profit exceeded Samsung's. Analysts point to the "innovator's dilemma" to explain Samsung's miss: its vast, successful business portfolio made it risk-averse, preventing an all-in bet on the initially niche HBM technology. In contrast, SK Hynix, as a challenger with its back against the wall, had no choice but to commit fully. The story highlights how Korea's chaebol system allows for ultra-long-term bets beyond quarterly pressures. However, SK Hynix's lead isn't guaranteed. Samsung is aggressively catching up on HBM4, and challenges like customer concentration (heavy reliance on NVIDIA) and technical hurdles in advanced packaging remain. The narrative underscores a market truth: the greatest alpha often comes from betting on uncertain, long-term directions others dismiss, much like HBM in 2008.

marsbit52 хв тому

The King of Blind Date Attire in Korea: How SK Hynix Made a Comeback Against Samsung?

marsbit52 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片