# Пов'язані статті щодо On-chain

Центр новин HTX надає останні статті та поглиблений аналіз на тему "On-chain", що охоплює ринкові тренди, оновлення проєктів, технологічні розробки та регуляторну політику в криптоіндустрії.

Has Satoshi Returned? Over 600 Bitcoin Over 16 Years Old Suddenly Moved

More than 600 bitcoins worth approximately $48 million, which had been dormant on addresses for over 16 years, were recently moved, sparking speculation about a potential connection to Bitcoin's mysterious creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. According to on-chain platform Whale Alert, 12 addresses containing 600 BTC—all mining rewards from March 2010—became active on September 5th. The platform stated its investigation found no links between these blocks and Nakamoto, reducing panic. The coins were mined when the block reward was 50 BTC, before four subsequent halvings. The movement attracted attention partly because it dates to the period when Nakamoto was still actively involved in Bitcoin's development. Whale Alert noted one transaction occurred several blocks earlier, likely a test. Lookonchain also reported similar activity involving 350 BTC from seven other inactive addresses. From a data analysis perspective, this event fits a broader trend: a significant volume of long-inactive bitcoins, valued at $104 billion, has changed hands in 2024-2025, a phenomenon some call the "great distribution." A technical note: some 2010-era coins are stored in outdated pay-to-public-key (P2PK) formats, making the public key visible and theoretically vulnerable to future quantum computing attacks, raising questions about how many of these ancient coins will be moved before such technology emerges.

cryptonews.ru10 год тому

Has Satoshi Returned? Over 600 Bitcoin Over 16 Years Old Suddenly Moved

cryptonews.ru10 год тому

Hyperliquid's Path to U.S. Compliance: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

Hyperliquid's US Compliance Path: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3 Hyperliquid, initially a decentralized perpetual trading platform, has repositioned itself as a "modern market infrastructure" for global, composable financial tools. Its modular, on-chain stack (HyperCore) separates exchange (DCM), clearinghouse (DCO), and broker (FCM) roles. However, this permissionless, self-custody design conflicts with strict US market structure laws requiring registered, custodial entities. To address this, Hyperliquid established the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), advocating for regulatory modernization. HPC argues regulated entities should be allowed to build products on Hyperliquid’s neutral infrastructure while fulfilling their compliance obligations (like KYC), rather than the platform itself becoming a registered entity. A key development is the "permissioned" HIP-3 DEX model on testnet. Unlike open deployments, these allow whitelisted access, enabling regulated entities to list markets, perform KYC, and grant trading permissions to compliant users. While creating separate order books, shared collateral and cross-book market makers are designed to prevent liquidity fragmentation. This approach, supported by tools like payload-based account controls, provides a potential compliant pathway for US brokers and institutions to onboard, while the core protocol remains permissionless infrastructure.

marsbitВчора 01:11

Hyperliquid's Path to U.S. Compliance: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

marsbitВчора 01:11

A New Era of On-Chain Governance on Solana: Deflationary Force Significantly Increased, Burn Proposal Unexpectedly Stalled

On August 27-28, 2026, Solana completed its first binding on-chain governance votes under its new SGP framework, shifting from informal validator signaling. Three proposals were voted on: SGP-0001 (the foundational constitution) passed with 86% support. SGP-0002, which doubles Solana's annual deflation rate from 15% to 30%, narrowly passed with exactly 67.00% support after dramatic last-minute vote changes. However, SGP-0003, a fee reform proposal that would have significantly increased SOL token burn rates by introducing variable "resource fees," failed. It received 53.90% support but was hindered by a high 27.18% abstention rate, which raised the effective threshold for passage. The failed proposal aimed to replace half of the fixed transaction fee with a resource-based fee to be entirely burned, potentially increasing daily burns by nearly 14x. Major opposition came from entities like The Solana Company (HSDT), which cited risks to stable network economics for institutional adoption. In contrast, many ecosystem builders supported the measure to redirect more value to the protocol layer. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko suggested the complex proposal be split into simpler parts for future votes, indicating a revised version is likely. Following the votes, SOL's price surged ~46% in August, its first positive month after ten months of decline, aided by strong ETF inflows.

Odaily星球日报09/03 03:37

A New Era of On-Chain Governance on Solana: Deflationary Force Significantly Increased, Burn Proposal Unexpectedly Stalled

Odaily星球日报09/03 03:37

活动图片