# Substack İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "Substack" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

Uncovering the 'God of Investment Research' Behind Citrini: Perpetual Substack Chart-Topper, a Single Report Evaporated Trillions from US Stocks

Revealing the "Research God" Behind Citrini: A Non-Finance Founder Shaking Up Markets Citrini, an independent research firm consistently ranked #1 on Substack's finance charts with nearly 250,000 subscribers, has gained significant attention in the current bull market. Its founder, James van Geelen, holds dual degrees in biology and psychology from UCLA, with a background as an emergency medical technician and a healthcare entrepreneur before founding Citrini. The firm is known for its deep, narrative-driven analyses focusing on long-term "super trends" like AI, geopolitics, and macro policy. Citrini made headlines in February with its report "The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis," a thought experiment on AI's potential societal impact. Despite being labeled a scenario analysis, it triggered a widespread sell-off in software and related stocks, briefly wiping hundreds of billions from the US market. Other notable reports include an on-the-ground analysis of the Strait of Hormuz and accurate calls on the copper foil industry's importance for AI/semiconductors. Geelen champions "second-order thinking," focusing on the indirect consequences of events. His investment style is thematic and often contrarian, seeking opportunities others miss. Citrini operates with a founder-driven, anonymous elite team model, recently adding specialists in macroeconomics and semiconductor analysis. The firm also manages a model portfolio, Citrindex, which has reportedly achieved over 200% cumulative returns.

marsbit06/18 09:12

Uncovering the 'God of Investment Research' Behind Citrini: Perpetual Substack Chart-Topper, a Single Report Evaporated Trillions from US Stocks

marsbit06/18 09:12

The Construction of SocialFi Originates from a Misreading of Its Own Medium

This article argues that the fundamental failure of SocialFi projects like Friend.tech stems from a misunderstanding of social media's core nature. It applies Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cool" media. "Cool" media (like traditional social networks) rely on low-resolution, incomplete signals (e.g., a tweet) that require user participation to create meaning. "Hot" media (like radio or print) deliver complete, high-resolution information that encourages passive consumption. SocialFi attempted to layer finance onto social media by making actions like follows and posts directly tradable with visible, real-time prices. However, this financial signal is a definitive "hot" signal. By superimposing it onto the inherently "cool" medium of social interaction, it fundamentally transformed the medium. Users stopped participating socially and instead began allocating capital rationally based on prices. The financial layer consumed the social one, leaving no genuine social substrate when speculation faded. The article extends this analysis to broader platform decay (e.g., Twitter's shift from cool participation to hot performance metrics) and NFTs. NFT platforms, by optimizing collections with real-time floor prices and rarity scores, rapidly "heated up" the traditionally "cool," participation-rich medium of collecting, destroying its cultural essence and leaving only speculative trading. The solution proposed is not to abandon capital in social contexts, but to design for "condensation points"—localized, infrequent financial interfaces (like Substack subscriptions or Patreon memberships) that allow capital to gather without saturating and overheating the core cool medium. The key lesson is that "liquidity is heat"; adding it to a cool medium doesn't enhance it but alters it, often destroying what made it valuable. Successful platforms will be those that introduce capital while meticulously preserving the cool, participatory nature of their underlying medium.

链捕手05/14 09:22

The Construction of SocialFi Originates from a Misreading of Its Own Medium

链捕手05/14 09:22

Outsmarting Algorithmic Manipulation on Twitter: How to Grow Your Account with Dignity?

This article analyzes the significant decline in engagement and reach experienced by many Twitter (X) content creators, attributing it to two major platform changes. First, the platform has weakened the "Following" tab, defaulting users to the algorithmic "For You" feed. Second, it has shifted from a chronological timeline to algorithmically recommended content, heavily influenced by its AI model, Grok. This results in a polarized content performance: deep, analytical posts receive minimal views and zero interaction, while sensationalist, controversial, or low-quality content (e.g., clickbait, politics, or adult material) often goes viral. The author argues this strategy, designed to increase ad revenue by keeping users in a recommendation loop, ultimately degrades the platform's community and commercial value. It incentivizes "farming" engagement through divisive or shallow content, driving away high-quality vertical creators who are increasingly migrating to platforms like Substack. The piece concludes with a three-part strategy for creators: 1) adapt by mixing deep content with high-engagement hooks and subscribing to Premium for better reach, 2) build direct audience connections through newsletters or private groups, and 3) wait for potential platform improvements. The core message is a call to maintain integrity while navigating the algorithmic challenges.

marsbit01/19 05:41

Outsmarting Algorithmic Manipulation on Twitter: How to Grow Your Account with Dignity?

marsbit01/19 05:41

活动图片