# DeFi İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "DeFi" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

Term Labs Project Hacked and Lost $8.5 Million

The Term Labs project suffered a hack resulting in a loss of $8.5 million. The attacker exploited a vulnerability in the protocol's management mechanism to gain access to Term Vaults, withdrawing 2,843 ETH and approximately 1.6 million DAI stablecoins. The developers acknowledged the breach was caused by a critical error in the management system's logic and have imposed restrictions on the affected smart contracts to prevent further outflows. According to CertiK, the stolen funds remain in a single wallet, and the hacker has not attempted to launder them through mixers like Tornado Cash or transfer them to centralized exchanges. This is not the first incident for the Term architecture, which previously lost $1.5 million in Spring 2025 due to an incorrect liquidity oracle update. The report follows a separate security alert from PeckShield regarding a $1.7 million hack on the cross-chain project Maya Protocol.

cryptonews.ru5 saat önce

Term Labs Project Hacked and Lost $8.5 Million

cryptonews.ru5 saat önce

Understanding Stablecoin Peg Deviations: What Actually Happens When a Digital Dollar Loses Its Link to the US Dollar

Stablecoin peg breakdowns occur because the code doesn't enforce a $1 value; it's an economic promise. Arbitrage by large traders (buying at a discount, redeeming for $1) maintains the peg. However, direct redemption is limited to large, verified clients, making general market confidence the true first line of defense. Four historical cases show different causes: USDT's 2018 drop was a trust issue; USDC's 2023 dip was a bank failure; xUSD's 2025 crash was due to risky yield strategies and a counterparty loss; and TerraUSD's 2022 collapse resulted from a flawed algorithmic design that triggered a death spiral. In 2026, a market-wide decline (total supply dropped ~$14.6B) is driven by new US regulations banning yield, reducing the arbitrage capital cushion that absorbs shocks. Market concentration remains high, with USDT and USDC comprising ~83% of the market, meaning any issue with either poses systemic risk. To interpret future de-pegs: identify the cause (reserve-backed coins tend to recover; algorithmic or yield-based models may not); monitor redemption processing, not just price; and watch for contagion to other protocols and assets, as seen with DAI during the USDC incident.

cryptonews.ru5 saat önce

Understanding Stablecoin Peg Deviations: What Actually Happens When a Digital Dollar Loses Its Link to the US Dollar

cryptonews.ru5 saat önce

The Danger of Old Bookmarks: How an Expired Tornado Cash Domain Cost a User 1,000 ETH

A user lost over 1,010 ETH (worth millions) due to a phishing attack via an expired official domain of the Tornado Cash protocol. As reported on August 20, 2026, the domain `tornado.cash` was not renewed by the original developers amid U.S. OFAC sanctions and was subsequently registered by malicious actors. They deployed a fake frontend mimicking the legitimate Tornado Cash interface. Through this site, the attackers gained access to the user's deposit notes—the data required to withdraw funds from the protocol's pools—and drained the ETH within 12 hours. On-chain data shows the stolen funds (e.g., wallet 0xd8B356...) were withdrawn from Tornado Cash pools. However, on-chain analyst Specter cast doubt on the victim's story. He suggested the individual might be involved in illicit activity, noting that a large sum of BTC was received from a coin-mixing service (Whirlpool) and converted to ETH before being sent to the fake Tornado Cash site. The victim's explanation of urgently moving funds due to a compromised hardware wallet was questioned, as the fund trail indicated deliberate obfuscation. Specter speculated this might be a conflict between malicious actors rather than a simple phishing case. The incident highlights the danger of expired domains for major protocols, where old bookmarks can lead to compromised sites. WHOIS records show the domain was registered in March 2025. Broader analysis notes that in 2025, over $1.8 billion was lost to scams and exploits, largely through social engineering like phishing via familiar but hijacked links. This case underscores the persistent risk when a domain's legal status changes but user trust and search engine reputation remain.

cryptonews.ru5 saat önce

The Danger of Old Bookmarks: How an Expired Tornado Cash Domain Cost a User 1,000 ETH

cryptonews.ru5 saat önce

Yesterday, the Altcoin Set a Record for the Number of Tokens Burned in a Single Day! This is a Historical Maximum!

Yesterday, the Uniswap token $UNI set a new record for the highest daily burn value in its history. On August 21, approximately $590,000 worth of $UNI was burned, marking the largest single-day burn by dollar value ever recorded for the token. The majority of the burn occurred on the Ethereum network, which accounted for about $267,000. This was followed by the Base network with $165,000 and the Robinhood Chain with approximately $87,000. In terms of token quantity, around 150,000 UNI tokens were burned, representing the second-highest daily burn volume on record. Data indicates that the $UNI burn mechanism has recently accelerated significantly, with activity expanding across various networks. Following this news, the price of $UNI increased by 6.88% over the past 24 hours, though it still trades approximately 90.7% below its all-time high of around $45.

cryptonews.ruDün 21:21

Yesterday, the Altcoin Set a Record for the Number of Tokens Burned in a Single Day! This is a Historical Maximum!

cryptonews.ruDün 21:21

HumidiFi Suspends Trading Followingdentin Network, Limiting Impact to Internal Funds

HumidiFi, a prominent decentralized exchange on Solana, has temporarily suspended trading on its platform following a security breach within its network. The company stated that the incident was limited to its own internal funds and did not affect client or third-party assets. According to its official announcement on X, the team is still investigating the attack and has not disclosed specific details or labeled it as a hack. Trading remains paused. Data from DefiLlama shows HumidiFi processed around $213.79 million in trades over the past 24 hours and had a 30-day trading volume of approximately $2.468 billion. Despite the incident, the exchange's native token, WET, saw its 24-hour trading volume surge nearly 192% to about $5.49 million, although its price fell 8.66% to $0.07173. This price is roughly 78% below its all-time high from December 10, 2025. This security breach follows a recent failed token sale on the Jupiter platform, which was canceled after an attacker used automated wallets to purchase nearly all available tokens. HumidiFi canceled the sale, vowing a new, fairer token distribution for legitimate participants. The report notes an increasing frequency of security investigations in the digital asset sector for Q2 2026, with a record number of incidents causing significant financial damage.

cryptonews.ruDün 17:52

HumidiFi Suspends Trading Followingdentin Network, Limiting Impact to Internal Funds

cryptonews.ruDün 17:52

GensynAI's Jeff Amico States That Real-World Asset (RWA) Investors May Lose Creditor Rights

Jeff Amico of GensynAI warns that investors in Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenized lending pools may lack creditor rights in case of borrower default. He notes a common structure where users receive a yield-bearing stablecoin from a platform, but the underlying loan and collateral are held by separate legal entities. This setup means investors have no enforceable claims against the borrower, the special purpose vehicles (SPVs), or the collateral itself, relying instead on the platform's promise to return funds. Amico emphasizes that investors must first identify who legally owes them money and what credit enhancement mechanisms exist, rather than focusing solely on nominal yield. Protections like collateral or first-loss capital are meaningless unless the lien is properly perfected and an agent is designated to enforce it on the investor's behalf. Investors without a formal credit agreement are particularly vulnerable. He cites Pareto/FalconX as a better model where depositors are direct contractual creditors, though this comes with higher minimum investments and KYC requirements. This highlights a trade-off: the crypto industry's permissionless ideals often conflict with the legal protections required for secure lending. Amico argues that weak legal structures could limit the RWA sector's growth. Traditional finance offers a clear template with defined creditor rights and perfected liens. Tokenized lending needs infrastructure, like oracles, to verify off-chain loan agreement status and collateral perfection, as smart contracts cannot do this autonomously. Ultimately, transparency is key. Some investors may accept weaker protections for open access, while others may prefer stronger legal rights. The legal structure of a lending pool will be as critical as its advertised yield, especially during a default, determining whether a token holder has enforceable rights or merely a platform promise.

cryptonews.ruDün 17:41

GensynAI's Jeff Amico States That Real-World Asset (RWA) Investors May Lose Creditor Rights

cryptonews.ruDün 17:41

MiCA is coming for DeFi vaults, but regulation will be difficult

The European Commission is exploring whether to extend the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation to cover decentralized finance (DeFi) lending and borrowing, including lending vaults. These vaults, which channel billions into on-chain credit markets, present significant regulatory challenges because their decentralized structure doesn't map neatly onto existing financial frameworks. Their legal status is currently based on non-binding interpretations that they fall outside MiCA and EU fund rules. The article uses Morpho's decentralized lending protocol as an example, illustrating how responsibilities are divided among various participants (owner, curator, allocator, sentinel), making it difficult to identify a single "provider" to regulate. Experts warn that broadly categorizing "DeFi lending" could inadvertently capture vastly different structures. They argue that any regulatory approach should focus on the specific structure and control mechanisms of a vault, rather than using decentralization as a simple dividing line, and that DeFi lending may require a dedicated, carefully crafted framework distinct from traditional finance. The Commission's consultation closes on September 30, 2026. The core challenge for regulators is not just whether to regulate DeFi lending, but how to design rules that distinguish between different forms of on-chain lending and the entities that control them.

cointelegraphDün 13:36

MiCA is coming for DeFi vaults, but regulation will be difficult

cointelegraphDün 13:36

Grayscale Named 3 Cryptocurrency Tokens That Could Benefit From New SEC Rules

Grayscale research head Zach Pandl, in an analyst report, identified three blockchain networks and their native tokens—Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), and BNB Chain (BNB)—as potential beneficiaries of the SEC's newly proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets." The proposed rules aim to simplify capital raising in the U.S. using tokens, with two pathways: one allowing eligible issuers to raise up to $5 million over four years, and another permitting offerings of up to $75 million annually with enhanced disclosure requirements. Pandl suggested the rules could reduce regulatory uncertainty, encouraging more U.S.-based token issuance and investment activity on public blockchains. This increased activity could, in turn, potentially drive value back to the underlying networks and their native tokens by supporting more token launches, stablecoins, and decentralized finance applications. The analysis notes that any benefits are conditional, not guaranteed. Token price increases are not assured, and final rules may change following public comment and SEC review. Investors in ETH, SOL, or BNB will still face inherent cryptocurrency risks regardless of the proposal's outcome.

cryptonews.ruDün 10:42

Grayscale Named 3 Cryptocurrency Tokens That Could Benefit From New SEC Rules

cryptonews.ruDün 10:42

UK Tax Authority Sends 81,000 Letters on Cryptocurrency Taxation Amid Tightened Oversight

The UK tax authority (HMRC) has intensified oversight of crypto investors, sending 81,000 'nudge' letters over the past 12 months—a 25% increase from the previous year. These letters warn recipients to disclose unpaid crypto taxes before HMRC launches formal investigations. According to accounting firm UHY Hacker Young, non-compliance is often due to investors misunderstanding complex rules or mistakenly believing transactions are untraceable, especially on foreign exchanges. The UK's crypto tax rules generally distinguish between personal investment gains and income-generating activities. Taxable events can include selling crypto for fiat, exchanging one crypto for another, spending it on goods/services, or transferring tokens. Income from staking or lending may fall under separate income tax rules. Notably, planned changes for April 2027 will simplify accounting for certain DeFi transactions but not eliminate tax on economic gains. HMRC's enforcement capabilities are set to expand with the global Cryptoasset Reporting Framework (CARF). From 2027, UK crypto service providers must collect and report client transaction data. International information exchange will also provide HMRC with data on UK residents using overseas platforms, significantly reducing offshore opacity. This broader reporting initiative coincides with increased UK regulatory actions, including recent raids on suspected illegal peer-to-peer trading sites.

cryptonews.ruDün 10:39

UK Tax Authority Sends 81,000 Letters on Cryptocurrency Taxation Amid Tightened Oversight

cryptonews.ruDün 10:39

Druckenmiller Invests $88 Million in Bitdeer and Hyperliquid Strategies

Stanley Druckenmiller, through his Duquesne Family Office, is increasing his exposure to digital assets. According to a Q2 2026 13F filing, Duquesne established a major position in Bitdeer Technologies Group (BTDR), purchasing 4.1 million shares worth over $64.7 million. Bitdeer, a high-performance computing firm involved in crypto mining hardware and data centers, recently secured a $4.7 billion AI contract in Norway and is expanding production in Nevada. This move aligns with increased investments in BTDR by Jane Street and Citadel. Additionally, Druckenmiller indirectly invested $23.1 million in the Hyperliquid ecosystem by acquiring 2.9 million shares of Hyperliquid Strategies ($PURR). This firm provides institutional access to the $HYPE token of the Hyperliquid decentralized exchange. The $HYPE token recently hit record highs after news that U.S. regulators are working to bring Hyperliquid into full compliance, boosting $PURR's price over 20%. Other major investors like BlackRock and State Street also increased their $PURR positions in Q2.

cryptonews.ruDün 10:31

Druckenmiller Invests $88 Million in Bitdeer and Hyperliquid Strategies

cryptonews.ruDün 10:31

活动图片

Regulatory Policyright-arrow

Market Analysisright-arrow