# Alliance İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "Alliance" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

Author: Chloe, ChainCatcher Last week, Open Standard launched the dollar stablecoin OpenUSD (OUSD) with a list of over 140 supposedly supporting companies, including major names like Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, American Express, BlackRock, BNY, Standard Chartered, Google, Shopify, Samsung, Coinbase, Solana, and Ripple. The announcement initially impacted Circle's stock price, but doubts about the list quickly emerged. Several Korean firms named, including Samsung Electronics, Shinhan Financial Group, Dunamu (Upbit's parent), and K Bank, clarified they had not formally agreed to join the alliance. Some stated they were only approached for potential interest or learned of their inclusion from news reports, expressing surprise. Similar concerns were raised by U.S. entities, suggesting the list may be misleading. OUSD, led by Zach Abrams of Bridge (acquired by Stripe in 2024), promotes zero-fee minting/redemption, no transaction limits, and sharing reserve asset yields with partners instead of keeping profits. However, this model makes listed partnership imply economic benefits, turning it into a serious credibility issue. This incident reflects a common crypto marketing tactic of leveraging big names. A Chainstory analysis found over 62% of crypto press releases in late 2025 were high-risk or scams. The situation recalls Facebook's Libra (later Diem), which collapsed in 2022 after initial heavyweight backers like Visa and PayPal withdrew under regulatory pressure. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire welcomed the competition but highlighted the challenges. He argued stablecoin success relies on network effects and real usage, not just alliances. He criticized OUSD's "free" model and full revenue sharing as potentially starving infrastructure development. Noting the dominance of USDT (~$1.84T) and USDC (~$730B) in the ~$2.91T stablecoin market, he suggested many new entrants lack real utility despite inflated circulation from incentives. In conclusion, while OUSD has genuine backing and a distinct model, its future depends on actual adoption in B2B payments, settlements, and cross-border transactions, not just a prestigious partner list. The market will determine if it is a credible challenger or merely another marketing promise.

链捕手07/06 14:28

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

链捕手07/06 14:28

Building USDC by Its Own Hands, Why Does Coinbase Turn to Support Competitor OUSD?

Coinbase, a key distributor of the dominant stablecoin USDC, has joined over 140 major companies—including Visa, Mastercard, and BlackRock—as a founding member of the Open USD (OUSD) alliance, a move that directly challenges the current stablecoin economic model. The new project aims to upend the established profit structure by offering zero minting and redemption fees and allocating the majority of reserve interest earnings to distribution partners, rather than the issuer. This shift highlights a growing power struggle in the $320+ billion stablecoin market, where platforms with massive user bases are demanding a larger share of the revenue generated from the underlying reserves. Circle, the issuer of USDC, saw its stock plummet 16% on the day of the OUSD announcement, reflecting investor concern over the potential strain on its crucial partnership with Coinbase. While Coinbase earned over $900 million from its USDC partnership in 2024, its support for a competing model gives it significant leverage as its revenue-sharing agreement with Circle nears expiration in August 2026. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire defended the USDC model, emphasizing its decade-long development, deep liquidity, and extensive ecosystem integration, which he argues cannot be easily replicated by a large, potentially slow-moving consortium. He also questioned the sustainability of a zero-fee model and warned that diverting all reserve interest would leave issuers without funds for critical compliance and operational infrastructure. Analysts remain skeptical of OUSD's prospects, citing the "cold start" problem of building liquidity, potential governance challenges within a large alliance, and heightened regulatory scrutiny. The emergence of OUSD signals a broader industry bifurcation, where stablecoins are increasingly viewed as backend settlement tools. The core competition is shifting from technology to a direct negotiation over how profits from the network are distributed between issuers and the powerful distribution channels.

Foresight News07/03 03:58

Building USDC by Its Own Hands, Why Does Coinbase Turn to Support Competitor OUSD?

Foresight News07/03 03:58

Circle CEO Responds to OUSD Challenge: Alliance Model Doomed to Fail, It's a 'Winner-Takes-All' Game

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire addresses the challenge posed by the new Open USD (OUSD) stablecoin project, backed by 140 global companies. He argues that the stablecoin market exhibits "winner-take-all" characteristics, where USDC's near-decade-long lead in application integrations, global liquidity, and regulatory compliance secures its dominant position. Allaire outlines three key network effects underpinning USDC's strength: 1) Extensive integration as an internet protocol layer, 2) Deep, globally distributed liquidity networks, and 3) Deep integration with global policy and regulatory frameworks. He cites data showing USDC facilitated 80% of on-chain USD stablecoin transaction volume in Q1 2026. He directly counters OUSD's proposed advantages: 1) "Free minting and redemption" may not be sustainable against market realities, which USDC addresses via contractual mechanisms. 2) "Sharing all revenue" risks starving the infrastructure of necessary investment for growth and reliability. 3) A "consortium model" often leads to slow innovation and poor coordination compared to focused, independent operators like Circle. Allaire reaffirms Circle's strong partnership with Coinbase and notes that Circle continues to collaborate with many OUSD founding members. He concludes by welcoming OUSD to the ecosystem while expressing confidence in USDC's entrenched network advantages and continued expansion.

Odaily星球日报07/02 04:00

Circle CEO Responds to OUSD Challenge: Alliance Model Doomed to Fail, It's a 'Winner-Takes-All' Game

Odaily星球日报07/02 04:00

They Waited 7 Years for This Money

The article discusses the significant drop in share price of Circle, known as the "first stablecoin stock," triggered by the announcement of a new alliance including Visa, Stripe, Mastercard, Coinbase, BlackRock, Google, IBM, and Ripple. This alliance plans to launch Open USD, a USD stablecoin, later this year. Key to the market reaction is Open USD's plan to distribute reserve-generated profits to its adopters, directly challenging Circle's core revenue model from USDC's reserve interest. The piece draws a parallel to Facebook's 2019 Libra (later Diem) project, which involved many of the same companies. Libra failed due to regulatory pressure, its association with Facebook's controversial reputation, and overly ambitious global currency narratives. However, the underlying desire of these major financial and tech firms to create a new digital payment infrastructure persisted. Over seven years, the landscape changed: clearer US stablecoin regulations (GENIUS Act), mature blockchain infrastructure, and companies gaining practical experience with crypto payments. Open USD presents a more modest, compliance-focused narrative—a settlement tool and enterprise payment rail rather than a revolutionary global currency. While the new alliance poses a serious threat to Circle's profitability and exclusivity, it faces challenges typical of large consortia: slow decision-making and complex profit-sharing. USDC's established liquidity, trust, and integrations provide Circle with significant defenses. The market's reaction is seen partly as an emotional overreaction but also a necessary reevaluation of Circle's business model from a unique "stablecoin era ticket" to a "strong issuer" in a competitive commodity market. Ultimately, the core ambition from the Libra era remains: to digitize the movement of dollar value on the internet and capture the adjacent commercial opportunities. The lesson learned is to pursue this goal not as a high-profile, platform-led revolution, but as a quiet, utility-focused infrastructure play.

marsbit07/01 10:41

They Waited 7 Years for This Money

marsbit07/01 10:41

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbit06/09 06:08

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbit06/09 06:08

Pharos Establishes RealFi Alliance to Promote Institutional-Grade On-Chain Execution Standardization for RWA

Pharos Network has launched the RealFi Alliance, a strategic ecosystem initiative aimed at unifying institutional asset issuers, financial infrastructure providers, and on-chain builders. The alliance seeks to standardize and scale the execution framework for real-world assets (RWA), moving beyond isolated pilots. Founding members include Chainlink, Asseto Finance, Ember, Faroo, LayerZero, R25, Re7 Labs, TopNod, and Centrifuge. The alliance addresses systemic issues like fragmented liquidity, inconsistent infrastructure standards, and regulatory disconnects by creating a unified operational layer where RWAs remain active, composable, and capable of supporting institutional workflows. It operates on four core pillars: Asset Enablement (bringing real-world value on-chain securely), Infrastructure & Compliance (leveraging Pharos’s parallel execution and built-in compliance modules), Liquidity & Utility (designing clear functional use cases like staking and yield mechanisms), and Market Transparency (establishing trust through clear risk and return benchmarks). Pharos CEO Wish Wu emphasized that the goal is to create a unified environment for assets to operate at scale with institutional reliability. The upcoming Pharos mainnet will launch as a ready-to-use financial environment with integrated liquidity and compliance standards. The alliance plans to expand in structured batches, selecting new members based on asset quality, technical maturity, and ecosystem synergy. Pharos is a financial-grade Layer 1 blockchain designed for RealFi, combining modular architecture, parallel execution, and built-in compliance modules. It is developed by a team with backgrounds from Ant Group and is backed by investors like Hack VC and Faction VC.

marsbit02/23 13:02

Pharos Establishes RealFi Alliance to Promote Institutional-Grade On-Chain Execution Standardization for RWA

marsbit02/23 13:02

活动图片