Terraform co-founder sentenced to 15 years in prison after guilty plea

cointelegraph2025-12-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2025-12-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon has been sentenced to 15 years in prison by a U.S. court after pleading guilty to wire fraud and conspiracy. The collapse of Terraform in 2022 wiped out an estimated $40 billion from the crypto market. Judge Paul Engelmayer called the fraud "unusually serious," stating that Kwon "publicly lied to the market" for years. Kwon expressed remorse and requested to serve his sentence in South Korea, where he may face additional charges and up to 40 more years in prison. Approximately 16,500 victims were affected, with several testifying about severe financial losses during the sentencing. Kwon is the latest high-profile crypto executive to be convicted, following cases like FTX's Sam Bankman-Fried and Celsius' Alex Mashinsky.

Do Kwon, the co-founder of Terraform Labs, has been sentenced to 15 years in prison after pleading guilty to wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud.

In a Thursday hearing in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, Judge Paul Engelmayer ordered that Kwon serve 15 years in prison for his role in the collapse of Terraform, which wiped out about $40 billion from the crypto market in 2022.

Prior to making his decision on sentencing, Engelmayer heard from some of Terraform’s victims and questioned what kind of justice Kwon might face in his native South Korea, where authorities are also building a case against him.

“I would like everyone to know that I have spent all my time thinking what I could have done, and what I can do,” said Kwon prior to his sentencing, according to Inner City Press. “It’s been four years since the crash, three years since I’ve seen my family. I’d like to [do] my penance in my home country.”

Engelmayer reportedly said the 12-year recommendation US prosecutors had requested the court impose on Kwon was “unreasonable,” while the five years requested by the co-founder’s lawyers “would be so implausible it would require appellate reversal.”

“To the next Do Kwon, if you commit fraud, you will lose your liberty for a long time as you will here,” said Engelmayer, according to Inner City Press. “You have been bitten by the crypto bug, and I don’t think that’s changed. You must be incapacitated. If not for your guilty plea, my sentence would have been higher.”

The judge added, addressing Kwon:

“Your fraud was unusually serious. For four years you publicly lied to the market [...] The investors were taking a risk, caveat emptor. But they were not taking the risk of being a fraud victim... What makes what you did so despicable is that you traded on trust.”

Kwon could be extradited to South Korea after serving seven and a half years, where he may complete the second half of his US sentence. He could face up to an additional 40 years in prison in his native country.

Several victims have their say during the sentencing hearing

Prosecutors said at the sentencing hearing that there were about 16,500 victims from the collapse of Terraform, according to claims in the company’s ongoing bankruptcy case. Six of them were allowed to address the court via phone before Engelmayer’s decision, describing their financial losses due to Terra.

“I sold my apartment in Moscow to invest with Do Kwon,” said Tatiana Dontsova, one of the victims, according to Inner City Press. “I moved to Tbilisi. $81,000 turned into $13 in the palm of my hand. Kwon came up with Luna 2, calling it LUNC. He is not showing any responsibility for those who invested. I am now officially homeless.”

Related: US judge asks for clarification on Do Kwon’s foreign charges

Kwon, alleged to have had a role in the 2022 collapse of the Terra ecosystem, was handed over to US authorities in December 2024 after his extradition from Montenegro. His legal team delayed proceedings for months by presenting various challenges in the Montenegrin courts.

With Kwon expected to be in prison for years, the Terraform co-founder became the latest former high-profile cryptocurrency executive to enter a plea deal or be found guilty in US courts.

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried is serving a 25-year sentence, former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao served four months — though was later pardoned by US President Donald Trump — and former Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky was sentenced to 12 years.

Magazine: When privacy and AML laws conflict: Crypto projects’ impossible choice

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was Do Kwon sentenced for and what was the length of his prison term?

ADo Kwon was sentenced to 15 years in prison after pleading guilty to wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud.

QWhich US court district handled the sentencing of Do Kwon and who was the presiding judge?

AThe sentencing was handled by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Paul Engelmayer presiding.

QWhat did Judge Engelmayer say about the sentencing recommendations from the prosecution and defense?

AJudge Engelmayer said the prosecution's recommended 12-year sentence was 'unreasonable' and the defense's requested 5-year sentence was 'so implausible it would require appellate reversal.'

QWhat potential additional legal consequences does Do Kwon face after serving his US sentence?

AAfter serving seven and a half years in the US, Kwon could be extradited to South Korea where he may complete the second half of his US sentence and face up to an additional 40 years in prison.

QHow did one victim, Tatiana Dontsova, describe the impact of the Terraform collapse on her life?

ATatiana Dontsova stated she sold her apartment in Moscow to invest with Do Kwon, saw her $81,000 investment turn into $13, and is now officially homeless.

İlgili Okumalar

Interview with Circle's Chief Economist: USDC's Entry into Hyperliquid Benefits Circle and HYPE, Stablecoins Are Becoming Marginal Buyers of U.S. Treasuries

In an interview with Circle's Chief Economist Gordon Liao, the conversation covers the strategic significance of USDC replacing USDH as the reference asset on the decentralized perpetual exchange Hyperliquid. This shift, facilitated by Coinbase as the reserve manager and Circle providing technical infrastructure, aims to capture net interest income for the platform, with 90% of reserve earnings directed back to Hyperliquid for HYPE token buybacks. Liao discusses how stablecoins like USDC, with their substantial on-chain settlement volumes (e.g., $21 trillion in Q1 2026), are emerging as marginal buyers of U.S. Treasuries, concentrating on short-term debt and effectively reducing the weighted duration of the market, which may provide underlying support for long-term rates. The dialogue also explores the evolving nature of stablecoins as both a medium of exchange and a vehicle for capital and collateral liquidity. Additionally, the panel touches on the CLARITY Act's legislative progress, noting compromises around "activity-based rewards" and remaining hurdles like ethics concerns. On AI, there's debate over value capture, with predictions that distribution and application layers, rather than foundational model companies like OpenAI, will accrue most value. Regarding the bond market, Liao attributes the rise in 30-year yields primarily to an increased term premium (around 80 bps) driven by supply-demand dynamics, including fiscal expansion and changing investor demand, rather than expectations of Fed rate hikes.

marsbit8 dk önce

Interview with Circle's Chief Economist: USDC's Entry into Hyperliquid Benefits Circle and HYPE, Stablecoins Are Becoming Marginal Buyers of U.S. Treasuries

marsbit8 dk önce

Cryptocurrency Asset Recovery: A Lucrative, Low-Profile Business

Summary: The article explores the growing business of cryptocurrency asset recovery, highlighting it as a quiet but profitable niche. While many assume recovery involves dramatic hacking or theft cases, the most common issues are everyday operational errors: sending crypto to the wrong blockchain network, forgetting transaction memos/Tags, hardware wallet failures, incorrect seed phrase backups, and frozen centralized exchange accounts. As cryptocurrency adoption expands to less technical users, the volume of such costly mistakes increases. This creates a genuine, recurring demand for professional recovery services. The article notes a paradox: while the technology emphasizes user-controlled assets, the complexity often necessitates expert intermediaries, similar to traditional financial services. However, the field is fraught with risks, including middlemen and secondary scammers who prey on desperate users. Truly professional teams avoid promising guaranteed results, instead focusing on diagnosing the specific problem—whether it's a technical wallet issue, an exchange compliance matter, or an unsolvable private key loss. The author concludes by noting the professionalization of this market and announces a partnership with a specialized recovery team, offering readers a preliminary assessment for issues like wrong-chain deposits, lost access, or frozen accounts, while emphasizing ethical practices and realistic expectations.

marsbit56 dk önce

Cryptocurrency Asset Recovery: A Lucrative, Low-Profile Business

marsbit56 dk önce

Cryptocurrency Asset Recovery: A Lucrative, Under-the-Radar Business

Cryptocurrency Asset Recovery: A Lucrative, Low-Key Business The article discusses the burgeoning business of cryptocurrency asset recovery, driven by common yet often crippling user errors rather than sensational hacking incidents. Key problem areas include selecting the wrong blockchain for a deposit, omitting required memos/tags when sending to exchanges, physical wallet device failures, errors in backing up or modifying seed phrases, and issues with frozen accounts or withdrawals on centralized exchanges. As cryptocurrency adoption grows among mainstream users—including retail investors and businesses—these operational mistakes increase. The decentralized nature of crypto places full responsibility for asset security on users, who may lack the technical expertise to navigate complex chains, wallets, and protocols. Even centralized exchanges, while offering some support, often present users with cumbersome, non-intuitive processes for resolving issues. This creates a persistent and growing demand for professional recovery services. However, the field is rife with risks, including middlemen without real expertise and outright scammers who promise guaranteed recovery, request sensitive information like private keys, or charge advance "fees." Legitimate service providers typically avoid absolute guarantees, as recovery feasibility depends heavily on the specific technical or administrative circumstances of each case. The business is evolving from an informal market into a professional one requiring a combination of technical analysis, exchange/platform communication, and legal/compliance knowledge. The article concludes by noting the author's partnership with a professional recovery team, offering preliminary assessments for issues like incorrect deposits, wallet access problems, or exchange account freezes, with an emphasis on realistic evaluation over promises.

链捕手1 saat önce

Cryptocurrency Asset Recovery: A Lucrative, Under-the-Radar Business

链捕手1 saat önce

YC Partner: How to Build a Self-Evolving AI-Native Company

YC Partner Tom Blomfield argues that the future lies in building AI-native companies designed as self-evolving systems, not just applying AI to traditional, hierarchical "Roman legion" structures. The core idea is to extract and codify all organizational knowledge—scattered across emails, Slack, documents, and human minds—into a central, AI-readable "company brain." This enables the creation of recursive AI loops that sense changes (from emails, support tickets, data), make decisions, execute via tools, and learn from feedback, all with minimal human intervention. YC exemplifies this with an agent that monitors failed queries, autonomously diagnoses the issue (e.g., needing a new database or index), writes code, submits it for review, and deploys fixes—optimizing the company while founders sleep. This shift redefines organizational structure: the bottleneck becomes token usage and context quality, not headcount. Middle management for coordination is largely obsolete. The critical human roles are individual contributors (ICs) and those handling high-risk, real-world judgments at the system's edge. Key steps include recording all organizational activity for AI, creating self-improving artifacts (like an AI-generated, living handbook), and treating internal software as temporary and disposable, while preserving valuable business context and data. The fundamental question for founders is whether to build their company as this new type of intelligent, self-optimizing system from the start.

marsbit1 saat önce

YC Partner: How to Build a Self-Evolving AI-Native Company

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片