Wintermute Ventures: Our 6 Major Predictions for Digital Assets in 2026

比推Опубликовано 2026-02-02Обновлено 2026-02-02

Original Author: Wintermute Ventures

Original Title: Wintermute Ventures: Our 6 Major Predictions for Digital Assets in 2026

Compiled by: BibiNews


For decades, the internet has enabled information to flow freely across borders, platforms, and systems. But the flow of "value" has always lagged behind. Money, assets, and financial contracts still rely on fragmented infrastructure, moving through outdated rails, national borders, and layers of intermediaries, each extracting costs.

And this gap is being filled at an unprecedented speed.

This creates an opportunity for a class of infrastructure companies—those that directly replace traditional clearing, settlement, and custody functions.

The infrastructure that allows value to flow as freely as information is no longer just a theoretical concept; it is being built, deployed, and used at scale.

For years, crypto assets existed on-chain but were disconnected from the real economy. Now, this is changing.

Crypto is becoming the clearing and settlement layer that the internet economy has always lacked: a system that operates 24/7, is transparent, and requires no permission from centralized gatekeepers.

The following themes represent our judgment on the direction of digital asset development by 2026 and are areas where Wintermute Ventures is actively supporting entrepreneurs.

Everything Will Become Tradable

More and more assets and real-world outcomes are becoming tradable through new financial primitives, including prediction markets, tokenization, and derivatives.

This shift provides a liquidity layer for areas where markets previously did not exist.

Tokenization and synthetic assets bring liquidity to known assets; prediction markets go a step further, pricing things that were previously "unpricable," transforming raw information into tradable financial instruments.

Prediction markets are continuously expanding, both as consumer-facing products and as entirely new financial instruments supporting hedging, outcome-linked trading, and expression on highly specific events. They are also beginning to replace some functions of financial infrastructure.

Insurance is a prime example: outcome-based markets can provide cheaper, more flexible hedging than traditional insurance or reinsurance by directly pricing specific risks.

Instead of buying hurricane insurance covering an entire region, a user can hedge against a specific time, specific place, and specific wind speed.

On a longer time scale, these highly personalized risks can be finely combined through agentic workflows according to individual needs.

As prediction market infrastructure expands, entirely new data products will emerge around themes that have never been priced before.

We anticipate markets to emerge for trading and quantifying objective indicators of "perception, sentiment, and collective opinion." These emerging markets are a natural extension of decentralized finance, opening new ways to price and exchange "information itself."

When everything is tradable, the infrastructure that provides liquidity, enables price discovery, and ensures settlement becomes critical.

This structural change will concentrate value at the infrastructure layer and directly impact how capital is allocated.

We are actively supporting teams building core market and settlement infrastructure, data layers for verification and proof, and new data products that support previously non-tradable outcomes.

We are also focused on new abstraction models that make these markets programmable and composable, allowing them to be embedded into real-world workflows and gradually replace parts of the traditional financial and insurance systems.

Stablecoins Become the Trust Layer, While Banks Handle Transitional Settlement

Digital assets currently still lack a robust system akin to settlement banks and clearinghouses in traditional finance.

Stablecoins provide an open, programmable form of value, but fragmentation between different systems creates friction in the absence of settlement infrastructure, limiting their scalable application.

As stablecoin issuers employing various collateral models continue to emerge across ecosystems, the need for a reliable interoperability layer to combine and coordinate these assets is rising.

For this system to truly scale, the crypto industry needs an infrastructure capable of net settlement, exchange, and clearing between different stablecoins and different chains, without introducing additional credit risk, liquidity risk, or operational complexity.

The missing key abstraction is shifting the exchange and credit risk onto the balance sheets of stablecoin issuers, achieving "balance sheet-based interoperability," rather than having end-users bear exchange rate, path selection, or counterparty risk when transacting across stablecoins.

We see this as a kind of "on-chain correspondent banking system": settlement takes seconds and is completely open to application developers. We expect more companies to position themselves as coordination layers between issuers and applications.

Markets Will Reward Sustainable Revenue, Not Short-Term Incentives

The approach of lacking sustainable business models and relying solely on token incentives to drive growth is gradually failing.

Companies that subsidize users or liquidity providers but structurally lack robust revenue models will find it increasingly difficult to compete.

Valuations will be more closely anchored to sustainable earnings and forward-looking profit expectations, gradually returning to cash-flow-based evaluation frameworks.

Simply annualizing short-term, highly volatile monthly fees is no longer a reasonable pricing method. Earnings quality and incentive alignment will become the heart of valuation.

Tokens lacking a clear value capture path will also struggle to maintain demand outside of speculative cycles.

Consequently, fewer companies will issue tokens at inception. Many projects will prioritize equity structures, using blockchain primarily as underlying infrastructure, almost "invisible" to users and investors.

When tokens are adopted, issuance will often occur after product-market fit is clear, and revenue, unit economics, and distribution channels are validated.

We believe this is a healthy and necessary evolution.

It allows founders to focus on building long-term sustainable businesses rather than chasing token incentives; it allows investors to evaluate using familiar financial frameworks; and it allows users to get products designed for long-term value.

DeFi Will Merge with FinTech

The future of finance is neither DeFi nor traditional finance, but a fusion of both. A dual-track architecture allows fintech applications to dynamically route transactions between different systems based on cost, speed, and yield.

Breakthrough consumer products will, on the surface, be indistinguishable from traditional fintech products; wallets, bridges, and blockchains will be completely abstracted and hidden. Capital efficiency, yield levels, settlement speed, and transparent execution define the next generation of financial products.

While the user experience converges with fintech, the industry will continue to expand rapidly at the底层. Tokenization and highly composable financial primitives drive this growth, enabling deeper liquidity and more complex financial products.

Distribution capability will be more important than "owning the interface." The winning teams will build infrastructure focused on the backend, embedding into existing platforms and channels, rather than competing as standalone applications.

Personalization and automation (increasingly driven by AI) will optimize pricing, routing, and yield in the background.

Users will not actively choose DeFi.

They will simply choose—better products.

Privacy Becomes a "Basic Threshold"

Privacy is becoming a fundamental condition for institutional adoption of digital assets, its role shifting from a "regulatory burden" to a "regulatory enabler."

Selective disclosure enabled by zero-knowledge proofs and secure multi-party computation allows participants to prove compliance without exposing raw data.

In practical terms, this means:

Banks can assess creditworthiness without viewing full transaction histories;

Employers can verify employment without disclosing specific salaries;

Financial institutions can prove sufficient reserves without公开 their持仓 structure.

A direct extension of this vision in the real world is that enterprises no longer need to store large amounts of sensitive data long-term, thereby freeing themselves from the high-cost, heavy burden of data privacy compliance requirements.

New technical primitives such as private shared state, zkTLS, and MPC are unlocking financial models that were previously infeasible, including undercollateralized loans, tranching, and new on-chain risk products.

This will migrate entire categories of structured finance that were previously difficult to put on-chain onto the chain.

Regulation Evolves from Compliance Obstacle to Distribution Advantage

Regulatory clarity has shifted from an adversarial obstacle to a standardized distribution channel.

Although the "permissionless" nature of early DeFi remains an important engine for innovation, frameworks such as the GENIUS Act in the US, MiCA in Europe, and Hong Kong's stablecoin regulatory framework are providing traditional institutions with clearer operational boundaries.

By 2026, the core question will no longer be "can institutions use blockchain," but *how* they use high-speed on-chain channels to replace the陈旧而低效的底层管道 of the traditional financial system under these regulatory guidelines.

These standards will drive the落地 of larger-scale compliant on-chain products, regulated on/off-ramps, and institutional-grade infrastructure, without sacrificing decentralized principles or moving towards full centralization, thereby significantly increasing institutional participation.

Regions with both clear rules and efficient approval mechanisms will continue to attract capital, talent, and experimental innovation, accelerating the normalization of on-chain value distribution in both native crypto and hybrid financial products; regions with slow regulatory progress will gradually fall behind.

The Internet Economy, Running on Crypto

The common thread running through all these changes is the maturation of infrastructure. Crypto is becoming the clearing and settlement layer for the internet economy, allowing value to flow as freely as information.

The protocols, primitives, and applications being built today are unleashing entirely new forms of real economic activity and continuously expanding the capabilities of the internet.

At Wintermute Ventures, we support entrepreneurs focused on building this infrastructure.

We look for teams with deep technical understanding and strong product sense—those that truly deliver products users want to use; that can operate within regulatory frameworks while advancing the core principles of decentralized systems; and that design business models with long-term impact in mind.

2026 will be a major inflection point.

For users, crypto infrastructure will gradually fade into the background;

But for the global financial system, it will become indispensable.

The best infrastructure empowers the world quietly, without needing to be noticed.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7607879

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the six key predictions Wintermute Ventures makes for digital assets by 2026?

A1. Everything becomes tradable through new financial primitives like prediction markets, tokenization, and derivatives. 2. Stablecoins become the trust layer, with banks handling transitional settlement. 3. Markets will reward sustainable revenue over short-term incentives. 4. DeFi will merge with fintech. 5. Privacy becomes a 'basic threshold' for institutional adoption. 6. Regulation evolves from a compliance barrier to a distribution advantage.

QHow do prediction markets and tokenization contribute to making 'everything tradable'?

ATokenization and synthetic assets bring liquidity to known assets, while prediction markets go further by pricing previously 'unpricable' things, turning raw information into tradable financial instruments. They enable hedging, outcome-linked trading, and expression on highly granular events, potentially replacing parts of traditional financial infrastructure like insurance.

QWhat role do stablecoins play in the future financial infrastructure according to the article?

AStablecoins provide an open, programmable form of value. The future requires an interoperable layer for netting, exchanging, and clearing between different stablecoins and chains without introducing additional risk. This is seen as an 'on-chain correspondent banking system' where settlement takes seconds and is open to application developers.

QWhy is privacy considered a 'basic threshold' for institutional adoption of digital assets?

APrivacy, enabled by zero-knowledge proofs and secure multi-party computation, allows for selective disclosure. Institutions can prove compliance without exposing raw data (e.g., banks assessing credit without full transaction history). This reduces data storage burdens and unlocks new financial models like undercollateralized lending and structured products on-chain.

QHow is the relationship between DeFi and traditional finance (TradFi) expected to change?

AThe future is a fusion of DeFi and TradFi. A dual-track architecture will allow fintech apps to dynamically route transactions between systems based on cost, speed, and yield. Breakthrough consumer products will look like traditional fintech on the surface, with wallets and blockchain abstracted away, while leveraging the deeper liquidity and complex products enabled by tokenization and composable financial primitives underneath.

Похожее

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手1 мин. назад

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手1 мин. назад

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手15 мин. назад

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手15 мин. назад

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbit35 мин. назад

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbit35 мин. назад

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbit43 мин. назад

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbit43 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片