Why XRP Investors Could Be Facing Serious Risks

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-02-17Обновлено 2026-02-17

Введение

Crypto analyst CryptoSensei warns that XRP investors face significant risks due to banks stalling the CLARITY Act, a crypto bill that could greatly benefit XRP and the market. Banks are proposing a ban on stablecoin yields, delaying progress. While a compromise is expected, it may harm retail investors. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse supports the bill despite its flaws, emphasizing the need for regulatory clarity. He predicts the bill has an 80% chance of becoming law by April. XRP price is currently around $1.48.

Crypto pundit CryptoSensei has warned that XRP investors are in danger as the banks continue to hold the CLARITY Act “hostage.” He explained that the passage of the crypto bill could provide a major boost to XRP and the broader crypto market, but warned that banks will likely continue to stall as much as possible.

Why XRP Investors Are At Risk

In an X post, CryptoSensei stated that XRP holders are at risk because the bank is likely to stall the progress of the CLARITY Act as much as possible before it is forced to proceed. The crypto pundit believes the White House will eventually get banks to reach a compromise on the crypto bill, but warned that such a compromise could hurt investors.

Banks are currently proposing a complete ban on the distribution of stablecoin yields to users, a move that is stalling the CLARITY Act’s progress as crypto leaders push back on this proposal. The passage of the crypto bill could be a major positive for XRP, as it stands out as one of the crypto assets most likely to benefit from regulatory clarity.

Crypto Sensei stated that he is not too excited about a potential compromise on the CLARITY Act because retail XRP holders and other crypto holders could end up bearing the consequences. However, the pundit remains confident that if the crypto bill passes with favorable terms for the crypto industry, a market boom is likely.

Crypto Sensei said that he is hopeful but a little discouraged about the way the bank has acted differently. He remarked that the banks could have negotiated these terms during the passage of the GENIUS Act rather than holding the CLARITY Act hostage now.

Ripple CEO Advocates For The CLARITY Act Passage

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has advocated for the passage of the CLARITY Act despite concerns over the ban on stablecoin yields. He acknowledged that the crypto bill isn’t perfect and that there are aspects he doesn’t like. However, Garlinghouse believes that these imperfections shouldn’t stall progress.

He also mentioned how Ripple has been a big advocate of the CLARITY Act because of the XRP lawsuit against the SEC. He noted that the token gained clarity from the lawsuit after the Judge ruled that the token isn’t a security.

However, Garlinghouse still believes that it is important for the broader crypto market to have clarity since Ripple’s fortunes kind of hinge on how well the industry performs. The Ripple CEO predicts that the crypto bill will be 80% close to getting signed into law by April.

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $1.48, up in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $1.47 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to CryptoSensei, why are XRP investors facing serious risks?

ABecause banks are likely to stall the progress of the CLARITY Act as much as possible, and any potential compromise on the bill could hurt retail XRP holders.

QWhat specific banking measure is currently stalling the CLARITY Act's progress?

ABanks are proposing a complete ban on the distribution of stablecoin yields to users, which is causing a stalemate as crypto leaders push back.

QWhat is Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse's stance on the CLARITY Act despite its imperfections?

AHe advocates for its passage, believing that its imperfections shouldn't stall progress, and he is a big advocate because of the regulatory clarity it could provide for the crypto industry.

QHow did the XRP token gain clarity regarding its legal status?

AIt gained clarity from the XRP lawsuit against the SEC after a Judge ruled that the token is not a security.

QWhat positive outcome does CryptoSensei predict if the crypto bill passes with favorable terms?

AHe remains confident that a market boom is likely for the crypto industry if the bill passes with favorable terms.

Похожее

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit9 мин. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit9 мин. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手32 мин. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手32 мин. назад

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1 ч. назад

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片