Why Only Dollar-Cost Averaging Can Capture Bitcoin's Long-Term Dividends?

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-03-06Обновлено 2026-03-06

Введение

The article argues that dollar-cost averaging (DCA) is the optimal strategy for capturing Bitcoin's long-term gains, supported by backtested data and forward-looking models. Historical analysis shows that a weekly DCA investment of $250 in Bitcoin starting in January 2021 would have yielded a 76% return by mid-2026, with significant upside potential at higher price levels. Even shorter-term DCA strategies, while susceptible to short-term drawdowns, show strong performance over time. Comparisons with the S&P 500 indicate that Bitcoin DCA outperforms traditional equity DCA despite higher risk. Long-term projections based on Bitcoin’s power-law growth model suggest substantial returns by 2030, with mid-range estimates around $430,000 per BTC. The key conclusion is that while entry timing affects short-term returns, long-term consistency is the primary driver of wealth accumulation in Bitcoin.

Written by: Cointelegraph

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

Both backtest data and forward-looking models indicate that using a dollar-cost averaging (DCA) strategy to buy Bitcoin is the best way to invest in BTC. Will this method still work in the next bull market?

Bitcoin has experienced a 50% crash over the past 5 months, and savvy investors adjust their strategies during such bear markets and correction periods. This strategy is called dollar-cost averaging (DCA), which involves investing a fixed amount regularly, regardless of market conditions.

By examining historical market cycle data and forward-looking BTC price simulations, we can more clearly see how this steady investment approach performs across different entry times and investment horizons.

Five Years of DCA in Bitcoin Yields Substantial Net Gains

Starting from January 2021, investing $250 weekly in Bitcoin via DCA, the total investment over five years would be $67,500. According to DCA simulation data, this strategy would have accumulated 1.65097905 BTC, with an average purchase price of $40,884.

At Bitcoin's current price of nearly $71,000, this 1.65097905 BTC is worth approximately $120,500, resulting in a profit of $53,000 (a 76% increase). If Bitcoin rises to $100,000, the holdings would be worth about $165,000; and at the cycle peak of around $126,000 in October 2025, the holdings would reach a value of $208,000.

2021-2026 Bitcoin DCA Cycle Source: Newhedge

Now, consider a shorter investment period to see the impact of entry timing on early returns. Starting from January 2024, investing $250 weekly, the total investment would be $28,500, accumulating 0.36863166 BTC with an average purchase price of $77,312.

At the current price of $71,000, these bitcoins are worth approximately $26,909, representing a 6% paper loss. If the price reaches $100,000, the holdings would be worth $36,863; and at the cycle peak of $126,000, the holdings would be valued at $46,448.

In February of this year, Swan Bitcoin analyst Adam Livingston compared on platform X the returns of DCA into BTC versus the S&P 500 over the past five years. Investing $100 weekly, BTC yielded $42,508, while the S&P 500 yielded $37,470, with returns of 62.9% and 43.6% respectively.

Livingston noted that although Bitcoin is highly volatile, historical data shows that persisting with DCA during downturns leads to higher long-term gains.

Weekly $100 DCA: BTC vs. S&P 500 Source: Adam Livingston/X

Long-Term Model: Time is the Key Factor

Forward-looking simulation studies have also tested the effectiveness of DCA starting in 2026. From January 2026, investing $250 weekly until March 2030, the total investment would be approximately $54,250.

The price prediction is based on Bitcoin's long-term power law growth curve (which tracks the relationship between Bitcoin's historical price and time on a logarithmic scale). This model generates a rising support band and a median trendline, which aligns well with previous market cycles.

Bitcoin Power Law Growth Curve Source: Bitbo.io

Based on this model, analysts estimate that the long-term trend support level could break through $100,000 by 2028, which also serves as the foundational assumption for future DCA modeling. Bitcoin Well's simulation shows that by March 2030, the median price projection is approximately $430,000.

Considering potential price deviations, the model also accounts for the upper and lower bounds of the power law channel, providing a lower estimate (around $274,000) and a higher estimate (around $900,000).

Based on these assumptions, four years of DCA would accumulate roughly 0.30 BTC:

  • If BTC price is $274,000, the holdings are worth approximately $82,200.
  • If BTC price is $430,000 (median projection), the holdings are worth approximately $129,000.
  • If BTC price is $900,000, the holdings are worth approximately $270,000.

DCA Investment Results as of March 2030 Source: Bitcoin Well

In November 2025, Bitcoin researcher Sminston With conducted a study using a similar predictive model to test the impact of entry time on long-term returns. The results found that even buying at a price 20% higher than the then price of $94,000 and selling at a price 20% lower than the projected 2035 median price, the remaining holdings after ten years would still yield a profit of nearly 300%.

In this simulation, the final total assets were 7.7 times the initial investment.

The study concluded: Entry timing affects the level of returns, but long-term holding is the key determinant of the magnitude of gains.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main investment strategy discussed in the article for capturing Bitcoin's long-term gains?

AThe main strategy discussed is Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA), which involves investing a fixed amount of money at regular intervals, regardless of market conditions.

QAccording to the article, how much profit was generated from a 5-year DCA strategy starting in January 2021 with a weekly investment of $250?

AThe 5-year DCA strategy generated a profit of $53,000, representing a 76% return on the initial investment of $67,500.

QWhat model is used to predict Bitcoin's long-term price growth in the article?

AThe article uses Bitcoin's long-term power law growth curve model, which tracks the historical relationship between Bitcoin's price and time on a logarithmic scale to predict future prices.

QHow does the performance of DCA in Bitcoin compare to the S&P 500 over a 5-year period, as mentioned in the article?

AOver a 5-year period, a weekly DCA of $100 in Bitcoin yielded $42,508 (62.9% return), while the same strategy in the S&P 500 yielded $37,470 (43.6% return).

QWhat is the key factor that determines the magnitude of returns in Bitcoin investment, according to the research cited in the article?

AThe key factor is the length of time the investment is held. While entry timing affects the level of returns, long-term holding is crucial for determining the overall magnitude of gains.

Похожее

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbit17 мин. назад

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbit17 мин. назад

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbit18 мин. назад

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbit18 мин. назад

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbit28 мин. назад

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbit28 мин. назад

Claude to Mandate "Face-Scan ID Verification", No ID No Service Starting July?

Anthropic, the creator of Claude AI, has sent privacy policy update emails to users, signaling a significant shift. The key change, effective July 8, is the potential requirement for consumer-level users (Free, Pro, Max plans) to verify their age or identity. This verification would be conducted through the third-party service Persona, involving uploading a government-issued photo ID and taking a live selfie for comparison. Anthropic states this data is for security purposes only, will not be used for model training, and is processed by Persona, not stored on its own servers. The update also clarifies data handling for Claude's new capabilities: when performing multi-step tasks or connecting to third-party apps, user data may flow between Anthropic and those external services. Additionally, more information may be collected from users who participate in Anthropic research. This move is seen as a major step towards establishing accountability as AI agents become more powerful and autonomous, capable of executing complex, real-world tasks. It follows previous enforcement actions, like the banning of the "Fable 5" account, and indicates a broader industry trend toward stricter user identification and safety measures. The verification is expected to apply in specific scenarios, particularly as users engage Claude in more complex agentic workflows.

链捕手40 мин. назад

Claude to Mandate "Face-Scan ID Verification", No ID No Service Starting July?

链捕手40 мин. назад

Blockchain Has Finally Started to Sail into the Mainstream After 18 Years

Blockchain Finds Its True Path After 18 Years: Becoming the Financial Backbone for AI Agents and Autonomy This analysis explores a pivotal shift in the blockchain and crypto investment landscape, driven by the dominance of AI. Major venture capital firms, including Variant, Paradigm, Haun Ventures, and YZi Labs, are moving beyond pure "crypto" investment theses. They are expanding their focus to AI, robotics, and frontier tech, signaling that blockchain is no longer seen as a standalone sector but as an underlying infrastructure layer. The core argument is that blockchain's killer application may not be user-facing apps, but rather providing the economic rails for the coming wave of AI agents, autonomous robots, and automated systems. Key capabilities like self-custody wallets, programmable stablecoins for micropayments, on-chain identity, and verifiable smart contracts are positioned as essential for a future where machines conduct economic activity. The recent $1.4 billion investment by Tether (via its venture arm) in German robotics company NEURA Robotics exemplifies this, aiming to embed Tether's wallet tools directly into robots for autonomous transactions. While many "AI + Crypto" projects remain superficial, the article concludes that true value lies where crypto is a necessary component—enabling machine-to-machine payments, agent autonomy, verifiable data provenance, and open financial settlement for the AI era. For crypto venture capital, this convergence with AI represents both an adaptation to shifting capital flows and a potential path to unlocking the large-scale, non-speculative utility the industry has long sought.

marsbit48 мин. назад

Blockchain Has Finally Started to Sail into the Mainstream After 18 Years

marsbit48 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片