Why Do Memes Only Cut You? An Article That Explains Their True Growth Mechanism

比推Опубликовано 2026-01-21Обновлено 2026-01-21

Введение

The article "Why Do Meme Coins Only 'Cut' You? Clarifying Their True Growth Mechanism" offers a fresh, analytical perspective on meme coin dynamics, framing their growth not as irrational speculation but as a mathematically explainable phenomenon. The core argument is that a meme coin’s market capitalization isn't just driven by price increases (Z-axis), but is fundamentally supported and "propped up" by two underlying factors: narrative density (X-axis) and the network of传播 nodes (Y-axis). Together, these form the base radius of a "Wealth Cone." A meme with only height (price) but no base (narrative and community) is like a thin needle—easily toppled. A strong, expanding base is necessary to support sustainable, exponential growth. The proposed XYZ three-dimensional growth spiral model explains the interaction: * **X-axis (Narrative Density):** The meme's core idea, cultural resonance, originality, and the richness of community-created content. * **Y-axis (Propagation Network):** The transmission pipelines, from major influencers (e.g., Elon Musk) to KOLs and finally to retail investors. * **Z-axis (Capital Flow):** The monetization of attention, measured by market cap, trading volume, and crucially, liquidity depth. The lifecycle of a successful meme is a reflexive, spiral ascent through stages: **Ignition** (a Y-axis spike from a KOL callout lifts the Z-axis), **Spin** (price growth attracts more discussion, enriching the narrative), and **Ascension** (an expande...

Author: danny

Original Title:

Why Do the Memes You Buy Only Fall? — Deconstructing the Growth Spiral and Volume of Memes Using First Principles


In the eyes of most people, Meme coins are irrational狂欢, a fool's赌场. But from a mathematical perspective, the birth of every ten-thousand-fold myth is not accidental; it is actually a middle school spatial geometry evolution word problem.

This article proposes a颠覆性的 perspective: The market value of Meme coins is not "grown" but "propped up." The value of Memes can be calculated!

We are accustomed to focusing on the fluctuations of the Z-axis (price height), but we overlook that what determines life and death is the base radius constructed by the X (narrative density) and Y (propagation nodes) axes. A Meme with only height and no base is just a very thin "needle" that topples with the wind; only by continuously expanding the consensus radius can it support a stable, geometrically growing wealth cone under the gravity of capital.

Note: This article is a popular science article on "financial physics," not a rigorous econometric paper, and is only intended to provide a new perspective for viewing Memes.

1. The Beginning of the Theory: The Three-Dimensional Coordinate System of Memes

In the current cryptocurrency market, Meme coins are often seen as irrational狂欢. But is that really the case?

If we strip away the noise of emotions, KOL shilling, and community bandwagoning, we will find that the birth and death of every phenomenal Meme follows a strict mathematical logic.

The essence of Meme coins is the tokenization of the attention economy. Their market value is not determined by traditional discounted cash flow (DCF) but is jointly constructed by the breadth of the narrative, community resonance, and the explosive power of funds.

For better discussion, we define these factors as the XYZ three-dimensional growth spiral model.

These three axes are not just independent variables; there is a strong reflexivity between them—that is, a change in one variable reinforces another, forming a positive feedback loop.

Let's explain these parameters:

X-axis: Narrative Density and Cultural Memes

Definition: The "genes" of a Meme. Includes the core梗 (e.g., Doge), origin story (e.g., CZ's pet name), cultural symbols (e.g., Pepe the Frog), and the richness of community二次创作.

Key metrics: Narrative originality, replicability, emotional resonance.

Y-axis: Propagation Potential and Node Network

Definition: The transmission pipeline of information. From top-tier nodes (CZ, Elon Musk) to secondary nodes (Alpha Callers, KOLs), and then to end nodes (ordinary retail investors).

Key metrics: Node weight, propagation coverage, shilling frequency.

Z-axis: Fund Flow and Liquidity Carrier

Definition: The monetization result of attention. Includes on-chain fund inflows, liquidity depth—i.e., the沉淀的价值 or the total amount of sell orders that can be承接.

Key metrics: Market capitalization, trading volume, turnover rate, and liquidity (the most important metric).

2. Diagram of the Growth Curve of XYZ Axis Interaction

If we plot these three axes in three-dimensional space, the growth trajectory of a successful Meme will generally show a spiral upward trend: (as shown in the figure below)

Bottom (Start): X, Y, Z are all close to zero.

Ignition: The Y-axis surges (KOL shilling), driving the Z-axis (price) to jump. The trajectory line tilts toward the Y-Z plane.

Spin: The growth of the Z-axis attracts more Y (more people discussing), and Y stimulates X's二次创作 (enriching content). The trajectory line begins to rotate around the X-Y-Z axes.

Ascension: As X is upgraded (X'), the base area of the cone expands (broader consensus range), and the Z-axis (market capitalization) reaches a new height.

Failed Meme (Rug Pull): Usually表现为 the Y-axis爆发后, the Z-axis briefly rises, but the X-axis fails to follow up with an upgrade (narrative scarcity), causing the Z-axis to quickly collapse to zero. The trajectory line shows an inverted V-shaped fall.

3. Evolution of the Growth Curve: The Spiral Ascension of Four Stages

From the previous section, we know that the lifecycle of a Meme is not linear but a vortex that continuously expands around the Z-axis (fund flow). In this section, we will analyze it based on the four development stages of Memes.

The figure below shows its standard evolution path: (I was also shocked at how cool AI drew it?!)

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7604686

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the core perspective proposed in the article regarding the growth of Meme coins?

AThe article proposes that Meme coin market capitalization is not simply 'rising' but is 'propped up' by a mathematical model involving narrative density (X-axis) and propagation nodes (Y-axis), which together form the base supporting the value (Z-axis).

QHow does the article define the X-axis in its Meme growth model?

AThe X-axis is defined as 'Narrative Density and Cultural Memes,' which includes the core meme, origin story, cultural symbols, and the richness of community-created content.

QAccording to the article, what is the role of the Y-axis in the Meme coin growth spiral?

AThe Y-axis represents 'Propagation Potential and Node Network,' which refers to the information transmission pipelines, from top nodes like influencers to secondary and end nodes like ordinary retail investors.

QWhat does the Z-axis represent in the XYZ model for Meme coins?

AThe Z-axis represents 'Capital Flow and Liquidity Carrier,' which is the monetization result of attention, including on-chain capital inflow, liquidity depth, and the total value that can absorb selling pressure.

QWhat is the key difference between a successful Meme and a failed one (Rug Pull) according to the model?

AA successful Meme undergoes a spiral ascent where narrative (X) and propagation (Y) expand to support the value (Z). A failed Meme (Rug Pull) sees a brief spike in Y and Z, but a lack of narrative development (X) causes the value to collapse back to zero.

Похожее

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit2 ч. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit2 ч. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit3 ч. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit3 ч. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手3 ч. назад

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手3 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片