Wall Street's Hottest Trades Are All Retreating

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-02-06Обновлено 2026-02-06

Введение

A broad-based risk-off sentiment has swept across Wall Street, with previously popular trades from tech stocks to gold and cryptocurrencies experiencing a sharp pullback. Unlike previous sell-offs triggered by specific events, this retreat stems from accumulating concerns over stretched valuations and growing anxiety about the sustainability of the AI-driven rally. Key developments include: the S&P 500 falling for three consecutive sessions, the Nasdaq 100 posting its worst decline since last April, silver plunging 17% after hitting record highs, and Bitcoin crashing 10%—erasing gains made since the previous presidential election. Meanwhile, U.S. Treasuries rebounded as a traditional safe haven. Despite strong earnings, tech giants like Alphabet and Amazon faced selling pressure due to concerns over their aggressive spending plans, particularly in AI. The market is reevaluating whether massive AI investments will yield returns and which companies might be left behind. Additional uncertainties include potential changes in Federal Reserve leadership and overall monetary policy direction. The sell-off reflects a broader shift toward defensive positioning, as investors question whether the momentum-driven rally in tech and crypto has been overextended and due for a correction.

Written by: He Hao

Source: Wall Street Insights

From tech stocks to gold to cryptocurrencies, the hottest trades on Wall Street that were being chased by a flood of capital every day are now rapidly retreating in a sudden shift toward risk aversion.

This time, there is no single trigger, unlike last April when the market plunged in a panic sell-off due to former President Donald Trump's launch of a trade war. Instead, a series of slowly accumulating messages have continuously sounded alarms, sparking anxiety about asset valuations—which many had long suspected had risen too high—and ultimately leading investors to retreat almost simultaneously.

Thursday's market action confirmed this once again:

The S&P 500 fell 1.2%, marking its third consecutive day of declines; the Nasdaq 100 index extended its losses, recording its deepest pullback since last April.

Software stocks continued their decline, as AI company Anthropic launched a new model designed for financial research, highlighting the competitive threat posed by new technologies.

Silver prices, which had previously hit record highs alongside gold, plummeted 17%.

Bitcoin plunged 10% in a single day, erasing all gains since Trump's election victory 15 months ago, as investors began unwinding leveraged, loss-making trades.

U.S. Treasuries rallied, once again playing their traditional role as the "ultimate safe haven."

Google's parent company Alphabet saw its stock come under pressure even after reporting better-than-expected revenue, due to its ambitious spending plans.

After the U.S. market closed on Thursday, Amazon's stock plummeted 10% as the company announced plans to invest $200 billion this year, far exceeding analyst expectations. These analysts are increasingly concerned about excessive spending by tech companies on artificial intelligence.

The recent market movements stand in stark contrast to the sentiment on Wall Street at the beginning of the year. Back then, strategists predicted that the U.S. stock market was poised for its longest winning streak in nearly two decades. These forecasts were based on several assumptions: the AI boom would continue, a resilient economy would continue to support corporate profits, and the Federal Reserve would cut interest rates.

This overall outlook largely remains intact, as evidenced by the steady stream of robust earnings reports in recent weeks. But at the same time, the market has refocused on a number of accumulating risks:

  • Which companies will be left behind in the AI wave;
  • Where monetary policy direction will head if Trump's nominee, Kevin Warsh, is confirmed to replace Jerome Powell as Fed Chair;
  • And whether the valuations of assets—from gold and Bitcoin to tech giants like Alphabet—have become too high and are unsustainable in the long run.

The stalling momentum is particularly evident in Bitcoin:

For most of last year, speculative fervor triggered by Trump's election victory drove a rapid surge in cryptocurrency prices, but this month, the market has collapsed as investors pulled out massive amounts of capital.

On Thursday, as the trading day progressed, the sell-off in Bitcoin intensified, dragging down other cryptocurrencies, related ETFs, and "crypto vault" companies like Strategy that hold significant amounts of Bitcoin.

In the late afternoon New York time, Bitcoin plunged as much as 13%, falling below $63,000, nearly halving from the all-time high set just four months ago.

In the stock market, the declines were relatively moderate but the selling pressure was broad-based, with 9 of the 11 main sectors of the S&P 500 falling. Beyond worries about which companies will be losers in the AI technology wave, investors are also questioning whether the massive investments in this technology will ultimately pay off. The stock decline of Google's parent Alphabet is a manifestation of this sentiment.

Regarding the above movements, industry insiders pointed out:

People are clearly shifting to more defensive strategies. This is more of a 'shoot first, ask questions later' market environment. The fear and uncertainty across the market are palpable.

The recent pullback reflects market concerns that the hottest stocks and assets like gold had risen too fast and were due for a 'reckoning.' This is a reset. Momentum may have been overextended.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the main asset classes that experienced a significant sell-off according to the article?

AThe main asset classes that experienced a significant sell-off are tech stocks, gold, and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.

QWhat was the performance of the Nasdaq 100 index, and why was it significant?

AThe Nasdaq 100 index extended its losses, marking its deepest pullback since last April.

QWhat specific event triggered a major sell-off in Bitcoin, and what was the magnitude of the drop?

AThe sell-off in Bitcoin was triggered by investors unwinding leveraged trades that were at a loss. It plummeted 10% in a single day, erasing all its gains since former President Trump's election win 15 months prior, and at one point dropped 13% to below $63,000.

QHow did the market react to Alphabet and Amazon's earnings reports and spending plans?

ADespite Alphabet's revenue beating expectations, its stock came under pressure after announcing ambitious spending plans. After the market closed, Amazon's stock plunged 10% as it announced a plan to invest $200 billion this year, far exceeding analyst expectations and fueling concerns about excessive AI spending.

QWhat are the three key risks that the market has refocused on, as mentioned in the article?

AThe three key risks are: 1) Which companies will be left behind in the AI wave. 2) The direction of monetary policy if Kevin Warsh, nominated by former President Trump, is confirmed to replace Jerome Powell as Fed Chair. 3) Whether the valuations of assets like gold, Bitcoin, and even tech giants like Alphabet have become too high and are unsustainable in the long run.

Похожее

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit33 мин. назад

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit33 мин. назад

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit1 ч. назад

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片