Trump Slams Banks After Coinbase CEO Secretly Met With Him

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-03-05Обновлено 2026-03-05

Введение

Donald Trump met privately with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, as first reported by Politico and confirmed by CoinDesk, shortly before publicly criticizing major banks on his Truth Social platform. In his post, Trump accused banks of trying to undermine the pro-crypto GENIUS Act and urged the advancement of the CLARITY Act to prevent the crypto industry from moving overseas. The key disagreement stalling the digital asset market structure legislation is over interest-bearing stablecoins. Banks, including JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, argue they threaten deposits and lending capacity and should be regulated like banks. Crypto advocates, including a presidential advisory committee executive, counter that the GENIUS Act already prohibits such lending practices and that stablecoins are not deposits. Following the meeting and Trump's statements, crypto market and related stocks, including Coinbase (COIN), saw significant gains.

Author: CoinDesk

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: CoinDesk exclusively confirmed a key timeline: Coinbase CEO Armstrong first met privately with Trump, after which Trump publicly criticized banks on Truth Social for obstructing crypto legislation.

This clue directly reveals the lobbying path behind Trump's statement, making the legislative battle between the crypto industry and the banking sector clearer.

Full Text Below:

Key Points:

  • Before publicly accusing banks of undermining the pro-crypto GENIUS Act and calling for the advancement of the CLARITY Act, Trump had a private meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong.
  • The meeting was first disclosed by Politico and occurred before Trump posted on Truth Social stating that banks "need to make a good deal with the crypto industry" to push forward stalled digital asset legislation on Capitol Hill.
  • This crypto market structure bill has stalled because banks warn that interest-bearing stablecoins could erode deposits and lending capacity, while crypto companies argue that the GENIUS Act reasonably allows consumers to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings.

CoinDesk confirmed that U.S. President Trump held a closed-door meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, shortly after which Trump posted on Truth Social claiming that banks are trying to undermine the GENIUS Act.

"America needs to complete market structure legislation ASAP. Americans should make more money from their money," Trump wrote in a post. "Major banks are making historic profits, and we won’t let them destroy our strong crypto agenda—if we don’t advance the CLARITY Act, all of this will go to China and other countries."

Politico first reported the meeting between Armstrong and Trump. Since then, Trump has publicly supported Coinbase's stance in the "ongoing lobbying battle with banks," a struggle that has stalled a major crypto bill.

The media cited "two people familiar with the matter" as sources, who spoke anonymously to discuss the closed-door event. The report also noted that it remains unclear what exactly the two discussed during the meeting.

However, the report reiterated that "the meeting took place shortly before Trump posted on social media saying banks 'need to make a good deal with the crypto industry,'" which was a key moment in pushing forward the stalled digital asset legislation on Capitol Hill.

The White House and Coinbase did not respond to CoinDesk's requests for comment.

The market structure bill has been in limbo since it was originally scheduled for debate and vote in the Senate Banking Committee. The core disagreement blocking the bill's passage is: banks believe stablecoin interest rates could impact bank deposits, thereby affecting their lending capacity; crypto exchanges argue that users should have the right to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings, which the GENIUS Act explicitly allows.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said on Tuesday that stablecoin issuers paying interest on customer deposit balances should be regulated like banks. Patrick White, Executive Director of the Presidential Digital Asset Advisory Committee, countered this, stating, "What truly requires bank-like regulation is not the act of paying yields on balances itself, but the act of lending or rehypothecating the underlying dollars that constitute the balances." White also noted that the GENIUS Act "explicitly prohibits stablecoin issuers from engaging in the latter. Stablecoins ≠ deposits."

Crypto-related stocks surged significantly on Wednesday alongside a broad rally in the crypto market, with COIN breaking above $200, reaching its highest price since late January.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat did former President Trump do shortly after his private meeting with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong?

AHe publicly criticized banks on Truth Social for obstructing the pro-crypto GENIUS Act and called for advancing the CLARITY Act.

QWhat is the core disagreement between banks and the crypto industry regarding the market structure bill?

ABanks warn that interest-bearing stablecoins could erode deposits and lending capacity, while crypto firms argue that the GENIUS Act reasonably allows consumers to earn rewards from stablecoin holdings.

QWhich media outlet first reported the private meeting between Trump and Armstrong?

APolitico first reported the private meeting between Trump and Armstrong.

QWhat did Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, say about stablecoin issuers paying interest to customers?

AJamie Dimon stated that stablecoin issuers paying interest on customer deposit balances should be regulated like banks.

QHow did crypto-related stocks perform following Trump's public statements and the market reaction?

ACrypto-related stocks surged significantly, with COIN (Coinbase stock) rising above $200, hitting its highest price since late January.

Похожее

Understanding CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) in One Article: Why Nvidia Is Willing to Spend $3.2 Billion on a Fiber?

NVIDIA and Corning announced a multi-year strategic partnership on May 6, 2026, with NVIDIA committing up to $3.2 billion to support Corning's U.S. expansion. This investment will triple Corning's manufacturing plants and significantly boost its optical fiber and communications production capacity. The core driver behind this massive investment is the fundamental shift from copper to optical interconnect technology within AI data centers. As GPU clusters scale, copper wires face critical limitations: severe signal attenuation over distance, high energy consumption for signal integrity, and excessive heat generation. Optical fiber, transmitting light instead of electrical signals, solves these issues with minimal loss, near-light speed, and lower power needs. The article outlines a three-stage evolution of data center interconnect: 1. **Traditional Copper Interconnects:** The mainstream solution of the 2010s, now being phased out due to scaling bottlenecks. 2. **Pluggable Optical Modules:** The current mainstream, where modules convert electrical signals to light externally. This process still introduces energy loss and latency. 3. **CPO (Co-Packaged Optics):** The next-generation technology where the optical engine is integrated directly with the GPU chip package. This drastically reduces the electrical signal travel distance to mere millimeters, slashing power consumption and latency while boosting data density. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang has identified CPO as an essential core technology for AI infrastructure. NVIDIA's investment signifies a strategic shift from being a buyer to actively controlling its supply chain for critical components. With demand for specialized optical fiber far outstripping supply—evidenced by soaring prices—securing long-term manufacturing capacity has become a competitive necessity. While Corning's expansion may pressure some suppliers, a projected global fiber supply gap of 5-15% over the next few years creates a significant opportunity window, particularly for Chinese manufacturers competitive in optical preforms, chips, and modules. Ultimately, NVIDIA's move is not about chasing a trend but an engineering imperative. The transition to light-based interconnects like CPO is driven by the physical limits of copper, marking a definitive step in the ongoing AI computing revolution.

marsbit10 мин. назад

Understanding CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) in One Article: Why Nvidia Is Willing to Spend $3.2 Billion on a Fiber?

marsbit10 мин. назад

KOL's Perspective: Why Is SOL Set to Rise from This Point?

**Summary: Why SOL is Positioned for Growth at This Level** The article argues that SOL is poised for an upward move from its current price point, citing several key factors. Primarily, SOL has just broken out of a 4-month consolidation phase. This breakout signals a return of risk appetite to the broader crypto market, as SOL is seen as a key indicator of overall crypto health. The token's ownership has reportedly shifted from short-term traders and tourists to long-term accumulators, leading to low volume. Any meaningful increase in trading activity could thus trigger significant upward momentum. Fundamental strengths include strong institutional adoption, integration with DeFi and RWAs (Real-World Assets), and the potential benefits from the Clarity Act. Despite its high volatility—having dropped 70% from its all-time high but still up 12x from its bear market low—SOL is highlighted as one of the few tokens from the last cycle to reach new highs. It boasts a robust ecosystem of applications, users, and protocols. Future catalysts include the expected influx of AI developers following the Miami Accelerate conference, which focused on AI on Solana. Furthermore, Solana is positioned as the premier chain for memecoin activity, a trend expected to continue and drive network usage and fees. The article concludes that recent price action reflects a healthy transfer to long-term holders, setting the stage for growth.

marsbit1 ч. назад

KOL's Perspective: Why Is SOL Set to Rise from This Point?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Those Pre-Bitcoin PoW Protocols Have Recently Been Reimplemented

This article details a recent surge in replicating pre-Bitcoin Proof-of-Work (PoW) protocols, specifically focusing on Hal Finney's 2004 RPOW (Reusable Proofs of Work). Within five days in May 2026, multiple independent builders in the Bitcoin/cypherpunk community launched projects inspired by this early electronic cash proposal. The initiative began with Fred Krueger's `rpow2.com`, a centralized but auditable system that replaced RPOW's original IBM 4758 hardware with Ed25519 signatures. Initially a faithful replica, it later adopted Bitcoin-like features (21M supply cap, difficulty adjustment) and a controversial 5.24% founder allocation. This sparked rapid forks, including `rpow4.com` which incorporated full Bitcoin parameters, a prediction market (`rpowmarket.com`), and a DEX (`rpow2swap.com`). Concurrently, Mike In Space created a prototype of Wei Dai's 1998 b-money proposal (`b-money.replit.app`), pushing the historical exploration even further back. The article contrasts these centralized, server-dependent experiments with Bitcoin's core innovation of decentralized, trustless consensus. It also highlights a parallel development: the `HASH` project on Ethereum, which uses smart contract hooks to enable a purely fair-launch, browser-mineable PoW token with 0% allocations to team or VCs. The collective activity is framed as a meme-driven, educational exploration of cypherpunk history rather than a serious financial movement, with all projects heavily disclaiming any investment value.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Those Pre-Bitcoin PoW Protocols Have Recently Been Reimplemented

marsbit1 ч. назад

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

South Korea's cryptocurrency industry is engaged in a rare, direct confrontation with regulators. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the primary anti-money laundering (AML) watchdog, has recently imposed heavy penalties on major exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb for alleged violations involving unregistered overseas VASPs and AML procedures. However, exchanges are now actively challenging these actions in court and through industry associations. In a significant shift, the Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favor of Upbit's operator, Dunamu, overturning part of an FIU-ordered business suspension. The court found the FIU's penalty criteria and justification insufficiently clear. Similarly, the court suspended the enforcement of a six-month business suspension against Bithumb pending a final ruling, citing potential irreversible harm to the exchange. Beyond legal battles, the industry is contesting proposed legislative amendments. The Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) strongly opposes a draft rule that would mandate Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) for all crypto transfers over 10 million KRW (~$6,800). DAXA argues this "poison pill" clause violates legal principles and would overwhelm the STR system, increasing reports from 63,000 to an estimated 5.45 million annually for major exchanges, thereby crippling effective AML monitoring. This conflict highlights a structural tension in South Korea's crypto governance: comprehensive digital asset laws are still developing, while regulators rely heavily on AML enforcement. The industry's move from passive compliance to active legal and legislative challenges signifies a new phase, pressing for clearer rules and more proportionate enforcement. While short-term disputes may intensify, this clash could ultimately lead to a more mature and sustainable regulatory framework for South Korea's vibrant crypto market.

marsbit1 ч. назад

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片