The Structure, Risks, and New Cycle of the On-Chain Lending Market

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-28Обновлено 2026-01-28

Введение

On-chain lending is evolving from a tool primarily for leverage into a fundamental infrastructure for capital allocation, now representing 53.54% of the total DeFi TVL at approximately $64.3 billion. Aave dominates the sector with around 50% market share. The integration of Real-World Assets (RWA), such as credit assets and U.S. Treasuries, is emerging as a key growth driver, supported by improving macroeconomic conditions and regulatory clarity. However, the market faces significant risks including liquidity volatility, collateral liquidations, credit defaults, and cross-chain security vulnerabilities. Future trends point toward institutional adoption, tokenization of securities, fixed and floating rate products, and a bifurcation between compliant and high-risk lending layers. The sector is transitioning into a mature component of the global financial system.

Author: CoinW Research Institute

Key Takeaways

On-chain lending functionality is gradually transforming, evolving from an early tool primarily for leverage into a fundamental infrastructure for capital allocation. On-chain lending has become a crucial component of the DeFi ecosystem. Currently, the TVL of on-chain lending protocols is approximately $64.3 billion, accounting for about 53.54% of the total DeFi TVL.

Aave has become the leading protocol in the on-chain lending sector, with a TVL of about $32.9 billion, representing roughly 50% of the total lending sector TVL. Meanwhile, protocols like Morpho continue to consolidate their market share, resulting in a competitive landscape characterized by one dominant player and several strong contenders.

Credit-based assets have become a significant part of on-chain Real World Assets (RWA). As more types of debt instruments are introduced on-chain and institutional demand for compliant, traceable collateral increases, RWA lending is poised to become another major growth engine. Simultaneously, improvements in both the macroeconomic monetary environment and regulatory frameworks are collectively reducing the costs associated with capital flow and compliance, creating smoother external conditions for market development.

On-chain lending protocols also face multiple risks. Firstly, they are highly dependent on collateral value and market liquidity, making them susceptible to liquidations during market volatility. Secondly, the introduction of unsecured lending and RWA increases credit default and counterparty risks. Additionally, over-reliance on token incentives can artificially inflate scale, and cross-chain expansion exposes vulnerabilities in bridge security. Therefore, on-chain lending protocols must balance security, liquidity, and compliance while pursuing growth.

With the gradual tokenization of securities and the entry of compliant assets like U.S. Treasuries onto the chain, on-chain lending is evolving from a crypto-native financing tool into mainstream financial infrastructure, with a more robust collateral foundation. In this process, inter-institutional on-chain lending is expected to be a significant source of growth. At the same time, the coexistence of fixed and floating interest rates will drive the maturation of the on-chain interest rate system. Regulatory and capital logic may also lead to a market structure divided into a compliant, stable layer and a high-risk, innovative layer. On-chain lending will accelerate its integration into the global capital market through asset compliance and institutional alignment.

Table of Contents

I. Overview of the On-Chain Lending Market

  • 1.1. Market Size and Capital Flow
  • 1.2. Macro and Industry Drivers
  • 1.3. Regulatory Dynamics and Compliance

II. Classification of On-Chain Lending Markets

  • 2.1. Collateralized Lending Protocols
  • 2.2. Uncollateralized Lending Protocols
  • 2.3. Modular Lending Protocols
  • 2.4. Integration of RWA and Lending

III. Competitive Landscape

  • 3.1. Leading Protocol Landscape and TVL Changes
  • 3.2. Revenue Structure and Profit Model Comparison
  • 3.3. User Profile and Asset Structure
  • 3.4. Multi-Chain Deployment and Ecosystem Integration

IV. Risks, Dilemmas, and Challenges

  • 4.1. Liquidity Risk
  • 4.2. Credit Default Risk
  • 4.3. Incentives and Growth Illusion
  • 4.4. Cross-Chain Risk

V. Potential Development Trends

  • 5.1. On-Chain Transformation of Inter-Institutional Lending
  • 5.2. On-Chain Tokenization of Securities and Collateral Potential
  • 5.3. U.S. Treasuries as Core Lending Assets
  • 5.4. Coexistence of Fixed and Floating Interest Rates
  • 5.5. Two-Tier Structural Differentiation in the Lending Market

VI. Conclusion

References

On-chain lending protocols have become a vital part of the DeFi ecosystem. Evolving from initial tools for leverage expansion, they now encompass diverse capital markets including stablecoins and RWA. These protocols not only steadily carry liquidity but are increasingly becoming centers for capital pricing and crucial hubs for capital allocation. Currently, the TVL of on-chain lending protocols is approximately $64.3 billion, accounting for about 53.54% of the total DeFi TVL (nearly $120.2 billion). Specifically, Aave alone holds about 50% of the lending TVL, approximately $32.9 billion; protocols like Morpho hold respective market shares.

Furthermore, the diversity of funding sources and asset classes in on-chain lending is increasing, with RWA becoming a new engine for protocol growth. The structure of the on-chain lending market faces a situation of coexisting growth and challenges. On one hand, protocol TVL has gradually recovered, showing a overall market recovery trend. On the other hand, the market still faces structural challenges: severe liquidity fragmentation, dispersed funds across protocols and chains, and a lack of efficient liquidity integration mechanisms; traditional stablecoin lending is nearing saturation, while RWA and institutional credit supply remains insufficient, leading to interest rate differentiation and differences in risk appetite. Below, this report will provide a systematic analysis of the operational logic, current development status, and trends of the on-chain lending sector from the perspectives of market overview, market classification, and competitor landscape.

Full report available at: https://www.coinw.com/zh_CN/research/on-chain-lending-market-structure-risks-and-the-new-cycle/106

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the current Total Value Locked (TVL) in on-chain lending protocols and what percentage of the total DeFi TVL does it represent?

AThe current TVL in on-chain lending protocols is approximately $64.3 billion, which represents about 53.54% of the total DeFi TVL.

QWhich protocol is the dominant leader in the on-chain lending sector and what is its market share?

AAave is the dominant leader in the on-chain lending sector, holding a TVL of approximately $32.9 billion and accounting for about 50% of the total lending market TVL.

QWhat are two major risks faced by on-chain lending protocols mentioned in the article?

ATwo major risks are: 1) High dependence on collateral value and market liquidity, making them vulnerable to liquidations during market volatility. 2) The introduction of unsecured lending and Real World Assets (RWA) increases credit default and counterparty risk.

QWhat emerging asset class is highlighted as a new growth engine for on-chain lending?

ACredit-type assets, particularly Real World Assets (RWA), are highlighted as a new and important growth engine for on-chain lending.

QWhat is one predicted future trend for the structure of the on-chain lending market according to the article?

AOne predicted trend is the market bifurcating into a two-tiered system, with a compliant and stable layer coexisting with a high-risk innovation layer, driven by regulatory and capital logic.

Похожее

Dialogue with a Macro Analyst: AI Drains All Liquidity from U.S. Stocks, $40K Bitcoin is the True Bottom

In a recent discussion, macro strategist Luke Groman, founder of FFT LC, presented a sobering analysis of current markets. He argues that while the S&P 500 hits new highs, this is largely driven by just seven AI stocks, which are "sucking all the oxygen and liquidity out of the room." Bitcoin, which he calls the "last working smoke alarm for liquidity," is signaling trouble, having entered a difficult period. Groman explains that the AI boom is fueled by accounting practices that front-load revenue, creating an illusion of high profits while cash is being depleted. He warns this cycle could reverse sharply when construction slows. His base case is that stocks will rise in dollar terms but fall significantly when measured in gold or Bitcoin, highlighting that long-term US Treasury futures have already lost 90% of their value against gold over the past decade. He points to major structural risks, including China's dominance in rare earths—a small commodity market underpinning trillions in tech stock value—and the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which he calls a "Suez Moment" for the US. This, combined with a shift towards a "no ticky, no washy" proof-of-work system for settling trade (using gold, not trust), signals deeper systemic distrust. Regarding US debt, Groman notes that historically, all 58 countries that reached a 130% debt-to-GDP ratio defaulted, primarily through inflation. The US crossed this threshold in 2020. He also highlights a contradiction in the AI narrative: if it's as transformative as claimed, it must destroy white-collar jobs, threatening half of US tax revenue—a reality at odds with the "no job loss" messaging from tech leaders. On Bitcoin, Groman sold most of his position near the top and hasn't fully re-entered. Citing technical analysis from Northstar Bad Charts, he suggests a potential bottom around $40,000 could materialize in Q3 or Q4. He concludes that while he may be labeled a doomsayer, his view is simply realistic, grounded in historical precedents and current macro pressures.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Dialogue with a Macro Analyst: AI Drains All Liquidity from U.S. Stocks, $40K Bitcoin is the True Bottom

marsbit1 ч. назад

Broadcom vs AMD: Which is the Most Promising AI Chip Stock to Bet on After Nvidia?

Amidst Nvidia's dominance in the AI chip market, Broadcom and AMD are key contenders for the second-place spot. AMD competes directly in general-purpose GPUs, gaining some traction with clients like Meta but facing significant challenges overcoming Nvidia's entrenched CUDA software ecosystem. In contrast, Broadcom pursues a differentiated strategy by designing custom XPU chips tailored to specific AI workloads for major clients like Anthropic, Google, Meta, and OpenAI. This approach offers efficiency advantages and greater customer stickiness, particularly as AI compute shifts from training to inference. Despite a recent stock sell-off following a Q2 revenue guidance miss, Broadcom's CEO reaffirmed the long-term target of $100 billion in annual AI chip revenue by fiscal 2027. With Q2 AI revenue at $10.8 billion, significant growth potential remains as its custom chip projects ramp up. While Broadcom trades at a higher valuation multiple than AMD, analysts argue this premium is justified given its superior competitive positioning and expected faster growth trajectory, making it the more compelling investment choice following its recent pullback.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Broadcom vs AMD: Which is the Most Promising AI Chip Stock to Bet on After Nvidia?

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Higher Bitcoin Goes, The Less Institutions Want It? Coinbase Executive Weighs In

Coinbase Head of Institutional Strategy John D'Agostino states that institutions which previously bought Bitcoin at higher prices are showing increased interest as its price drops to around $60,000. He notes no signs of panic selling or major liquidation risks among large investors; instead, many, including family offices and sovereign wealth funds, see the correction as a buying opportunity. D'Agostino emphasizes that institutional interest often grows when prices fall, reflecting a long-term holding strategy. Despite recent market volatility and geopolitical tensions, exposure via spot Bitcoin ETFs remains high, exceeding $750 billion. He attributes price swings to normal commodity-like behavior and believes current market infrastructure is stronger than in past downturns. Bitcoin was trading near $63,800 at the time of reporting.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

The Higher Bitcoin Goes, The Less Institutions Want It? Coinbase Executive Weighs In

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Bitmine Continues Aggressive Ethereum Accumulation as Others Scale Back

Bitmine, an Ethereum treasury, accumulated 126,971 ETH last week, reinforcing its aggressive accumulation strategy amid a broader market downturn. Its holdings now total $9.6 billion in assets, including 5.54 million ETH—representing 4.59% of the total supply—203 Bitcoin, stakes in Beast Industries and Eightco Holdings, and cash. The company has staked approximately 4.72 million ETH, generating significant yields and potential annual income of around $230 million. Chairman Thomas 'Tom' Lee views the market decline as the beginning of a "crypto spring," driven by anticipated rising demand for decentralized networks like Ethereum from advancing AI systems. Unlike many other treasury firms that have halted or reversed accumulation, Bitmine continues to acquire. It recently announced plans to raise capital via a public stock offering, with proceeds potentially used for further ETH purchases, ecosystem investments, and infrastructure expansion. Bitmine now holds the world's second-largest corporate crypto treasury and the largest dedicated Ethereum treasury.

TheNewsCrypto2 ч. назад

Bitmine Continues Aggressive Ethereum Accumulation as Others Scale Back

TheNewsCrypto2 ч. назад

Apple's Desired On-Device AI Sees a Dark Horse Emerge: The First Cognitive Model is Born, 4B Matches GPT-5.4

A Chinese company, Tomorrow's Journey (Nextie), has introduced what it is calling the industry's first "cognitive model" for edge devices. Named New Journey Alpha, this 4-billion-parameter model reportedly matches the performance of trillion-parameter giants like GPT-5.4 in group intelligence tasks such as debate and collective decision-making. The development follows Andrej Karpathy's vision of stripping vast factual knowledge from large language models to retain only a smaller "cognitive core" capable of reasoning, planning, and knowing its own limits. This approach directly addresses the soaring computational costs and token expenses hindering AI's widespread deployment, as highlighted by incidents like Amazon shutting down an internal AI tool due to prohibitive costs. Trained via reinforcement learning on a corpus of academic papers from 1800-2020 to enhance generalization, the model enables three key advancements: 1) Improved decision quality in multi-agent systems, 2) Drastically reduced compute costs, allowing for cost-effective cloud or on-device (e.g., MacBook) deployment, and 3) The feasibility of "proactive" AI agents that act autonomously without user prompts, unlocking new commercial possibilities beyond today's reactive models. Built by the former Microsoft Xiaoice team—known for creating a 3.6B model that outperformed a 65B Llama model—the company is now focusing on the multi-agent systems sector, a field gaining significant investor interest. The model's economic impact is profound; by achieving high-level performance with minimal parameters, it fundamentally alters the cost structure of AI services, challenging the prevailing model of ever-larger parameter counts.

marsbit3 ч. назад

Apple's Desired On-Device AI Sees a Dark Horse Emerge: The First Cognitive Model is Born, 4B Matches GPT-5.4

marsbit3 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow