The Hottest 00s Generation on Wall Street

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-31Обновлено 2026-05-31

Введение

"Wall Street's Hottest '00s Phenom: The 25-Year-Old Fund Manager Who Bet on AI's 'Boring' Backbone" At just 25, Leopold Aschenbrenner, once fired by OpenAI, now runs a hedge fund worth $13.7 billion. His strategy? Betting against the consensus. While others chased AI chips, he invested early in the physical infrastructure powering the AI boom: electricity, data centers, and energy. Expelled from OpenAI's safety team in 2024, Aschenbrenner foresaw the coming bottleneck. He argued that AI progress would be limited not by algorithms, but by power, chip capacity, and space. Acting on this, he founded Situational Awareness LP to go long on these "old economy" assets. His bets have paid off spectacularly. His fund's assets soared from $255 million in late 2024 to $13.7 billion by Q1 2026. His portfolio is a direct reflection of his thesis: major long positions in fuel cell company Bloom Energy and data center/bitcoin mining firms like CleanSpark and Riot Platforms, which control critical land and power resources. Conversely, he holds massive put options against overheated semiconductor giants like NVIDIA and AMD. A notable exception was his bullish bet on storage company SanDisk, which surged ~160% in Q2. Aschenbrenner's vision is materializing. Tech giants like Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta are ramping up colossal capital expenditure on data centers. Global data center power consumption is projected to skyrocket, with AI accounting for over half by 2030. The demand for enabling t...

"I was early, but I wasn't wrong."

The protagonist in the movie "The Big Short" would surely resonate deeply with these words, much like the youngest hedge fund manager on Wall Street today.

In 2024, a notice from OpenAI sent 23-year-old Leopold Aschenbrenner packing. Soon after, he turned around and founded a hedge fund, positioning himself against the prevailing consensus—he didn't go all-in on the then-sizzling hot AI chips and semiconductors, but instead went long on electricity, data centers, computing power infrastructure, and energy infrastructure. These were seen as slow, clunky "old-school" assets at the time.

His early calculation soon proved prophetic. Today, tech giants are pouring huge investments into AI infrastructure, and the capital markets have enthusiastically crowned new AI kings in areas like storage and optical modules. Leopold won. His fund's portfolio value had already reached $13.7 billion (approx. RMB 90 billion) by the end of Q1 this year, and his personal wealth has skyrocketed.

And he's only 25. In the AI era, the genius narrative is simply too compelling.

Graduated from University at 19

Fired by OpenAI Two Years Ago

His youth shouldn't be too surprising, considering he started university at 15.

This German teenager from a family of doctors showed exceptional academic talent. In 2021, at age 19, Leopold earned three degrees in Mathematics, Statistics, and Economics, graduating as the valedictorian from Columbia University, and subsequently worked at two funds.

Not long after, he joined OpenAI's Superalignment team. This was a star-studded team, co-led by OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, with the goal of solving the superintelligence alignment problem within four years—essentially ensuring highly intelligent AI remains under human control.

The drama came when Leopold was very publicly fired by OpenAI.

The trigger was an internal memo written by the OpenAI board warning of insufficient safety measures at the company. This memo, however, sparked tensions between management and the board. In April 2024, OpenAI dismissed Leopold, citing information leaks.

Experiences shape choices and hone foresight.

Shortly after being fired, Leopold published a profound, lengthy essay that almost predicted the current direction of AI development and investment trends. In it, he mentioned that by 2027, large models would be capable of doing the work of AI researchers or engineers.

To achieve this, the key constraints wouldn't be at the algorithmic level, but in electricity, chip manufacturing capacity, and physical space. The power consumption of a single training cluster would leap from megawatt scale to gigawatt scale, approaching the output of a large nuclear power plant.

Based on this prediction, at the end of 2024, Leopold chose to start a business—founding the hedge fund Situational Awareness LP, dedicating himself to going long on the energy and computing power infrastructure needed for AI development, while avoiding the crowded bubbles in chips and the application layer.

Shorting Nvidia

But Buying Into the High-Flier SanDisk

Thus, Wall Street's new genius trader was born.

In May 2026, as Leopold's hedge fund disclosed its latest U.S. stock holdings (13F filing) for the first quarter of the year, the astonishing expansion of this 00s-generation manager's wealth came into view:

The total market value of his portfolio had skyrocketed from $5.52 billion at the end of 2025 to $13.7 billion. At the end of 2024, the fund's size was merely $255 million. This speed is nothing short of meteoric.

Beyond his resume and genius stories, global onlookers were more interested in what he bought.

Looking at his latest holdings, Leopold maintained his long positions in AI infrastructure while establishing new short option positions worth $8.45 billion as a hedge against tech and semiconductors. As of the end of Q1, his top five holdings were all put options. These included put options on the VanEck Semiconductor ETF valued at around $2 billion, put options on Nvidia valued at around $1.6 billion, as well as put options on Oracle, Broadcom, and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).

This portfolio clearly signaled wariness towards overheated chip stocks. An exception was that by the end of Q1, he had exclusively increased his holdings of SanDisk by 86,000 shares and established call options on SanDisk worth $390 million. SanDisk's subsequent performance undoubtedly became the envy of many; since the start of Q2 alone, SanDisk has risen approximately 160%.

The main action was on the long side, where Leopold heavily invested in critical infrastructure assets for the AGI era.

His top long holding was the fuel cell company Bloom Energy. Leopold holds nearly 6.5 million shares of the company, with a position value of about $879 million. More precisely, Bloom Energy makes fuel cells, which can efficiently convert natural gas directly into electricity.

Simultaneously, in Q1, Leopold also increased his holdings in companies like CleanSpark, Riot Platforms, Applied Digital, and IREN—firms involved in data centers or crypto mining, possessing land, power resources, data center capabilities, or grid permits.

"The speed of AI development is determined by physical bottlenecks, so you should invest in the bottlenecks themselves." Looking across these trades, they precisely correspond to the underlying logic Leopold had when founding the fund.

Of course, for ordinary investors, copying these moves comes a bit late. Holdings reports typically have a 45-day delay, and by the time the public sees what the big players have bought, the most lucrative part of the rally has often already passed.

The End Point of the AI World

"The whole world is starting to value AI infrastructure assets."

In just the past few months of this year, the sectors Leopold bet on—power supply, data center computing power, semiconductor optics—have fully demonstrated their potential and immense demand.

Take electricity, for example. IEA data shows that in 2025, global data centers consumed 485 TWh of electricity, with AI accounting for 170 TWh (35%). It's projected that by 2030, total global data center electricity consumption will reach 950 TWh, with AI consuming 510 TWh (54%), exceeding Japan's total national electricity consumption. China's figures are equally staggering: in 2025, AI electricity consumption reached 450 billion kWh (3.8% of total societal electricity use), and it's expected to reach 600 billion kWh (5%) in 2026, nearly matching the annual electricity consumption of China's entire steel industry.

Then look at "light." As AI competition rapidly evolves from a battle of computing power to one of connectivity, traditional copper wire connections are long overburdened, leading to explosive growth in demand for "optical links."

According to data from UK-based commodity research firm CRU, global data center fiber optic cable usage reached 69.6 million core kilometers in 2025 and is expected to exceed 100 million core kilometers in 2026. Their estimates suggest that by 2027, AI-driven fiber demand will account for 35% of total data center fiber demand. For optical modules, Goldman Sachs has significantly raised its 2026 sales forecast for 800G optical modules from an initial 25 million units to 33.5 million units, a 58% increase.

Unsurprisingly, tech giants have already begun building their AI infrastructure moats.

In 2026, capital expenditure plans from Amazon, Alphabet (Google's parent), Meta, and others have grown substantially, with massive funds directed towards building new data centers and a long list of equipment including AI chips, network cables, and backup generators. Domestically, the latest development is rumors that ByteDance is discussing a spending plan of up to $70 billion (approx. RMB 474.7 billion) this year, primarily for building data centers and other AI infrastructure.

This wave of AI infrastructure frenzy is even more directly and violently reflected in the capital markets.

Looking domestically, the "Yi-Zhong-Tian" trio of optical module giants have seen their stock prices double since last year, especially InnoLight Technology, which soared from a low of 66 yuan per share in April last year to over 1,000 yuan, with a market cap now nearing 1.3 trillion yuan.

Similarly, since the memory cycle rally began in the second half of last year, stocks like Longsys, Deming Li, and Biwin Storage have surged in sync. Dapu Micro, which just went public in April, multiplied its IPO price nearly 20-fold in just one month.

In contrast, one can't help but reflect: the internet was once imagined as a weightless world, yet it gave rise to server rooms, fiber optic cables, and undersea cables. Now AI might seem even lighter, but when it comes to actual implementation, it equally relies on electricity, land, chips, networks, and cooling systems.

A grand future always grows from those silent assets.

This article is from the WeChat public account "Investment Community" (ID: pedaily2012), author: Feng Yuchen

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the core investment thesis behind Leopold Aschenbrenner's hedge fund, Situational Awareness LP, when he founded it?

AThe core investment thesis was to go long on the physical infrastructure necessary for AI development—such as power, data centers, compute capacity, and energy infrastructure—while avoiding the crowded and potentially overvalued bets on AI chips and semiconductors. He believed that the speed of AI advancement would be limited by these physical bottlenecks, so investors should own the bottlenecks themselves.

QWhat major positions did Leopold Aschenbrenner's fund hold in Q1 2026 according to the 13F filing, and what did they indicate about his market view?

AIn Q1 2026, his fund's largest holdings were put options (bearish bets), primarily on semiconductor and tech companies like the VanEck Semiconductor ETF, NVIDIA, Oracle, Broadcom, and AMD, indicating a strong caution towards overheated valuations in the chip sector. Conversely, he held significant long positions in companies like Bloom Energy (fuel cells), CleanSpark, and other data center/crypto mining firms with energy and infrastructure assets, reflecting his bullish thesis on AI infrastructure.

QWhy was Leopold Aschenbrenner fired from OpenAI, and how did that experience influence his subsequent career path?

AHe was fired from OpenAI in 2024 for allegedly leaking an internal memorandum where the board warned of insufficient safety measures, which heightened tensions between management and the board. This experience, coupled with his work on superintelligence alignment, helped shape his foresight. He later published an essay predicting AI's physical infrastructure needs, which directly led him to found a hedge fund focused on investing in that very sector.

QWhat does the article suggest are the key physical constraints on the rapid development of AI, based on data cited?

AThe article identifies electricity/power and optical connectivity ('light') as key physical constraints. It cites IEA data showing AI's massive and growing share of global data center electricity consumption. It also references forecasts for surging demand in fiber optics and optical modules within data centers, driven by AI's need for high-speed connections that copper wires cannot support.

QAccording to the article, how have capital markets and tech giants responded to the growing demand for AI infrastructure?

ACapital markets have responded by dramatically driving up the stock prices of companies in relevant sectors, such as Chinese optical module manufacturers ('Yizhongtian') and memory chip makers, with some seeing multi-fold increases. Tech giants like Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and reportedly ByteDance are making massive capital expenditure plans, significantly increasing investments in building new data centers and purchasing related equipment like AI chips and network cables to secure their AI infrastructure moats.

Похожее

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手1 ч. назад

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbit2 ч. назад

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbit2 ч. назад

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbit2 ч. назад

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbit2 ч. назад

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbit4 ч. назад

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbit4 ч. назад

$26 Billion: An 'All-Chinese Team' Backs the World's Highest-Valued AI Programming Company

Cognition AI, the company behind the AI programmer "Devin," has raised over $1 billion in new funding at a valuation of $26 billion, just eight months after reaching a $10.2 billion valuation. The round was led by Lux Capital, General Catalyst, and 8VC. Founded by three young Chinese entrepreneurs with strong competitive programming backgrounds, Cognition initially gained fame with Devin, marketed as the world's first AI software engineer capable of handling tasks from start to finish. While its early demos were impressive, real-world usage revealed reliability and cost-effectiveness issues, leading to a significant price cut for Devin in 2025. A pivotal moment came when Cognition acquired the assets of AI IDE company Windsurf after a failed acquisition by OpenAI. This move gave Cognition a crucial developer-facing tool, allowing it to pursue a two-pronged strategy: Devin for autonomous task execution and Windsurf for integrated, collaborative coding within an IDE. This shift helped the company move away from the controversial "AI replacement" narrative towards a model of augmenting human engineers, particularly for repetitive or maintenance tasks. This strategic pivot is backed by strong commercial metrics. The company reports a 10x increase in enterprise usage this year, with an annual revenue run-rate of $492 million and a 50% month-over-month growth in enterprise Devin usage over the past six months. Its client list now includes major corporations like Goldman Sachs and Mercedes-Benz, as well as government agencies like NASA and the U.S. Army. Investors are betting on Cognition becoming a foundational piece of next-generation software engineering infrastructure, positioning it at the center of a hybrid future where AI agents and human developers work in tandem.

marsbit4 ч. назад

$26 Billion: An 'All-Chinese Team' Backs the World's Highest-Valued AI Programming Company

marsbit4 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片