The Four-Year Cycle Concludes, Crypto Market Embarks on a Decade-Long Protracted War

marsbitОпубликовано 2025-12-24Обновлено 2025-12-24

Введение

In a recent article, Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan addresses the question of whether Bitcoin's historical four-year cycle—characterized by three years of gains followed by a crash in the fourth—remains relevant. He argues that the cycle, driven by factors like Bitcoin halvings, interest rate spikes, and post-bubble crashes, is losing significance due to changing conditions. The 2026 halving may have reduced impact, interest rates are likely to decrease, and the market hasn’t seen the extreme euphoria of previous cycles. Instead, Hougan proposes a "decade-long grinding advance" as the new framework, where sustained positive forces—such as institutional adoption, regulatory clarity, and real-world applications like stablecoins—gradually outweigh intermittent negative shocks like macroeconomic events or leverage-induced selloffs. This shift suggests more moderate long-term returns, lower volatility, and periodic 20-40% corrections, marking a maturation of the crypto market since the approval of Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024. Investors should expect a prolonged tug-of-war between these forces, requiring patience and a focus on fundamentals despite short-term downturns.

Author: Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer of Bitwise

Compiled by: Luffy, Foresight News

Over the past few weeks, the question I've been asked most frequently in meetings with institutional investors is: Is the four-year cycle of Bitcoin still relevant?

The so-called four-year cycle refers to the historical pattern in Bitcoin's price movement: 'three years of gains, followed by a crash in the fourth year.'

This question is crucial because, according to the logic of the four-year cycle, next year would be a difficult one for Bitcoin and the entire cryptocurrency market.

Although I cannot accurately predict cryptocurrency prices next year, I believe that blindly adhering to the idea that the four-year cycle will mechanically repeat is unwise. After all, the four-year cycle is not an immutable law carved in stone by the god of cryptocurrency; its formation actually stems from three specific driving factors:

  • Bitcoin Halving Events: The mining reward on the Bitcoin blockchain halves approximately every four years.

  • Interest Rate Fluctuations: The two interest rate surges in 2018 and 2022 both contributed to cryptocurrency market corrections.

  • Boom-and-Bust Market Cycles: The crash years for cryptocurrency (2014, 2018, 2022) invariably followed years of strong gains. For example, Bitcoin rose 5530% in 2013, 1349% in 2017, and 57% in 2021. During periods of market euphoria, fraud and speculative bubbles proliferate. The bursting of these bubbles, such as the regulatory crackdown on ICOs in 2018 and the collapse of FTX in 2022, directly triggered the market crashes in those years.

Today, these three driving factors have either significantly diminished in influence or are trending in the opposite direction compared to previous cycles. The impact of the Bitcoin halving is not as strong as it was four years ago; interest rates in 2026 are more likely to fall than rise; and the cryptocurrency market in 2025 has not experienced the kind of狂热暴涨 (frenzied surge) seen in previous cycles.

Meanwhile, more decisive forces, particularly the large-scale entry of institutional investors and the gradual improvement of regulatory policies, are gathering momentum for 2026. In our latest "2026 Market Outlook" report, we predicted that Bitcoin will reach a new all-time high next year. Currently, I still believe this is the most likely outcome.

What Will Replace the Four-Year Cycle?

If the four-year cycle is indeed over, a logical question follows: What new framework should we establish for thinking about the cryptocurrency market in 2026 and beyond?

The four-year cycle once provided clear guidance for investors. Knowing whether the market was in a recovery phase, a bull market, or a crypto winter helped investors hold on during bear markets and remain rational during bull markets.

So, what framework can replace it now?

The answer is: A Decade-Long Protracted War.

I know this phrase sounds far less catchy than 'four-year cycle.' But hear me out, because I firmly believe this is the essence of the current market.

By 'protracted war,' I mean the long-term struggle between two forces: one is a strong, persistent, and gradual positive driving force; the other is an intermittent, fierce but short-lived negative shock force.

The positive driving forces currently gaining momentum include: accelerated adoption by institutional investors, continuous improvement of regulatory frameworks, concerns about fiat currency devaluation, and the implementation of practical use cases like stablecoins and asset tokenization.

The goal of these trends is to disrupt deeply entrenched traditional systems such as capital markets, global payment systems, and international monetary regimes. Their full realization will inevitably take over a decade. Early signs of this process are already visible: billions of dollars flowing into crypto ETFs, cryptocurrency-related bills steadily advancing in Congress, rapid expansion of the stablecoin and tokenization markets, and so on.

But progress will inevitably meet resistance. Potential negative shock forces include: macroeconomic shocks, waves of leveraged position liquidations, and恶性事件 (malicious events) such as hacks, scams, and rug pulls. The impact cycle of such negative shocks typically lasts weeks, months, or quarters.

Overall, the long-term influence of the positive driving forces far exceeds that of the negative shock forces, but the negative shocks erupt rapidly and can suppress the positive forces in the short term. The market crash on October 10, 2025, is a classic case: a macro shock triggered large-scale liquidations of cryptocurrency leveraged positions, leading directly to a cliff-like drop in the market.

It is precisely this protracted war dynamic that has caused the severe divergence in the current cryptocurrency market: retail investors are in deep despair, while many institutional investors are full of bullish confidence. The root cause lies in the completely different time horizons they focus on. Retail investors are focused on the aftermath of the October liquidation event; institutions are looking ahead to the prospect of stablecoin assets surpassing $3 trillion by 2030.

Both views have their validity, just based on different time scales.

Implications of the Protracted War for Investors

For the past few months, I have been using the 'protracted war' framework to analyze the market, and it has proven extremely valuable. The protracted war格局 (situation) suggests the market will exhibit the following characteristics:

  • Substantial but not outrageously夸张离谱 (outlandish) returns over the long term

  • Overall decreased volatility

  • Periodic corrections of 20%—40%

This means that investors must take every market correction seriously, as they could last for a considerable time. But as long as the fundamentals remain strong, one can be confident that prices will eventually rebound.

Looking back, I believe the cryptocurrency market officially entered the protracted war phase in January 2024 with the approval of the Bitcoin spot ETFs. This milestone event unleashed a wave of institutional investment, a trend I believe will last a full decade. The facts bear this out: since the ETFs launched, the price of Bitcoin has risen 93% cumulatively, while also experiencing three deep corrections of over 20%.

I believe the market will maintain these return characteristics for a long time to come. The protracted war might not be as thrilling as the previous boom-and-bust cycles, but it signifies a deeper transformation正在迎来 (is ushering in) for the cryptocurrency industry. When an asset class matures, the era of the protracted war arrives.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat are the three specific drivers that historically formed Bitcoin's four-year cycle according to the article?

AThe three drivers are: Bitcoin halving events, interest rate fluctuations, and boom-bust market cycles (including speculative bubbles and subsequent crashes like ICO crackdowns or exchange collapses).

QWhy does the author believe the four-year cycle is no longer reliable for predicting crypto market behavior?

ABecause the three historical drivers have significantly weakened or reversed: halving impact has diminished, interest rates are likely to decrease in 2026, and the 2025 market lacks the extreme euphoria seen in previous cycles.

QWhat new framework does the author propose to replace the four-year cycle for understanding crypto market dynamics?

AThe author proposes a 'decade-long persistent war' framework, describing a long-term tug-of-war between sustained positive forces (e.g., institutional adoption, regulation) and intermittent negative shocks (e.g., macro events, leverage unwinding).

QHow does the 'persistent war' framework explain the current divergence between retail and institutional investor sentiment?

ARetail investors focus on short-term negative shocks (e.g., recent market crashes), while institutions focus on long-term positive trends (e.g., stablecoin growth to $3 trillion by 2030), leading to contrasting perspectives based on different time horizons.

QWhat market characteristics does the author associate with the 'persistent war' phase starting from January 2024?

AThe phase features solid long-term returns (but not extreme), lower overall volatility, and periodic 20-40% drawdowns, requiring investors to take corrections seriously while maintaining confidence in eventual recoveries if fundamentals remain strong.

Похожее

Anthropic's IPO Launch: Commercial Miracle or Valuation Bubble?

Anthropic has confidentially filed for an IPO, led by Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, potentially going public by October. Following its latest $650 billion funding round, its pre-IPO valuation stands at $965 billion, with projections reaching up to $2 trillion at listing, which would make it the highest-valued private company ever. The article, written by Fu Sheng, addresses skepticism that this represents an AI bubble akin to the 2000 dot-com crash. It argues the current situation differs fundamentally. Unlike the internet bubble era, which relied on speculative narratives with little revenue, Anthropic's valuation is backed by unprecedented, measurable financial performance. Key data points include: * **Revenue Growth:** ARR skyrocketed from $10 billion in early 2025 to $470 billion by May 2026, targeting $100 billion by year-end—a growth curve unmatched in business history. * **Profitability:** It achieved operating profitability in Q2 2026 with an estimated $5.6 billion profit. * **Efficiency:** With ~3,000 employees and ~$470 billion ARR, its revenue per employee exceeds $10 million. Products like Claude Code, launched less than a year ago, already generate $25 billion in annualized revenue. * **Enterprise Adoption:** It boasts a strong enterprise client base, with 8 of the Fortune 10 and over 1,000 large firms spending over $1 million annually on Claude. The valuation is framed using a traditional SaaS model (e.g., a 10x Price-to-Sales multiple on $100 billion revenue). The author contends the core question for analysts has shifted from "How big could this be?" to "How much is it earning and will earn next quarter?" The discussion extends beyond Anthropic to a broader paradigm shift: the transition from a "carbon-based" to a "silicon-based" economy. Companies are increasingly prioritizing investment in compute and AI capabilities over human resources, as these directly scale productivity and competitive advantage. Anthropic's IPO is thus positioned not just as a corporate milestone, but as a price anchor for this new economic era.

链捕手2 ч. назад

Anthropic's IPO Launch: Commercial Miracle or Valuation Bubble?

链捕手2 ч. назад

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit5 ч. назад

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit5 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ZEST

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Zest Protocol (ZEST) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Zest Protocol (ZEST).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Zest Protocol (ZEST)После приобретения вами Zest Protocol (ZEST) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Zest Protocol (ZEST)С легкостью торгуйте Zest Protocol (ZEST) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

261 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2026.05.19Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить ZEST

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на A (A) представлены ниже.

活动图片